Stickster

Пікірлер

@kmac. 13 күн бұрын

Hey I know this video is a little bit old but I'd love to get your input if I can. I created a drum multi with each drum as a separate program going to different outputs. Works great! But I'm hitting one limitation, and maybe I'm just not setting things up right. If I want to apply fx to all of the programs in the multi, I've tried doing it by using the mixer aux sends/master track. The issue there is that the effect will output on the main out. So if I mute one of the outputs in my DAW, it still comes through the main out where all the drums are sent to. As a workaround ill just use other effects in the DAW but there's a few built into Falcon that would be nice to have. Maybe there's a better way for me to set things up?

@stickster 2 күн бұрын

I believe I understand what you're running into. Presumably, you're routing your individual programs from the multi starting with Out 2, and only the auxes are going to the mains. Of course, you could perform any muting operations using automations. Choose the mute on the specific drum Program(s) you're concerned with, and attach them to a free Host Automation lane. Now you can automate your track so Falcon mutes the right things at the right time. This won't help if you're trying to manually mute programs while mixing or auditioning, though. (You could do the above, and monkey with the automation but that's awkward.) You could try: (1) mute/unmute using the Falcon interface, rather than your DAW (easiest solution); (2) assign the Program mute(s) in Falcon to MIDI CCs that your MIDI controller issues already for track mute(**); or (3) if your DAW is capable of producing Open Sound Control (OSC) or MIDI messages from the DAW track mute control, you might control Falcon from that. (**) This may be error prone so I'd only consider this a stopgap to be used temporarily. Typically controllers have a "window" of tracks they control, and if that window doesn't stay precisely lined up -- for instance if you navigate around to other tracks using the controller -- you'll experience problems.

@markfernandez2187 15 күн бұрын

Anyone here knows how to save the presets externally? It says it has to use the "sysex tx". I'm quite unsure how to do it using midi ox. I'm afraid I'll lose all the presets I have mapped for days and nights. This midi controller works for me but it lacks software support.

@stickster 15 күн бұрын

@@markfernandez2187 most MIDI librarian software works basically the same. You set the librarian software to receive sysex from a device, then on the device you trigger the transmission (dump or Tx) from its menu system. I don't use MIDI Ox but maybe someone else does.

@markfernandez2187 15 күн бұрын

@stickster thank you for your response. So it would the transmission remember the order of the presets and the name of the preset once I load the ".sys" file (If that's what it is called hehe) My first midi controller was M audio code . I never had problems with saving presets because of the software editor. It is my first time to deal with sysex transmission.

@leonprofes8544 18 күн бұрын

Please help me out understand this. I am literally going crazy in my mind. I fail to see the difference. At the beginning of your video, you have a Synth sound fed to Delay which is then fed into the Reverb. Serial processing so to speak. Let me call this Scenario 1. And then you say how sometimes you want a dry sound to be processed with a Delay only. And Dry sound being processed with a Reverb only. Therefore you introduce effect racks with their "parallel" processing. Let me call this Scenario 2. What I want to understand ultimately is how this is different from Scenario 1. Because at some point your Scenario 2 (parallel processors) are ultimately being summed into one output in the mixer. So each processor, or both of them if you will are being "heard" at one output mixed together with a Dry sound. How the hell is this different from Scenario 1? In my mind, I understand I can get the same sound if carefully tweak the Dry and Wet controls on Delay and Reverb from Scenario 1. No? Ultimatively the only difference is in Scenario 2 is that you get "finer" controls to work with on the left side (tree) at the expense of a more convoluted workflow but in the sense of the sound you could end up with exactly the same sound in both scenarios Because even in your Scenario 2 the output of these two effect rack are mixed and summed with Dry signal and all goes into output. No? Do I think this incorrectly?

