One of my favorite pieces, though I never associated it with artichokes. I like your idea of using it and compliment you on using your own performance. It's by no means an easy piece. I disagree with many, even the eminent Andras Schiff, that the figuration must be interpreted as one of Schubert's references to a brook or stream, that rubato is mostly out of place, and that the remarkable double cut-time obligates speed. I think there is more to hear in the piece without getting sentimental, and that the voicing has more dialogue. Kempf belongs to a much earlier generation, but, whether you agree, partly or wholly, or not, I think his conception deserves consideration. kzbin.info/www/bejne/nZ-Wd5t3oJ14hqc Best wishes as you continue in our shared passions for Classical music and film!
@silverandplatinum11 сағат бұрын
Thank you so much for that kind comment and for introducing me to that Kempff recording! WOW does he go slow, but I do like the way it completely changes the perception of that middle voice. The composition definitely lends itself to different interpretations, which I think is a big part of the fun. It’s always been a special piece to me; in fact, it was the recessional at my wedding. In truth, I’m much more of a jazz pianist than a classical one, but I was always encouraged by my piano teachers to push myself on the classical side and learning this was a definite stretch for me but worth it. Thanks for watching and listening!
@bnealy114 сағат бұрын
What tripod is that? Looks nice and sturdy
@silverandplatinum14 сағат бұрын
It’s a super old Chicago Majestic that was gifted to me by a photo teacher. It weighs 12 pounds and one of the legs falls out if you pull it out too far but yeah, you’ll never need sandbags again
@X_yzzil14 сағат бұрын
All the Ryan Jacob’s art forms coalescing 🎹📷🥗 👏
@rossmansell58772 күн бұрын
Turn the freaking music down!! otherwise ace video!!
@silverandplatinum15 сағат бұрын
Oh boy you will LOVE the video that dropped today! In all seriousness, I'll take it under advisement, and if it's causing you a lot of trouble, you can always use the captions as a workaround - on this channel they're not auto-generated, they're actually written (albeit sometimes quickly) by an actual human (me)
@ebreevephoto5 күн бұрын
Good luck on the lomograflok I love mine... Cool but expensive project.
@silverandplatinum5 күн бұрын
Thanks! Yeah I stocked up on FP-100C at $40/pack when it was discontinued. I don’t think I’ll use anymore for this project because I got some nice negatives. An Instax photo is only slightly more expensive than a photo on my RB67, so I can use it pretty guilt-free!
@filmic15 күн бұрын
Very cool. I have a cartridge of 100C in my Mamiaya RZ57 Polaroid back. some chemistry leaked out of one of the sheets corroded the film speed dial.and fell off. Seven shots left. What to do? I got one exposure, but woefully underexposed. (meter reading from my Sekonic Flashmate.) I see the price for a pack, wholly mackinaw!! I think I paid just under 20$ CDN for mine ten years ago or so. Thanks for showing your process.
@silverandplatinum5 күн бұрын
Oh no! I’ve luckily never had FP-100C chemistry leak. I’ve had trouble with underexposure when I haven’t used a tripod - it’s old film at this point, so try giving it a couple stops compensation
@alexanderdobroruka85346 күн бұрын
Great shots! I've been into darkroom printing for a couple years now printing negs from my RZ and Fuji6x9 and your shots were really inspiring. Keep it up!
@rodrigolev17 күн бұрын
super useful thanksss
@kamillistwan777110 күн бұрын
Thats incredible approach.WOW. Genuinly THANK YOU AND WISH YOU Happy New Year and making dreams come true
@joseerazevedo17 күн бұрын
Great idea! Thanks for sharing!
@bertcremers313425 күн бұрын
Nice work Ryan, glad to see some real B&W prints again, Frances was in my opinion the most powerfull expression and print quality, lots of deep blacks.
@philipu15026 күн бұрын
First thousand -- great! Stay with it. Piano Tuner is a fine image.
@sheelios26 күн бұрын
congrats on 1000 subs! thanks for the videos you make i really enjoy them all :)
@Tids_Ай бұрын
That was really interesting, thanks
@OrenArieliАй бұрын
Really brings me back to my days spent under the red light. Results looked great. I would have loved to see how they'd look against a defocused natural background though...even that textured stucco wall. The shallow DOF of these large-formats is also a big selling point for me.
