kzbin.info/www/bejne/pou4hmVtg9WmbNU 4K And very playable Running at a native render resolution of 4K (See Link Above)

Yeah the guy doesnt understand the frame generatin option is DLSS3.

@@635574 I didn't want to say it like this but yeah that's totally true lmao

In 4K, this is in 1440p.

It does have Frame Generation enabled.

Frame gen and 1440p.

In video itll look identical to something with no frame gen, Playing is where you feel the difference. And without frame gen itll be about 40 fps @ 1440p

I get about 30 fps with the 4090@3440x1440 without FG.

@@tmkongen wow that's crazy how much it improves the framerate. just curious do you feel that aiming is bad (like you are really playing at 30fps) or does it feel like nicely fluid kinda 60fps experience no issues?

@@kovrcek Think I average around 100 fps with everything on and DLSS quality+FG. Feels fluid enough for me tbh and I usually don't find 60fps fluid. I aim for 90. If I turn FG off I end up around 60 fps average and that feels worse so... But this is subjective. Some tink 30fps enough :)

@@tmkongen but before you said 30fps average without FG. If it is running 60fps without FG then I guess the aiming is not a problem at all, as 60 is plenty and if you add FG it's super fluid.

The OLED if it's purely/mostly for gaming, the 4K otherwise

Rule #1 - Before buying, if you can, see with your own eyes, from a distance that you will have it at home, in a store near your home. It is very important to first know the size of the monitor, its resolution and the distance you will be from it. It's also important to know if you can control the lighting level of the place where you're going to have the monitor/TV. To see the maximum details of a game, you will have to have the monitor close to your face and the resolution will have to be as high as possible. However, if the monitor you're considering buying is a 27", 1440p resolution is enough and I'd go for an OLED. 1440p is far more easy to be handled by the graphics card. I own a 40" 4K LCD (an old Philips BDM4065UC), which is a little over half a meter from my face, because I like to see every small details that is possible to see and you can't do this with small monitors. I've had this 40" monitor (it's a VA monitor, with an excellent native contrast ratio of 5000:1, without the use of digital gimmicks) for over 6 years and I'm thinking (read "earning the buck") on buying an LG OLED 42C3 (it's being released to the market right now). Yes, it's a television, but I intend to continue to have a big monitor in front of my face. And if I was rich and it was already on the market, I would go for a 43" OLED TV with 8K resolution! There are some games (generally older ones) that I am playing at 8K (using the DSR factor in the NVidia panel configured for 4X), many times with antialiasing turned off (from 4K and up, antialiasing is not so necessary, the graphics card is not so overloaded and textures may look more vivid), and the image is just fabulous! OLED monitors that aren't televisions are coming out on the market now. This year, 2023, and most likely next year as well, we will see new OLED monitors come out with better features and prices will also gradually drop, at least for the initial models. It's a time of excitement about a new technology, but you also have to be cautious, as what's released now may be slightly outdated a year from now. In addition, prices are still very high and at the moment, with luck, you can still find an LG OLED 42C2 television on sale, as it is leaving the market, for a price below these new OLED monitors. However, I strongly advise you to see it with your own eyes before buying! If you decide to go for a 4K LCD, make sure it's at least a VA. It always has a much higher contrast than an IPS monitor, which is why I never wanted to have an IPS monitor for games. The big difference in image is essentially between an IPS monitor and an OLED. There is also a difference between an OLED and a VA, but it is not just as big (I have an OLED TV and I was able to compare the image of the games with what I see on my VA monitor). And don't forget Rules #2, 3, 4,... and 10 - See with your own eyes before you buy, if you get the chance. Good luck!

OLED 1440p

@@letsplayskyrimle9391 Thanks for the detailed reply! I am between the Gigabyte Aorus M32U (4k) and the Alienware AW3423DWF (OLED 1440p). To be honest I am leaning towards the latter because as you also said it will be easier to get high frames in 1440p. Still, I don't know how much of a difference it makes from 1440p to 4k. Does an oled in HDR mode look better than 4k VA/IPS? I do sit close to my monitor and I can dim, or brighten, the lights in the room. My new system will have a 4090 so I want to buy a monitor that will give me the best experience.

Depends, honestly if it's a really really good lcd, 4K can be a good choice. But oled looks so nice that it could be worth the downgrade in resolution. Personally I would get a 1440p oled, because that's the main resolution I use, and I need high refresh rate. I have a 4K TN panel and I barely use it cuz colors are washed compared to my 1440p VA panel (and also my gpu doesn't always run 4K depening on the game)

I think it's because lighting is getting more realistic, and your brain doesn't understand cuz he think it's "reality" so you get a bigger contrast with the animations that are not so realistic yet

@@Dbentzjr LMFAO it'd be cool if this was intentional and certain cybernetics influenced movement and animations. Would be a sick addition to a sequel for immersion and gameplay.

Nothing was abandoned, just in dev still. And yea game's been playable for about a year. I mean, you're looking at someone run a path traced version of the game, if it can do this, I'm sure the base game itself should be stable.

It's playable now, they fixed it

yeah, it's been "fixed" since about 6 months after it was released. Been receiving updates every few months too, iirc, and has an expansion releasing at some point

I recommend waiting for the expansion to play it as the game's last big update will drop with it. But yeah it's very playable now unless you play on an old gen console or a computer with an HDD

@@Kyepo I've got a very high end system. 4090 etc. Is the expansion going to be free or paid? I don't think I'd spend more money on this game. Perhaps I'll wait for the expansion and just play on whatever the last patch is with or without the new content itself.

I actually think path tracing is most noticeable in enclosed areas with a lot of dynamic lighting and contrasting areas. In big outdoor settings it's a bit of a waste, especially during the day. A game like Dead Space would be perfect path tracing + DLSS3.

Funnily enough I think they are using DLSS. Native at those settings 4090 gets 20fps, double that with frame generation 40 "fps". Not even close to 100 they seem to be getting

@@FakeMichau 20fps at 4k, He is playing 1440p. So with no DLSS or frame gen he'd be getting about 40fps. With frame gen about 100, and with both enabled at the same time youd be looking at about 130fps @ 1440p. I get about 100fps with both enabled @ 4k.

I have got exactly the same GPU

Eazy Ryder 700W PSU will be enough for both CPU/GPU OVERCLOCKING MY RIG is MSI B350M MORTAR RYZEN 5 1600 G-SKILL FLARE X (2×8GB ) @ 2400 MHz ZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti AMP EXTREME EDITION SAMSUNG 960 EVO M.2 NVMe 250GB THERMALTAKE TR 2 S 80+ GOLD 700W

streamfiets I did exactly the same thing

Dr FoolyCooly just like a Beast