Thank you professor this was educated well. Very easy to understand and recall.
@albertjr.wagner58232 ай бұрын
Definition of Policy Analysis Policy analysis is a systematic evaluation of the policy process, policy alternatives, and policy outcomes aimed at solving public problems. It involves a thorough examination of the policy-making process, including the identification of problems, the analysis of policy options, and the assessment of policy outcomes. The goal of policy analysis is to provide policymakers with the best possible solutions to public problems, taking into account the complexities and nuances of the policy-making process. Objectivity in Policy Analysis Objectivity is a crucial aspect of policy analysis. The goal is to rise above personal beliefs and political opinions to produce the best possible solutions to public problems. Objectivity means avoiding bias and ensuring that the analysis is based on facts, data, and evidence. This approach helps to promote good outcomes over political involvement and ensures that policies are based on sound reasoning and evidence rather than personal opinions or political agendas. Three Approaches to Policy Analysis Policy analysis can be approached from three different perspectives: scientific, professional, and political. Scientific Analysis: This approach seeks truth through research, emphasizing objectivity and the pursuit of knowledge. Scientific analysis is often conducted by academics and researchers, who use empirical data and evidence-based research to inform their analysis. However, this approach can struggle to translate findings into practical public policy due to the complexity and jargon used in academic research. Professional Analysis: This approach is more practical, focusing on solving public problems by studying alternatives. Professional analysts, such as those working in government agencies like the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and Congressional Budget Office (CBO), use this method to provide actionable insights to policymakers. Professional analysis is often more accessible and relevant to policymakers than scientific analysis. Political Analysis: This approach is outcome-driven, with a focus on achieving a specific policy outcome. Political analysts, such as advocacy groups, often start with a desired outcome and tailor data to support it. Examples of political analysis include the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the Cato Institute. Five Steps of Policy Analysis The policy analysis process typically involves the following five steps: Defining and Analyzing the Problem: This step involves identifying the problem, defining its scope and complexity, and analyzing its causes and consequences. Constructing Policy Alternatives: This step involves generating a range of policy options, evaluating their potential effectiveness, and identifying potential trade-offs and unintended consequences. Developing Criteria for Evaluation: This step involves identifying the key criteria for evaluating policy alternatives, such as effectiveness, cost, feasibility, and social equity. Assessing Alternatives: This step involves evaluating each policy alternative against the criteria developed in step 3, using data and evidence to inform the analysis. Drawing Conclusions: This step involves selecting the most desirable policy option, determining its practicality, and finding ways to make it acceptable to the public. Criteria for Evaluation When evaluating policy alternatives, policymakers should consider the following criteria: Effectiveness: Does the policy achieve its intended goals and outcomes? Cost: What are the financial implications of the policy, including costs and benefits? Feasibility: Is the policy practical and achievable, given the available resources and constraints? Social Equity: Does the policy promote social justice and equity, or does it exacerbate existing inequalities? Conclusion and Policy Implementation The final step in the policy analysis process involves selecting the most desirable policy option, determining its practicality, and finding ways to make it acceptable to the public. This may involve communicating the policy's benefits and trade-offs to stakeholders, building coalitions and partnerships, and addressing potential opposition and resistance. Ultimately, the goal is to implement the policy in a way that achieves the desired outcomes and improves the lives of citizens.
@Jason-o5s2 ай бұрын
Cheer~~~a course or principle of action adopted or proposed by a government, party, business, or individual.😊
@HRHRobert2 ай бұрын
About 5 years ago I caught google blocking me from contacting any US agency.
@HRHRobert2 ай бұрын
About a week ago I caught META blocking congressional correspondence between a Clandestine CIA operative (me) and my personal friend who is a senator.
@HRHRobert2 ай бұрын
we do not have a representative Republic in a pure form anymore in the united states, We have The people and they are controlled by phycological operations of the tech oligarchs and we have the congress and the peoples messages to congress are screened and filtered by the tech oligarchs princibly Google and Meta are the two true offenders in gross violation of constitutional rights.
@HRHRobert2 ай бұрын
Both Zuckerberg and Pichai have more control over the mind of the people than all the politicians in Washington combined and that is a huge problem. Both Google and Meta are perfect examples of monopolies that are actively subverting the democratic processes of the state.
@HRHRobert2 ай бұрын
Zuckerberg and Pichai are both guilty of Treason.
@RO-st8wh2 ай бұрын
good video thanks
@johnomukhunya3 ай бұрын
Why can't the 3 analysis be integrated to produce the best analysis
@FaaraxBashiir-vs3ez4 ай бұрын
Thaks
@jakelong68604 ай бұрын
Kevin Roberts said he gets ultimate power.
