@@cobro2626 hey, yes all kinds of equatorial mounts need to be polar aligned. Otherwise the motion of your telescope will not be inline with the motion of the sky.

Cześć, używam Tłumacza Google, więc mam nadzieję, że to ma sens. Teleskop (skywatcher 200/1000 PDS) kosztuje obecnie 570 euro, a komputerowy montaż (HEQ5-pro) kosztuje 1400 euro. Aparat (zwo294mc-pro) kosztuje 1400 euro, jednak można również kupić mały element łączący, aby przymocować do niego dowolny aparat DLSR. Nie polecałbym tego już początkującemu. (ceny są oparte na rynku holenderskim)

Dziękuję za informację

@@mestermaster7611 Thanks! The maximum the HEQ-5 Pro can carry is 15kg, so theoretically yes but it is not recommended for imaging. My complete setup is about 10kg.

@Boekoe12 Thanks for the answer! I want to use it for visual observations, on planets. I would like to clarify about tracking objects, do you think there will be no problems with this? I want to buy an exos-2 or HEQ-5 pro.

@ I think pushing the weight to the max will have some tracking problems, but I don’t think I will know enough for this.

@@HR-yd5ib hi yeah the white mount it is standing on (the HEQ5) compensates for earths rotation, this gives me about 60 seconds exposure time.

its not a big problem, but finding targets with such a high focal length will be difficult.

"The Last Stand" - Andreas Waldetoft from a video game called Stellaris.

Dew heater, preventing dew from forming since I live in quite a humid environment

Hi! Yeah it’s quite a difficult decision, it is definitely possible to get amazing pictures with the 200 version. However you need to be very precise which you can see in another video what the results will be. I think my advice after using this setup for 3 years will be to go for the 150/750 version to prevent a lot of frustrations. Yes it works but a lot of times it doesn’t work ;)

@@Boekoe12 What problems you have faced with 200/1000?

@@bartoszrozanski447 currently yes, I haven’t used my telescope for imaging for at least 7 months. I have alot of artifacts in my images that look like dust/vignetting (even after cleaning my mirrors) any correction files maken it worse. Using a coma corrector gives me more problems. So I don’t know what to do anymore, and I am considering changing my 50ED into an usable refractor.

I have to save this comment for later. I have to.

@@hunter133official LOL I totally understand where you're coming from my friend...It's heavy as sh*t! But it is true!

In the beginning: -ISO 1600 -seconds where variable, because I held the exposure button myself Later: -ISO 1600 -intervelometer 30 or 60 seconds

Appreciated it, that is the reason why i made this video and the video from 2 years ago, Actual beginner pictures and what you can expect when just starting out.

Mach is the aircraft speed divided by the speed of sound. Thus high Mach is close to the speed of sound but not over it cuz otherwise we would have had an sonic boom.

@@Boekoe12 So, if it's going 700 MPH, its "high Mach" is 0.9126466 ???

@@jackriley5974 for at sea level, I would say yes.

Hey thanks for the kind words, It’s important to select your telescope on what you want to image. I love galaxies and star clusters so I bought a telescope that suits these kind of targets (think about focal length) If you like to image nebulae a wide field telescope, or just a camera lens is best. If you already have a camera you can already attempt shooting nebulae with just a tripod. Will continue later..

@@Boekoe12 Im a student so I want to go low budget first like if I buy a telescope it would be give me nebula access or no ?

@@Hanumanjikishakti5 it will, depending on the target. If you have a low budget I think just a camera + lens is a good start

i only learned last week that it's a turbo whine sound.

You can do quite a lot with just a camera and tripod, there are quite some turtorials on how to do it. Will be difficult, and won’t look as good but you can give it a try!

It is always amazing to look at the skies! Hope you will get a nice telescope :)

Hi I do not use any guiding because the setup will be to heavy. One of the disadvantages of having an 8 inch dip on a Heq5-pro. The max exposure time I use is 60 seconds. I am looking into a new guide scope tho, so maybe soon I will start guiding.

