No. The little horn is the Antichrist. “21- As I watched, this horn was waging war against the saints and prevailing against them, 22until the Ancient of Days arrived and pronounced judgment in favor of the saints of the Most High, and the time came for them to possess the kingdom.”

Why do you break the 9th commandment by slandering Christians for the sake of your tradition?

This has nothing to do with jezues lmao. ISRAELITES WILL RISE

A King of The Isralites Will Rise. HALAH HAWAH

Jesus was literally in the beginning with God and is God

The word became flesh

Agree with all you said except your timeline is off by 1 year. Artexerxes decree was 458/457BC to 26AD baptism/annointing of Yeshua and he was crucified in 30AD. His crucifixion could not have been 31AD given the full moon always occurs at Passover and in 31AD the full moon was on a Tuesday so rules it out as a possible year. (It was in March, the April full moon that year is too late in the month to be Nissan). We know from Luke 24:21, Jesus was raised the "on the third day" (exactly as He'd said) and that discussion in Luke 24 occurred on the "first day of the week" (Luke 24:1) which is what we call Sunday but Jews called "first day if the week (precisely sundown Saturday to sundown Sunday). Jesus was crucified on a Thursday, buried at sundown starting NIGHT 1 of 3 (Thur, Fri, Sat nights) and 3 DAYS (Fri, Sat, SunDAY). He was raised onbthe 3rd DAY, on Sunday as the sun began to rise, the "SON" rose fulfilling Malachi 4:2: "But for you who fear My name, the SUN OF RIGHTEOUSNESS WILL RISE with healing in its wings; and you will go forth and frolic like calves from the stall." That's a play on words (Sun/Son -- Jesus is called the bright, MORNING STAR afterall and the SUN is exactly that -- a STAR, the "Light of the world" -- that rises every morning and outshines all others. His ressurection occurred the "3rd day" which is the first day (Sunday) of the Jewish week. The only named day of the Jewish week was Sabbath (7th). Every other day was just called first day, second day, etc.

please attempt this with this factor. It makes sense. Plug BiBi Natenyaho as the Wicked. His political career was injured but came back. Jews are fleeing. Little horn pushed larger horn aside and is steering the iron beast. Crushing others. Consolidating all power in Isreel and will soon sit on a throne and declare supremacy. He doesn’t declare to be faithful. Persecuting the weak and those who claim to love God. Attacking the Saints of the Most High. The people of God. Christ will return to end the wicked and unite all those who believe in Him and the one who sent him, God. I know it’s a different perspective, but clear your preestablish view and please think about it.

This is not 2 pac or 666 Mafia

Great stuff my man !!!

I believe the star of Jacob is Nibiru, I believe the scepter is the staff of Ra and I believe the king is Ningishzida.... or Thoth, whichever you prefer. Just a hunch.😉

Jesus died for us to be our High Priest in heavens temple. He and the angels are making propitiation for us by pleasing God with feasts (sacrifices). Hebrews 2:17 and Hebrews 8:1-5. God has a body like we do because we are made in his image. Sacrifices are made morning and evening. You just need to obey the commands (even the law of Moses) to be resurrected. Obedience means discipleship too. You are born again on the day of the Lord. It would not hurt to understand where you live in Genesis 1 so the rest of the Bible makes sense also.

great explanation!

Can you guys do a review of a debate on the channel “breakfasttacos” there was an Arian Unitarian who absolutely wrecked an entire room of trinitarians. Thanks guys for the content

I went to church tonight and they were discussing this. Wha I got from it is as follows. The beasts were the empires starting with Babylon and ending with Rome. The Holy Roman Empire is the 4th and last beast. The little horn is the Vatican. There will be marriage between this Holy Roman Empire and the coming world government. From this a national Sunday law will be passed forcing you to worship at church on Sunday and by accepting this you will have taken the mark of the beast. God said the Sabbath was Saturday not Sunday so Martin Luther was correct when he called the Church the beast and accused it of blasphemy by in one case by deciding against God when the Sabbath would be observed. If you refuse to go along with this in the future you will have the mark of God and will not end up in the lake of fire forever and ever.