@paynelcasey4 ай бұрын
The fact Republicans say Trump was a better president then Lincoln says a lot. As in don't bother even talking with them.
@NosyRosieunderthebed4 ай бұрын
We have to focus on the United States policy , which is there is killing no Americans. White French men. The Asian only speaks English.
@davidsonbulleh27334 ай бұрын
Nice teaching
@gabrieldgallegos5 ай бұрын
Alexander Hamilton: The President is Not a King SCOTUS: hold my beer
@EdT.-xt6yv4 ай бұрын
🎯
@juanamora95135 ай бұрын
Representative democracy is when you have a large group of people such as USA or any large country where everyone can't be there to make the laws personally. So the founders decide on Representative democracy where they chose leaders of their communities to go to DC and vote for them. They chose these people every 4 years. Direct democracy is good when you have some small group or logical decisions where you can go vote personally.
@HRHRobert2 ай бұрын
Right except for the last decade big tech has been silently and stealthily subverting that representation by controlling all electronic correspondence between the constituents and the representatives.
@HRHRobert2 ай бұрын
Facebooks app can edit the functionality of buttons on your email app.
@davidceesay13225 ай бұрын
Thank you, Professor. The explanation is simple to understand.
@bermudezjayjhun60285 ай бұрын
Forestry student is here🙆
@nasirohasen80507 ай бұрын
good lecture
@remyphilly51687 ай бұрын
Thanks for this video. You'll get your views and likes soon
@tiffanysouissi20518 ай бұрын
Why do you have to put "poor" people in a negative light? There are so-called poor people who do have money in the bank. They are very resourceful people.
@wildexperience31399 ай бұрын
Great presentation
@Ohdear.ana_9 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for posting an explanation about this. I was having trouble understanding and it was difficult to find a video explaining❤
@BigShot5710 ай бұрын
I was dreading having to read this and take notes. Luckily your video saved me from an all nighter!
@markmhongole10 ай бұрын
Asante prof
@jessicasalguero7684 Жыл бұрын
where would trump and Biden be classified in the scheme ? I need help for a paper I am writing ....
@user82928-z15 күн бұрын
did you ever figure it out?writing the same paper now
@halloweendancing Жыл бұрын
This is so helpful :) thank you!
@julfahmisalim Жыл бұрын
so informatif, thanks sir
@carmenfoy7943 Жыл бұрын
Finally a clear explanation! Thank you, Sir.
@a-star4969 Жыл бұрын
Awesome
@tiisetsosetso1661 Жыл бұрын
Thank you sooo much professor ,your information helped me write my assignment. ❤
@danielfromyesterday Жыл бұрын
thank you
@mscarter624 Жыл бұрын
Excellent. This is helpful for a school assignment I'm working on. Thank you.
@jasminesage21 Жыл бұрын
I appreciate the real-world scenarios you use to explain. Thank you for this break-down.
@muskduh Жыл бұрын
thanks for the video presentation.
@henriomoeje8741 Жыл бұрын
One yr term was preposterous and will lead to a chaotic government.
@cristalsosa98 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this very informative and useful video Professor Leckrone. Very grateful!
@henriomoeje8741 Жыл бұрын
What was horrible? I think you did a great job on giving us a synopsis of Fed 68.
@indushekhar7184 Жыл бұрын
Good but still need to do lot on coherence!
@clandestinelylegal2 жыл бұрын
koina bhai hota hai ! aayega tumhara daur bhi ! lage rho !🥂
@Nino151512 жыл бұрын
Well done! Thanks
@chiomacletus85082 жыл бұрын
Wonderful explanation. 😍
@mikepeine38982 жыл бұрын
there were over 50 unconstitutional electors in 2016
@sharonbarros42382 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video, please post more 🤍
@ethanriddle98722 жыл бұрын
thanks
@SupremeLeader1872 жыл бұрын
Direct democracy is the way to go It’s not rocket science cut out the middle man and have supreme leader that lives the word of God and wisdom and rules the mob majority. No more corrupt representative democracy
@SupremeLeader1872 жыл бұрын
Representative democracy has too much room for corruption and you see that in united states and Ukraine
@garsonharper1292 жыл бұрын
great information, good job.
@philipmugerwaasante55122 жыл бұрын
This is very informative.
@tmaganaassabaqallaa87162 жыл бұрын
Good
@naufrancisco60542 жыл бұрын
I thought at first the dog will bite the cat, but then the snake came and made sounds ssssssss the kid should have barked. so irresponsible