That's a good price I got mine for $330 and to me it was worth every penny and will always be in my fleet

If you're not into combat, you can use it as a solo hauler or something like that just fine. Just be prepared, if someone wants to kill you, you're dead no matter what you do. Solo you're dead in the water with that thing. But still fun to fly ;-)

@@heraklesfarnese960 well the good thing about the Polaris it's got great shields and pdc it gives you a chance to get away if your solo in it especially if there in a small fighter . But it's just like every ship in the game it has it's downfall and it's perks

@@jasonmcclure5491 Yeah the shields are sick. But if some guys want to gank you, they're going to, nothing you can do about it. It is just too big and too slow to escape a Mantis/Cutlass/Guardian. But that is the same problem for many other big ships without pilot controlled guns. Don't get me wrong, i think it rocks as a mobile base in the current state of the game. And with 5+ friends it is a blast to do some bounty hunting.

you can't even buy the Nursa

@AconiteDeath it's 124,740 aUEC in lorville.

@@S7upidity hell yeah thank you Ill have to travel back to Stanton

The PDC are a little too strong in my opinion. So you have to dumb fire torpedos. But torps are far away from useless, they hurt badly. They should be expensive, but maybe we need better paying "Idris" Missions.

Definitely would need a equivalent Airforce Pararescue team, if your gonna fly into a active combat site like the trailer.

I think AI Blades for RemoteTurrets would be a great start. 99% what ppl want Ai Crew now is to crew the turrets.

From Q&A it has no cargo

@ yeah but I hope that might change by the time it starts getting worked on. In the QA a lot of people talked about it getting 2 to 8 SCU and it seems big enough to get that.

@@codymartin6551 I guess I will be stacking bodies high in that ship then. Missed opportunities to make an epic ship once again. Only needed two to four tops. It’s kind of funny, in real life a company does not look to make specific limitations on a vehicle. They tried to put anything and everything they can into it to sell the product. CIG specifically goes out of its way to block and hinder its players. You can see inside that ship there’s a corner you can stack two boxes. And that’s all people are wanting. Nobody’s asking for 16 or 32 SCU.

Always the cheapest one, The mustang alpha ; ) Follow by Intrepid starter pack only because it comes with "lifetime insurance" in a starter pack but much more pricier

Thanks for the confirmation, i remember some YT video showing the max's cargo bay and fit quite a selection of small ship and most vehicle without issue. And yes the Pisces does fit too! also doing well TQ but i need a new rig to play SC now :"(

Dude, get a lti token before doing all that. And honestly, you're better off with a Taurus than a Starlancer. Starlancer, certainly is a beautiful ship, but it's large, and you need ppl to fly it efficiently. Now, if you comparre the manpower you need to get something out of it, with the manpower you need to get something out of bigger, meaner ship, then you might conclude that it's not worth it. Starlancer MAX is only 300 cargo, while something like a C2 is double, and really only need one pilot and maybe a turret guy. On the other hand, Taurus is totally playable alone with 4 size 5 guns, and a very strong 170ish cargo capacity. I understand the appeal, I really do, the ship is gorgeous, I wish it could be more interesting, but the stats are not that good. Get yourself a lti bro. Anyway, time will not be an issue, this game is in developpement for YEARS still. Monitor the website from time to time, and get something that have lti and do your upgrades through that.

@@SloulDesTucs Fairly easy to grab a constellation in game.

@@ronnieo9571 Well that's true for like 99% of the ships? And will be true for the Starlancer MAX in about 3-6 months. Don't see your point.

@@SloulDesTucs Agreed, if it is the only ship you own, stick to the Taurus. At least until it gets nerfed. ;-)

@@heraklesfarnese960 some ships easier to grab then others. 100% of the time.

It is a bad ship for its designated purpose. It is a terrible mix of different designs and thus makes it bad at all of them. Also, you do not get to decide what he makes a video on; you are not that special. Making a video to point out why a ship is bad is perfectly fine, especially since people like you do not have the brain power to think past the fake hype that other content creators are literally paid to generate.

