Simple yet 5000 years missed ?
13:48
The best A - A ≠ 0 paradox
24:48
Secrets of the lost number walls
36:37
Why is calculus so ... EASY ?
38:32
The ultimate tower of Hanoi algorithm
39:23
Пікірлер
@CoollHwhip
@CoollHwhip 19 сағат бұрын
9 is the number for consciousness 😊
@davidhand9721
@davidhand9721 Күн бұрын
There's a guy on KZbin that thinks continued fractions like this explain all of physics, Gavin Wince. The numerology is strong with that one.
@davidhand9721
@davidhand9721 Күн бұрын
I hate numerology so much. Learn another number base, any other number base, and whatever neat little coincidence you've got disappears.
@Thankingyou1
@Thankingyou1 Күн бұрын
Why didn't you use simpler examples? You started out with a great video then your examples are way too complicated.
@Thankingyou1
@Thankingyou1 Күн бұрын
You made a great video but your first example is Way too Complicated.
@DesignBySish
@DesignBySish Күн бұрын
What do you think about Terrence Howard´s theories?
@kafiruddinmulhiddeen2386
@kafiruddinmulhiddeen2386 Күн бұрын
My son came up with the algebraic proof (second one in this video) by himself after around a day of staring at his piece of paper
@derekangel7845
@derekangel7845 Күн бұрын
Your research makes complete sense. This proves that black holes aren't sucking light out, they're projecting darkness inward by bending around the outside of our space and then getting pulled around and then sucked inside our space from a light vacuum. The "event horizon" is the light in which we see pulling this dark matter into our space. Make sense?
@stevefrandsen7897
@stevefrandsen7897 Күн бұрын
Brilliant and fun video
@donwald3436
@donwald3436 2 күн бұрын
Proof by contradiction: 1. assume false statement 2. handwave 3. contradiction QED lol.
@donwald3436
@donwald3436 2 күн бұрын
The youtube doors are locked? I want to leave! Let me out!!!!!
@noellwilson1273
@noellwilson1273 2 күн бұрын
I’m not sure about the “magic” and the “400 years” but I’m 81, grew up with a slide rule, and still think they are wonderful. As you partly mentioned, logs 1614 by Napier, Log Scale 1620 by Gunter, “sliding scales” in 1622 by Oughtred, and circular sliding scales in 1622(or 1632?) by Oughtred. So, in 20-30 years, we had most of the magic. By the 1960’s we had straight 10” slide rules with 32 scales for, almost, everything (Pickett N3). Unfortunately, we had to wait 400 years for the animated Power Point presentation that makes it jump out at you.
@NonTwinBrothers
@NonTwinBrothers 2 күн бұрын
2:24 Just in case KZbin deletes my comment with a link on it, I found A solution to the Red Cross puzzle in Desmos. I put a link to the graph on my channel about page. Still not sure if it's THE unique solution (I was ready to like, categorize every possible cut you could take haha). Another day perhaps!!
@valherustinger7848
@valherustinger7848 2 күн бұрын
that diagram is a graphical representation of analogue sound
@pauselab5569
@pauselab5569 2 күн бұрын
3:00 heard it from a lot of people a bit randomly then learned it from a corollary of Gauss's lemma. come on we already had minimal polynomials 5 years ago on this channel... that's a small step away from some field theory
@faustobarbuto
@faustobarbuto 2 күн бұрын
I'm amazed that such an educational and well-elaborated video got only 15K thumbs-up in almost eight years. That makes less than 2K thumbs-up per year.
@bmaxwell7718
@bmaxwell7718 3 күн бұрын
neither one
@yiutungwong315
@yiutungwong315 3 күн бұрын
Put it Harder... In English and German... University 🎓🏫🎓🏫 Universe and Universal ♾️💍 That's Means π = 2 in Riemann Paradox and Sphere Geometry System Incorporated... 1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ... = 1 + 1 = 2 = π So 1 = 0.999... is Indeed Correct 😄😁💯🔥▶️
@yiutungwong315
@yiutungwong315 3 күн бұрын
This Made For Kids... This Channel is Excellent 💯🔥▶️
@yiutungwong315
@yiutungwong315 3 күн бұрын
Thanks For Sharing... This is Very Useful...
@yiutungwong315
@yiutungwong315 3 күн бұрын
π = 2 2Circle ⭕⭕⭕ = Square ⬜⬜⬜ In the Riemann Paradox and Sphere Geometry System Incorporated...
@Originalimoc
@Originalimoc 3 күн бұрын
Guessed it, constant width
@FabianRoling
@FabianRoling 3 күн бұрын
If you can make the paint infinitely thin, you can paint an infinite surface with finite (or actually zero) paint volume even if the surface is just a flat plane. I bet many explanations of this horn therefore technically do not even mention anything that is really special about it.
@pierrecarrette4976
@pierrecarrette4976 3 күн бұрын
What a t-shirt!
@PC_Simo
@PC_Simo 3 күн бұрын
1:21 Can we all just appreciate the fact that the 3-4-5 -triangle features both, a unit circle (as its incircle/”heart”), and a unit square (in its right-angled corner) 😮?
