Hello! Sorry, no GPX available. We use more trial-and-error navigation :)

@@ratracerunaways1779 hi, Can you draw it with mymaps?

That is how Vietnam sounds like. :) It was very difficult to find peaceful places to record anything

Actually, now that I have been riding some 25tkm after the installation it doesn't seem to be much of an issue. Couple times during the riding season I have taken the cover out and cleaned the lights and the backside of the lens. I wouldn't try to seal it.

Jäänyt vähän muiden asioiden alle. Mutta ehkä tässä talven myötä ehtisi taas editoimaan

Good to hear! But of course sorry for your experiences. I haven't had any of this, luckily. Almost 30t kms with these bags already

Did you fall with the bags?

@@moyanak no I did not . I would have accepted that if I fell then this bound to happen.

As I understood the instruction, outer bag is not designed to be 100% waterproof. It's inner bag which should to keep your things 100% dry. Just sayin.

No need, it is not that big of an issue. Cleaning it couple times in a year is enough. And it only takes few minutes

Yes, mostly gravel roads. Suitable for big bikes

@@ratracerunaways1779 thanks! I'm hoping to go there later this summer. In some countries bits of the TET (when muddy) are beyond my skill level on a big bike.

Finnish TET is very good for big bikes. Video is old so the route has changed a bit since then. I prefer Michelin Anakee Wilds for these fast gravel roads.

Thank you! There is more to come...

Thank you!

Kun vaan ehtii editoimaan, saattaa jokunen viikko vierähtää. Kannattaa ottaa kanava seurantaan ja klikata sitä kelloa niin saat ilmoituksen kun uusi video on ulkona

@@ratracerunaways1779 otin seurantaan ja odottelen.......

Joo, häiritsee itseäkin... Parannetaan seuraaviin

Kiitos palautteesta :)

both 3895 lumens and colour temp of 4500k. just emailed rade about that exact question ;p

Yes, but I am so "weightless" on the bike that I move my feet all the time in different positions. And definitely don't want something hitting my heel while I do it. 😉

It is not visible from the video but there is few millimeters wide opening in the bottom. It is not possible to seal it, atleast not in any tidy way

Difficult to say. Or then the vibrations just don't bother me at all.

The LEDs are definitely worth the money. If there is some room for improvement it would be with the aerodynamics of the screen. The new version of Rade Garage screen is clear and I don't know if it has different shape as well

The stated power is always nominal power, it doesn't tell what is the lighting power. The less electrical power required (to produce powerful lightstream) the better.

The new Rally Kit from Rade Garage has a clear windshield, which has a different look to the carbon shield of the older version presented in this video. It seems that the clear windshield is not as high as the carbon one.

Thanks for the feedback! Obviously the difference is not that big when sitting down. But of course you have slightly more room and the angle of the knee is not so tight. To me the biggest benefit when sitting is that I don't have to position my feet so accurately. No matter how you wiggle around on the bike you always find the footpegs. :D

No, they are lower from the hinge

Maybe 15mm if you use the original rubber.

Yes, that was exactly the reason I showed the current. But the 33W printed on the LED unit is just nominal power and actual power can vary depending on voltage, resistance in the cables etc. To me the nominal power of the light in watts is not interesting at all. And not even the actual power in watts. What makes difference is the volume of light it creates and how little current it is taking. Unfortunately couldn't find a reliable way to measure light volume. :)

@@ratracerunaways1779 Light output of a light source is related to how many watts the light is consuming vs its efficiency. Thats why it is relevant - Light output is an essential feature of a light - I would like to think most people would agree that the main and primary purpose of having a headlight is to actually generate light. In terms of efficiency (how much light output (in a vehicle headlight application) you get per unit of electrical power consumed), modern LED light sources put out 105-120 lumens (light output) per watt. HID sources put out about 80-90 lumens per watt and halogen bulbs around 25-30 lumens per watt. Thats why the wattage is relevant. Consume more electrical power for a given level of efficiency and you get more light output. Similarly, if you are not consuming many watts, then you are not going to get much output. A theoretical 33w consumption LED light will put out about 3.5 times more light than an LED consuming 9w. Knowing the wattage will make calculating the luminous flux of the light relatively straight forward. It also makes comparing the light output among various different light sources easier. i.e. the light output from a 35w HID is 2 times more than a 55w halogen bulb, as we know how much more efficient a HID is in making light from electrical power vis a vis a halogen bulb (which makes a lot more heat instead of light with those watts). An LED light consuming 9 watts (as per this high beam) is going to put out roughly the equivalent of a halogen bulb that is consuming 36w, (or a 12w HID). And an LED consuming 19w (as in the low beam) would be the equivalent of a 76w halogen bulb (or 25w HID). It is also worth considering in this case that the OEM KTM reflector is a piece of junk (as is amply demostrated in your riding videos ... very uneven beam pattern), and that projector lights make far better beam patterns compared to simple reflector lights. Testing the current draw (as you have done) is important as it allows you to see if the power of the light is what is advertised / claimed ... or if it isnt. You may be interested in the current draw from the perspective of your bikes electrical system. I am interested in the current draw as it tells me it those lights are really 33 watts, or if they are just 9 watts. Because that tells me how much light they are putting out ... which as I said earlier is kind of the main feature of headlights. If I buy a 33w LED headlight, I wouldnt want to find out it was really 9w. This video is very useful. I came across your video as I have been trying to find powerful ECE approved LED projectors. 33 watts (or even 29w) would be phenomenal. Very powerful. And unusual without a cooling fan. Even more light than a 35w HID projector. But it seems that it was too good to be true

Yes, from Helsinki to Luopioinen and back. So not the whole TET Finland 😅

@@ratracerunaways1779 oh ofc ok 😀

www.transeurotrail.org/ sieltä löytyy reitti ja .gpx tiedosto ladattavaksi navigaattoriin

It is filmed in early September. February would have been only snow and ice...

The height of the screen is quite same as original but this is quite vertical while the original is strongly tilted backwards. This is also the reason for turbulence. With the original screen chest is protectet but the stream hits my helmet quite strongly. With Rade Garage screen I can feel small turbulence in my chest at any speed mut on the otherhand no strong fluctuation on the helmet. Difficult to explain shortly, I prefer Rade Garage screen anyway!

I am 180cm but this screen for 990 is quite different than the one Rade offers for 1090. So can't say anything about that. Light unit is the same and it is awesome!

Cyrube kiitos palautteesta! Tarkoituksemme on nimenomaan ollut jakaa tietoutta moottoripyörämatkailusta ja kohteista tavallisille motoristeille joita itsekin olemme ja osoittaa ettei se niin vaikea ole lähteä. Työstämme parhaillaan jaksoa 10!