@silverandplatinumАй бұрын
Yes large format at f/8 or wider is a unique look for sure! I'll do portraits like that sometimes if I don't have a strobe, and then I don't need a backdrop. I do run into some other issues though: on an overcast day like this, my shutter speed gets too slow to capture people tack-sharp, even at ISO 400. Also, with a plane of focus that shallow, I really need the person I'm photographing not to move their face at all, even a little, and the concentration it takes to stay still will for many people add tension to the face unless I do a lot of extra coaching. The other thing going on here is that that particular wall when rendered in black and white is almost the exact tone of Richard's face, so it would have washed him out - I've had problems with this wall before. Thanks for watching!
@OrenArieliАй бұрын
@@silverandplatinum Makes sense. Thanks for the reply and explanation.
@kenlor71Ай бұрын
Waaaaay back in '93 I learned how to shoot on 4x5, printing and mounting my own images. I haven't done it since about 2004, but I could pick it up again if I had access to the film and the chemistry. Still have my Speed Graphic too. I probably won't because I'm just not a fan of working with those chemicals.
@silverandplatinumАй бұрын
Cool! I’m lucky to have good low-cost community darkrooms near me, with matting equipment too. You’re right about chemical exposure; I do try to stay mindful. Those speed graphics have some great history attached to them! Thanks for watching!
@RogierYouАй бұрын
That’s a very nice well equipped lab!!!!
@Nat.ImagesLarge.F.PhotographerАй бұрын
Stunning work!
@jogrevАй бұрын
God job. Excellent portrait!!
@jumpingjohn280459Ай бұрын
Thanks for an interesting video - quick question: Were you limited with image circle from your lens? I wondering if you could have raised the front standard a little rather than asking your first subject to squat down.
@silverandplatinumАй бұрын
The main issue was actually the backdrop - my light stands didn’t go high enough and no camera movement would have compensated. Another minor issue is that I only had 1/2 hour total, so I was trying not to fiddle with movements between subjects. (I think I actually rushed Yenny’s portrait a little; in retrospect, I wish I had had the time to work her expression a little more)
@wrecknobleАй бұрын
Stumbled on your channel yesterday and am so glad I did. Your style is a breath of fresh air compared to all the other photography KZbinrs. Love your work - please keep it up!
@silverandplatinumАй бұрын
Hey thanks so much! It’s nice to know that my channel is filling a gap - that was a big reason I started this channel. Thanks for watching!
@LaurentBourdierАй бұрын
That’s how photography was made one hundred years ago by the time of Edward Weston (8x10, contact print and dry mounting). Great to see it demonstrated. And you are lucky to have access to such a nice lab. For amateurs like me, the hot mount press is impossible to manage (too scarce, and too large). When I contact print 8x10 on 8x10 paper I like to keep the border untrimmed, otherwise it looks just like any other enlarged print.
@silverandplatinumАй бұрын
I am definitely lucky to live near San Francisco, where we have some fantastic darkroom facilities (although Edward Weston made contact prints at home with a regular light bulb!). I show the sheet film border sometimes, although sometimes I think it's also fun to crop that part out so that people DO compare it to a 35mm print and wonder why it's so sharp. Thanks so much for watching!
@patdebraekeler1010Ай бұрын
Nice pictures
@SonofNun1232 ай бұрын
Thanks Ryan. You just reminded me of the three years I spent in photography classes. Though in the fifteen years I spent working in photo labs, not once did i mount a photo that way professionally. I do miss that. Everything I do today is done digitally. Keep doing what your doing.
@silverandplatinumАй бұрын
Thanks so much! I also really enjoy all the little processes done by hand in photography
@andyvan56922 ай бұрын
at 6:00 maybe a ND filter, or at the printing stage, a lower contrast filter, to even out the brightness, as the light is fairly harsh, but great capture of the shadow details.
@andyvan56922 ай бұрын
you forgot 4 or 6 shots, as 120 is also used in 6x12 and 6x17 camera backs for LF and panoramic cameras, like Linhof Technorama, FujiG617 and a few other eg's.
@KanEast2 ай бұрын
Finally a show and tell portrait video. So sick of talking heads that offer zero value. Pictures is what we want to see. I'm gonna check out their website. 50 years of digital and these idiots still can't match large format film. Disgusting industry should vaporize and let film return to the game.