@stickster 18 күн бұрын

In scenario 1, the delay is treated with reverb, with each echo passing through the reverb so they are heard through the hall, so to speak. In scenario 2, the delay echoes do not pass through the reverb. You will still hear the echoes, but they are *dry* and do not pass through the hall. The difference here is subtle but indeed it exists, and depending on your choice of parallel effects the difference in other cases will not sound as subtle.

@leonprofes8544 17 күн бұрын

@@stickster I understand what you are saying. And thanks for your response. I figured this much alone. But follow me and tell me what is wrong with my mind? Because every time I start thinking about this I am ending up in same logic. So in Scenario 1 Echoed sound is fed into Reverb. And then output. In Scenario 2 Echoed sound is individual (controlled by effect rack and volume of it), so Is Reverb sound controlled by Effect rack. What is confusing to me is that even though they are in effect rack, they are still ending up being mixed with the Dry sound at the output of a Effect rack thus making them exactly same sounding like in Scenario 1. The only difference soundwise is workflow. Or not??

@stickster 15 күн бұрын

@@leonprofes8544 they are literally and demonstrably *not* the same. They will sound similar, as I explained. Because the delay echoes can get lost in the reverb due to their relative volume, but not actually processed through it. This is simply a listening artifact of specific settings, not the same result. Here's a thought experiment. Set up an effect rack with dry chain #1, a delay with high feedback and a long timing on chain #2, and a reverb with small size android short decay time on #3. Now process through this chain a simple patch with a very short or zero release time. You're going to hear what I'm describing, in a highly overemphasized way. You'll hear the patch, the short reverb behind it for a short time, and then very dry echoes of the patch for a long time. None of those echoes will sound like they're in the same space with the original patch, which you hear in a small space thanks to the reverb. If you processed them serially without the effect rack, you'd hear the echoes in the same space as the dry patch. Similarly, in what I demonstrated, if you listen critically, or change some settings to emphasize the difference, you'll hear that the delay echoes sound "in front" of the patch and reverb when using this parallel mix, whereas using the serial version, they'll seem to occupy the same space. I highly recommend that you try this yourself to prove the theory.

@leonprofes8544 14 күн бұрын

@@stickster I tried and I hear a difference. It's not even subtle. You are correct. It was just my silly mind and my inability to understand this until I tried it and compared it. Thanks again. Appreciate your effort in explaining.

@RodneyRicoWillis Ай бұрын

great vid. I have a question. how did you rename your "New Program" to "UVI Falcon - Osc Demo?"

@stickster Ай бұрын

@@RodneyRicoWillis to do that, just save the program. By the way, it will be saved by default in your User Presets > Programs folder.

@marcotronic Ай бұрын

Excellent tutorial. Thanks a lot!

@stickster Ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@ricshaw4358 Ай бұрын

nice

@rinzai543 Ай бұрын

Very interesting. There are many sequencers in Falcon, but the documentation is often lacking and seeing working examples is very helpful. Maybe, if you have some time and energy, could you create and show us a full generative Falcon patch, using some of its sequencers?

@fucorophnus6121 Ай бұрын

welcome back man! gj

@michaelm5926 2 ай бұрын

Top video! Thanks. On point, please do more of these Falcon tutorials.

@ELEKTROGOWK 2 ай бұрын

How can I comfortably see my own User Library in the browser without going into the directory folder ever time? Can I build a Soundware library with my own picture?

@stickster Ай бұрын

Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately the format used for the soundware is proprietary and you can't get your own programs or multis into that area without working directly with UVI.

@ajayrajkumar3505 2 ай бұрын

I see your view count is still growing but I really hope you keep making videos because you are one of my favourite KZbin content creators for music production!

@rayderrich 2 ай бұрын

You may have noticed from my recent videos I am a pretty seasoned programmer, and I never thought about generating or modifying Falcon data like this. Very cool idea and a great quality talk.

