Hi sam bro what is zizek take on gender studies specically in academia and gender theorist? Plz answer
@arnavdas218315 сағат бұрын
Haha cool
@exlauslegale85342 күн бұрын
1:07:12 ... and we hate you back! @TheYoungIdealist
@stefanolacchin49633 күн бұрын
I've always been convinced that proprioception is integral to the development of subjective experience, and ultimately to the arisal of consciousness. I guess we'll see all sorts of unexpected emergent behaviours with AI embodiment. What a time to be alive! 🙃
@RahulSam2 күн бұрын
Yes! This is my intuition, too. But proprioception, along with "being-in-the-world," in my view, is the way towards AGI. Thus, my interest in computational phenomenology: [1] kzbin.info/www/bejne/jaC4n6CJqbWdn5osi=yFruGNj0SLFhGyj_ and [2] link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11023-023-09638-w
@ThreeBillionNances4 күн бұрын
Dude, this is great Rahul!!!!! thank you!!! I'm thinking/writing about The Body from the perspective of the "Disembodied Intellect", or the Post Class Fractured Mass, or just the pomo subject. This approaches many of the questions I have from the "opposite" side.
@RahulSam3 күн бұрын
Cheers, Nance! I'm certainly looking forward to reading that, man. My MRes, too, is in computational phenomenology, which is definitely connected to the notion of the body. Is your writing on the matter currently available publicly so that I can have a gander?
@ThreeBillionNances3 күн бұрын
@@RahulSam not yet. It will hopefully be hitting substack soon! Also, I might have to pick your brain before then!!!
@RahulSam2 күн бұрын
@@ThreeBillionNances Anytime!
@AsifKhan-bv3iu4 күн бұрын
Thanks for clarity.
@RahulSam4 күн бұрын
Cheers!
@DelandaBaudLacanian5 күн бұрын
There's a few researchers developing a new discipline called Categorical Cybernetics that might interest you (I first learned about them from MLST's interview with Paul Lessard), its all very math theory dense but that's name of the game these days
@RahulSam4 күн бұрын
Interesting. I Googled these names and bookmarked them. Will have a look soon!
@DelandaBaudLacanian5 күн бұрын
Very fascinating, I learned a lot from Dr Mazzaglia. I really appreciate how your channel is the only one that is faithfully bridging continental theory with analytical theory. Keep up the thought-provoking discussions!
@RahulSam4 күн бұрын
Thanks, my friend. I am only a podcaster, but I believe there's a growing number of people in academia who are doing such bridging. For instance, one person is Dr Tim Elmo Feiten (who I hope to speak to soon).
@anacampos78875 күн бұрын
Very interesting 👏
@RahulSam5 күн бұрын
Cheers! 😃
@F--B5 күн бұрын
To Todd's point about feeling homeless, at around 53mins. I think Todd should understand and accept that he is a very unusual person with unusual, and some might say perverse, views. He may not feel at home where he comes from, but I do - so much so that I feel homesick when I'm away for any length of time. This is, I believe, how most people feel. He's an outsider and all of his prescriptions only really apply to other outsiders. When he senses the attitudes of the common, folkish man, he reaches for his gun.
@Robert_McGarry_Poems6 күн бұрын
21:00 Hmm... Maybe Heidegger had the initial concept of the absurd... interesting thought.
@Robert_McGarry_Poems6 күн бұрын
56:00 NES Tetris... Nintendo entertainment system. The OG... lol. Love that game.
@GuillermoPSKrebs7 күн бұрын
Awesome!
@RahulSam7 күн бұрын
Cheers!
@naledimyabi26868 күн бұрын
Appreciate this conversation 🙏🏾,
@RahulSam8 күн бұрын
Thank you for the kind comment 🙏
@akbar-nr4kc9 күн бұрын
hi sam why hegel dissmises noumenal and modern science and anylitic philosphy acccept that essence of things is ultimate mysteries like colin mcginn and chomsky?
@Robert_McGarry_Poems6 күн бұрын
He doesn't dismiss both internal and external... that seems silly to imagine. What he does is realize that because of particles and energy actually being waves, which wouldn't really have been understood at the time he wrote, he understood that everything must be connected as one unified thing. This Meaning, as such, that the mind of the body must also be a part of everything. To dislocate any part of the whole, namely self, and call it something by any other name than the whole... was to create a contradiction. The impossible task of contradicting nature by becoming aware of it... that is the split. To be an individual self, you must contradict nature and embrace the linguistic and symbolic representations that allow our agential selves to emerge.
@Robert_McGarry_Poems6 күн бұрын
We may never finish understanding... because that's not how knowing works. But the usefulness of thinking is obvious. Plus, ideas are infinitely softer than bullets.
