7 ай бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@petev1606 5 күн бұрын
If you don’t believe Christmas on December 25, go to WORK!! Don’t accept Christmas gifts and Christmas bonuses!! Simple as that.
@MosesGrace-f8e Ай бұрын
May I clarify this for you? Gal 2: 14But when I saw that they were not straightforward about the truth of the gospel, I said to Peter before them all, “If you, being ONE WHO KNOWS/OBEYS THE LAW, live in the manner of LAWLESSNESS and not as the ONES WHO KNOW/OBEY THE LAW, why do you compel LAWLESS ONES to live as ONES WHO KNOW/OBEY THE LAW? 15We who are Jews, ONES WHO KNOW/OBEY THE LAW, BEING RAISED IN IT, and not ONES WHO DON'T KNOW/OBEY THE LAW of the NATIONS, 16knowing that a man is not justified by the ONE'S RELIGIOUS TRADITION but by faithFULNESS, OBEDIENCE TO THE LAW, in Jesus Christ, even we have STOOD-FAST in Christ Jesus, that we might be justified by faithFULNESS, OBEDIENCE TO THE LAW, in Christ and not by ONE'S RELIGIOUS TRADITION; for by ONE'S RELIGIOUS TRADITION no MAN shall be justified. ONE'S RELIGIOUS TRADITION = Judaism, Christianity, Pharisaic Oral Judaism, ect.
@18waywardson Ай бұрын
Sorry, but if he doesn't have the wounds of the crucifixion, he isnt my Lord. That's not Jesus.
@monicafloreani5487 Ай бұрын
Thank you for this fantastic analysis. Loved it!
@Sahih_al-Bukhari_2658 Ай бұрын
Skip to 2:03 for intro 3:47 Talk begins
@Sahih_al-Bukhari_2658 Ай бұрын
8:56 Intro 13:20 Intro to presentation 14:45 Presentation begins
@wonderfulfebruary 2 ай бұрын
You know who's really wonderful? You
@MatthewWayne33 2 ай бұрын
Thank you for this explanation.
@JeremyLewisHoff 2 ай бұрын
Could someone kindly tell me whether I have correctly understood the key differience with how Aquinas understands the resistabillity of grace, contra Augustine? Augustine sees all grace as intrinsically efficacious (or irresistible), since the creaturely will has nothingness as its only independent source. Therefore the only thing that distingishes sufficient grace from efficient grace is the strength of the impulse from God. Aquinas, however, makes a real distinction between the nature of sufficient grace versus intrinsically effectual grace, since, following Aristotle, the creaturely will is actually informed by being, as opposed to the platonic notion that the creature is devoid of the actual substance of being. This means that sufficient grace must be cooperated with by the will (which has actually been informed by grace) in order for it to go from potency to act, thus grounding the responsibillity of the will to act. Augustine, on the other hand, places all the responsibility to act with the will of God alone. Have I understood this correctly?
@kamilziemian995 3 ай бұрын
14:57 Seeing massive rate of divorce and annulments among Catholics, particular in USA, this saying about "marriage as friendship" fell deaf to my ears.
@kamilziemian995 3 ай бұрын
10:30 "Christocentric humanism" is a steel bar made from wood. Christ is God and man, you cannot be humanist putting God, ultimately, at the center.
@kamilziemian995 3 ай бұрын
9:53 Solidarity with unborn anyone?
@kamilziemian995 3 ай бұрын
9:19 Proper interpretation of Gaudium et Spes is so hard to achieve, that I think: why bother? Isn't christian life easier and more fruitful without spending time on document that is easy to misinterpreted and hard to interpreted properly?
@clairefph1 3 ай бұрын
Thank you Fathers. Grateful for this talk and q&a s.
@dariaschooler 4 ай бұрын
My mom met him when he visited the Art Institute of Chicago when she studied there from 1948-52. She was in the back of a packed room by the door as Dali was mobbed by everyone. Apparently he wanted a quick exit and dropped to the floor, crawling between his admirers legs to the door. He stood up right in front of her and signaled she stay quiet, and ran out the door without saying a word. My mother was equally talented, and devoted her life to her family and students.
@raysnvc 4 ай бұрын
Thank you very much for this detailed video!
