0.53 Look up the entire olympus pen ee line

Awful song in the background

Fuji film is nice , its god on the greens , but not so good on the reds like Kodak.

Seems like a good time.

mmm silver in the drain is a problem for environment because you have to extract more Ag for films but it' does not poison nor it causes pathologies. Are you able to retrieve the Ag from the solutions? I don't think so. again the "ilford method" just concentrates all the rest of fixer in a little water that will go into the drain as well while if you wash the film in current water you diluite it much more making it much less dangerous. You know water doesn't disappear from the earth once if falls into the drain. Do you keep your shit in the toilet for days until you have enough and then you flush it? I think you have rather to drink less alcholic and believe less bs about what is "environmentally friendly". results seem good anyway but I prefer add a fixer eliminator bath as safety

Thank you for this video. I just purchased one of these cameras. What speed film do you recommend? Do you know the shutter speed and aperture?

The music makes this video a tough watch. i had to give up half way through. Just drop the volume down a bit, please!

Thanks for the walkthrough. Was that Barcelona on your negative?

I love this info! I will be adding a Canonet to my collection when that Camera Trade Show comes around in Brecksville. They always have a lot of good Canonets there!

Hello, I have a Cannnet QL19, and I have a question, the lense has in the aperture in Blu color the numbers 28, 20 and 14and in Blue also in the speed 30th of a second. No idea what is their function.

The ql17giii lens is unreasonably good

Good story. Thanks. toronto canada.

Great video. Thank you

I generally adapt lenses. I use a drop-in filter adapter so I prefer EF lenses to RF lenses whenever I have the choice. I could not afford to replace all of my EF lenses with RF lenses even if I wanted to anyway.

As a Canon and MFT (Pana/ Olympus) guy, I say YES and NO. I started my photographic journey with kit lenses and entry level cameras, and when starting to have money, moved to hi-end cameras, premium, then pro lenses (Canon L, Leica, Zuiko PRO), and YES I recommend to move to pro lenses but also NO, because PRO lenses create big expectations, in terms of picture quality (I mean technical and not artistic). Meaning, it makes you focusing on details (resolution, sharpness) more than on the actual picture itself.

I decided on the Mark2 of this lens myself after owning the Sigma version. I couldn’t justify the upgrade on my R6. At some point I will upgrade if the need is truly there. I use mine for Sports and I shoot Soccer. I do like the fact that I don’t have to carry the adaptor with me and just slapping on the RF. I have a RF24-7. I did see the Sigma 105 f1.4 and was thinking I can put that on my R50 crop sensor for better low light in some places where stadium light is bad. Thoughts?

Couldn't sneak that sign past me! I know Szalay's when I see it! Awesome video!

Thanks for this!

Thanks!!

You can rotate the digital back on the camera, just switch it to the R on the right sight of the camera and rotated, you got the adapter plate. You don't have to switch to another camera, put it in the R and rotate.

I fortunately got a 70-200mm f2.8 iii on Marketplace for $900 and I was shocked the whole way back home after in person meet at how extremely clean the lenses is, now I don't have to worry about RF version in my mind with that extending tube mechanism anymore. I use for wildlife with R7 and crop is just insanely sharp. Best 70-200mm of all time.

I Love your content. Very very relatable. Speak about winning mindset in the future many photographers get stuck die to a mindset issue.

Any dude with a beard that also owns a cat - must be a pretty alright kind'a guy! I subscribed!!! Now, on your next video show us the cat.... lol.

love the angle! here for more

Interesting glass.... i use and have several smc f series glass from the pentax line. I shoot pentax so its an easy one for me. Cool video review.

