great video! a lot of profs have hours of videos online, but no one understands what they are trying to say...
@ShreyaAnish-p6t13 күн бұрын
I finally understand what I got wrong in my midterms...I had a misconception...thanks for this clear explanation
@مسعودکشاورز-ب2ص16 күн бұрын
Nice
@مسعودکشاورز-ب2ص18 күн бұрын
Very nice.🎉
@joeymeatloafАй бұрын
This is false
@SaikatSaha-yk1yq3 ай бұрын
Im a Saha too😅
@grinard5553 ай бұрын
Muy bonito y toda la teoría del ruso pero viola la segunda ley de la termodinámica Y Cómo dijo Homero aquí en esta casa se respetan las leyes de la termodinámica😂😂😂😂😂
@wotcherfaz3 ай бұрын
Examples of real physical systems or simplified models for such, that don't satisfy detailed balance? Or even more interesting,are there any that don't achieve equilibrium but forever oscillate somehow? Sorry but such questions have pestered me for a while now... thanks for presenting detailed balance in this way I found it interesting .
@georgeveropoulos24896 ай бұрын
hi very nice presentation In r direction there not radiation?
@tarikabaraka22516 ай бұрын
Yákov Borísovich Zeldóvich. Fue un prolífico físico soviético nacido en Bielorrusia. Jugó un papel importante en el desarrollo de la Unión Soviética las armas nucleares y termonucleares.
@The_fusion_physics_guy6 ай бұрын
great video, really helped me sanity check something for my research!
@bertelo-hs5ol7 ай бұрын
stop yapping
@faheemrajuu7 ай бұрын
Thank you for sharing your knowledge. Much appreciated.
@javierdiaz63837 ай бұрын
thank you for your lesson, very clear
@katja21348 ай бұрын
0:39 Is there not a density factor missing in this integral? And in the second term on the RHS of the radiative transfer equation.
@hsclouds8 ай бұрын
Excellent simplistic explanation, keep up the GOOD work !
@freakyfrequency253010 ай бұрын
Best explanation!
@shaswatachowdhury903210 ай бұрын
Thanks a lot!!
@arianamcsavi488410 ай бұрын
Good explanation
@lizw313411 ай бұрын
Thank you, very clearly explained! Super helpful
@HaiderKhanPakistan11 ай бұрын
Watching this a day before my Radiative Processes exam. It honestly cleared up so many questions I had about the subject.
@tecnologiamecanica658011 ай бұрын
Fantastic, thank you very much for that explanation. Could you please suggest a book to learn more about Inverse Bremsstrahlung Absorption and Fresnel Absorption.
@whiskeymike515411 ай бұрын
Very clear explanation. Well done.
@jorgeagosto6848 Жыл бұрын
Yes... amazing....! Perfect video for EEng...thanks for sharing
@oia_trab2306 Жыл бұрын
my goat
@roalba8947 Жыл бұрын
excellent video
@paulg444 Жыл бұрын
Outstanding, but its not obvious current has that factor \sqrt( n A L)
@BrentLeVasseur Жыл бұрын
While your explanation is clear and easily understandable (good job!), the theory of what’s going on is totally bonkers! 😂 First of all, let’s be honest, okay? Honestly, can you say that you have ever in your life “seen an electron” either “in the lab” or from the reference frame of ‘the electron’ itself? I think not! That would be like me talking about that unicorn ‘I saw’ in my backyard last weekend! 😂 It doesn’t exist. So it doesn’t matter what imaginary reference frame you are talking about… unicorns don’t exist, and neither do ‘electrons’. 😂 Now the explanation for synchrotron radiation is rather simple… what you call ‘an electron’ is nothing but a transverse electromagnetic impulse in the Aether medium. It’s a wave of luminiferous Aether, nothing more, and it contains both current or ‘charge’ and it generates its own magnetic field 90 degrees perpendicular to its direction of travel. So, the reason why you have synchrotron radiation is because you are essentially colliding two magnetic fields together - one magnetic field from the ‘electron Aether impulse’ with a second magnetic field of the magnetic field of the cyclotron itself and that collision of two magnetic fields causes secondary emissions or waves in the Aether to occur. Those secondary waves are what you call ‘photons’’ or ‘Xrays’. And that is what synchrotron radiation is in a nutshell. It has nothing to do with Relativity, time dilation, or Lorentz contractions…etc…
@ziyangchen2301 Жыл бұрын
very helpful!
@litiometalico Жыл бұрын
Very nice explained for me that has installed e TS experiment and obtained nice spectra. It would be interesting to hear a lecture that include a large magnetic field. I think that maybe the cross section could change. It would be needed to add the Lorentz force F= q vx B I think. Congrats
@lanceranon8227 Жыл бұрын
This is a masterpiece of a summary. What about a follow up video of any new science discoveries in the last 10 years that have impacted or answered further questions which you’ve laid out?
@jacobvandijk6525 Жыл бұрын
@ 2:29 Make that - 1/tau. Then we have exp(- (1/tau) . t) and a decaying exponential.
@jacobvandijk6525Ай бұрын
He is too arrogant to admit his error.
@pauliexcluded1 Жыл бұрын
Scientemp ultra cold cleaning
@azzip-x Жыл бұрын
6:19 Nu is frequency of what?
@ApteraEV2024 Жыл бұрын
Wow! ❤A Must Watch, again 👌 Thanks for Sharing ! Hope all is Well, ❤
@ApteraEV2024 Жыл бұрын
1st!🎉 hello?? 😅
@ApteraEV2024 Жыл бұрын
Im Here!🎉 9yrs later❤😅
@brendawilliams8062 Жыл бұрын
Me too, with a 3 and a 16😮
@jacobvandijk6525 Жыл бұрын
@ 4:32 So its probability is very, very, very small.
@oguzaltnbas3108 Жыл бұрын
It has long time to decay, but we have lots of these HI clouds in the Galaxy. Therefore we could detect HI-21 cm emission line although the spontaneous decay is very long.
@Venaber Жыл бұрын
very good video, so much thanks
@inagalic6481 Жыл бұрын
Amazing video! Thank you for the explanation ❤
@frank_n1ng Жыл бұрын
Good job! A very clear explanation.
@sepidehsepehri Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much. I was nervous about my spectroscopy exam cuz I didn't understand these concepts well, but now I understand much better by your explanation.
@sepidehsepehri Жыл бұрын
thank you so much for the great explanation
@JohnVKaravitis Жыл бұрын
Aaron, love your videos. Well-produced, informative, and to the point. Thank you.
@stauffap Жыл бұрын
Nice explanation. Thank you for sharing this. This made it really easy to understand those previously mysterious Einstein coefficients. I kept coming across those with regards to radiative transfer and line shapes, but didn't really understand them.
@stauffap Жыл бұрын
I've never come across a nicer explanation of this. Thank you! It's very understandable.
@alilotfyelawady5599 Жыл бұрын
Really amazing, from great explanation and analogy to precise and rigorous foundations. So, Thanks!!
@rosenberg1419 Жыл бұрын
Thanks! Finally I find a clear explanation of the concept!
@Stiftoad Жыл бұрын
I love considering how people might've discovered these phenomena. Because obviously we're learning from the motion of the electron upwards but scientists probably noticed noisy current out of the resistor and tested different environments to discover it's cause. Fucking love that.
@Coffeemugs4chicken Жыл бұрын
Amazing! Many thanks for uploading this, Aaron. It was very helpful.