11 сағат бұрын
12 сағат бұрын
2 сағат бұрын
2 сағат бұрын
9 сағат бұрын
12 сағат бұрын
14 сағат бұрын
14 сағат бұрын
16 сағат бұрын
16 сағат бұрын
19 сағат бұрын
21 сағат бұрын
Күн бұрын
14 күн бұрын
14 күн бұрын
14 күн бұрын
14 күн бұрын
14 күн бұрын
14 күн бұрын
21 күн бұрын
Пікірлер
@Proportions34 5 сағат бұрын
I saw so much blueprint catia videos on youtube. However, ıwant ask this, what's the better blueprint software ? I want do draw and design F-16 and MMU Kaan TF-X 3D. But ı not desicion which can ı use design software. I think catia is bad about this job. is it? What's your think?
@3DComparison 3 сағат бұрын
Hello, I would pick Fusion 360 for the F-16 design. You will find many references videos regarding this.
@dacarrier5443 9 сағат бұрын
Sir plz uploaded piping module video..how to used...
@3DComparison 8 сағат бұрын
Thank you for the comment. My experience regarding Piping in CATIA V5 is quite limited as I mostly use other workbenches from it. But I can try to approach some of the features and create some videos.
@dacarrier5443 7 сағат бұрын
@@3DComparison thank you..because this domin have not enough video for youtube
@rafetizgici8806 13 сағат бұрын
Hi i have to ask a question, I v same problem for point size i think that the problem related to resolution. Could you help me please?
@3DComparison 12 сағат бұрын
Hello, I will make a new video today regarding this. There are some changes that can be done to change the point size.
@rafetizgici8806 6 сағат бұрын
@@3DComparisonThanks, I will be waiting for it. Also, whole icons (pad,pocket and etc. ) seems as blurred. My screen has a high resolution (higher than 1920x1080).
@rafetizgici8806 6 сағат бұрын
@@3DComparison Especially, when i was sketchin in part design module, points are so small for example; When i am trying to user pattern a hole with sketch, i need to use point by clicking but these points are really really look small.
@stuartp2006 Күн бұрын
"Do a bevel, use the scroll wheel to increase bevel subdivisions" - 10 second video
@3DComparison Күн бұрын
This video was mostly intended for CAD users. And applying a fillet in CAD is completly different. Also within a 10 video second you can't discuss additional parameters associated with bevel. Bevel substitudes both Chamfer and Fillet from CAD solutions.
@AR-wy2dz 2 күн бұрын
Very useful video
@3DComparison 2 күн бұрын
Glad you think so! Thank you for taking time to write a comment! This helps me grow my channel!
@nishanttekade4187 3 күн бұрын
Can you take offline coaching for solidwork
@3DComparison 3 күн бұрын
Hello, I can do 1 on 1 coaching using screen share / microphone. Consider to give me an email at [email protected] with more details of you specific needs. Are interested in Part Design/Assembly/Drafting or other more complex workbenches such as Sheet Metal /Surface Design / Mold tools or others.
@dqson7502 4 күн бұрын
30 years of innovation and solidworks runs like crap on my work pc with 1070ti, how in the world did they run this in the 90s?
@3DComparison 3 күн бұрын
I agree, I still use SolidWorks 2021 on my PC with 970 and I rarely encounter problems. Do you receive Graphical Card notifications within SolidWorks Resource Monitor? Usually SolidWorks requires RAM and that's the bottle neck, not the VRAM of the GPU (if you are not rendering or applying shaders elements within the viewport). I have addressed your comment in my recent video - kzbin.info/www/bejne/j4epq36AeMesrJI
@dqson7502 3 күн бұрын
@@3DComparison it's pretty good I'm probably exaggerating a little. I usually only experience lag and occasionally crashing on larger assemblies. My PC at work has 16 gigs of ram, gets the job done well forsure just wish sometimes things would load quicker and whatnot at work. Makes me wonder how it was way back when. Cool video by the way, I just graduated for mechanical engineering and found it very interesting how the software looked a long time ago.
@3DComparison Күн бұрын
Congratulations on graduating with a degree in mechanical engineering! I graduated in 2010 and SolidWorks hasn't really changed much since then, CATIA V5 even less!
@Proportions34 4 күн бұрын
Could you share expert user or admin user catia settings ? It may be useful for many people. Example: PDF settings, IGS settings, DXF file settings, Create a Drafting special standard and content. 3D iso standard Thank you for all videos. I'm following you every time. Although, Even if I don't write a comment.
@3DComparison 3 күн бұрын
Thank you very much for taking the time to write a comment, it means a lot for the KZbin algorithm. I will make videos regarding this within the near future as there are many settings and changes that need to be done differently then the defaults CATIA V5 settings for each file format.
@3DComparison 6 күн бұрын
For some reason all my recent shorts are muted.
@hussainaleid4389 7 күн бұрын
Cool command to use!
@hussainaleid4389 7 күн бұрын
I just started using this great command lately, and now I can use it more effectively after watching this video. Thank you so much!
