Also I was told the company can’t report a drug violation to the clearinghouse it has to be the the testing site or the mro
@inoutlabs3 ай бұрын
The MRO reports positive FMCSA results to the Clearinghouse. Most Refusals and Actual Knowledge are reported by the employer
@smoothwill3 ай бұрын
@@inoutlabs what do you mean most refusals . What constitute most refusals ?
@smoothwill3 ай бұрын
Also you said actual knowledge for the company. What do you mean . I’ve been told conflicting stories about my situation if a refusal . I was told if I resigned the day before and bring that the random was not on the same day and I was not at the facility than it’s not a refusal . But I’m getting different stories
@smoothwill3 ай бұрын
Also this happened this past Tuesday . How long would the company have to legally report it if they were going to before it’s no longer valid to report ? Thank you .
@smoothwill3 ай бұрын
I just started with a company and after I took a pre employment drug test 2 weeks later I was told on a Tuesday that I had to go on Wednesday the next day for a random . I resigned that same day before . Is it considered a refusal . I was told if I had refused that same day to report and decided to resign that would be a refusal . Or if I got to the site and decided not to test it’s a refusal . Is this info correct ? This came from my dot doctor .
@inoutlabs3 ай бұрын
If you were notified of a random test and resigned after begin notified of the test, and did not report for the test, that would be a Refusal.
@smoothwill3 ай бұрын
Why are all your comments turned off on your later videos ?
@inoutlabs3 ай бұрын
Too many trolls
@Derpyderp5974 ай бұрын
This is dump, until drug test kits can tell when the last time you used was they should be considerd a violation of the 4th amendment, yournjob shouldint own you or be able to punish you or fire you for what you do in your free time
@lupitas.59411 ай бұрын
Thank you. 🇲🇽🇱🇷🚛
@LilGodfather06 Жыл бұрын
If i ever want to get out of a random drug test i just bribe the nurse.
@Nino__.4 жыл бұрын
Is the employer required to pay for his employees random dot drug test? My employer is charging me $400+ for a dot drug test
@timthoelecke19574 жыл бұрын
Hmmm... That may be illegal.
@Nino__.4 жыл бұрын
Also the mro took more than 10 min to review my sample and then said he couldn’t accept my urine because it was out of temp range... I agreed to provide a second sample but declined to do it under direct observation after my request for a different mro was declined... so I left and the mro sent my unaccepted sample to the lab anyway instead of discarding it after I refused (dO) is that legal? Also they did not give me any paper or anything to sign
@timthoelecke19574 жыл бұрын
@@Nino__. That is a totally different issue. MROs do not collect specimens. Assume you mean the collector. If a DOT sample is out of temperature range, an immediate recollection under direct observation is required by the regulations. If you refuse, you fail. The refusal to test trumps anything else that happens. If this is for FMCSA and occurred after 1/6/20, it is reported to the Clearinghouse. You are not permitted to performs safety sensitive work for any employer until you have completed the Return To Duty process. www.inoutlabs.com/the-return-to-duty-process-and-the-sap/
@carlossoriano43682 ай бұрын
How did it ended up???
@elontusk98986 жыл бұрын
I just pay the clinic where I get my test done $500 to doctor my results everytime I have a random test. Its worth paying a couple hundred as opposed to losing a 6 figure job where I plan on retiring.
@AndrewFishes7 жыл бұрын
I've been drug testing employees and drug court for 13 years. Those stats are accurate. I tell employers that surprise testing and control from the moment of notification are the best ways to ensure a valid sample. Still, some people carry heaters and urine at all times.
@jackduffy25138 жыл бұрын
Your a Moron. Why do you keep saying the word "drug" to point to Marijuana? Just the word sounds idiotic. It's a plant that grows on the planet... What people do what that plant is their choice. Do you have the same attitude toward roses or bushes? I know exact what your going to say.... But But Bushes and roses don't impare your ability if you roll em up and smoke em? Then by that same logic alcohol should be illegal? Grow a pair.
@inoutlabs7 жыл бұрын
Ad hominem attacks are used when logic fails. You may have to look that one up. So "natural" = "safe" is what I hear you saying. So let's continue the discussion after you consume a handful of English yew, water hemlock or wolfsbane. www.epicgardening.com/plants-that-will-kill-you/ Also, (and bear in mind this is coming from a "moron"), most common OTC supplements and many prescription medications are derived from plants. So to say that a plant is not a drug is a misstatement.
