Thanks for the video! I got my Sony 18-105mm lens back in 2017 to replace the 16-50mm kit lens that came with my 𝛼6300. It's been a very good lens since. I originally got the camera and the 18-105 lens to shoot stills. But then, I found out from a colleague that both were really good for video when that colleague hired me and the camera to shoot some B-roll on a small commercial shoot. All these years that 18-105 has been my go to lens and has rarely come off the 𝛼6300. A few times I put the 18-105 on my old FS5 MkII. That combo really worked well for run and gun (fast auto focus) and the zoom worked as a true variable speed zoom with the FS5's zoom control. More recently, I have used the 18-105 lens with my FX30. The AI auto focus works great. The lens has proven its versatility by being able to shoot wide for doc style filming and then settling in with a longer focal length for sit down "formal" interviews. Today you can see that my Sony 18-105mm lens has been well used. It's scratched, dented and even got hit by a baseball once. It has worked in every type of bad weather from extreme heat and humidity to cold and rain, but continues to work great. The glass is clean and the inner workings -- focus, zoom, OSS -- still work fine. It's a testament to Sony's commitment to quality.
@smf0002715 сағат бұрын
Sir what camera mode you used?
@toms_bay_bbq2 күн бұрын
I just purchased this lens I’m excited to try it
@iiHavingFun5 күн бұрын
There are 2 photos of every shot, is the 2nd photo edited or a picture mode. Can u please tell.
@petersroom5 күн бұрын
Hi! I dont use the camera’s picture modes. I edited in Lightroom
@krisztianhubler9 күн бұрын
Nagyon szemezek ezzel a géppel :D LumixG80-ról leválva
@petersroom3 күн бұрын
Én nagyon szerettem ezt a kamerát. Szerintem nagyon jó belépő a sony rendszerbe. 😎
@hongquangtrieu312010 күн бұрын
Thanks for your inspirational video. I miss Budapest.
@petersroom10 күн бұрын
Thanks! I really appreciate. Gave a nice day! 😎
@derrickc9010 күн бұрын
What App/Software did you use for Color correction.
@petersroom10 күн бұрын
Thank you for asking! I use Lightroom for photo editing and Davinci resolve for video editing. Have a nice day! 😎
@artistjoh11 күн бұрын
The 10-18 and 18-105 f4 OSS lenses are an essential pair for APS-C. Eventually add Sigma and Viltrox f1.4 lenses (16, 23, 30, 56)for night shooting and you have an almost perfect kit. Maybe add the Laowa 65mm macro if you like getting very close to subjects. But if I had to have just one lens, it would be the 18-105. In a single word - versatile. The 10-18 is better for vlogging, but most other things, the 18-105 is king.
@petersroom3 күн бұрын
I totally agree, thank you for sharing. 😎
@Shahi-bangalah_135213 күн бұрын
Can you please suggest me between sony a6400 vs fujifilm xs10
@petersroom3 күн бұрын
I think its not about buying the camera its about picking the ecosystem. Because when you buy one of them you will invest into a brand. I like better the sony so i would 100% go with the a6400. You will get a lot of lens options and great autofocus etc… its really reliable. 😎👌
@elodbirtalan469817 күн бұрын
Ott lakok a panelban a Duna másik oldalán 😀
@petersroom3 күн бұрын
Sejtettem, hogy egy nap valaki onnan is megnèzi, de nem gondoltam, hogy ilyen hamar 😂
@viarfxxx18 күн бұрын
hey man trying to get into videography of america football games. i have the editing down as i’ve been doing it for around 3 years. i’m thinking of getting the a6400 myself and im wondering if it’s worth it. also, does the lens zoom enough to capture a single player or should i get a higher mm lens? thanks
@erickgiovanniescobarareval334522 күн бұрын
Thank you for the info… quick and focus… so much value in your video… come to Guatemala and make great photos with that lens! 😂🤘🇬🇹👍🏻📸😊
@petersroom3 күн бұрын
Thanks! I really appreciate it 😎 have a nice day 👌
@RetroKadez24 күн бұрын
First day shooting yesterday with my new camera and this lens. I was struggling lol like you said, you have to get a lot more creative with this lens. I have a lot of learning to do lol
@petersroom3 күн бұрын
You will be fine. It could takes some time, but its a really great focal length. 😎
@g1g1.25 күн бұрын
What color grading settings r u using
@petersroom24 күн бұрын
Hi! I colorgraded the video part in Davinci resolve and for stills I usually use my custom made presets in lightroom. If you're intrested, it's available on my website here: ptrsroom.com
@RetroKadez25 күн бұрын
I just picked this camera up today with this lens included for 600$ ! Can't wait to start shooting !!