I just wanted to check your channel out& though I'm not into photography it's interesting to see how you approach your Occupation,and as I suspected ,I enjoyed it because I believe you are a great communicator! This channel will grow easily man,just keep talking!😉👍

Still an EF user and I use the Macro 24-105 for landscape and macro and a Sigma 150-600 for wildlife. Now you know my entire set up 😂

I sold the same lens and adapter to help pay for a RF 100-500 F4.5-7.1 and glad I did. The EF 70-200 F2.8 is a very heavy lens to carry around. Just curious, the Canon RF 70-200 F4 is about the same price as what you paid, but shorter and much less in weight. Did you need the EF F2.8 for the wider aperture? I'm seriously considering the getting the RF 70-200 F4.

I just found your channel and I really like it. Your comment on skipping at least one generation on new models is a principle I've used for some time. It works really well for cell phones too. As a hobbyist I've found if you can make the most of what you have in gear is sufficient for the quality of images you are trying to achieve, then you don't need anything new. When your needs exceed that capability is when to start looking. I'm not a fanboy of Canon but like you, it's what I started using and continue to do so. I started with a Canon EF film SLR (showing my age) and now have an R5 upgrading from a 5DS. If Canon comes out with a R5S someday, it will be mine. If not, then maybe a medium format.

You make some good points. Many people tend to measure a "successful" photographer to the guys who have a massive following on social media, are super specialised etc. I'm a pro of 25 years, and yes, in time things do niche down a bit, BUT, like you, I do whatever comes across my way, and being a generalist is probably where most people who make a living from photography are. My KZbin channel just gave me an excuse to start playing with my old film gear again and really helped me reignite the love for shooting and the analogue process.

I’m enjoying your photography content. My son still falls into the hobbyist category, though he uses photography in his journalism major. His most recent toy has been a Canon EOS Rebel 2000, which works like new and cost home about $10.

Ha, didn't recognize you without the beard.

Recently subscribed to both of your channels. I'm into both topics. Hanging out and nerding out about cameras sounds cool. I really dig platforms like Josh Sattin's Camera Talk live stream and The Moe and O Photo Show Podcast (though it's been months since they've published an episode). Best wishes on growing this channel!

Pleasantly surprised! Thought I was in for a biking video, then realized this is a new channel. Photography and cycling are my passions too. Keep it up, please.

I, too, got the kit 24-105 with my R6m2 and fell in love. But it wasn't until I got my EF 70-200 m1 that I really started improving my photography skills.

Great vid! You sound like you have a wealth of experience and knowledge to share with us

Hey, great info! I couldn't agree more...the best investment is in good glass👍. Thanks for sharing!

really enjoyed your video brother man

Oh dear. The lenses are made to be durable, but it pains me every time you slap the most vulnerable parts in it right away lol. You dont need to beat it like that!

RF16 and RF 50mm were 2 of the first RF lenses I bought since going RF mount, 3rd was the RF 100-400, 4th the RF 24-105 cheap one, then the RF14-35L. For simple just want to run and gun like biking or hiking I think these cheaper lenses work well for just that. I don't always want to lug my bigger RF cameras with cages out and about so I picked up a R50 for just going out on no missions to do anything and just shoot whatever with these smaller RF lenses, it's fun for me and the weight reduction is noticeable.

