Пікірлер
@quinsattorney
@quinsattorney 8 күн бұрын
I liked it.
@htpc002Weirdhouse
@htpc002Weirdhouse 21 күн бұрын
Was last reading about this in the '80s. Whatever happened to CPT invariance?
@pareshprajapati7916
@pareshprajapati7916 22 күн бұрын
What is radioactive decays. ??? ...responsibilities
@LettersAndNumbers300
@LettersAndNumbers300 22 күн бұрын
This abbrev. is a reserved keyword.
@bloodyorphan
@bloodyorphan 23 күн бұрын
The Higgs field makes almost all of this OUT OF DATE! **EINSTEIN** i.e. The HIGGS field is also a BOSON tensor field
@TrailersReheard
@TrailersReheard 23 күн бұрын
This is assuming active transformations. But what if i passively transform my own coordinates? Obviously Newton's laws can hold in other forms because my coordinates are irrelevant to the physics. Given this how can you be sure no transforms but affine ones relate inertial observers ?
@thomaswilhelm5120
@thomaswilhelm5120 24 күн бұрын
I would like to know more about the strange Quarks , strangelet's or are these unconfirmed in Gr?
@jaymakormik6779
@jaymakormik6779 24 күн бұрын
RRIIGGHHHTTTT????!!!!!!!!!!??!!??!!!AAAHHHHH!!!!!!!!😤💩
@jaymakormik6779
@jaymakormik6779 24 күн бұрын
Dark matter is gravity! Right??!!!!😠RIGHT??!!!!!!!!👊😡🤬💥SAG--A🕳
@nbooth
@nbooth 25 күн бұрын
Isn't p conjugation an inversion of an odd number of spacial dimensions, not necessarily three?
@vanceerickson2538
@vanceerickson2538 26 күн бұрын
Excellent.
@graxxor
@graxxor 28 күн бұрын
Brain dead projectionists in the comments.
@seema.900
@seema.900 28 күн бұрын
Could the limitations of QCD suggest we need an entirely new framework for understanding strong interactions?
@Velereonics
@Velereonics 29 күн бұрын
It's kinda weird that protos and electrons are so dissimilar.
@fletch88zz
@fletch88zz 29 күн бұрын
This was an excellent video. As an amatuer observer I can never understand how physicists just go "these formulas are all time reversible and you can't tell the differance". Well maybe you can't but the universe clearly has another idea about that. Then physicists go "yes that's just the arrow of time". If you're looking for some missing energy in your equations why not figure out a way to include the arrow. Time and gravity are somewhat related yeah.
@bishopdredd5349
@bishopdredd5349 Ай бұрын
Hopefully we can soon study the suspected Axion generation in pulsars.
@chadbailey3623
@chadbailey3623 Ай бұрын
I would love to see a video about the lack of time symmetry of some weak force interactions.
@Sugar3Glider
@Sugar3Glider Ай бұрын
0:15 thats going to be a meme, isn't it?
@coupsdestylo
@coupsdestylo Ай бұрын
if an angle is maesured from 2 different directions it will always equal zero
@normanicole4714
@normanicole4714 Ай бұрын
(Hypothesis) we dont observe particles that violate CP because all of those particles are moving through time in the other direction. That what dark matter is. Thats why there is so much more dark matter. There are far more non symetric combinations than symetrical ones.
@ChosenOne41
@ChosenOne41 Ай бұрын
The WHAT!?
@seifyk
@seifyk Ай бұрын
Theres tonedeaf and then theres whatever this is.
@tomholroyd7519
@tomholroyd7519 Ай бұрын
"Nothing but thieves" --- "OMG stop showing ART to young children!!! They might learn to draw!!!"
@tomholroyd7519
@tomholroyd7519 Ай бұрын
reverse the flow of time and nothing changes ---- i.e. it's wrong
@tomholroyd7519
@tomholroyd7519 Ай бұрын
A lot of this is just dumb gellmann is dead let's move on
@while_coyote
@while_coyote Ай бұрын
Can you go into more detail about which angles theta and theta prime represent?
@thetinkerist
@thetinkerist Ай бұрын
I love your description of this problem. QCD is not complete in its description, or observations aren't seeing what we should, so either there are more quarks, or we mathematically fix angles with more dimensions.... perhaps. Adding axions, is like gravitons and like dark matter, we don't know it. Yet?
@KrudlerTheHorse
@KrudlerTheHorse Ай бұрын
Very well done. Other explanations never connected or made sense to me, this was different! You earned a sub for this vid
@bogganalseryd2324
@bogganalseryd2324 Ай бұрын
Actually gravity isn't a force at all
@mysteryblankdspace4342
@mysteryblankdspace4342 Ай бұрын
Sorry to slightly tangent, but, could we say 'dark gravity', instead of 'dark matter', and still be true to the data?
@louisalfieri3187
@louisalfieri3187 Ай бұрын
This was really well done.
@big_possum
@big_possum Ай бұрын
This video was helpful for me on so many levels!