@petersroom24 күн бұрын
Really nice! Congratulations! :DD
@sverre431926 күн бұрын
Amint meghallottam az akcentust, tudtam hogy magyar vagy. :D
@petersroom24 күн бұрын
Le se tagadhatnám :D Azért igyekszem fejleszteni ezen. Bízom benne, hogy majd idővel gördülékenyebben fog menni.
@kristijanturbic253529 күн бұрын
Great video!I ordered today for my ZVE 10 and I think it will be great Combo!Are you croatian?
@petersroom29 күн бұрын
Thanks and Congrats! The zv-e10 is a really great pick, especially with the sigma. Have fun with it. 😎No, I'm from Hungary. :D
@kristijanturbic253529 күн бұрын
Neighborhood ❤
@qenreblayers533129 күн бұрын
So where are you now?
@petersroom24 күн бұрын
My life was really busy so i couldnt make new videos, so it's the same. :D
@GadgetsGearCoffeeАй бұрын
I'm thinking of getting the sigma lens with the NEW Sony a6700, you mention it would work better in your description, is that because of the overall stabilization in the 6700?
@petersroom24 күн бұрын
Hi! Thank you for asking! Sure the a6700 works better than my a6400 with the sigma 16mm. 1) the a6700 has more resolution, so it would be sharper. 2) It has much better rolling shutter in 4k so your handheld shots would be better 3) The OSS can help you a ton
@orrin-manningАй бұрын
1/1250 seems pretty excessive for shooting inanimate objects, wouldn't you rather bring that ISO down to 100?
@petersroom24 күн бұрын
Thank you for asking! I'm not shooting 1/1250 because of the inanimate objects. I'm shooting this way because i'm moving all the time and usually i have to react quick. Otherways sometimes i found intresting subjects and i dont have enough time to scroll up my shutter. Than i leave it there. Thats why i shoot around 400 iso. It lifts the overall brightness and i could focus more to my subject. I never shoot in ISO 100. with 400 iso i'm so much flexible. And otherways ISO 100 is too clinical and clean to me. It's just street photography, it doesn't have to be perfect.
@ghozialfayyadh9444Ай бұрын
I have it and i love it so much, i wish can have 18-105mm f4 tho
@petersroom24 күн бұрын
The 35mm was one of my favorite lens with a good lens it could be complement each other. Have a nice day bro! :)
@TBAN18Ай бұрын
Body: Sony A6400 new with kit lens or A6400 new (Body only) with used lens? What's your choice?
@robholguin909127 күн бұрын
What kit lens?
@petersroom24 күн бұрын
You can buy both for the same price. You should never buy a kit lens separately because its around 100$ if you buy it boundled with the camera and 3-400$ if you buy it alone. So If you concider to buy an a6400 new, i would suggest to buy with the kit lens. People usually sell their kit lenses for the same price then the new ones (around 100$). But if you find a used a6400 I would go for a used kit lens also. Its more affordable. So overall: Buy a complete new a6400 with a new kit lens in bundle or buy a used camera and lens. It depends on the camera's condition.
@curselensАй бұрын
Which lens would you recommend after having this?
@petersroom24 күн бұрын
Hi! For apsc zoom, it depends on the situation. If i want to be compact: sigma 18-50 f2.8, If the range is the most important thing then sony 18-105. If i would go for the best value for the money then I would buy the tamron 17-70 f2.8.
@andyaddinawan9022Ай бұрын
Thank you, greetings from Indonesia. Salam bro . What lens would you recommend for making videos like laptop disassembly on ZV-e10?
@petersroom24 күн бұрын
You're welcome :) In budget i would use the 16-50 kit lens with good lighting. But if you have budget you could go for the sigma 16mm f1.4. But i would 100% go for a good light, because it would make your videos so much better. With shitty lighting the sigma would make really bad videos also. Lighting is king. :D Have a nice day bro ;)
@ladyethymeАй бұрын
You're hilarious!
@petersroom24 күн бұрын
Ty!
@OmarKruppАй бұрын
Are the pictures edited??? Or
@petersroomАй бұрын
Yup. I edit in Lightroom. 😎
@sifur_rahmanАй бұрын
I'm confused between the Sony 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 and the Sigma 16mm F1.4. I just bought the Sony A6400 with the 16-50mm kit lens, but I'm not happy with the kit lens. I intend to shoot indoor videos and photography, so low light performance is important. Should I buy the Sony 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 or the Sigma 16mm F1.4?
@petersroom24 күн бұрын
Thank you for asking! The sony 18-135 would perform the same as the 16-50 but with a little bit extended range. If you want better zoom lenses than go for the sigma 18-50 f2.8 or tamron 17-70 f2.8. Those are quie decent in lowlight. But if you want extreme good low light performance, than go for a prime like the sigma trio. 16mm 30mm 56mm 1.4. Otherways I don't know what would you shoot indoors, so if you have a chance i would use lights instead of buying better lenses. With good lighting a "bad" lens could produce amazing results. With bad lighting an "excellent" lens would produce shitty images :D. Lighting is the king!