@3DComparison 7 күн бұрын
Than you very much for the comment! You are one of my most active subscribers! Glad you find my video useful!
@imtiazmnzr1816 8 күн бұрын
Bravo! Very clear explanation. I have learnt more from your tutorials specially surface modeling. I have a question to ask.
@3DComparison 8 күн бұрын
Thanks for the comment! Let me know what is your question and I will address it within a following video!
@imtiazmnzr1816 8 күн бұрын
@@3DComparison thank you. Can you please plz make a detail video about how to add part no. heat treatment, surface treatment and related part notes as parameters in a geometrical set ? I have worked on many cad models which includes all details as parameters in geometrical set. But I didnt succeed to do it by myself.
@imtiazmnzr1816 8 күн бұрын
@@3DComparison if you plz provide your email so I can share SS of the said part specs tree.
@3DComparison 9 күн бұрын
For some reason my latest shorts are muted
@hanifarsalan4743 9 күн бұрын
what tools do you use
@3DComparison 9 күн бұрын
This has been polygonal modeled in Blender, then imported as a mesh to Catia.
@SomeRandomNerdYo 9 күн бұрын
Excellent! Thank you!
@3DComparison 9 күн бұрын
You are welcome! Thank you for the comment!
@souravdas1751 9 күн бұрын
Why is it called split. It should be called trim
@3DComparison 9 күн бұрын
The naming in CATIA V5 is weird. I agree that this mostly trims.
@mohadeseasgari4409 10 күн бұрын
Thank you for your good training
@3DComparison 10 күн бұрын
Thank you for your kind comment!
@hoilamchi 14 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@3DComparison 14 күн бұрын
Thanks for the comment
@3DComparison 15 күн бұрын
*Beijing Bird's Nest
@naderzamani5752 16 күн бұрын
Nice video 3DComparison, I learned some good points which I did not know.
@3DComparison 16 күн бұрын
Glad to hear that! Thank you for the comment!
@MrMargaretScratcher 18 күн бұрын
I just found this out too. Hopefully it gets added back in, or it can be an addon.
@3DComparison 18 күн бұрын
It is weird that the decided to remove it.
@mustafatemiz1850 19 күн бұрын
Thank you for the video. You are the best.
@3DComparison 19 күн бұрын
Thank you, I will address the trim feature in detail tomorrow!
@mustafatemiz1850 20 күн бұрын
Hello first of all thank you for all of your videos. Could you make a tutorial for trim command in Generative shape design sometimes using it can be hard and I am having a hard time using it? Thank you.
@3DComparison 20 күн бұрын
Hello, thank you for the comment and for the support! I will make a video regarding GSD Trim tool next.
@ligistinuswastaken 22 күн бұрын
i love you
@3DComparison 22 күн бұрын
Glad you enjoy this content! Thx for the comment!
@Andrx_edits 23 күн бұрын
Bro is it Lego?
@3DComparison 22 күн бұрын
Yes! Lego Technic.
@quochaihaikahai4309 25 күн бұрын
Maybe your video isn't for everyone, but it helps some people like me make a decision. Thanks so much!
@3DComparison 25 күн бұрын
Thanks you very much for the comment! It helped me decide to go for 64gb instead of 32 for my laptop! Glad you find it useful!
@futballerxx14 25 күн бұрын
Any overclocking / undervolting?
@3DComparison 25 күн бұрын
No, this was done with the default factory settings for the laptop.
@futballerxx14 24 күн бұрын
@@3DComparison All good, I thought this was Cinebench 2024...and that was GPU at 29k haha - I'm getting similar settings, but I did undervolt and now getting a little higher numbers ... waiting for it to finish
@jamesriley5057 25 күн бұрын
It's no longer a feature in 4.2 What am I missing
@3DComparison 25 күн бұрын
I haven't noticed that they remove it WRL file import in Blender 4.2. Guess they considered that it's a legacy file format and is no longer used/needed. Thanks for the comment, this is an interesting find!
@jamesriley5057 25 күн бұрын
@@3DComparison I found it under extensions rather than add-ons. Thanks for the reply!
@parthtiwari3529 26 күн бұрын
Thanks for the help mr.3d comparison!!! You did a great job explaining it so simply🥰
@3DComparison 26 күн бұрын
Thank you very much for the comment! Glad you enjoyed it!
@surject 27 күн бұрын
Dude, why so complicated. Just install GS and add the lib folder to "Path" - DONE! No need to extract, combine bin+lib, create c:\gs and the gs sys env variable, semicolon divider, nvidia line (wtf?) etc. etc.
@3DComparison 27 күн бұрын
Thanks for the feedback, didn't knew it works only by adding the lib folder.
@GalaxyofArt Ай бұрын
Thank you so much. It works for 4.2.0
@3DComparison Ай бұрын
Great! Thanks for the comment!
@Pol-Torres-Campos Ай бұрын
nice
@3DComparison Ай бұрын
Thanks for the comment!