@fireballgarcia1281 4 ай бұрын
Probably the best speech that has ever been posted to this website
@SteveHeinrichs 4 ай бұрын
Thank you for such a thoughtful presentation, communicated with a real depth of feeling. May we grow in the poverty modelled by Francis, and above all, Christ.
@robertsewe7273 5 ай бұрын
Congratulations Br Nick. Great speech
@frederickanderson1860 5 ай бұрын
Ecclesiastes chapter 7 v 16 says it all
@frederickanderson1860 5 ай бұрын
Jesus parables are simple and tailor made for simple people like fisherman and shepherds.
@GregMontoya1 5 ай бұрын
A human being is a person. It’s not complicated.
@theresameuse8583 5 ай бұрын
I'd like to see a catholic spiritual posting
@davidwright8432 5 ай бұрын
Very many thanks. I came across the Dali painting as a 10 yr old Catholic kid, and was startled and drawn into it. Likewise with Dali's other Christ figure, 'Corpus Hypercubus' ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crucifixion_(Corpus_Hypercubus) ). I was unaware of John of the Cross' sketch, which in some ways I find far more 'living' (ironic, but there it is) than Dali's - tho each has its own resonance.
@dennisdolan7250 6 ай бұрын
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
@migueleduardoescalante5381 6 ай бұрын
This Is Why in The Philippines They Have The Salubong Every Easter Sunday Commemorates This Scene
@HolyReV 7 ай бұрын
Father God Loves You so Much ❤️ Please let me know if You want to talk about Kingdom of God💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐
@HuwRaphael 7 ай бұрын
From marker 8:30ff: Brother's linking of Participatio Actuosa in Gaudium & Spes ¶68 and Sacrosanctum Concilium ¶14 made me sit up and gasp. There is so much to meditate on there! It seems telling that in the official English on the Vatican website, they are not translated the same.
@MRabbott13 8 ай бұрын
Too many people have died in the name of Christ for anyone to hear the call.
@john4elohim 8 ай бұрын
The Beatific Vision is seeing Jesus in His glory, and also seeing the Person no one ever saw directly - the Father. There will always be limits to our perception of God even on the level of this Vision. But that's the real beauty of it - we'll keep chasing the limits eternally without ever reaching it. Thereby, the more we gaze upon God, the more wonderful and beautiful He will appear - as though, to us, He "grows" in beauty everyday, continually and eternally. That's what makes the Beatific Vision inexhaustible in our awe of the LORD God.
@John-ng8fx 2 ай бұрын
No, probably not. It’s a pretty clear teaching that individuals’ perception and splendor is correlated with their merits and position in heaven. The idea of God perceivably “growing” in beauty as the source of our “inexhaustible awe” is entirely unnecessary and honestly approximates blasphemy. Not for suggesting God would appear to change, because you seem to make it clear that He isn’t actually changing, but because it suggests that beholding God in and of Himself, even at our limited capacity, isn’t sufficient for perpetual admiration. God fully comprehends **everything**, including Himself, and is perfectly content within Himself. To be sustained at, by, and with the most infinitesimal drop of His perfection would be enough to produce permanent awe and joy.
@john4elohim 2 ай бұрын
@@John-ng8fx _"....because it suggests that beholding God in and of Himself, even at our limited capacity, isn’t sufficient for perpetual admiration."_ --> Thanks, I understand my error. Any extent of our gaze upon His glory, no matter how small, must and will produce inexhaustible, everlasting admiration. _"The idea of God perceivably “growing” in beauty as the source of our “inexhaustible awe” is entirely unnecessary and honestly approximates blasphemy."_ --> I agree. _"To be sustained at, by, and with the most infinitesimal drop of His perfection would be enough to produce permanent awe and joy."_ --> Very well said. This is a new perspective for me. Then, based on our exchange, I'd say that our enjoyment of God is (for lack of a better word) 'multi-layered'. Our least perception of His glory, even without any degree of growth, is enough to dazzle us for eternity; but that perception will also expand everyday without an end.
@shermano2153 9 ай бұрын
Read Luke. Now I will listen.
@omar_3189 9 ай бұрын
Finally. But majority will not believe it, despite it's historycal
@FSFSFSFS532 10 ай бұрын
I've never heard such blatant lies, there are numerous years recorded in the bible after Jesus death, and none of his followers celebrated his birthday.