@sifur_rahman24 күн бұрын
@@petersroom Thanks for the reply. I will be shooting kids videos indoors, and very harsh light won't be good for them. The Sigma 30mm 1.4 is the right choice for me.
@mannet1994Ай бұрын
great video
@petersroomАй бұрын
Thanks! 🙏😎
@mko7680Ай бұрын
What would you prefer for architecture photography? This lens or Sigma 10-18 f2.8 ?
@petersroomАй бұрын
Hi! I would go for the 10-18. Its more versatile for architecture photography. 😎
@sanne3704Ай бұрын
Love my primes, but sometimes you just dont have time to swap lenses. Just ordered this one, cant wait for it to arrive. It will be my first zoom lens lmao.
@petersroom24 күн бұрын
I'm in the same story. I think its a great all arounder lens, i only swap this lens if the lighting is so poor.
@avirupdharray1Ай бұрын
Hello..I am looking for a lens for my A6700. Already have the Sigma 56mm f1.4. Would like to add something good and wide for landscape photography but at the same time have good low light performance and also be a good choice for Astrophotography. Would you suggest the Sigma 16mm or Viltrox 13mm? Note : Landscape would be mostly mountains,valleys and lakes
@petersroom24 күн бұрын
Hi! I would prefer sigma and tamron for third party lenses because of the autofocus. I heard a lot of stories about viltrox and samyang which was unreliable and the focus hunt a lot. I think for landscape the sigma 16mm could be enough, but if you want more room to play than i would go for the sony 11mm f1.8.
@vipul8859Ай бұрын
Great pictures 🎉 awesome edits, made it look so easy… thanks. Comparison between sigma 18-50 and sony 18-105 please?? Thanks.
@petersroom24 күн бұрын
Thanks! I already have a comparison video. Check my YT channel ;)
@mathewmathai891Ай бұрын
Hi... I'm a bit late to this video. But can you please mention the lens that you used for the photo comparison between 6400 and a7iii and the aperture and mm details. Please
@petersroom24 күн бұрын
Thanks for asking! It was between the a7sIII and the a6400. In the a6400 i used the sigma 16mm f1.4 at f1.4 aperture and in the a7sIII i used the sigma 24-70mm f2.8 at f2.8. It looks kind the same. :D I hope it could help you :) Have a nice day!
@muhammadfauzanalghifari7776Ай бұрын
i like ur color grading man!
@petersroomАй бұрын
Thanks! I really appreciate 🙏😎
@lukasmerkaphotosАй бұрын
after a year using this lens I really like it ( a nice budget lens for aps-c camera for my a6000 ) But if I have to say some cons, sometimes the focus takes time and the Aberration is very frequently problem ( at least in my case :) ) But still! Good lens.
@petersroomАй бұрын
Thank you for sharing! I appreiate.
@GeryCubingАй бұрын
These photos are so beautiful :D btw why are you in Hungary?
@petersroomАй бұрын
Thanks I really appreciate! Well.. I live here :D
@aritraroy7841Ай бұрын
Hi, Thinking to buy a6400, but also confused on a6700. The a6700 is out of my budget, and would need to wait atleast 3 4 months more. Also as this will be my first camera, not sure whether I should spend this much money in body alone. Planning to buy 50mm f1.8 with the a6400. Will use for both photo and video. Waiting for your feedback.
@petersroomАй бұрын
Hi! The a6700 is basically an upgraded a6400 you get bigger battery, In body stabilization, 10bit colors, and 4k 120fps and Ai autofocus. So if you ask me i would recommend the a6700 for long term. For video it's much better than the a6400. You'll grow out the a6400 so fast. I had an a6400 and after 3 years i felt that a little bit weak next to my other comeras. So a6700 more futureproof. But i would pick a more versatile lens than a 50mm f1.8 because it will be so limiting. You know if its a fullframe lens, than you will get a 1.5x crop if you use it on an apsc sensor camera like the a6700 or the a6400. So it will be around 75mm which is not versatile at all. I would go for the sigma 18-50 f2.8 . It's a great budget midrange all rounder lens. You will be thank me, because 50 and 75mm is so tight. You'll feel the tight limitations after a while. And usually people cant buy multiple lenses at first to cover all the focal lenghts. So a good zoom lens is a much better option. It's better to cover a lot of focal lengths (which looks also really good) than master 1 focal length and lose all the others. So if you ask me you should be a little bit patient. It will be much better in long term. I waited almost 2 years to get my bigger sony camera, and it worth every penny.
