聼星國人說博客不如聼國外的。無論語調，詞匯，陳述，世界觀，批判性各方面都更勝一籌。😅😆

Why is that even an issue? Or criteria?

Is this topics of her race necessary?

you are too generous with Fahmi. I'm not seen any minister over the past 10 years that seek to censor dissent more than Fahmi. Not even Badawi nor Najib nor Dr M nor Sabri

Why dont you have the part where you talk about if she is black or Indian?

I have to disagree with both of your opinions

I don't find her jokes funny at all but distasteful and hateful. She came across as having an axe to grind with Malaysia.

Yall chnese giving too much hope fpr dap and this "unity" governemnt. The fact there is no such thing as unity in real life in malaysia 😂

By the way, what is the theme music title of your podcast. Shalom.

If u guys really want meritocracy. Abolish all those dng zong and chnese organisation klscah all that first and only use national education system like in sgpore. Can u chnese accept that? I think no. Bcos u guys like to isolate from others with ur community only. u acting like u from china so u been treated like one simple 😂

33:15 just stop dreaming that affirmative action will abolish. It will stay here in malaysia forever

33:15 why do u guys still want to question bumi righs? U not learn ur lesson fron 13 mei? Just read ur ancestor social contract la. Ur ancestor agreed with bumi rights policy in exchange tunku give them citizenship and give them rights to build all this dong zong and ra sis chnese organisation. All that. But why now their descendent tryna challenge bumi rights?

this brain drain term is quite ra sis. U wanna make like chnese the only genius race in malaysia and if they left malaysia its brain drain. They are many more smart among other races. Btw most who migrate is chnese and indian. But that doesnt mean its brain drain

28:00 this brain drain term is quite rasis. U wanna make like chnese the only genius race in malaysia and if they left malaysia its brain drain. They are many more smart among other races. Btw most who migrate is chnese and indian. But that doesnt mean its brain drain

There are many chnese owned company and tycoon offer scholarship for chnes only. Why not talk about that 😂

If u talk about uitm. Why not talk about xiamen university utar and many others chnes only uni here 😂

Why u chnse ppl always complaint about tax money. U think malay and bumiputra dont pay taxes?😂 if h dont wanna pay tax then live in another country la 😂

Nep is actually working it helps a lot malays small entrepnaurs to do their start up. It aslo provide many malays scholarship to study abroad and have quality job. Only malay who dont take the oppurtinity will not get the nep benefit.

Why not talk about all those hired for mandarin speakers and chnese only. All those chnese scholarship just for chnese. And all those chnese organisation like klscah all that. Why not talk about that?

Ur ancestor have agreed to accept this bumi and quota system long ago as agreement tunku give them citizenship here. But look at their descendent now trying to challenge malaysia system.😂

Syed saddiq can only dreaming la. He dont understand he loved in malay and muslim majority country 😂. Syed saddiq will not last long if he challenge quota. He and u guys need to wake up to reality. Quota and bumi rights will stay here forever

u chnese always talk about politics about u guys dont even understand about malaysia system. we have sultan. do u guys even understand malay sultan role? 😂. sultan protect article 153 bumi righst

3:21 4:29 5:20 6:35 7:00 9:30 10:00 12:30 13:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 19:00 23:00 26:00 32:00

1:00 its not green wave its malay wave. Malay unite againts u dap 💪💚

Tanah melayu 💪💚 11:00 16:00 18:20 20:00 23:00 26:00 29:00 32:00 35:07 37:00 39:00 40:50 43:00 44:00 48:00

looking at the election results and votes percentage increase. there is a wave right now happening. call it whatever you want. green wave, malay wave, sanusi wave etc. even state like negeri sembilan are facing this wave. 15 percent votes increase to PN in 2023 compare to 2022 election. PN win 5 seats. 8 BN seats that BN won and 2 PH seat that PH won are under 750 majority votes. in Kedah, 14 percent increase of PN votes. in Selangor, 10 percent increase of PN votes. in Terengganu and Kelantan also have substantial vote increase for PN. total seats. PN 145, PH 80, BN 19. this is a referendum. a referendum especially to UMNO. two drastic things Umno needs to do right now for the party survival. First, Zahid need to resign. Second, Umno need to leave PH. we know both things would never happen. so umno self-destruction would continue. in G16, we would see the end of UMNO.

2:35

u cant change anything this is MALAYsia land of bumiputra. u must remember where ur ancestor came from

3:30 bak ku teh is chnese food originate from china not from malaysia 5:00 8:00 10:00 11:00 13:00 14:00 16:15 21:00 23:00 26:00 27:20 28:30 29:45 34:00 38:00

10:00

3:20 5:00 7:05

3:00 17:00

21:00 31:00 29:00 32:00 34:00 35:20

4:00 8:00 10:00

4:22 5:40 7:20 8:40 11:00 13:00 14:50 17:10 20:59 25:00 26:00 27:28 28:25 30:00

1:48 2:20 3:25 5:15 6:28 8:10 9:12 10:00 11:00 12:30 15:50 16:30 18:29 23:10

ini tanah melayu

ini tanah melayu. lu ingat lu bole jadi pm ka 😂

😚 *Promosm*

On Malaysia constitution, does the special position equivalent to special rights? Are they to be interpreted that way?