@fuffoon
@fuffoon Ай бұрын
It's not you, man. It's me. Everything sounded like Charlie Brown's teacher. Wah wah wah, wah wah, wah wah wah wah. Even your artwork is better than my stick figures.
@kaio0777
@kaio0777 Ай бұрын
P= NP all over again
@JonDisnard
@JonDisnard Ай бұрын
Gravity is not a force, its an emergent effect of condensed matter... The bending of spacetime curves. Likewise, time is also an emergent effect of condensed matter... But a repulsive kind proportionately opposite of the spacegravity curve. This is why you will have problems adding these emerged effects into standard model. They are already in there , hiding in plain sight as normal nucleons matter, probably mostly the energy traped by quarks.
@jasongarcia2140
@jasongarcia2140 28 күн бұрын
Ah you are smarter than all the world's physicists? Haha What about realitivity and time dialation?
@JonDisnard
@JonDisnard 28 күн бұрын
@jasongarcia2140 My dude, I beg your pardon? You must be mistaken, these are not my ideas, they belong to Einstein who described "Space Time" over 100 years ago! When a massive object exists, for example a star or planet, it warps space causing smaller objects to orbit. Not because of an intrinsic force of gravity, but rather because space has been curved. Likewise, time follows gravity effects proportionally being fastest further away or slower near the spacetime warp.... Einstein's relativity. Nothing I wrote contradicts any of the existing theoriest because everything I wrote was in fact given by those theories. Your being silly my dude, and surely your just trolling.
@dekumarademosater2762
@dekumarademosater2762 26 күн бұрын
​​@@jasongarcia2140he's just parroting some Swiss patent clerk's patter from the 1900's. Something something curved spacetime something time dilation something relativity something.
@ccriztoff
@ccriztoff Ай бұрын
Erm what...
@theMonkeyMonkey
@theMonkeyMonkey Ай бұрын
This is really clearly and simply explained. Brilliant job.
@thumper8684
@thumper8684 Ай бұрын
Doesn't CP symmetry suggest the net charge is always zero? Don't the LCD equations describe protons which have a positive charge? What am I missing?
@peterdennis6106
@peterdennis6106 Ай бұрын
Absolutely brilliant, entertaining, educational, well written and presented. Thank you for doing this
@kostoglotov2000
@kostoglotov2000 Ай бұрын
BRILLIANT!
@WobblycogsUk
@WobblycogsUk Ай бұрын
Damn speed of light being the fun police again. Great video, thanks.
@alphgeek
@alphgeek Ай бұрын
Great vid and clear explanation. However, the insanity wolf is unleashed in the comments, every KZbin crackpot is chiming in with their "theories" 😂😂😂
@shotsinthequark
@shotsinthequark Ай бұрын
Thanks so much for your support - really appreciate it! You’re spot on about some of the comments on here, they do at least make for some amusing reading!
@stevenverrall4527
@stevenverrall4527 Ай бұрын
Very nice!
@stevenverrall4527
@stevenverrall4527 Ай бұрын
There is no such thing as a completely rational physical model. A useful model does not need to make complete sense. It merely needs to closely agree with experiment. This is why Bohr's model is still taught in schools.
@stevenverrall4527
@stevenverrall4527 Ай бұрын
Very thought provoking. However, absolute space is not needed. Newton's 3rd law of equal and opposite force pairs resolves the paradox presented in this video.
@stevenverrall4527
@stevenverrall4527 Ай бұрын
My team theorizes, that at very low energies, the strong force is directly linked to gravity, which is itself CP symmetric. See our 2023 and 2024 peer-reviewed publications for details.
@alphgeek
@alphgeek Ай бұрын
Link to paper?
@stevenverrall4527
@stevenverrall4527 Ай бұрын
@@alphgeek In the description of my two recent KZbin videos. Also on my LinkedIn and ResearchGate profiles.
@stevenverrall4527
@stevenverrall4527 Ай бұрын
@@alphgeek Listed in recent video descriptions on my KZbin channel, my LinkedIn profile, and my ResearchGate profile.
@scarletevans4474
@scarletevans4474 Ай бұрын
Hooray! ♥ Good luck with the channel!
@Tossphate
@Tossphate Ай бұрын
Is this the thing where, if the universe is played backwards, it won't necessarily return you to an identical previous state?
@ilyafoskin
@ilyafoskin Ай бұрын
I know MOND took a hit from some recent papers but I’m still skeptical of dark matter being the solution to the radial rotation curves. It just seems so unlikely that every galaxy has its own envelope of dark matter in the right distribution to produce the curve. Surely if it was true then many galaxies would also have little to no surrounding dark matter and match the predicted curve. But if the observed anomalous behaviour is so ubiquitous across all the galaxies, then it must be part of the laws of motion. It’s probably not MOND because that’s a Newtonian theory. Perhaps what we’re seeing with galactic rotation is to GR what the precession of Mercury was to Newtonian mechanics, an anomaly that won’t be explained until we have a new theory of gravity beyond our current theory. Quantum gravity or something closer to it