Now, more than ever ... Israel has lost its way 🙏

Where does this “seven-year” concept come from anyway? It may shock you, but if you look for “seven years of tribulation” in any concordance, you won’t find it. The truth is, from Genesis to Revelation, there is no exact passage that specifically mentions a seven-year period of tribulation at all. Amazingly, the entire theory is really based on a rather speculative interpretation of two little words in one single verse. The text is Daniel 9:27; and the two words are, “one week.” Let's go 1. The entire prophecy of Daniel 9:24-27 covers a period of “seventy weeks.” This period applies to one complete, sequential block of time. This prophecy would start during the Persian period and would end during the time of the Messiah. 2. Logic requires that the 70th week follow immediately after the 69th week. If it does not, then it cannot properly be called the 70th week! 3. It is illogical to insert a 2,000-year gap between the 69th and the 70th week. No hint of this gap is found in the prophecy itself. There is no gap between the first 7 weeks and the following 62 weeks. Why insert one between the 69th and the 70th week? 4. Daniel 9:27 says nothing about a seven-year period of tribulation, or about any Antichrist 5. The focus of this prophecy is the Messiah, not the Antichrist. Modern interpreters have applied “the people of the prince” who would come to “destroy the city and the sanctuary” (verse 26) to the Antichrist. Yet the text does not say this. In the past, that sentence has been applied to the Romans, who under Prince Titus did “destroy the city and the sanctuary” in'‘A.D. 70 6. “He shall confirm the covenant.” Jesus Christ came “to confirm the promises made unto the fathers.” Romans 15:8. Nowhere in the Bible is Antichrist ever said to make or confirm a covenant with anyone! The word “covenant” always applies to the Messiah, never to the Antichrist! 7. “He shall confirm the covenant with many.” Jesus said, “This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many.” Matthew 26:28. Jesus used the same words, because He knew that He was fulfilling Daniel 9:27! 8. “In the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease.” The 70th week was from A.D. 27 to 34. After three and a half years of ministry, Christ died in A.D. 31, “in the midst [middle] of the week.” At the moment of His death, “the veil of the temple was rent [torn] in twain from the top to the bottom.” Matthew 27. The Great Sacrifice had been offered! 9. “For the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate.” Jesus plainly applied this “abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet” (Matthew 24:15) to the time when His followers were to flee from Jerusalem before the destruction of the second temple in A.D. 70. Jesus told His 12 disciples, “When ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies [the Roman armies led by Prince Titus], then know that its desolation is near.” Luke 21:20, emphasis added. Those disciples did “see” those very events. Christ’s very last words to the Pharisees from inside the second temple were, “Behold, (Your house is left unto you desolate.” Matthew 23:38. Thus Daniel’s prophecy about Jerusalem becoming “desolate” was exactly fulfilled in A.D. 70! Jesus understood this perfectly. 10. Gabriel said that the 70'week prophecy specifically applied to the Jewish people (see Daniel 9:24). During the period of Christ’s public ministry of 3 1/2 years, the Master’s focus was largely upon “the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matthew 10:6). After His resurrection and then for another 3 1/2 years, His disciples preached mostly to Jews (see Acts 1-6). After that second 3 1/2-year period, in 34 A.D., the bold Stephen was stoned by the Jewish Sanhedrin (see Acts 7). This infamous deed marked the then-ruling Jewish leaders’ final, official rejection of the gospel of our Savior. Then the gospel went to the Gentiles. In Acts 9, Saul became Paul, the “apostle to the Gentiles” (Romans 11:13). In Acts 10, God gave Peter a vision revealing it was now time to preach to the Gentiles(see Acts l0:1-28). Read also Acts (l3:46) Thus approximately 3 1/2 years after the crucifixion-and at the end of the 70-week prophecy given for the Jewish people-the gospel shifted to the Gentiles exactly as predicted in Bible prophecy. The seventy weeks of Daniel therefore, have certainly ended many centuries ago. We are not to look to the future for the fulfillment of these predictions. We must look to the past. And if to the past; where is there one who can have any adequate claims to being the subject of these prophecies, but Jesus? He, and he only can claim them; and to him they most certainly refer. one would think, the people [the Jews] among whom [these events] occurred, could not possibly have misapplied the prophecy. “But they did. In fact, one major reason why the Jewish nation as a whole failed to receive its Messiah was because its scholars misinterpreted Daniel (9:27.) They failed to see Jesus Christ as the predicted One who would die in the midst of the 70th week! Amazingly, the exact same thing is happening today. Sincere Christian scholars are now misapplying the very same prophecy. The entire “seven-year period of tribulation” theory is an end time delusion, a massive mega-myth. It may even go down in history as the “greatest evangelical misinterpretation of all time.” The whole concept is like a gigantic bubble. Once Daniel 9:27 is correctly understood and the sharply-pointed pin of truth is inserted, “Pop goes the seven years!” It’s a fact: There is no text in the Bible which teaches a “seven-year tribulation.” If you hunt for it, you’ll end up like Ponce de Leo searching for the mystical Fountain of Youth, but never finding it.

what a load of crap, you have made stuff up and added to the scripture.

Great job! I enjoyed this discussion.

Great discussion. The “feminine attribute of Adam”, I didn’t really like that speculation on the part of the one brother. I do not believe Adam was diminished or an “attribute” was removed and given to Eve. That is adding to what is revealed in the passage. When his “rib” was removed, to create Eve, we can not assume Adam was diminished but instead like 1 Cor 11 expresses woman is made from man because she exists for man. It was not good for man to be alone so woman is made to meet the need of being a helpmeet for man. The point is before Eve was taken from man, he was already missing something that he needed. That lack or missing part of man did not begin when his rib was taken. Hopefully that makes sense. Let me know.