Yay.. this round opening and closing scores didn't burst my eardrums

Thanks @Simon Says Podcast for posting this video about affirmative action / supreme court. Here are the viewpoints expressed by Supreme Court justices regarding affirmative action. 1) This case is about a group called Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) who sued Harvard College and the University of North Carolina (UNC). They said that these schools were not fair in their admissions process because they were using race as a factor, which they believed was against the law. The law they referred to is the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment*. 2) The Equal Protection Clause is a part of the Fourteenth Amendment that says that every person should be treated equally by the law, no matter their race, color, or nationality. The SFFA believed that by considering race in admissions, Harvard and UNC were not treating all applicants equally. 3) The Court looked at the history of the Fourteenth Amendment and how it has been used in the past. They also looked at how other cases involving race and college admissions were handled. They found that while diversity in a student body can be a good thing, it must be handled in a way that treats all applicants fairly and equally. 4) The Court also looked at the idea of "strict scrutiny*". This is a way for the courts to look at laws to see if they are fair and necessary. If a law or policy is found to be unfair or unnecessary, it may not pass strict scrutiny and could be considered unconstitutional. 5) The Court found that the admissions systems at Harvard and UNC did not pass strict scrutiny. They said that the schools' use of race in admissions was not clear or specific enough, and it resulted in fewer admissions for certain racial groups. They also said that the schools' use of race in admissions seemed to stereotype certain racial groups, which is not allowed. 6) The Court also said that the schools' admissions systems did not have a clear end point. This means that there was no clear plan for when the schools would stop using race as a factor in admissions. This was another reason why the Court said the schools' admissions systems were not fair. 7) The Court decided that the admissions systems at Harvard and UNC were not fair and did not follow the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. They said that the schools' use of race in admissions was not clear, specific, or fair enough to be allowed. 8) However, the Court also said that schools can consider how race has affected an applicant's life. They can look at how an applicant's experiences with their race have shaped them and what they can bring to the school because of those experiences. 9) In the end, the Court decided that the admissions systems at Harvard and UNC were not fair and did not follow the law. They said that the schools' use of race in admissions was not allowed because it was not clear, specific, or fair enough. 10) So, the Court decided that the SFFA was right. They said that Harvard and UNC were not treating all applicants equally in their admissions process, which is against the law. They said that the schools needed to change their admissions systems to be fair to all applicants, no matter their race. *The Equal Protection Clause is a part of the Fourteenth Amendment that says that every person should be treated equally by the law, no matter their race, color, or nationality. *Strict scrutiny is a way for the courts to look at laws to see if they are fair and necessary. If a law or policy is found to be unfair or unnecessary, it may not pass strict scrutiny and could be considered unconstitutional.

Wow! That's simply enlightening topic. Good job.

Promo`SM

Problem about Jocelyn Chia that trigger so many malaysia is the way is deliver the comedy, many other comedian say similar jokes but got away.

Very interesting discussions. Got me thinking, the solutions that be based on specific principles that is sustainable over a long time and not subjective to temporal ideas or trends. Prehaps we can start with a few common understanding: These are what I would consider as the lowest denominator where if we cannot agree, very few things can be discussed. 1. Regarding society and children. The purpose are to have a growing society or civilization that is sustainable and prosporous. The way a society or civilization can physically grow must be the expansion of humans in the society. Therefore protecting the physical, mental and psychological development of children supercedes personal freedom in the society. 2. Regarding Moral Policing. Regardless of ones' worldview, morality is what one understands or know to be right or wrong. There can be unlimited opinion as to all that can be described as wrong. Thereby, to policed what is wrong, it must appeal to the widest and broadest understanding of what is wrong. 1. Violating soemone's personal freedom and welfate directly. Hence.. murder, bodily assault, rape, theft of properties should be policed. Policing someone's sexual activities in private in undesireable because they are activities of consenting adults. Planning crimes in private, child pornography activities must be prosecuted because "crimes" against another persons' freedom and welfare is morally wrong, and deterring child porn is protecting children and the interest of a society. 3. Govenment Power Purpose - To facilitate the welfare of the society Inevitabiity - Power corrupts **************************** Purpose - Maintaining roads, security (army to prevent neighbouring tribes from coming in and killing/pillaging the society), facilitating smooth operations of economics and NOT manipulating the levers of economics. Eg: When someone comes to the police station to report a crime, a moral policing has failed and someones' freedom and welfare has been violated. It's not the job of the police to evaluate the dressing of the victims. Inevibility - Every power given to the govenment or proposal of legislation by the govt (which in its intend and purpose is to give them power to police) must be scrutinized that it is not a backdoor for power over-reach. Eg: The Generation End Game of banning smoking to those born after certain period include a clause to allow the govt to seacrh and seize premises without a court order. People has been smoking for ages and it is certainly not an eminent threat to the society. Why is there a need for the power to S & S without court order? Ok, these write ups are longer than I expected. Enough for now.

Even compass magnetic needle, would be affected by magnetic substance from outside and that caused its North-South misaligning. My practical observation. No offense taken.