@@Boekoe12I just got an heq5pro for my 80mm refractor but I also have an 8ninch newton and was wondering if the heq5pro would be enough for the newton. I use the newton with an explorescientific exos2goto (the old version) and the max exposure time is varies from 30 seconds to 1 minute.

its an awesome telescope indeed!

The furthest object I have imagied if the data is correct could be a quaser in the M44 region, at just over 10billion ly, if the data proves wrong, it will be a galaxy some 3.2 billion ly. I use the PD version of the scope, on a he6 Pro mount. These smudges of light I find when I plate solve the image, otherwise you would hardly see them, some are so faint but once highlighted are so obvious, and to echo your words, the thought that those photons started there journey before multicellular life evolved on this planet, and haven't interacted with anything in 3 plus billion years, is mind blowing.

For planetary you like to have a high focal length, so the telescope I have is quite good. It is 8 inch, and has a focal length of a 1000mm. Could always use Barlow lenses to increase the focal length. However, to high focal length is bad, due to the moving atmosphere and you have to March your camera pixels to it. A camera for imaging needs to have high Frames Per Second, because of the moving atmosphere. So you should look into a small planetary ZWO camera like the Zwo120. If you want a telescope and camera in one, you probably should look into a dobsonian, those are quite cheap but you need too track them by yourselves.

@@Boekoe12 so you dont have exact model that you woud recomend for someone like me?

@@OperatorAron no sorry, at the astrobiscuit discord you could ask for better advice.

@@Boekoe12 good that's fine but still thanks for your help and time

Il see if I can make a video about it.

Just the 2020 images, from Feb 2021 I had the zwo294.

These pictures are taking in bortle 5 according to the website, now I live in bortle 9.

@@Boekoe12 you still do astrophotography?

@@StagnantMizu yeah if i have time left over, University is quite difficult

How can you capture your own galaxy fool... 😂😂

@@VILLANJOD_69 you can capture the the core of our galaxy.

Skywatcher 200 PDS 1000mm focal length 200mm diameter F/5 9kg

Indeed one of the bigger factors

Best of luck!

Ohoh hahahahaha nice

Hi sorry, I have never tried to image with such a method. You could and Tru to ask on the AstroBiscuit discord, I have seen people there with good results with phone imaging.

@@Boekoe12 I asked but nobody gave me an answer

@@woozii.capalot ow that’s sad to hear, did you ask in the processing section? Maybe you have better luck there.

Thanks! I have even better sunspots in this video kzbin.info/www/bejne/nGXZeIeEd7F0i9k

Basically yeah, including more exposure time calibration files and much more knowledge on how to edit such data.

@@Boekoe12 thanks for answer and perfect video

hi, i thought i had the same issue in the beginning. What you need to do is balance the teslcope itself aswel. So if you have a camera and finderscope attached the middle in between the two has to point down to the earth. If you only have a camera attached, this needs to point directly to the earth aswell.

Ty so much that fixed it. I thought I was screwed

@@Duster_1 awesome! money saved :) Its funny how no one tells how you actually balance a newtonian xD

Yea its very Nice of you to help 😃

Hi sorry for the late response, visually looking through the telescope is always very limiting due to light pollution. So if you live in a high class lightpolution, don’t expect to see much. The picture you saw was taken with a camera, and multiple images were stacked. Hence you could see a lot of detail.

@@Boekoe12 okay thanks!

that must be a hell of a time, can't imagine taking images with a black and white roll. Must be very interesting! What kind of setup are you going for?

@@Boekoe12 Starting with a modified Canon 7Ti, Rokinon 135 f2.0, Star Adventurer Pro mount. I have an Orange tube Celestron C-8 and a William Optics GT81 ill be using once I get the basics of digital astrophotography down.

@@ronwilliams7611 nice, i have been looking into the GT81 aswell but not sure if i am going for it. Also looked into a ZWO camera + Rokinon lens.

you're welcome :)