Trinity Verse for Review - 2 Revelation 22, basically from verse 10 on. KJV (currently I am using KJV, I have not been able to see if there are better translations, though I think the KJV has issues as well.) 10: And he saith unto me, Seal not the sayings of the prophecy of this book: for the time is at hand. -He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still. -And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be. -I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last. -Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city. -For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie. -I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star. -And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely. -For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: -And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book. -He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus. Ok, so the person who gave me this verse is saying that Christ is saying he is the Alpha and the Omega (and all the other stuff), because of the verse 2 down that starts with "I Jesus.....". But, I have reread this section many times, and I am wondering if it is a list of sayings, as the Angle speaking alludes to in Verse 10. So it should kind of read like this: 10: And he saith unto me: (The Angle) "Seal not the sayings of the prophecy of this book: for the time is at hand. -He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still." NOW SAYINGS OF GOD THE FATHER: -And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be. -I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last. -Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city. -For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie. NOW SAYINGS OF CHRIST -I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star. -And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely. NOW BACK TO THE ANGLE -For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: -And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book. -He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus. Thoughts?? Thank you much!!

Trinity Verse for Review. Someone gave me a list of "Trinity" verses. Here is one I feel like I have fleshed out, but could use a 2nd opinion. Zechariah 10: "God says, and they shall look upon ME whom they have pierced..." This persons point was as follows "God was pierced. This is strong evidence that Jesus is God." So using the Blue Letter bible website, I looked at the Hebrew. From what I could gather the word in Hebrew that is translated as "upon me", is NEVER listed in the Strong's as including the word "me". The word should not be in the translation. I was thinking it should read "upon whom they have pierced". On top of that when John quotes this verse... He states it as "And again another scripture saith, They shall look on him whom they pierced." John 19:37. And in the Greek "him" is not really there as an option for translation. It is really just whom. Which, given that, it seems to be a word for word quote from Zechariah to John. Thoughts?? Thank you much!!

Thanks John for this. Great insights!

Seventh month is September

I have a new testament translation from Arimaic. And in that translation Christ says, "before Abraham, I was.". Which kind of makes sense.

I always thought “I will be that which I will be” is kind of saying “don’t worry about it” or “who are you to ask me who I am? You cannot comprehend the vastness that is The Almighty”. That’s why HE chose those letters to describe himself: יהוה “I was, I am, I will be” it’s so special and epic!

Question: So do all three of you also have a thought that the Roman Catholic Church developed the Trinity because they were always Pagans, or Satan worshipers or some sort of continuation of the "pit of vipers". Just curious. Because that idea is what caused me to review the doctrines from the RCC. Thank you!

For the record, Brad also is a great speaker! Did not want to leave him out. Yah Bless!

Has anyone else noticed that during some of these debates (Trinity and otherwise), that some of them, that are for it, have some sort of red light behind them? For the new Yorker it makes his back drop red and purple. I just think it is interesting.

Wow this is fascinating information. Especially from the cowboy hat guy. So articulate and clear. Soooo different from the New Yorker, who just goes on rambling. Thank you to all of you! Kingdom Seeker, I have some verses that I could use some help in regards to the Trinity... If you have some time.

Wilwaukee pointed out on the side chat, that the MJAA (Messianic Jewish Alliance) needs funding so they appeal to the larger audience of Christians by promoting and defending the Trinity...that's an interesting point!!

It was very interesting to hear these two brothers point out the inconsistent and inaccurate use of Hebrew from Eduardo. I learned a lot from this discussion with them! Faces to Faces is plural because there's two faces...The Almighty Father and Moses. That's a big one! What was your key point that you took from this review? Thank you for watching yall!

HALLELUYAH! What a wonderful and glorious day that will be. Let us all reflect on how we live our lives and repent of our sins in preparation for that holy day!

YHWH is Yahweh, not Jehovah.

I really like your moderating. I see you should have spoken more The other brothers I appreciate their attempt but their reliance and dependence on rabbis, ancient Jews kabbalah and tradition instead of scripture really hurt this video. I would love to join you because I have a view is I believe merging many ideas using scripture. To say scripture is idiom or poetry is a cop out in my opinion.

Some great points on what I heard. I will download and listen soon, Lord willing. Love you all…

Excellent, thank you for this video. Soon we will see our King! 🥰🙏🏻

The Trinity violates Romans 1:23-25.

Only Unitarianism holds up to scriptural scrutiny. Jesus is a man in the entire Bible. Even in the end He still has a God (John 20:17, Revelation 1:6,3:12, 1 Corinthians 15:23-28). Never was Jesus looked at as God by any of his peers.

What about John 10:30?

This is awesome. My understanding has been enlightened. Thanks. God bless you.

Good job bro 👍

Exactly!

For if Jesus had given them rest, [katapauō] then would he not afterward have spoken of another day. There remaineth therefore a rest [sabbatismos] to the people of God. {Hebrews 4:8-9}

Romans 14 is saying nothing about the sabbath day. It's not even mentioned in the verses.

The Gnostic "Eight Day" origins of Sunday rest.

Only if you are the author of your own faith.

Go go Lebanon

Matt 28:19 when we get baptized why is it that it says The Father, The Son and Holy Spirit? It mentions all three?