@FrankMaurits69 3 ай бұрын

I was a fan of UVI long before Falcon. They then had the Workstation, but it was much more than a player as it is today. It was more the pre-thought of Falcon, with synths inside and very deep. I was SOOO disappointed when they took those features out that I never looked at UVI again. But in the last couple of years I started a new interest and today went for Falcon 3.1. Must say it's a long way from the old Workstation synth, but man I am already loving it. Thanks for the tip on the Effectrack.

@stickster 2 ай бұрын

@@FrankMaurits69 UVI Workstation still exists!

@FrankMaurits69 2 ай бұрын

@@stickster Yes, I know, I have it installed as well 🙂 But a long long time ago in a galaxy far away there was a different UVI Workstation. In that ancient version there was for instance also a fully featured sampler, you could create your own instruments and not just play soundware. The current Workstation is nice and offers a lot, but a lot was taken out also. It's been so long ago, I think early 2000 or so, I don't even remember what was in it. But I do remember being very disappointed when they took stuff out. They were preparing to launch the first Falcon, so they dumbed down the player version.

@arnaubrichs 3 ай бұрын

Video idea: mpe multi-tracked filters and related tricks!

@rinzai543 3 ай бұрын

Good patch!

@eduardoguerrero2298 3 ай бұрын

Esxcelente, muchas gracias!

@malikmartin 4 ай бұрын

Wow… I had no idea what I’d bought!!! Thanks for sharing!!

@deinvorbild6991 4 ай бұрын

Falcon is sooooo deep and endless. Always explore new ways and effects. Its just awesome. Hav ent used another vsti since i got it a year ago. Except deep fm mods, that arent possible with falcon. Btw great videos! I watch them all. Maybe share my fi dings withinalconwith the world 😁💪

@Dimitripetry 5 ай бұрын

💥

@daviHuggMonster 6 ай бұрын

weee nice. Keep doing these in your own pace. I am very patient. Still a big noob in Falcon tho I am on sonic pass for quite a while^^

@ZETONEproductions 6 ай бұрын

Is there preview for presets when Browning in Falcon these days.?

@stickster 6 ай бұрын

@@ZETONEproductions No, although the fact that a patch fits into a Part makes it kind of unnecessary. You can always load a patch into a Part with other Parts more and try it out without messing up your existing sound design.

@ZETONEproductions 6 ай бұрын

@@stickster hmm not sure What u mean .. but if u just Wanna Preview the presets without loading it ,, some presets in Falcon takes pretty long time to load if you compare to other heavy vsts, like omnisphere or avenger for example .. if you fast wanna find sounds i must say that falcon is a pretty bad in that matter …

@FrankMaurits69 3 ай бұрын

The 3.1 update features this: preview sounds/packs from the browser

@Digitalman42 6 ай бұрын

Thanks for a great video series. This video convinced me to buy a nearly new MOTÖR. I wasn't sure how or if it would work in my studio, but after watching this video, I knew it would.

@birdsiview6845 6 ай бұрын

There’s just not enough time anymore to procrastinate !

@nicksrstka 7 ай бұрын

Fantastic! Very easy to follow and the sound came out great! Keep ‘em coming please! I really enjoy synth lead sounds, so any video like this for a sound like that would be awesome.

@itinerantghost 7 ай бұрын

Really cool!

@tomd-y6y 7 ай бұрын

Is there any way to do this with fx? Say you have reverb and want to duck it when a midi note is playing?

@stickster 7 ай бұрын

Should work fine -- just assign the modulation to the output gain of the reverb, or alternately follow the FX with a simple Gain effect and modulate it instead.

@tomd-y6y 7 ай бұрын

@@stickster Awesome, thank you :)

@trippypixel3830 8 ай бұрын

Amazing video! i Have been trying to fumble my way around falcon for a while. I downloaded your preset and got a break is missing error, added my own into the slice osc but it does not play I know I am probably doing something incorrect any ideas on how to get it to work?

