The combine overwatch soldiers are former humans that became trnashuman creatures.

“nuh uh uh” 2:18

computers can calculate fractional additions, you just gotta not use floats for that.

2:02 Sir am I reta...

That has to be bad cop from Entropy Zero 2

Barney:Alyx its me barney fr- Alyx:wrong game *shoots him*

How long does it take to break 20 chracters long password

Keep in mind that, even if your data has been leaked in a data breach, your passwords are still encrypted nowadays (salted hash). So it isn't the end of the world IF your password is secure (long and unpredictable).

Awesome video dude.

Thanks algorithm, this is some pretty sweet content

New vid! -> kzbin.info/www/bejne/aajSaWZjnb5meaM

Alright, time to go hack some facebook accounts, thanks Cocoa!

I actually coded this random number generator in a Minecraft data pack once. It made me suffer.

the random number one reminded me of the gcp dot

I don't know why there is the halting problem needed to prove that there is something computers can not do. Think of you you have a program that you can give a definition of a machine and that then creates blueprint for the machine. Then give it two instructions. First let it create blueprints machine that create indestructible boxes. Next let it create a machine that can destroy any kind of box. The computer will fail creating one or the other blueprint. The Computer will never can do what a almighty god can not do either. However the Halting problem can not be solved by human either.

0:14, the second I saw those people I knew this video explained the halting problem. And 2:47 straight up roasted anyone who codes in an interpreted language.

The random number problem kind of depends on how you define randomness to be honest. Is a dice roll random? Because when you get really into it, it isn't. It's just a very complicated physics equation and if you knew all the variables you could predict the result. Same for card shuffling etc. So I think it's kind of "unfair" to hold computers to an impossible standard. But even more than that, it is easy to imagine a computer with a specialized hardware device that generates random numbers via nuclear decay, quantum events etc. There isn't any practical reason to do it but you could, and it would be much more random than a dice roll.

Help you get a solid relationship

NAHHH WHY HE USE THE KZbin TROLL POLICE LOGO

"It won't be able to f*ck me" Wise word by me

Dint understood a word

1. The D isn't outputting the opposite of the input, it does the opposite of the input (if the input is halt, then D will loop, and vice versa)... 2. You need to combine S+D (let's call it SD), S output will be fed into D... 3. You feed SD its own code... The problem: Inside SD, S will try to determine whether SD will halt or not... Let's say it concludes that SD will halt, then it feeds the output into D, which means D will loop... Because D is part of SD, that means SD will loop... So S is wrong... The idea behind S is it's supposed to give the exact answer of halt vs no halt, but as you can see it fails to do so, S can't exist... (I don't know if my explanation is clear or not, I tried my best... If you guys want to understand it better I suggest watching Veritasium's video called "Math's Fundamental Flaw")

The decision problem isn't proven false from the halting problem being false since the decision problem is limited to math. And since at the start you said the computer had infinite computation power the floating point error would be nonexistant. Also because of cosmic rays that can flip bits at any time a computer is actually very random if you leave it for many many years running

The only thing a computer will never be able to do is be human

Flashbang warning 5:11

give me a gf

Nothing humans can

I like this channel if there is more content like this so basicly I like this type of content and not the channel but because you do this type of content I like your channel

Tom scott much?

1:06 Basically Brainf, so it is a turing complete lang

Can anyone give me articles on this for further reading? I know KZbin wasn't made for this, but once I'm interested in a topic, I'm never gonna stop being interested

Who’s my good little one and zero

TLDW: The halting problem.

If it play porn, and play music, it’s nasa shit dude, doesn’t need to do anything else -filthy frank

I like my coworker’s analogy of predicting random numbers. “So, you’re telling me, that if I knew what number they chose as a ‘seed’ for a lottery ticket…. I could win the lottery?” “Yes, if you knew where the right ticket was.” “Cool.”

Fucking around and finding out

This is my new favorite video as of recent haha. Please tell me you have a twitter or discord

i left a like :3

Use two integers to make a precise decimal. If you need bigger decimals you can use growing integers ie 'BigInt' concept. You can get random numbers from noise pins on some chips ex: arduino's or the instruction rdseed available on some cpu's 2/3 things can be done by computers

Actually D does not have any input

the fact that D program returns the opposite of it's input is merely a facade. It really doesn't matter that it's answer is yes or no, these aren't meaningful to decision problems (yes this is spaghetti xor no this isn't, is not really meaningful or important). The point is that a decision is arrived at. And in your example the decision problem is solved.. by producing a decision. You need a better example.

There are several ways to generate true random numbers, including using the CMB or electrically noise

Technically speaking, computers CAN do floating point calculations. The problem of floating point is not in the incapacity of computers, but rather the incompatibility of the base ten numeral system to mathematics in base 2, as well as some design compromises made to increase the speed of floating point math. If you were concerned purely with accuracy, infinitely accurate floating point is technically possible given a more tuned approach. Also, theoretically, if you were to code your computer with something like trinary you could do some math in trinary that is traditionally impossible in the decimal system, such as the given example of 1/3. The USSR actually expiremented with trinary, and there are some interesting and unique advantages to such a computing system. The random one is probably the most technically correct, but it's also only random on the technicality that computers are designed to be deterministic. Many do however have hardware random units which theoretically do generate true random numbers through a variety of methods; but at the end of the day, "random" is subjective and unless you want to hash out the question of whether the universe is deterministic, it is maybe best to just accept "good enough".

During this fight you can just run up to the soldiers and shotgun them right as you go in with minimal damage due to them targeting the headcrabs over you.

1. Why would H nested within D be somehow invalidated by what that D says? These programs run in order. In the case(or opposite) Unknown input program halts -> H determines halts -> D Runs forever -> H determines Runs forever -> D Halts, the second D is run after the second H and therefore it's output changes. This doesn't invalidate H, The second D runs with a different input than the first. 2. The rounding problem isn't a real problem, just bad programming, computers can use binary to represent any number base by just never using some binary combinations (base3 can be 00, 01, 10 with 11 never used). 3. The randomness problem wouldn't apply to a quantum computer, and sometimes doesn't even apply to a normal computer (Like when a cosmic ray flips a single bit in your mario 64 run).

computers only do stuff because i allow it, but I am a generous god

Infinite time and processing power but still can't get you a single match on tinder😢

Forgot another critical thing computers cant do. Getting you a bi-

5:22 Neat! That's what PacMan used!