I just did that today.

That's been my main question as well. From what I've read, the standard on both was: If you posted something with a licensed track while being subscribed, you don't have to take it down after your subscription ends. However, you cannot use tracks you downloaded while being a subscriber in content posted after you cancelled. That is still reflected in Epidemic's FAQ but Artlist is slightly more confusing and may require that you retroactively remove anything you posted with their tracks if you cancel your subscription. In that case you would essentially be locked into paying for that subscription for as long as you want to make money from your content so...there's zero reason not to go Epidemic.

@@rekrap6331not 100% sure on this either, it's pretty unclear from Artlist's T&C's. Epidemic just makes more sense in the long run. I've used them on loads of projects with no issues over many years now.

I'm not sure about Artlist, but with Epidemic, you're covered indefinitely for any videos that you uploaded while your subscription was still current.

@@rekrap6331 Wow I was going through videos to know which one to subscribe to between artist and epidemic sounds. I was gonna go for artlist because I felt there sound effects sounded more authentic than that of Epidemics sounds and now I saw what you said about removal of old videos you posted with an active subscription been given a copyright strike because you terminated subscription… is that really true? Because If it is it’s bad. I’m going for the monthly subscription to taste the water.

Just leaving out the fact that when you cancel epidemic you lose all of those licenses and all of your previous content will instantly get flagged. If you use epidemic you're stuck with epidemic permanently.