@stickster 8 ай бұрын

The sample is not one of mine and thus not redistributable, apologies for that. It's hard for me to diagnose without a video or having your patch in front of me. Of course make sure you're using the most up-to-date Falcon. Check that the slice oscillator is mapped across the keyboard. Slice the sample up with user markers or however you prefer, so there are enough slices. Feel free to send a patch link and I can check it for you, it's not too big a channel for me to offer help. ;-)

@issiewizzie 8 ай бұрын

well appreciated

@TheFujac 8 ай бұрын

ha...this is brilliant!!! now i know how to add delays and reverbs at the keygroup level

@stickster 8 ай бұрын

Be careful doing that. While it seems like it may work because the architecture allows it, if you don't manage voices carefully you'll likely crash Falcon. And even if you do manage them carefully, you still might. 😂 There's a reason they don't allow those things at keygroup level!

@TheFujac 8 ай бұрын

@@stickster interesting....ill be sure to save often and will remember this if i encounter crashes.

@basssam8422 9 ай бұрын

Gracias

@basssam8422 9 ай бұрын

Cómo hago para que ese mapeo se guarde en pro tool,por que cada vez que lo cierro y vuelvo abrir el programa tengo que realizar el mapeo nuevamente

@stickster 9 ай бұрын

See other comments. Make sure you save the preset on your Behringer controller using the Preset menu. Pro Tools does save its configuration immediately.

@kimmolaine665 9 ай бұрын

Very nice. More of these 'how to recreate real life sounds' please

@spaceiswater6539 9 ай бұрын

Another awesome video thank you so much for your time in helping us to learn UVI Falcon 3.

@daviHuggMonster 9 ай бұрын

woaaa happy to find your channel. Even searching in youtube did not show up your videos,kinda odd...subbed.

@stickster 9 ай бұрын

Thanks so much! Welcome all Falconistas and creators in general 🙂

@itinerantghost 9 ай бұрын

Such a powerful beast! Always appreciate your videos! I still haven't delved into Multis but it is something I want to try to see if I can get a track going with one or a few of those and nothing else. Not there yet!

@spaceiswater6539 9 ай бұрын

Your videos and they way you explain how to do stuff is so easy to understand I want to say thank you so much in creating them please keep them coming.

@stickster 9 ай бұрын

That is very kind of you to say, thanks! More will be coming! 👍🏻

@ZorinA-cp1kn 9 ай бұрын

Well, it is nice to see your explanation, thank you, but then I have a question: Falcon, is it a synth or a DAW? Because I have the feeling that tries to be both and I am not sure if I am a fan of that. I have the feeling that when it tries to be both the things start to be "lost in the mix". And probably that is one of the reasons why Falcon is such a computer resources hog, it tries to be more than it should, overstepping the DAW. You were talking at he beginning about "how ridiculously infinite the possibilities of Falcon are", with all due respect I disagree with that, and if you think that I may be subjective when saying that, my computer and your computer will disagree with that, because they have a very finite amount of resources.

@stickster 9 ай бұрын

The Mixer view is simply a convenient way to look at the audio and effects options at the Multi level. Everything I showed can be done through the Main view and (for example) the left Tree pane. Falcon isn't trying to be a DAW any more than any other flagship synth. One might as well say having on board EQ is trying to be a DAW! 😁 As for limits, they are down to your computer's CPU. There are very few limits imposed by the design of Falcon itself, unlike many other synths that are in the same price range. I own a lot of software synths, and Falcon is by far one of the most efficient. Of course as you pile on additional architecture and effects, you can run into those limits. It's such a great tool to have for sound design, and it's amazing that it can adapt to numerous purposes.

@Purgatorium8 9 ай бұрын

Falcon this underrated ecosystem! It is true that it is not easy to use because it was made by programmers, not musicians :/ Great video, more and moore and mooore... lalalalala :)

@stickster 9 ай бұрын

I don't know if I agree that the programmers weren't musicians. It's hard to make a worthwhile synthesizer without also having a musician's ear, and the UVI folks are very talented. Falcon may not look as flashy as some other synths, but it makes it very easy to create good sounds fast!

