Al it is isn’t it? I got that from Huberman and Petersons last podcast together. It helped me connect some of these ideas.

I’ve heard Peterson talk about it before. Love that concept!

@@IRunReallyReallyFar surprised you didn’t comment on the meat suit quote, which was your quote :-) Yes, I pulled a lot of these topics together from other sources. Huberman and Petersen‘s recent podcast was eye-opening for me. The only reason I’m able to articulate any of the stuff is because I’m standing on the shoulders of Giants.

Thanks John! Took me a long time to be able to get those thoughts out in a coherent way like that.

BIll it was a blast! I am excited to have you in my ownership group. They are excited to dive into this topic and the framework you've built. Happy Holidays!

I look forward to it Ryan. I think when people grasp the idea of distributed leadership they will understand why top down leadership development so often fails. You were absolutely correct in calling this atomic habits for teams.

@@387bill387 you have something here, excited to dive in more!

The code might be on my old KZbin channel where this originally was... i split from my partners and they shut down the original channel. Since then Chris also left the company he was at since we did this interview. Sorry about that! The concepts in the interview are awesome though, aren't they? I would try to find Chris on LinkedIn to see what he is up to these days and where you might be able to find more resources.

@@ryantansom yes very interesting! Thanks for the context. Is it because the model didn't ultimately work or hold up?

@@lenaimamura I am not sure. We used them at my old company and there was a good process and outcome. I am not sure the reasons Chris moved on. The concepts and approach is for sure sound and works. Its all about the messaging and execution. That's key

SOOO fun Casey ;-) I literally just got off the phone with one of my clients and he forwarded this episode to his head of sales and he told him to "get on it" hahaha

You’re welcome! Hopefully you like the episode! Feel free to drop any questions you want me to ask on the next episode with them!

Rock on! You’ll have to let me know what you think of it! I really enjoyed the conversation with Matt

I am literally a Joe Brown junky. I love every one of his episodes

Thanks @yulianaasriyan! Eric did a great job sharing his story. He was very vulnerable with how everything went down. I loved the honest reflection.

Glad you enjoyed it Tom! I am sure we all know some people who could have kept a few more dollars during an exit 😁

Thanks! I love my convos with Brian!

Thanks! Peter is awesome. You should check out this interview we did. I think this one is my favorite kzbin.info/www/bejne/kJPXlpebhNqGndUsi=Bceza42JbyGGaGsR

100%. It’s a service that’s needed and 100% valued by a lot of people, especially me. And I would be happy to pay taxes for it as well. If we had sound money (money that was hard and not printed out of thin air), we would have to raise the taxes and we would all have to agree on what the money that taxes are being raised for is allocated to. When someone artificially increases the money supply, it creates money out of thin air and steals peoples time like you who create the roads by debasing the currency (reduces your savings because the hard work you did to earn that money is worth less because the money supply grew… see the example I gave in the video about my twins and chores). This issue arises when people closest to the money printer get to decide how much is printed and where it goes instead of asking for the revenue from people who earned it. Our deficits are funded by money printing instead of deciding what we really need. I would argue roads and education and the basics are the most needed and wouldn’t get much argument or push back from the public if we had sound money that wasn’t just printed out of thin air and actually needed to be collected from people via taxes.

​@@ryantansom all road funding comes from taxes paid.

@@ross60100% and as I said, because it’s a utility, I would agree that most people would want to pay that tax so you could do the roads. The problem comes when the government is able to print money from nothing, They’re not forced to make hard decisions between roads and other things (they don’t have a finite amount of tax revenue to work with if they just print money ) So the government just prints money and therefore is devaluing mine and your savings (if the money supply grows mine and your savings is worth less). As I mentioned in my earlier comment, I would argue that people would always be willing to pay taxes to pay for roads. It’s all the other stuff that the government spends money on above and beyond what they raise in taxes, is the issue. When they don’t have the money they create money from nothing, they devalue your savings and my savings.

Chances are, they don't

Great question! Pray that they don't!

Shoot me ur email or WhatsApp and i can send u a book written by this guy

;)