@exlauslegale85342 күн бұрын
@@Robert_McGarry_Poems Bullet was also an idea once...
@Robert_McGarry_Poems2 күн бұрын
@@akbar-nr4kc Yep, idea... didn't kill anyone. Actions killed... you get it...
@Antifrustrated9 күн бұрын
Hope to find you on bluesky one day Rahul
@RahulSam9 күн бұрын
Hey mate, I am already there. Let's connect! bsky.app/profile/trsam97.bsky.social
@CIANB10 күн бұрын
When boredom encroached my being I became crabbit (Scots word for irritable) Thanks pal I was quite stimulated by your remarks and I just went to see Zizek in Edinburgh!
@RahulSam10 күн бұрын
Cheers, my friend!
@far-light2112fuzzion11 күн бұрын
Being a studant of hegel, marx and Proudhon , i congrat your podcast, may u someday looking for sobody that have got some research about vero-similar dialetiks abotout Heráclito , Hegel and the Anarquist Proudhon Jean Pierre?! Thanks... The anti-nomics pairs of Proudhon are similar and do-not have a fixed sinthésis...
@RahulSam11 күн бұрын
Thank you, my friend. I will keep an eye out for such guests for sure.
@RastapopoulosMagnus11 күн бұрын
Hi ! Very interesting talk ! Do you know if there is a possibility to read Katherine's thesis ? I cant find it online...
@RahulSam11 күн бұрын
Cheers. Feel free to email me at [email protected], and I'll be happy to share it with you.
@Robert_McGarry_Poems13 күн бұрын
I might have to re watch this at some point. He makes some intriguing points and arguments. 😊
@akbar-nr4kc13 күн бұрын
bro what sir say about colin mcginn idea of mysterianism.colin mcginn and chomsky derived a conclusion that some questions are we unable to answer and some questions we unable to formulate.they say that as our genes dertermined who we are then there are scope and limits to us because genes dertermined us if there is no preprogram we will end up some ameoba like creature ..anything falls outside of scope we cannot acess and ultimate mystery to us. what,s your views on this idea?
@DelandaBaudLacanian13 күн бұрын
dang this is a good teaser, i guess imma have to listen to this sooner than later
@RahulSam13 күн бұрын
Ah haha! Cheers!
@gurugeorge13 күн бұрын
Wittgenstein's Kantianism, such as it was, he probably inherited from his Schopenhauer enthusiasm. By the time of his On Certainty thoughts, he was in some ways re-discovering Aristotle.
@Robert_McGarry_Poems13 күн бұрын
Aren't we all always kinda re-discovering Aristotle by going to college/university?
@RahulSam13 күн бұрын
True!
@RahulSam13 күн бұрын
Yep! "Re-discovering Aristotle", I think, is a phase every great thinker goes through.
@Skiamakhos14 күн бұрын
As regards them being hard to find, JavaDoc is definitely our friend here. It's fallen into disuse somewhat but a decently written JavaDoc for a class's public API can save a lot of time & hassle. Don't explain what's going on under the hood, just tell the developers who're going to use it what they need to give it & what they can expect to get back, and maybe why the decision was taken to do a Static Factory Method rather than the expected constructor.
@conexionneuronal882015 күн бұрын
well, that's obvious, but tell the sillicon valley guys, they are completely fix in the propositional
@RahulSam14 күн бұрын
Unfortunately, that seems to be the case.
@ossen541115 күн бұрын
Todd's writing is so masterful precisely because he gives it to you in such a clear way that you think it's all easy
@ossen541115 күн бұрын
The book is great.
@RahulSam15 күн бұрын
I couldn't agree more! His books are a game-changer for me.
@animefurry350815 күн бұрын
What is the internal state of a chimpanzee that rap es, kills its child and goes to war? The hegelian questions.
@RahulSam15 күн бұрын
HAHA!
@ASH-cn7qs15 күн бұрын
it is hilarious that these overfed, middle upper class eggheads talks about CAPITALISM....
@karlmartell760016 күн бұрын
There is not "a hegelian science" something is either hegelian or not.
@DelandaBaudLacanian16 күн бұрын
Such a great discussion..Dr Last's comparisons between Galileo vs Hegel and Darwin vs Freud was so illuminating and brings together so many broad ideas. What he is doing with Philisophy Portal is amazing, and his recent substack article reflecting on the Dawkins/Peterson debate was also thought-provoking (and demonstrates the need for a Lacanian framing to mediate these sort of big ideas debates). Sam, I hope you interview Isabel Milar in the future?? Thanks for all your interviews, I always learn so much!
@RahulSam16 күн бұрын
Thank you for the kind words! Cadell sure is great. And yes! I have reached out to Isabel Milar and am hoping to discuss her book 'The Psychoanalysis of Artificial Intelligence' once she's back to work from maternal leave.