@Purgatorium8 9 ай бұрын

Even if it is not very easy, you can learn it, but until then you cannot concentrate on the joy of creating. At least that's how it is for me.

@stickster 9 ай бұрын

@@Purgatorium8 make sure to check out the official UVI getting started videos. They helped me a lot when I got started. Also Venus Theory has some fantastic Falcon videos too.

@victorventura1006 9 ай бұрын

Can i open a clean Falcon import a Sample ( wav file ) i cut and import to Falcon, ok i can put Delay Reverb and can i put the Sample with Arpeggiator ou sequence ? I drag the Arp but when i play the sample in Keyboard dont have Arpeggiator

@stickster 9 ай бұрын

I'm not sure I understand the problem you're seeing. You can absolutely use the arpeggiator with your sample. I just tested it this way. I didn't put any delay or reverb on it since it's not important to the example: 1. Drag sample onto the mapping to make a Sample oscillator with the sample in it. 2. At either the Layer or the Program level, under Event, add an Arpeggiator of choice. (I used the standard Arpeggiator and chose Line > Bass Line.) 3. Hold down any key and I hear the arpeggiation, and can watch it happening. What are you doing differently?

@mattkomlofske8912 9 ай бұрын

I just started using Falcon and Phase Plant recently. Phase Plant clicked with me quite easily, but I was initially put off by Falcon due to the unintuitive interface. Your videos are really helping me get my head around this amazing sounding piece of software.

@ytb917 9 ай бұрын

this technique does make the synthesizer sound more like a classic analog polysynth.

@stickster 9 ай бұрын

Thanks! There are a number of techniques I use to mimic oscillator drift and this is just one. At some point I'll make a video with some others. Hopefully others will share their techniques too.

@gesslr 9 ай бұрын

Brilliant.

@stickster 9 ай бұрын

Sincere thanks! 🙏🏻

@piggosalternateaccount4917 9 ай бұрын

These videos are absolutely fantastic!!!! Thank you SO much, great audio for your narration too!

@stickster 9 ай бұрын

Thank you so much! 🙏🏻

@smyrnian_ 9 ай бұрын

It's a shame macros can only be on/off and continuous. Would be nice to use specific values, like delay time in 1/8 or 1/8T etc..

@stickster 9 ай бұрын

@smyrnian_ do you mean the way the macro value is displayed on the Info page, or do you mean how it acts on a patch?

@stickster 9 ай бұрын

@smyrnian_ When using stepped values (like tempo), I don't believe there's an easy way to get the stepped value to display in the macro's value -- not without writing some custom Lua scripts at least, which may not be worth the time. But the macro itself will work fine, adjusting the stepped values behind the scenes. By the way, you can also create stepped values "behind the scenes" on any macro by using a mapper (and turning off interpolation) to step the values that get transmitted to the macro's modulation destination.

@CARLOSCHAVARROBOHORQUEZ 9 ай бұрын

Hi; thanks for explain every function. I would know if is possible amke the same tutorial on FL Studio, please

@stickster 9 ай бұрын

Sorry, we don't use FL Studio at our studio. But the concept of setting up MIDI controllers here should give you all the information you need to set it up.

@Unibabble 9 ай бұрын

Had to watch the part about using the unison event processor a couple times to really get it - so the Unison event processor can be thought of as a "cloner"; which reproduces a signal X times (X being the number of voices selected). On its own, you just get X times the signal amplitude, but if you use it to modulate pitch; you get X instances of the signal spread symmetrically across the specified pitch range.

@stickster 9 ай бұрын

You nailed it.

@Unibabble 9 ай бұрын

Nice the way those tuned noise oscillators added tat texture. Very cool.

@Unibabble 9 ай бұрын

That is very, very clever! Nice work.

@JumpingCow 10 ай бұрын

Excellent. Thanks.

Ең жақсы KZbin

Пікірлер