@Yayayamadrid2 ай бұрын
Hello! I'm a beginner, but I also shoot 8x10 photos, and when making contact prints, I often struggle to center the film on the paper. How do you use a contact printing frame or guide to ensure the film is centered on the paper? Is the paper size 11x14?
@silverandplatinum2 ай бұрын
There are different ways to do it. In this video I’m using 8x10 paper and 8x10 film, so it’s easy: I just align the edges. The white border is from the easel. With 11x14 paper, one trick you can use is to get an 11x14 mat with an 8x10 window, and bring that into the darkroom to use as a guide. You could also use a ruler, but that takes a little longer.
@Yayayamadrid2 ай бұрын
@@silverandplatinum Thank you for the clear explanation! I'll give it a try!
@neilmacdonaldfilm2 ай бұрын
Very nice prints.
@silverandplatinum2 ай бұрын
Thanks so much! I’m really happy with how these came out
@briantarpley96722 ай бұрын
Wow! Such a cool video Ryan!
@jackbfruby2 ай бұрын
Thankfully a film photographer who realises when shooting film the whole point is to actually develop and print the photographs via the darkroom, too many out there just shoot film then turn it into a digital file !!!…why don’t they just shoot digital. Subscribed
@silverandplatinum2 ай бұрын
Printing is the most satisfying part for me for sure! I feel lucky to have such great community darkroom spaces near me. Thank you so much for subscribing!
@analogueandy8x102 ай бұрын
Thank you for using film! 🙂 It's hard to beat HP5. I've been using it in several formats up to 8x10, forever. Cheers!
@silverandplatinum2 ай бұрын
Love the stuff. The only other B/W film I use with any regularity is Acros/Acros II. I used to scour eBay for expired Acros 4x5, but it’s gotten so rare that I gave up and just use the medium format version these days. Hopefully we’ll see some Acros II sheets someday! And the return of Fuji Pro 400H if anyone out there is reading my wish list 🙂
@analogueandy8x102 ай бұрын
@@silverandplatinum I also shoot Acros...the old stuff. I have a huge stock of it since Fujifilm announced its discontinuation several years ago. My wife just happened to be in Japan at the time visiting family, so she stocked up for me, including a few boxes of 4x5, and one 8x10. I do have some 120 Acros II, but won't touch them until I've finished going through the stock of old stuff. I also shoot several other films. A lot of IR, and recently, colour neg (self processing it is a hoot!) Cheers!
@chasingtheleitz2 ай бұрын
What aperture were you using in this exampIe? I''d imagine the base exposure and subsequent intervals thereafter would be dependent on your aperture. If the base exposure, in this case, was 4 seconds, and the lens was set to f8, then would it stand to reason that you'd want your base exposure to be 8 seconds, if using f11 on your enlarger lens?
@silverandplatinum2 ай бұрын
You could, but you don’t have to. The main thing I care about is that my desired exposure is somewhere on the paper. Beyond that, it doesn’t matter much to me what the bounds are
@seanmac55072 ай бұрын
Really "Living the Dream" with this video. The double exposure worked very well as a way to capture the memories and experience. A pleasure to watch.
@sheelios2 ай бұрын
close ups of the prints next time!
@swerbolicious2 ай бұрын
I agree, we needed to see those prints better!
@chriscard65442 ай бұрын
Beautiful negative and print
@LarryParamedic12 ай бұрын
Wonderful video and super images. Having friends with like interests is a blessing.
@silverandplatinum2 ай бұрын
Thanks so much! I'm lucky to be part of such an active film photo community here in the Bay Area; I've made a lot of great friends in the lab.
@photomaster12 ай бұрын
When you have a guest on your videos, do they also take images? If so, do they have links?
@silverandplatinum2 ай бұрын
Sometimes. Jazmin brought her digital camera this time, so her photos aren't right for the channel, and Annie won't develop hers for a while because she didn't finish a full roll. They also don't want me blowing up their socials. They're both talented photographers though; Annie's photos appear in my recent Flower Piano video, and a couple of Jazmin's prints are shown in the video I made of the Harvey Milk Photo Center gallery show if you want to check those out!
@Jim-z8j2 ай бұрын
@@silverandplatinum Too many of my digital friends admit they will take 50 pictures of a scene and hope they get one good photo. Those of us who shoot large format know enough to slow down, compose, take one picture and be done with it. Sheet film has gotten so expensive since I started 25 years ago.
