Lawyers are intellectually dishonest. Not a job for kind people.

I've had multiple DUIs. In my early 60s, I gave up driving.

I don't recall eating any pie 😂😂

Lock me up cause I would not help police in any way shape or fashion I’ll flat out tell them no call your buddies if you need help or go find a real job

No, No, No! Are you a fish? What are your colors? Do you eat sardines? Isn't it true your primary diet is sardines? Isn't it true you ate my sardines last Tuesday? Here's a video of you eating my sardines! Impeachment! Leading is only on cross-examination! Think fast, and never ask the question "why"!

I live the joke!

I just arrested they most definitely missed used this word

♻️🌏🪬☯️🌌

I'm pretty sure the only reason they said this argument was reasonable was because the guy had committed a sexual crime. Justice doesn't exist when the courtroom preemptively decides it wants a conviction.

Would I be able to get my youthful offender for this felony in Alabama if I have a juvenile history ?

This video has motivate me

Can't ask leading questions unless you're on cross tho.

OMG!! This makes me believe in parallel universes. The tweaked out fish's questioning was Emmy worthy. Lol

Great tutorial Andrew, thanks for the tips and advice. I think the voice of the fish sounds distorted and difficult to understand, at times. Constructive criticism 🙏

Great Video!

So basically girl gets fake id, club allows her in, guy views id has no way of knowing it’s fake and gets jail time? That’s not right that’s why people come up dead in the worse ways smh law makers create monsters

😊

😅

The importance of being an idiot- The word "idiot" comes from the Greek noun ἰδιώτης idiōtēs 'a private person, individual', 'a private citizen' (as opposed to an official), 'a common man’,

just a suggestion- Ways of asking questions: 1)-Is you denying that you did not eat the cherry pie? If there is no denial, then it is safe to presume that you ate the cherry pie.

I'm a high school senior and want to study law next year in college

I defended myself on refusing a breath alcohol test I told the peace keeper I don't drink alcohol he insisted I said na I got pepper sprayed dragged out of my van arrested and dragged of to the police station , charged had to have the paperwork , then I said to this peace keeper I'll do your breath test now he was gleeful I blew and 000 reading the peace keeper went white he tried to push the charges to diversion I said no let's go to court , and that we did got to the hearing judge alone I got the peace keeper in the box and I asked him how far down was my window he says all the way down I said so could you smell alcohol on my breath he said he wasn't sure so you only had suspicion I was drunk then I asked him if suspicion is a crime he said no so I said why try to breath test me were you trying to escalate the matter he said no then I asked him did I blow at the police station he said yes I asked him what did I blow he said 000 negative judge said he had heard enough and ript shit out of the peace keeper

I don't understand the statement/question because it doesn't pertain to any guilt wrong doing or relationship to anything that you are in court for or guilty of Remember if it is leading it's not worth answering . always let a lawyer know when they are leading and or lying . yes it's appropriate to summarize first then ask the questions but one thing that always shows up in court rooms is lies more so from the lawyers than the guilty .

I thought leading questions weren't allowed

Ruslan did the same thing and dressed up in a yellow raincoat

The Texas chainsaw wheelchair guy

I know they used a circular saw because of the oval blood pattern around the priamiter around the pool of blood

The 8 leiters of blood on the floor at the wheelchair guys apartment that tried stabbing me when I was washing dishes they tried to get me to help them rent a carpet steamer there was 8+ lieters of blood from multiple murder victims in the same spot it was a satanic totem pole

The wheelchair is a mobility aid firstly. Which is used as a vehicle for independence. Denying a person freedom and independence is akin to modern slavery. Is my point of view.

Well if lawyers don't think like normal people, then politicians don't either, as most politicians are lawyers. That explains why things are screwed up!

I wonder, would a country forcibly taking another country be considered a robbery in the second degree: a Class B felony?

Your fish is so noisy

That’s only for trained dummies, to answer as such. Or those who are “LOST AT SEE”! 1.) The U.S. banner has 13 stripes that represented the 13 United Colonies of New England; does it not? 2.) And do you remember that those 13 Colonies made a Declaration of Independence from Britain back in the year 1776. 3.) Which all foreign UNITED STATES CITIZENS are claiming that they are the Americans!? 4.) But their Bloodline is European, is it not? 5.) Is that not considered BIRTHRIGHT THIEF?

Ahhh, the power of circular reasoning 😀

What if i use a needle full of fentanyl to sew my pants back together? Is it still paraphernalia?

Would that the world had no need for any drugs whatsoever. The seer Kahlil Gibran in his beautiful work: [The Prophet} has the folloiwng word: "Would that you could live on the fragrance of the earth, and like an air plant be sustained by the light." :)

Mind?

🌟 P r o m o s m

Who knows the mind of a politician? :)

Very good information. In fact excellent. Many people should appreciate and review your videos because you are a professional in the law and this type information is not taught in public schools. You have to go to college and law school to get this knowledge. Even though ignorance of the law is no excuse. You are much appreciated by me. God bless you.

".. in a non-legal sense was guilty ..." (2:31) An interesting phrase. Thank you for your enlightening mind and wonderful presentation.

Breaking bad stuff

And, as a witness, you simply wait until the "Statement" is re-phrased as a "Question"! (This could be a long trial...)

The field of “Law” is very broad. Generally, the presentation is helpful. However, there are many areas of the law and this is only one perspective about “thinking like a lawyer”. Helpful, but way to limiting.

BUT anyhow, I was hoping you could be more specific on your examples, and not just use the sardine as an example.

just ingrain this Mantra --- Bend them over -- Bend them over -- Bend them over --- and you can't go WRONG

Leading

These are the adult lessons I've missed, and errored to frustrations.

Very enjoyable to watch and most informative. Thank you so much for taking the time to put it all together. You have a nice style about you. :)

How to teach like a lawyer (I.e., if it’s free, it’s useless/obvious): if there is so much evidence like crumbs, stains, a plate etc., it won’t matter much the way you ask your questions as the evidence is overwhelming already. And it’s common sense to have a goal in mind when asking questions. And if someone found these self-evident, common sense points as some kind of revelation/trick of the trade, I can assure you that no question can help you navigate whatever it is you need to navigate with questions.