Don’t think it is real the visor does not really fit with Renaissance, and late medieval style helmet to mr really

@@thatonelad4594 I suspected the visor wasn't kosher for the period, but what about the helmet itself?

Basically they didn't, so it was rare, yes, but sometimes happened.

One Lord against another, on a point which cannot be remembered

German mercenaries heading towards Rome to sack it, 1527 - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sack_of_Rome_(1527)

그게 무서운 부분인데 중세에 성앞에서 끌고다니지도 못하는 집채만한 공성포나 쓰던걸 저때 유럽애들이 한참 싸워보니 저런거 몇십문 끌고 야전에 다니는게 훨씬 낫다고 판단하면서 현대 포병까지 발전한거죠. 저 시대부터 군사력으로 유럽에 발리기 시작한것..ㅠ

@@dongjukim1822 나대지마

Tercios my friend!

Infact the real battle of Governolo was a proper ambush, not a direct charge like this; Giovanni De Medici tactic was to avoid direct battles like this and continuing to haunt the imperials with sudden and speed attacks, as you can see at the beginning of the movie. By the way this scene and the movie are great and quite unic in modern cinema.

в точку

I was just thinking the production value Of this Is Low. Most of It went to Random armor From Different medieval eras. Then when the horses charged And got lit up by Gunpowder I noticed not one horse fell. Or not even one stunt actor fell off of a horse. The Canon balls missed too. Unless you count the One loud DING against armor and the rider sort of Leaning sideways like it hit him. They could of made this Awesome.

It's a 2001 Italian movie called "Il mestiere delle armi" in English "the Profession of arms"

sorry, that is total BS. The Sallet was a matter of fashion, especially in the German countrys (and it provided good protection for the neck)

Великий Медичи: рыцарь войны

Ottoman

Как называется

@@andreybolshakov3337 "Великий Медичи: рыцарь войны".

"il mestiere delle armi" Ermanno Olmi director, product of Italy in early 2000. You can find a sub version on youtube ;)

@@sameada what cannon is that tho? They had breach loading cannons already back then?

@@alekshukhevych2644 yes is call "falconetto". Not a big artillery cannon. In fact it was a big rifle for killing the heavy cavallry and penetrate the plate armour.

1526

Dario Alberto fucj

@@darioalberto1128 what film is this

@@difijioanz "il mestiere delle armi" Ermanno Olmi director, product of Italy in early 2000. You can find a sub version on youtube ;)

no. armor works

They used to proof armour against firearms back in the days, problem was by the time massed musketry became more popular than any other type of infantry, the 3 quarter suits fell out of favour and were replaced with the simple cuirass that will see use all the way up to ww1 in some places. The 3 quarter suits were proofed more or less like this: cuirass was proofed against muskets or arquebus, pauldrons and tassets against pistol shot, assuming they were proofed against any shot, now that depends on how much you want to pay and how much weight you're willing to carry. The later cuirass worn by Napoleonic Cuirassiers for instance were still proofed but their actual effectiveness against muskets is heavily debated by historians today, as there are many surviving examples that did their job and many that didn't, this is mostly down to metallurgy and quality control, as these were now mass produced pieces. Now this show has a fair few inaccuracies, so while yes period armour could stop musket balls, this isn't a 100% accurate representation of renaissance warfare, but it's not terrible either.

Penetration depends not only on the thickness of armor but also on the angle of the hit plus the shooting distance.

Equipment wise I definitely agree! (Minus the absence of a bevor for the sallet troops.) If I recall correctly in 1503 at Cerignola the Arquebus proper played a huge role in the Spanish/imperial victory. So these late 15th century quasi hand cannon/Arquebus’ that are used in this film don’t seem too entirely far fetched. But cav shouldn’t using them yet:/

@@DefeatedRoyalist this is the year 1526, so not late 15th century, but early 16th century. The black bands were famous to be among the Europe's first mounted arquebusiers. (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Bands)

Dario Alberto right you are! My mistake lol Cheers mate!

@@darioalberto1128 what film is this

@@difijioanz "il mestere delle armi (the profession of the arms)" 2001, by Ermanno Olmi

Sometimes

If you have the balls

Yes, this was a time of standing armies unlike 2 centuries before when the agriculture growing seasons determined warfare schedules

Most of the times no, until 19th century, especially late 19th. Usually before that time campaigns would halt and troops would take winter quarters. Fighting would continue but as small skirmishes between foraging or scouting parties, small detatchments at the most. Now there was exceptions, when generals wanted to surprise the enemy by initiating a big move during the winter season, but that would be of high risk if things got out of control.

@@anonymousbosch9265 Seasonal warfare wasn't only tied to standing armies and agriculture. As a general, winter within a campaign was a time you could settle down your army, replan, reorganize... Any large manoeuver or operation was highly risky and dangerous during winter. Most armies wouldn't have any specific winter gear, same shoes, same clothes, maybe a blanket or two, diseases, low food very often, difficulties to forage. Winter large scale manoeuvers was always exceptions, and either a deseperate move, either a bold attempt to surprise the adversaries. Like I said, small encounters and skirmishes would often take place during winter within a campaign between foraging or scouting parties.

il mestiere delle armi is the name of the movie :)

"il mestiere delle armi" Ermanno Olmi director, product of Italy in early 2000. You can find a sub version on youtube ;)

本当そうですよね！！！！