that interviewer too excited we be hearing his machine gun breath.

Need to enforce the laws to stop illegal immigration.

Need to rebuild military forces ,check the personal criminal background, drug test, family background ...

Thanks for the video.

Tanzania, wildlife crimes, clinical pshychology behavior therapy, Clarke's superior wanted his work to be useful, Clarke defines himself as trying to reduce crime and he has a very correctional attitude, which is frowned upon by criminologists. counseling or early intervention. The tremendous insight Clarke learned by the end of the study was that there were very few differences between boys who ran away and those who didn't. The environment was so powerful in this behavior. Behavior is a function of interaction between the person and the environment. Clarke and Cornish considered their early controlled trial research to be a failure. The basic idea behind Clarke's theories is that people commit crime to benefit themselves. Clarke thinks situational crime prevention is much more integrated in Europe than it is in the US. The decisions about what you're going to do are influenced heavily by the opportunity of that particular type of crime. Increase the risk, increase the effort, reduce the rewards, remove exclusives, and reduce provocations and temptations. The private sector is much more pragmatic. There has been an increase in security over the last 30 years. The replacement of domestic gas with natural gas dramatically reduced the number of suicides. Americans don't listen to social science from abroad. What annoys Clarke about criminology is that it's not crime-specific enough. Good enough to help them solve the problems they were looking at Situational prevention The number of security gaurds in this country outnumber serving police. It's too far away from the naked situation. By not letting them do these bad things. Environmental crime

0:12 - The Oral History of Criminology Project in conjunction with the American Society of Criminology is pleased to present an interview with Ronald Clarke. We're joining Ronald Clarke here on the campus of Rutgers University in Newark, New Jersey. Just a brief introduction to Dr. Ronald Clarke's life and career and some of the seminal elements that he's contributed to the scholarship of the course and duration of his career. Began his undergraduate career at the University of Bristol of the United Kingdom and from there he pursued an MA at the University of London earning that. In 1965, he had a Ph.D. -- and 1968 -- both of those in psychology. From 1964 to 1968, he was research officer, Kingswood Training Schools, schools for delinquent boys. From 1968 to 1984 he held 4th at the Home Office, the Research and Planning unit. From 1984 to 1987 -- and 1984, actually, marked the year you came to the United States from the United Kingdom -- from '84 to '87, he was professor of Criminal Justice at Temple University. '87 to '98, Dean and Distinguished professor at the School of Criminal Justice here at Rutgers University. And in 1998, he was named University Professor -- a rather distinguished title there. He's also held a number of visiting positions over the course of his career -- he served as Visiting Professor at the State University of New York in Albany at their famous School of Criminal Justice, he's served as also Visiting Professor at the Jill Dando Institute for Crime Science, University College London. He's had several visiting fellowships as well the first of which was at the National Police Research Unity you have to help me with the pronunciation here "Adelaide? Adelaide. Australia

This is how I write. 1 sentence, 35 words 😂

That’s my grandpa

That’s my grandpa

This moron said police of yesterday would let a person go for improper plates! .. professor your a moron!!

this was great am now confident to do my exam in two weeks. Thank you

what variable from transnational crime? please answer

Great interview! As did all of the people who worked for him, I had enormous respect and affection for Sgt John Barker, Tom's brother..

Thank you! Ms Rafter is a Hera!

This is a great interview. Prof. Savelsberg is my former Ph.D. advisor. He is an excellent scholar and a wonderful human being.

I can listen to him for hours. :)

Fascinating conversation. My first career was in corrections. I graduated from Anderson College a few years after Todd. His dad Val was my advisor and mentor. I, too, interned at the Indiana Reformatory and had shocking experiences there, too. As I think about my upcoming retirement, I think often of Todd’s father’s influences on me and how they might inspire me to contribute in my retirement to people and communities affected by incarceration. What are some of those changes you envision that, if made today, would reduce incarceration in a handful of years? Thanks for this conversation!

Awesome stuff...

Great man

22:52 what is the name given here? Is it Vincent Chow?

!Qué persona tan interesante!

Im shocked you thought a bunch of prison wardens cared about rehabilitation, They are logistic workers that care about staying alive, for some part anyhow. They think punitively, authoritarianism the name of "consistent' punishment that is not. You have different types of screws and plenty of corruption so why would corrupt, institutionalised logistic workers care about rehab.? Thats the new penology, like the old penology before the 1960's/70's

😉

I think you should invest in microphones rather than recording from the camera.

I think foucault is not the right person to implement as a criminal theory, its generalism is insipid, not all the poor are criminals, I do not understand why sociology is still being used as a mother science to explain or capture criminalist theories ... because is implemented psychological frameworks instead of sociological ... ???

Outstanding resume, but perhaps it could have been placed in the contents. I wanted to hear from Dr. Clark when I selected the video.

who decided editing in all the weird camera zooms was a good idea

Wow! What a fantastic interview of Julius DeBro, renowned African-American Criminologist, regarding his trials and tribulations within the academy and his contributions to the field of criminal justice. John Hepburn, the moderator, did an excellent job keeping Julius on topic by filling in a few details lost in the aging process. Julius, this interview rekindles many fond memories of how you were (and are) a beacon of light guiding young scholars through the dark halls of crime and justice. I never realized how much our careers have crisscrossed-from Buffalo, to Milwaukee, to mutual friends, and to our love of tennis. Beyond your sage advice of academic survival, I am especially moved by your remark that “you did not know how you and your siblings made it through.” I think the late Mahalia Jackson and I have a pretty good idea Stay strong, keep the faith, and thanks for all that you do!

Nice job Johann and Tony. I think the interview captures precisely what oral histories are supposed to convey, especially as I am well aware of Tony's story both inside and outside of the worlds of criminology. Full disclosure: I am commenting as one of those former "hungry" and "excited" undergraduate and graduate students at the School of Criminology from 1967-1973. Tony was my primary mentor and the chair of my revisionist dissertation on the origins and development of the public defender system in the US. I was also Tony's teaching assistant and he remains a friend and colleague. Were it not for him and the Berkeley School I would not be the type of criminologist that I am today. So thanks again. Gregg Barak

i like it :)