@aritraroy7841Ай бұрын
@@petersroom thanks man for your detailed advice. Will surely help a lot. However, as I am a hobbyist photographer, won't be able to make money from it . Also considering a6600 now, if not a6700 due to the Ibis, let's see..
@venyconoceloconmigoАй бұрын
Hermosa corrección de color 🙌
@petersroomАй бұрын
Thanks!
@sharptechnique7883Ай бұрын
Do you have any dead pixels on your viewfinder for the A6400?
@petersroomАй бұрын
Thank you for asking! No i dont have any dead pixels.
@corbinmiller76272 ай бұрын
I love the way your talking head shot is composed the window in the back and the lens flair is actually cool in my opinion
@petersroomАй бұрын
Thanks! I appreciate. It was a really windy day, that's why it made some intresting flares in the background.
@tylerheath71002 ай бұрын
I really enjoy your content. Thank you for sharing!
@petersroomАй бұрын
Thank you! I appreciate it. Have a nice day! :)
@lamentodelogro2 ай бұрын
1/2500 F 4 y Iso 100? DDDDDDDDD: WHAAAAAAT
@DMRCapitalHill2 ай бұрын
The work around for the shakes is S&Q and getting a gimbal.
@petersroomАй бұрын
Thank you for sharing! I dont know how S&Q help with the shakes. If you mean slow motion, than you only have slowmo in FullHD (in the a6400) and i usually work in 4k..but sure it's just a preference. Yes, the gimbal could help..if you could bring one with you. I have 2 gimbals, so it would be logical to bring one of them with me. But when you're for example in a trip with you wife or with your friends, there is a chance you don't want to bring a gimbal to a plane and walk around in the city all day with your expensive toy... especially if you are for example bigger cities where there are many robbers. And if you're a hybrid shooter like me, than the gimbal could be a big problem. So overall, yes... the gimbal could help you, but not all the time it's the best solution.
@officialabdulrehman2 ай бұрын
is it sharp enough ?
@petersroomАй бұрын
for me...yup :D
@editman.1012 ай бұрын
Hi man, i rly appreciated the video ! I've a question, i want to do football pics and i was wondering if the apparture (f/4) had a too low exposure for evening/night match when there is not a lot of lights. Do you think this lens is still ok for that ? Thank you !
@petersroomАй бұрын
Hi! Thank you for asking. I think f4 here is not the best option in low light..but you have luck with football, because usually football players cant play in the dark, because they dont see the ball. So i think there is a chance that they have lights.
@TLOverlander2 ай бұрын
This lens with Sony S-cine3 colour science... BUTTER!
@petersroomАй бұрын
Thank you for sharing!
@raketalabuswet2 ай бұрын
Szia a napokban vásároltam én is egy Sigma 16mm f1.4 obit használtan. A kép minőségével elégetett vagyok az autó fókusz is egészen jól teszi a dolgát. Feltűnt, hogy valamivel hangosabb a fókusz motor a többi lencsémhez képest. Ha kézzel adom meg neki a fókuszpontot (kijelzőn érintve) esetleg nagyobb a két pont közötti fókusz távolság kattanás szerű hangosabb hangot ad ki. (Ennyire hangosan állna be a lencse egyes esetekben?) Ez normális ennél lencsénél vagy esetleg nálam lehet valami gond? A képalkotásnál nem jelentkeznek problémák, a fókusz is gyors pontos, bár sötét témánál kicsit lomhább. (Összehasonlításképpen a Tamron 18-300 obim teljesen hangtalan hozzá képest.) A másik, ami még feltűnt, hogy a napellenző is kicsit mozog zárt állapotában is bár kopásra vagy túlhasználatra utaló jelek nincsenek rajta. (Samyang 12mm f/2 NCS CS obimnál is van némi mozgás új kora óta.)
@petersroomАй бұрын
Szia! Igen, hallottam én is már arról, hogy zajos az af, de nekem valahogy sose hallatszott belőle semmi. Lehet csak szerencsés vagyok. 😀
@V0ID_beats2 ай бұрын
A good lens is a good lens no matter how old. Fking love it
@petersroomАй бұрын
Thank you for sharing! I really like that lens too.😀
@muhammadfauzanalghifari77762 ай бұрын
i like ur color grading man!
@petersroomАй бұрын
Thanks! I really appreciate. 😀
@Joe_I_Hadley2 ай бұрын
Im using this lens on my ZV-E10 and have alot of focus hunting. I was looking for a fix for that
@petersroomАй бұрын
Thank you for sharing! With my a6400 there was no issues wit the focus. Do you have the latest firmwares?
@Joe_I_HadleyАй бұрын
@petersroom my camera, yes. The lens. Probably not.