@andrefelixstudio28333 ай бұрын
Nicely done!
@large_format_photography3 ай бұрын
what is the black tray to develop 0x10 film? please, send me a link
"Here is the lens" .. and im left wondering what lens??
@silverandplatinum3 ай бұрын
Landscapes are a 480mm, portraits are a 210mm. Just added full info to the video description
@faithbettencourt11513 ай бұрын
how would you do this on a black and white only exposure machine thing (sorry i’m new)
@silverandplatinum3 ай бұрын
No worries! It depends what kind of enlarger (machine thing :) ) that you have. Mine has those little magenta and yellow dials, but yours might not. You might have to buy a set of filters that can be inserted into your enlarger; different enlargers use different size filters so make sure you have the correct size. Where I use magenta 200, you'll use a #5 magenta filter. Where I use yellow 80, you'll use a #0 yellow filter.
@mattdavies50233 ай бұрын
subscribed. Gonna teach my students this one.
@silverandplatinum3 ай бұрын
Yessss please pass it on! And thanks for subscribing! I’ve been shooting a ton lately so recent videos are mostly on location, but I’m hoping to do some more darkroom tutorials like this in the future
@chickenitsa4 ай бұрын
Hello from Paris. I used the darkroom at the Center on my last visit to San Francisco. Have a great show!
@silverandplatinum3 ай бұрын
Wow fantastic! I’m happy you found out darkroom; it’s so nice to see photos from around the world
@pierrechouvin61964 ай бұрын
Hi, what lens are you using on the 8x10? kind regards
@silverandplatinum4 ай бұрын
This lens is a Fuji 210mm lens, so pretty wide. I can’t remember the exact model, but I know it opens to f/5.6
@inyomanpasma3314 ай бұрын
how to measure the diameter of a pinhole so you can determine the f/number
@silverandplatinum4 ай бұрын
My camera lists the f-stop on the manufacturer website. You can also use www.mrpinhole.com/calcpinh.php
@sheelios4 ай бұрын
love the sun flare in the first photo!
@chriscard65444 ай бұрын
0:04 I thought it was your tree-pinhole
@silverandplatinum4 ай бұрын
Haha I bet that’s actually possible, maybe one day I’ll try it. That is actually the cross-section of a 2000+ year old fallen redwood 😮 - they display it at the trailhead
@chriscard65444 ай бұрын
@@silverandplatinum awesome
@terrywbreedlove4 ай бұрын
I just selenium toned a couple fiber prints. That stuff smells LOL. I want to try toning with Selenium and Sepia on the same print someday.
@silverandplatinum4 ай бұрын
Yeah it’s pretty strong, especially at 1:4. I try to use it outside if I can. I’ve never had cause to really investigate sepia toning or split toning in my own work, but there may come a time! I’ll post a video if that happens
@terrywbreedlove4 ай бұрын
@@silverandplatinum Super I will be watching
@cesarecantarella21714 ай бұрын
Hi there Mr Ryan, great tutorial out of contest what brand is your easels. Regards Cesare
@silverandplatinum4 ай бұрын
Hi Cesare, thanks for watching! This is the darkroom at my school; they use Beseler easels.
@philipu1504 ай бұрын
Nice intro, Ryan. I assume you're using RC papers, from the short hypo clearing time you gave. I'll add a couple of comments. Different papers can respond very differently to selenium (and other toners). Dilution, toning speed, time/temp can all affect the result; even the printer developer can affect it, though two untoned prints developed in different developers might appear identical. For instance, Ilford Warmtone fiber base, in 1:19 selenium at about 68 F, shows only a slight change in the lower middle values until several minutes have passed. Fomatone, another warm-tone paper fiber paper, tones so fast at 1:19 that I use 1:80 (!) to have better control, and still rarely go beyond 2.5 minutes, unless a very full toning is desired. (If so, with the Ilford, I might use 1:9 or even a lower dilution to spend less time per print.) Most papers today are variable contrast, using a high-contrast and a low-contrast emulsion, which typically tone at different rates. This can produce a print with far more toning effect in the lower values. The result can be a print with two "colors", an effect the artist may or may not find desirable, depending on subject, extent, and tonal distribution.