@NavM2317 күн бұрын
Animals are conscious but not self conscious, that's a good one
@akbar-nr4kc17 күн бұрын
hi sam i want to know what would be hegel and zizek take on chomsky and colin mcginn idea of mysterianism? did he reject or accept it? mysterianism means certain metaphyiscal questions like concioussness and many other questions are beyond our cognitive limits ..sometimes it is also called cognitive closure...chomsky also derived idea from thomas nagel idea of 'what it is like to bat'''that same like this question ''what it is like to me '' is unanswerable and ultimate mystery..i want to know what would hegel and zizek regard this idea of mysterianism(ultimate pessimissm)..
@diedoktor17 күн бұрын
Hegel, Zizek, and Chomsky would all claim that there's an invisible barrier between human beings in the world that prevents knowledge from forming. Read Engels' Anti Duhring for a refutation.
@Robert_McGarry_Poems17 күн бұрын
I made it twice as far this time... I'm 40 minutes in now. 😋 Mind blow time. Check out the experiment below some time. Double slit with quantum eraser, experiment hinting at some form of retro-causation in the entanglement of photons.
@Robert_McGarry_Poems17 күн бұрын
And then ponder this: photons experience no time, and travel no distance... they are not a thing but the essence of information. The information being released from the electrons in your light bulb's filament no more travels than the electrons in the filament have location. The photons are the information that excited electrons (and other less known phenomenon) exchange between each other. They just exist filling the void from our perspective. This means that every electron, from the point of view of photons, is in the same place.....🤯
@Robert_McGarry_Poems17 күн бұрын
So, how does information split into two streams, sent down two different paths, to two different detectors, over two different time intervals, interfere with one another? If, as stated above, the electrons are technically in the same place from the start. The electron that emits the photon and the electrons plural that received the signals after splitting. We can measure one beam, collapsing the function to a point and then watch as the interference pattern springs into existence the second path two finishes.
@Robert_McGarry_Poems18 күн бұрын
😊 OK, my attempt at a simple explanation. The action of needing to become a 'self' while being a whole person is a contradiction.
@RahulSam18 күн бұрын
Despite its brevity, I wouldn't say this is a simple explanation, Robert. You indeed got it!
@Robert_McGarry_Poems17 күн бұрын
Identity is both itself and not itself. The incomplete void of proto-self gives rise to the curiosity and ego/ideal that allows true self-fulfillment. Or an alienation of self from identity, which is an alienation from culture and social knowledge, is the natural state of existing. One must seek out and find the tools necessary for their own social and, therefore, self enlightenment.
@gabrielaegerter345120 күн бұрын
I've said for a while that it makes sense for Homo Sapiens to have evolved cognitive blinders to Nihilistic views on a Darwinian level, i.e. encoded into our neurobiological structure. Those experiencing this [certain kind of] Nihilism and/or Ego-death tend to become very self destructive, self-annihilating; self-removing from Darwinian perspective. Those with inbuilt cognitive faculties to override the type of reasoning which leads to Nihilistic positions have a selected advantage; they are genetically protected from despair. i.e. it makes total sense that that a certain kind of self delusion is necessarily inherent in the physical form of the human; and thereby is inherent OF the self of the species itself. In the totally Nihilistic state, one would reach the conclusion that the very self itself is a delusion; the very concept of the self is an illusion. The ontology of the self that we naturally have is shattered - nothing but a prescriptive byproduct of nature evolving brains. You can even reach the view that Cartesian dualism is both inescapable real to us, and simultaneously not-real, merely a fabrication of consciousnesses perception - the difference, or the barriers between the concepts of You and The World break down. It makes sense that our basic mental capacities of ontology-forming are biased towards holding beliefs compatible with existing successfully, reproductively... It can be argued there is a level of Cognitive dissonance required to ascribe to Nihilism and not fall susceptible to some of its implications.
@acebone220 күн бұрын
vertigo: hegel had some great insights for marx to flip ...
@MrDude20000121 күн бұрын
I can't help wondering if Heidegger was alive today, how he would interpret the saying "I need some space" in ontological sense.
@RahulSam21 күн бұрын
Ah haha! I'm sure Heidegger always asked for "more space", even when he was in that hut in the middle of nowhere!
@beauzeph16 күн бұрын
Sloterdijk gave Heidegger his due space with his Bubbles trilogy, so it's really nice to see Everitt here so eloquently giving Hegel his space in a way that fuses many other thinkers
@MrDude20000121 күн бұрын
I have to rewatch "Vertigo" but I found Denis Villeneuve's "Enemy" a very Hegelian film regarding the negation. After all, because it was written by José Saramago who translated Hegel's texts in the 1950s.
