Жыл бұрын
Жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@luizavillanueva5895 28 күн бұрын
❤🎉❤❤
@mohamedboutouizgha 5 ай бұрын
Good
@c3controls 4 ай бұрын
Thanks for your support! If you're in need of reliable electrical control products, check out our website at c3controls.com. We offer top-notch solutions for all your electrical needs. Shop today and experience the quality of c3controls!
@Keksik303 11 ай бұрын
Ребята!Используйте лотки для внутренней проводки,так же на дверцах шкафов тоже их крепите.Итог-все провода подвязаны в пучки и прямые линии,это всегда выглядит красиво
@kingofslotsmillion3263 11 ай бұрын
Ugly internal wiring
@UppergoEdge 11 ай бұрын
I want to apply for a job. I couldn't find your human resources link. I have 10 years of cam switch production experience. I assembled 600,000 products a year for different companies in Turkiye/ Istanbul. I think I can be useful in your production line. Thanks.
@c3controls 11 ай бұрын
Thank you for considering our company for your job application. Your 10 years of cam switch production experience and expertise in assembling products is impressive. Please send your resume and cover letter to www.c3controls.com/contact/ and we will be in touch. Best of luck!
@nadeemasif2406 Жыл бұрын
Sir how to check Standard sizes of magnetic contactor avalible in market
@peTeMelster Жыл бұрын
Could you explain the difference between a MCB and a standard size circuit breaker found in most U.S.A. residential homes? What are the pros/cons of an MCB versus a standard size circuit breaker?
@chrisbarnett6982 2 жыл бұрын
Can a UL 1077 Supplemental Protector be used to downsize a conductor to a single device? For example, if I have a UL 489, 15A breaker protecting several control circuit loads, I would need to use #14AWG conductors. If one of those control loads draws 1A (and is within the panel), can I place a 1A UL 1077 Supplemental Protector after the UL 489 breaker and downsize the conductors to the device, say with a 22AWG conductor?
@shinypuneet 4 жыл бұрын
Hi !, at 0:42 Instead of synchronous it should be asynchronous.