​@webbygaming1583 Not everyone is paid to create positive content. There are creators out there who have been very vocal about the shortcomings of this ship and with a considerable higher number of followers/subscribers. As always, it's this creator's opinion, just like everyone has an opinion. Personally, I see the max as a jack of all trades leaning more towards cargo. It needs a buff on the speed side but the problem with MISC is that it doesn't have many fans and therefore not many stalwart and vocal defenders on spectrum compared to other manufacturers. Then again, ships are frequently fine tuned so I wouldn't be surprised it will see some polish. Just like some people love the cutty black, I detest it with a passion, just like the corsair, so like it's always said: different folks, different strokes. What I would like is for people to drop the ridiculous idea that every ship that is released has to be the best at what it does or the best of the best at everything. It's mind boggling really. This ship fills a nich role and is supposed to have great range, which I'm sure people will love if they don't want to stop frequently to refuel/want to save on fuel on their runs. Peace ✌🏻

@@PetrosSanctus I am not sure what confused you about my comment, but I most certainly did not say all content creators are paid for positive content. However, if you deny that some are in fact paid to do so, then you are very naive. My comment was in response to the OP who said "if you didn't like it you should not have made a video on it" and my point was he does not get to decide what a creator makes content on. In a way, you agreed with my point, while missing my point at the same time.

Perhaps do more research on the actual goal of the project before investing and then complaining.

@callsigngrimdoll wow a genius

I think it is perfect for 1-2 players. I don't think anybody wants to sit in that rear turret while hauling cargo from A to B.

lol, 224 cargo hauler is not overkill for a solo player 🤣 However, the ship is a terrible mix of two different designs; lousy for muti crew and inefficient for solo Only 224 cargo, maybe 300 if you stuff it, means low profit, and if you have to split that low profit between four crew means nobody makes any aUEC and thus a huge waste of time for multi crew. However, if you choose to fly it solo for better profit, then the four crew quarters are a huge waste of space. The ship is bad for both solo and multi crew. It needed either more cargo capacity for viable multi crew, or remove the crew quarters and reduce the size and weight of the ship for solo. As it is now, it's a dumb mix of both that makes it worthless.

@@webbygaming1583 I'm gonna solo this and a Polaris. Why not? Melted my C2, and some other stuff. Bought the Starlancer Max and waiting for the Polaris. I will run the entire length..fire a torp...run back, man the size 6. It will be fun.

​@@ronnieo9571 Not sure of your point... if you want to solo the Freelancer MAX then great, have fun with it. My point is that it is a wildly inefficient ship for solo use. It is too big, heavy, and slow and has tons of wasted space for solo (i.e. four crew quarters). For a solo ship, all that wasted space should be eliminated to make the ship lighter and faster. And as for multi-crew use, it simply does not have enough cargo storage space to provide enough income for four crew members. The ship is very poorly designed for both multi-crew and solo use; it is a frustrating mix of both, which makes it bad for both. However, if you want to fly it solo because you like the look of the ship or for role-play then great, this is a game after all, have fun. Nevertheless, it is still one of the worst ships in the game for cargo hauling from an efficiency perspective.

@@webbygaming1583 my point? That it will be fun to solo for me because of the obvious ineffciency. Because...its a game. And I could grab an efficient hauler any time I feel the desire.

My take on it is that the ships are a needed element to drive revenue to support the stabilization of the underlying technology. It's the thing we see that they can ask us to put money to. Just my 2 cents.

@@dkunstman1 I agree for sure and Im not opposed to supporting them and the ships they put out I just would like to see them patch the really necessary things like ships and contracts so people can progress without wasting and hour getting setup to roll out just to 30k and end up back in a bed where you just tried to leave lol

@@codywilliams3073 Agreed!

@@dkunstman1 800 million dollars is more than enough. Now CIG is milking the loyal fan base for every dime they can. Unfortunately, Chris Roberts is in charge and he has never completed a video game in his entire career. Not one game ever! Every game he has ever worked on became an over bloated and buggy mess and he was fired more than once so the game could be completed.

Did you see the new dashboard revamp of the Starlancer Max in latest PTU drop today? What an improvement over the initial release.

@@dkunstman1 i somewhat like it from a visual stand point. But not having any MFD's in sight while flying. I don't really like it from a practical stand point.

Ultra wide monitor plus Tobii eye tracker combats that limitation for me.

interesting question, since the crafting "Ship" upgrade gameplay/function is not available in game and i will be using This line "Level 1 is chassis and original" i want to say that you should be claiming back the upgraded ship's value in UEC/Credits (basic Level 1 insurance ). To Claim back the ship, Warranty is needed and an active Insurance But i will wait for confirmation when the crafting game mechanic is live, then will most likely will have a more in depth coverage on the insurance tiers and the warranty.