@gene3443 10 ай бұрын
The observance of Christmas on December 25 was not introduced until 353 A.D. The chief pastor at Rome, Julius I (336-352), had the imperial archives of Rome searched for the exact date of the birth of Christ. A subsequent pastor of Rome, Liberius (352-366), then fixed the celebration of Christmas for December 25. Justin Martyr (died 150 A.D.) writes: “Christ was born in Bethlehem, as may be gathered from the census records.” Another writer, Tertullian (155 or 160-220 or 230 A.D.), testifies that in the census of Augustus the Roman archives have provided the most reliable testimony of the birth of the Savior.
@CarlosGomez-pb8ry 10 ай бұрын
Love my catholic church is so full of teachings and it has an answer to every question , there is no way way that billions of cristians can be wrong by celebrating on december 25th . VIVA CRISTO REY .
@FSFSFSFS532 10 ай бұрын
Actually the Catholic encyclopedia states that Jesus was NOT born on December the 25.
@curiouser-and-curiouser 18 күн бұрын
Why is the Catholic Church the only entity that fits the description of the anti-christ? Do they have an answer for that?
@hossamhoussein 10 ай бұрын
So the pagans took the date from the true believers, hmmm and you want us to believe that?!!!!
@OLOLAK_7777 10 ай бұрын
Who he/she/it, celebrate Christmas is not a real follower of Jesus Christ nor a true Christian.
@ChrisWardofLegalShield 10 ай бұрын
That's just it. There is a good "biblical" argument for why the 25th. I will accept that it can be debated that the Christians piggy-backed Saturnalia and Sol Invictus but the Winter Solstice has been recognized since the Neolithic period over 12,000 years ago. The reality is that the modern Jesus was born at the First Council of Nicaea, between May-Aug of 325 AD under Emporer Constantine. That's why December 25th was not recognized as the birth of Jesus Christ until 333 AD.
@rtoguidver3651 10 ай бұрын
The Magi gave Gifts to Jesus - Not each other.??? Do you Worship Satan Claus, or Jesus Christ.???
@monabell9822 10 ай бұрын
❣️❣️
@lifesforliving4929 10 ай бұрын
We are enjoying figuring out a jigsaw of this painting and your analysis of it has made our happy task even more enjoyable. Thank you.
@konmanolis2907 11 ай бұрын
They didn’t keep records of births then, the 25 th of December is the ROMAN festival of the SATURNALIA ,the Christian’s just picked that date to convert pagans
@jamesgabriel7132 10 ай бұрын
celebration of Christmas started before the emergence of Christendom, one of the theory is that Constantine put christmas on 25th to standardize all religious celebration together. christmas and saturnalia celebration were celebrate side by side at that time. Sol invictus was another celebration that came later to be incorporated into 25th dec.
@aKaButtons15 11 ай бұрын
I’ve had this vision , I seen a Holy light in clouds and felt the presence of God , the authority the the Father is so powerful , extremely powerful , it’s so beautiful plus you will KNOW it’s God , your spirit knows the Father , I’m so blessed to have experience the Spirit of God 💕💕💕
@cynthiaanthony544 11 ай бұрын
Thank you father for the information
@Terabapu3156 11 ай бұрын
Thankyou sir for nice explanation may Lord Jesus Christ Ji bless you.
@MrCartmannn 11 ай бұрын
Heidegger 1, fat metaphysician 0
@user-bn6jg7jo5x Жыл бұрын
D kung ginawa Ng kasakiman kapalit buong Buhay Ng bansa wow tanung sa bioscience ako hirap hulahak YOU/ONE ME/KAYONG GAHA!AN YOU SA STOCK KEYBANK INYO PATI NG TAU INYO.
@user-bn6jg7jo5x Жыл бұрын
Anu kayo sa Buhay nyo kayo hack syakin nyo lhat maligtas nyo dhil pag ako gumawa d nagtugma pag double Ng lhi.
@JimOHara100 Жыл бұрын
Had the good fortune to be a parishioner at St. Dominic’s in Benicia when Augustine was there. Obviously an intellectual, but skilled and caring pastorally as well.
@aisthpaoitht Жыл бұрын
This is a great explanation. Thank you. It seems that matter is potentiality (quantum physics supports this). The potentiality is actualized by a mind. But we cannot actualize ourselves. So therefore, God.