@PC_Simo
@PC_Simo 3 күн бұрын
2:30 Also: φ² + φ = φ² * φ 🙂.
@azadomer5273
@azadomer5273 3 күн бұрын
Cos 120 != -1, it's equal to -0.5
@artortega7230
@artortega7230 4 күн бұрын
Wow! great video. Im glad I found your channel.
@spinbulle5312
@spinbulle5312 4 күн бұрын
I might be being stupid to ask this, but i sm not able to get my head around it. Why doesn't this proof work on a perfect square like 4, n prove that root(4) is irrational (even though it isn't)? Like if u have '4x²=y²', and you place those 4 squares in the big 'Y square' in such a way that; 2 squares are lined up horizontally in the middle and 2 are lined up vertically in middle. Which will create a overlapping x² in the middle and 4 smaller square on each corner. And then the equation would be 'x²=4a²'. But as we had assumed that the inetial equation is in the smallest form, so it can't be smaller; thus it proves that our original assumption was incorrect. Hence, root(4) is irrational. How is this possible? What am I going wrong in this, that root(4) is coming irrational 😂😅.
@DeadJDona
@DeadJDona 4 күн бұрын
20:00 Y / X = √2 looks weird
@DeadJDona
@DeadJDona 4 күн бұрын
2:22 🇬🇪
@AdithyaMA-ox8it
@AdithyaMA-ox8it 4 күн бұрын
madhava of sangamagrama
@AdithyaMA-ox8it
@AdithyaMA-ox8it 4 күн бұрын
But how can ramanujan make no sense while saying infinity - 4*infinity ? Did math break there?
@tomagain
@tomagain 4 күн бұрын
Personally I like to think of mathematics as inhabited by amazing creatures that move around interacting and spawning new creatures. So I was immediately attracted to the wiper approach.
@soyezegaming
@soyezegaming 4 күн бұрын
paranormal distribution
@parsimoniousdialog
@parsimoniousdialog 5 күн бұрын
加油 Jiāyóu Lego Euler😇
@guestgreenstein4726
@guestgreenstein4726 5 күн бұрын
Color8ng proof better
@oleksandrkhomandyak3860
@oleksandrkhomandyak3860 5 күн бұрын
I don't know why but even after I read the comments and saw different videos I can't understand the interpretation of log(ab)= log(a)+log(b) :cc I understood the graphic interpretation but not the mathematical one In those moments I feel pretty dumb
@TheMichaelmorad
@TheMichaelmorad 5 күн бұрын
does every polygon inscribe a shape of constant width? does every triangle? (one which is not a circle)
@zacbergart6840
@zacbergart6840 5 күн бұрын
prefer swivel test
@taiwan153
@taiwan153 5 күн бұрын
He is the man who knew infinity ♾️ indeed
@DrJigglebones
@DrJigglebones 5 күн бұрын
swivel
@Josivis
@Josivis 5 күн бұрын
6:12 I think due to Luca sounds like a name they say it as LUCA's numbers.
@Macieks300
@Macieks300 5 күн бұрын
On my own I came up with the second proof - the coloring way. So I think I like it better. But on the other hand the swiveling method seems more elegant and less intuitive so I like it too.
@hedgeh0g7
@hedgeh0g7 5 күн бұрын
This video is just about math and nothing more. I love math but this video is boring. There are more mystical meaning behind 369. I believe this is a key for opening loops between the galaxies and time traveling.
@danielfilan8056
@danielfilan8056 5 күн бұрын
I preferred the colouring version, altho the swivel version was classier.
@thecritiquer9407
@thecritiquer9407 5 күн бұрын
❤❤❤
@christophernewton8474
@christophernewton8474 5 күн бұрын
Alternative title: every German stereotype in one video.
@39sj55
@39sj55 5 күн бұрын
0÷0=idk 😐😶😐😶😶😐😐😐😶😐😶😐😶😶😐😐😐😐😶😐😶😐😶😶😶😐😐😐😐😐😐😶😐😶😶😶😶😐😐😐😶😶😶😶😶😐😐😐😐😶😐😶😐😐😐😐😐😐😶😶😶😶😶😶😶😶😶😶😶😶😶😶😐😶😐😶😐😶😐😶😐😶😐😶😐😶😐😶😶😐😐😶😐😶😐😶😐😶😐😶😐😶😐😶😐😶😐😶😐😶😐😶😐😶😐😶
@slawomirkupiec
@slawomirkupiec 6 күн бұрын
There is a cool trick when you multiply by 9: take both of your hands: 1x9 - bend your pinkie, what you have left is 0 fingers and 9 2x9 - bend second finger and you have 1 and 8 3x9 - bend third finger and you have 2 and 7 4x9 - 3 and 6 5x9 - 4 and 5 6x9 - 5 and 4 7x9 - 6 and 3 8x9 - 7 and 2 9x9 - 8 and 1 10x9 - 9 and 0 :)