@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu21 күн бұрын
That's awesome, I like spatial description defined in real world physical measurement (tangible concrete facts of reality). Inflation of meter space happened everywhere, it didn't occur at a point. Meter space is not a valid measure of energy. This is a fact about our universe, a contracted meter space (E) conversions are less in comparison to the uncontracted meter space, the local observer doesn't detect this unless the observer is smart enough to detect the energy exchange differential between these 2 reference frames. Inflation is not real, you must divide angular quanta to have more, energy is never created or destroyed, there is no free lunch, conservation of momentum and angular momentum. This is why gravity works, smaller angular quanta closer to the black hole, larger angular quanta as you move away from the black hole. Smaller angular quanta (smaller energy extent) will be pushed by the larger quanta (longer energy extent) into curved alignments in (real space not meter space), the length contraction does not occur in meter space, it acts ON meter space. It's important for science that we communicate meter space limitations, and where meter space is useful. Because ultimately it's about a objective measure of what the universe is. Nothing can travel faster than light in meter space, this is simply not true in real space. Universe is in wind down phase, observers will continue to shrink in real space and lose transfer speed between angular quanta, and see galaxies moving away in meter space and distances expanding. Inflation really is a illusion, not a valid measure of distance. Remember quantum mechanics operates in meter space, (E=hf) suffers the same problem. The nice thing is that we can derive real space by measure the differentials between 2 different frames. This is a objective real world measure of what space is.
@RahulSam21 күн бұрын
Fascinating insight. I've bookmarked this comment to read it more carefully later. Thanks!
@Robert_McGarry_Poems25 күн бұрын
Yep.
@Robert_McGarry_Poems25 күн бұрын
Experimentation and theory building should be broadly explored. Language and approach probably shouldn't be messed with, without a good reason for doing so... [Because of reproducibility]
@Robert_McGarry_Poems27 күн бұрын
I am getting it slowly.
@Robert_McGarry_Poems27 күн бұрын
Zoe Bee: Politics is a language war. 1 hour video.
@RahulSam27 күн бұрын
Great to hear, Robert!
@tw363828 күн бұрын
McGowan doesn’t know wtf he’s talking about
@Parsons4Geist23 күн бұрын
thank goodness none of do. 😂
@rotteneggconcept29 күн бұрын
not sure I understand alienation is an act of self-conflict or self-comfort?
@RahulSam29 күн бұрын
Maybe it is both?
@rotteneggconcept28 күн бұрын
@@RahulSam I think you can be in conflict with the self but not alienated from the self, you cannot remove the self from the self. all other from of alienation can be removed, i.e. viruses, self-doubt, alien species or migrants. they will forever be alienated. they cannot be identified as the self once they do they are no longer alienated. hence the confusion. i.e Gutt bacteria is not longer bacteria to the body its just part of the body , I'm trying to understand the discussion
@tw363828 күн бұрын
Both
@akbar-nr4kcАй бұрын
Hi bro please answer this ..i want to know if zizek is critical of postmodernism why his work is influence from mainly Jacques lacan and also from jacques dierada and michael focault .?
@RahulSamАй бұрын
Hey mate, I suggest you read The Sublime Object of Ideology. It's impossible for me to answer this question in a KZbin comment section.
@Robert_McGarry_PoemsАй бұрын
Channel: Machine Learning Street Talk Video: Joscha Bach, why your thoughts aren't yours.
@Robert_McGarry_PoemsАй бұрын
🎉
@davedouglass438Ай бұрын
Every few months, a cohort of facilitators and students at the Active Inference Institute works through the Parr/Pezzulo/Friston textbook "Active Inference." You're welcome to sign up for an upcoming course, and to go through any completed course, for example: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fWqql4KDn6tnnZI
@RahulSamАй бұрын
This is excellent! I had no idea about these sessions. Thank you. I will check them out.
@DelandaBaudLacanianАй бұрын
This anthropological concept of (ancient) generics sounds so interesting
@ThorianSagaАй бұрын
3 times I have watched this vid and 3 times I have learned something
@RahulSamАй бұрын
Great to hear! 🙏
@Jorn-sy6hoАй бұрын
I love Zizek!
@hyper_modern5071Ай бұрын
I am have recently graduated from Macquarie uni in the wrong degree ( commerce). I love philosophy and love this type of discussion. I want a career in thinking/philosophy/theory. Any advice for me mate? I am struggling :(
@RahulSamАй бұрын
Hey mate, my suggestion is to keep exploring your interests regardless of whether they align with your "career" or not. And if you want to study them deeper, go back into academia, although I completely understand it's challenging for us in Australia as research students are paid terribly (if not nothing at all). Shoot me an email at [email protected] if you want to chat more with a brief intro to yourself.