@Pol-Torres-Campos Ай бұрын
@@3DComparison Actually very useful
@Proportions34 Ай бұрын
Thank you for prepared this video by you and for my question answer. Everythinks ok. But, if we using surface standard parts, will have light assembly and faster catia. Can we say this?
@3DComparison Ай бұрын
Yes, using surfaces makes it lighter overall, but for various applications it is easier to work with solid bodies. You can always generate the surfaces starting from solid bodies using the multiple extract feature.
@cadcaetutorial2039 Ай бұрын
Great sir
@3DComparison Ай бұрын
Thank you!
@cadcaetutorial2039 Ай бұрын
So good sir
@3DComparison Ай бұрын
Thanks for the comment!
@cadcaetutorial2039 Ай бұрын
Amazing this lecture sir
@3DComparison Ай бұрын
Glad you find it useful!
@cadcaetutorial2039 Ай бұрын
So perfect sir
@3DComparison Ай бұрын
Thank you for the comment!
@Proportions34 Ай бұрын
I want to ask you a question about catia. Question 1: Does having only a solid model of a standard part, such as a bolt, or having all the features under the model make the catia file lighter? Which one is useful for large assemblies? 2. Question: Is it lighter and more performant if the same standard part, such as a bolt, is a solid model or just a surface model?
@3DComparison Ай бұрын
Hello, that is a very good question. I have decided to give this a try and see what files are lighter and offer better performance. I have addressed this within my recent video - kzbin.info/www/bejne/laeUfGhsatGshc0. I have also compared CATIA V5 to SolidWorks in terms of STEP file usage and CATIA has the stronger lead regarding this.
@maikol4ever731 Ай бұрын
doesn't work on blender 4.1.1, i switched to blender 4.1 thank you for the tutorial man
@3DComparison Ай бұрын
Glad it helped!
@derek4613 Ай бұрын
How did you do this. Show me
@3DComparison Ай бұрын
Hello, I have made a video regarding this. This time I used CATIA as the CAD software. kzbin.info/www/bejne/rX-qaJSnisafb7c here is the workflow presented within a previous video kzbin.info/www/bejne/pGiVma2XZrF8p8k
@derek4613 Ай бұрын
@@3DComparison In what format do you save? In SolidWorks?
@nexnca Ай бұрын
this helped thanks
@3DComparison Ай бұрын
Glad to hear! I also prefer to use SolidWorks for these type of tracing operations compared to CATIA V5 or Fusion 360. You can also use vectors to automate this.
@nexnca Ай бұрын
@@3DComparison oh ok thanks :)
@futballerxx14 Ай бұрын
Which Scar was this? 4090?
@3DComparison Ай бұрын
The ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 18 G834JYR-R6087. This is my current laptop.
@humourunified Ай бұрын
Thanks
@ronancunin4791 Ай бұрын
great video thanks
@3DComparison Ай бұрын
Thanks for the comment!
@fardin5059 Ай бұрын
Hi,which workbench is this?
@3DComparison Ай бұрын
Hello, it is DMU Optimizer.
@HK-yo4se Ай бұрын
LoL CATIA V5 Tutorials in 2024.... love it if you company still uses CATIA V5 you should think about leaving. Damn you as well still the purple background, it feels like it is 2007
@3DComparison Ай бұрын
The majority of companies are still using CATIA V5 in various countries in Europe. I am curios where are you from, since 3D Experience hasn't been adopted yet by all companies around the world for various reasons.
@omergulluoglu3007 Ай бұрын
Thank you very much for this. I kept getting oval shapes and I searched for a solution for hours before coming across this video.
@3DComparison Ай бұрын
Glad it helped! This is the reason why I decided to create this kind of videos! Thanks for the comment! it means a lot since I rarely get comments on my videos!
@lowsparks6140 Ай бұрын
what are the licenses that are you using ?
@3DComparison Ай бұрын
V5 R2017
@shayanshabani Ай бұрын
thanks for sharing!
@3DComparison Ай бұрын
Thanks for the comment
@shayanshabani Ай бұрын
@@3DComparison i want to buy this laptop for blender, is it good and ok? Because i had a pc 5 months ago that was 14900k 4090 and have some issues like blue screen and crashes while cycle rendering also unreal engine 5 have some crashes problem!
@3DComparison Ай бұрын
Hello, I use this laptop for Blender and UE5 and I haven't encounter any major problems with it so far. I haven't render in cycles a lot, but UE5 works great!
@ulungprabowo Ай бұрын
Thank you so much for the video. I am used to do everything in Catia, how difficult to switch to Fusion 360? What are the fundamental differences?
@3DComparison Ай бұрын
Hello, Thanks for the comment. I also prefer to use CATIA as this is the CAD solution that I learned during my studies, but Fusion 360 offers better workflows in some cases. CATIA V5 is still far superior when dealing with Surface Design. I would suggest that it is good to learn multiple CAD solutions and Fusion is quite a good solution option as it is available for free to hobbyist.