I was so excited to get my first 70-200L.. got it from a pawn shop for 400.00..yeah..70-200L F4 with no IS... It was still a great deal and one of my first L lenses probably 5 years ago. surprisingly it was tack sharp on the 90D, but any camera shake omg it sucked at times with that 32mp sensor. I decided I wanted to invest in a version II with is and 2.8. That was the most expensive lens I had ever bought in my hobbyist shooting since 2008. After taxes it was right at 1500.00 a couple years ago. Was a mint lens with no scratches on it and little use. One of my best investments I think for a lens at the time, used it for portraits, wildlife, sons track meets it's just a great freaking lens to use and versatile. But somewhere in that time period I got a interest in wildlife photography and oh boy..what a rabbit hole that is!!! 70-200 did great at subjects up close but it shows it lack of mm pretty quick when out and about trying to shoot raptures and other birds like that. Got the EF 100-400L IS ver 1 and for its time period it was probably a good lens for the lower MP FF cameras and apsc but it did not work well with the 90D and eventually sold it and got the sigma 150-600C and it was a better combo for the 90D and gave me more mm for subjects but birds in flight was a struggle so invested in the R7, a decently great camera all around but got the FF bug and bought the R6MII which was so much better shooting with. Sold the Sigma and got 1 of 3 RF 200-800 that was available in my state the day after it was released to sell and I am pretty happy now with my setup and adding the 1.4 extender I'm up to 1120mm for wildlife. Photography is my main hobby and I don't spend money on much else so for me even as a hobbyist I make that my validation for overspending probably more than I should. I've looked at the RF 70-200's don't think I could ever justify the 2.8 version having an ef version that works great. Almost got a F4 used for 900.00, but again..why... for what you do I think it is a great investment for your business and you saved a lot of money going with the EF version, I still have a ton of EF glass even though the only EF body I have now is a 70D my daughter uses once in a while and it works great with the EF L glass I own and the lenses work great with the adapter for the RF, I thought I was the only person with 2 EF-RF adapters, good to know I am not hahaha. I do like doing video so the overheating of the R6 and R5 honestly was a turn off for me when they first came out and that has stuck in my brain on spending money on either of those bodies. It's nice to watch a video of someone that utilizes what they have and makes it work for them for their business and career, I admire that. I'm not much of a people person anymore so wanting to go pro with what I have doing weddings or portraits really has no interest for me, although I do like doing portraits of people. Liking your channel so far, hope it grows for you. Subbed.

"Date your cameras, but marry your lenses" You made some good points. New Subscriber.

I have an old Sigma 70-200 2.8 with no IS that needs upgrading. I've had it for a decade, and the aperture randomly sticks, that said, it has been a very good lens image-wise. I've been contemplating getting the Canon EF version, but I don't like the white lenses because they make you stick out like a sore thumb, and at certain events people/security see you as a paparazzi. I might just keep it Sigma for my upgrade, and plus I'll be saving a truck load of cash. Tamron makes a good one that some of my Nikon friends use, and it is very tempting too…

Hey Fitz, I just upgraded my wife from a Rebel T6 to an M50 for $350 because she wants to start taking her photography more seriously. Was that a good choice in your opinion? I also picked her up a Canon 70-200 f/4 (she specifically requested a Canon 70-200 lol) and Sigma 17-50 2.8 for her upcoming world travels. How did I do?

I love that lens! I have the non IS version, as I used it when I bought it, for sports. I could swear that my EF 100-400L WITH IS works perfectly, mounted on my R6 MII with the adaptor, I can hear it. If I turn the switch on it off, the sound stops. Interesting.

70-200 my most used glass. Super versatile.

Good move! Every time I switched camera systems I would always get a 24 to 70 2.8 and a 70-200 2.8 or equivalent. I wish I knew you were in the market for one, I have one I don’t use, but it’s a series one and has a lot of marks on it. Works great though. One of the two sharpest lenses I’ve ever shot with.

I think you made the right choice with native Cannon. I shoot Nikon and bought the Tamron and its not really sharp at 2.8. I’ve often wondered if it would be sharper if I spent the few extra doll-hairs and got the Nikon 70-200. Dont get me wrong, its sharp enough for what I do. Its simply the OCD.

Tim, Nice video! You make valid points. Here is my journey so far. I was a Minolta film shooter. Digital came out at the same time that my girls started playing youth softball and I bought an Olympus something or other and started sharing sports photos. I was discovered by a local newspaper and my journey as a newspaper sports photographer began. To be brief, I upgraded to a Canon Rebel and like yourself, quickly discovered its limitations. Next was the Canon EOS 1D, then a Canon EOS 1D MII X (in order to have a second body and not swap out lenses). I used that camera for, what, 14/16 years now? I am no longer shooting professionally but still shooting, "normal stuff" I guess you could call it and I upgraded to the Canon EOS R6 mark II with a lens adapter because I own too many quality, fast, L lenses. I love this camera, and I'm glad I made the move but look how long it took !