@bruha3218 жыл бұрын
My employer does random drug testing, but that's ok because I only abuse the drugs that aren't tested for. LOL
@ad3569 жыл бұрын
i really HATE "drug" testing. what they really they are looking for is pot. if i want to smoke a joint after work that's my business as long i am not messed up when i go to work. also pot stays in your system for almost a month, someone could smoke crack, or use cocaine and it is out of their system. it sends the wrong message its ok to use the hard shit, but dont smoke pot. these assholes do not own my body when i am not on the clock. yes, the deserve to have me sober at work but that is the begining and end of their rights. test me for intoxication and i would have ZERO problems with that but testing my piss to see if i have used something in that last 30 days is total bullshit. its none of their business
@inoutlabs9 жыл бұрын
andrew donohue Thanks for taking the time to comment. You can "hate" drug testing all you want, but understand that workplace drug testing is not about imposing any morality. It's about safety and security. Every employee has a right to work in a safe, secure, drug-free workplace, and it's every employer's responsibility to provide a safe, secure, drug-free workplace. Regarding pot, 43% of positive drug tests are for marijuana. That leaves 57% for cocaine, amphetamines, prescription drugs, etc. There are credible studies that show impairment as much as 3 weeks after marijuana use, so what you do on your own time does, in fact, affect safety at work. If you have an accident at work and hurt someone, not only is someone hurt, but your employer gets hit with a workers comp claim. Employers have to do everything they can to prevent accidents, and drug testing is one of those things. Personally, I don't care if you sit on the couch all day, smoke weed and eat Cheetos. But don't expect me to employ you.
@inoutlabs9 жыл бұрын
Such vitriol! I suspect you'll have to look that one up. Rather than return the ad hominem attacks with comments on your grammar and logic, I'll refer you to the scientific studies. I'm confident I will not change your view, but you are mistaken on a number of your assertions. This blog post (inoutlabs.com/high-on-sunday-still-impaired-on-monday-yep/) links to 2 studies that show impairment long after the high. I suspect you won't read it though. You are correct in that what you do on your own time is your business, UNLESS it negatively impacts someone else. Plain and simple: If you use drugs, you are a liability to your employer. Most employers are not required to drug test, but it is their right to do so. You are also correct that many public figures smoke pot, including some politicians. Politicians also steal from us. Just because they do it, does not make it right. If you want to continue using drugs, your best bet is to find an employer who does not drug test. There are many out there. FWIW, workplace drug testing is growing fast in states with recreational marijuana. The courts have consistently supported an employer's right to a drug-free workplace. Oh, and I'm glad you don't work for me too.
@RowanWarren787 жыл бұрын
If we are speaking from a purely logical point of view, then you will have to agree, that in terms of workplace impairment (which you say is effected by what we do in our off time at home) that testing for alcohol would be even more valuable in offsetting workplace accidents, etc. It is more commonly used and far more intoxicating. We test for Pot, and not alcohol, because alcohol is legal and marijuana is not. Period. This is based on laws that are not always rational. I am only speaking on behalf of marijuana.
@inoutlabs7 жыл бұрын
Alcohol is indeed a problem. A couple weeks ago an employer sent an employee in for suspicion. She blew a .45 on the breathalyzer. Not sure why she wasn't dead or passed out. It happens. We've had truck drivers fail random breath tests just before hitting the road to drive cross country. How would you like to be driving on the road next to this guy? Both of these people were drinking off duty and then came to work. Is that okay since they weren't drinking at work? Just last week I caught a truck driver who had smuggled in urine for a drug test. He had to provide a second specimen under direct observation. He failed for marijuana and cocaine. Had I not caught him, he would be on the road. Employers can choose whether they want to test or not, and what they want to do if someone fails. Drugs and alcohol are liability risks for employers, and they ruin families. Having said all this, you are correct in that it's not 100% rational across the board. What I mean by that is that you could blow a zero on a breath test, but be so hungover that you are unproductive and a danger to others. That, then, becomes a behavior or performance issue for HR.