Don’t forget this woman’s role in the death of Ruth Perry …

this guy is a genius in a sense

A breathe of fresh air from the suffocating crowds of ideology in Australian education

🤩

37:23 Diagrams

Hard to believe that a school that charges such a great deal and ensure that they only get the top students performs so well. Inequity in education at its finest.

Voice is annoying as hell

Great to see that these ideas are beginning to reach the mainstream - I almost did a doctorate on spatial-metaphorical thinking way back in the '70s! If you get interested in these Lakoff-influenced ideas for representing thinking, the next level is to understand that pretty much any coherent abstract theory in fields like economics, politics, psychology, management and sociology is built on an underlying metaphor. But normally the metaphor is implicit, which does not help any kind of critical thinking on the issue. Bringing the metaphor to the surface helps clarify what aspects of reality the theory can illuminate, and what aspects it is omitting for the sake of simplicity and abstraction. Once you begin to see clashes of ideas as clashes of metaphors, it becomes much easier to extract some light from the heat. (And I note that quite unconsciously I used a physical metaphor to describe metaphorical thinking - those little critters sure are ubiquitous...)

Too many uh's and um's.

Mary Pleassssss come to my school and back me up on these issues. Mary for Education minister!

I think cookbooks are written like that so that you can make a comprehensive shopping list... Great video though. They really should just put ingredients in both!

Rosenshine is nothing but stating the obvious. This is just trying to make a science out of something aka snake oil

Wow thank you this is fantastic

36:30 visual organizers

He’s so cute! 🧸

I wish more senior leaders would watch this.

This is one of the best talks on research in education that I've come across, touching on so many important points. Really happy to see him focused on measurement, and on the limitations of RCTs and meta-analyses. A million likes for the idea that just telling people "do X" often does little good. And that there can be no professionalization without putting teachers at the center of research development. There's a couple of clarifications that I think bear more explanation, though. He doesn't explicitly use this word, but part and parcel of the "what works" question is HOW things work. That's part of understanding the context. If you just say "well, with group X, it had an effect size of .5; with group Y, it had an effect size of .3... etc." That's not really that helpful. You need to investigate the mechanism. For the feedback studies, the question is, can we give a compelling explanation that makes sense of the variation in outcomes. And then testing those explanations. It's almost never a question of "feedback works" or "homework doesn't work". That's part of what makes this kind of research so endlessly fascinating - and also endlessly challenging to communicate. Because every time you say "feedback is important" you have to say fifty other things about how feedback helps, why it doesn't work when it doesn't work, things that we have a good handle on, things that we don't know at all, etc. Also, getting "general" effect sizes is often not the main point of meta-analyses. A lot of times, as he said, that number is completely meaningless. But the point is to explicitly explore the factors he's talking about - does age make a difference? Did time spent on feedback make a difference? Etc. The results are certainly not definitive, but suggestive of certain explanations.

Many thanks for your continued interest in this

Maybe they rent a room and work from home!

Hello.thank you

Could you put a link to the PowerPoint up?

Latest news: Sweden has cheated in the reports to PISA in order to lie to the own population ( and to the world) about better results than reality.

Amazing presentation. That Fibonacci Clock was really tough to understand.

Where my St. Andrews people at?

Great stuff, Harry! Sending best wishes to you and the family for 2021.

buy a watch

All very useful, would be more accessible as a podcast on a platform such as ITunes and Spotify, would help you grow too, appreciate every upload thank you

20:56 a thesis

18:42 - 18:57 O_o :O

Be sure to watch Andreas Schleicher's TED talk (referenced by Sjoberg) to hear PISA's rationale. This video is widely cited by PISA haters, but I've never seen Schleicher's talk cited in the same context. Note too that the German Institute for International Educational Research found that 85% of the between-country variation in PISA Mathematics Literacy could be explained by TIMSS, and vice versa. They reported a similar finding for science. So Sjoberg's criticisms of curriculum not being included in PISA doesn't seem to matter when it comes down to testing whether students can actually think independently in the end.

That weird moment when studying for your PGCE and your old RE/Sociology teacher's video is used as a resource! Hi Mr White!

Could someone provide a full citation of Weinberg’s study? The internet does many things, but it cannot seem to locate this study

Great presentation. Very useful, thanks

What was the research Wales? re. reading aloud to kids?

Really found this practical and realistic

This was so awesome. Ideas being either in a container or a path model.

Sound really poor

Excellent video content! Sorry for chiming in, I am interested in your thoughts. Have you considered - Teannah Psychic Sucker (erm, check it on google should be there)? It is a good one off product for finding the best project management and business templates without the hard work. Ive heard some incredible things about it and my m8 after many years got astronomical results with it.

Thank you Cat Scutt for the talk. So much to relate to and take away. Always believed in practices you have mentioned. So much reassurances for me to gather. Gratitude!

Thank you for sharing this fascinating lecture, it's going to be very useful especially when tutoring my teen daughter. 🙏🙏

Thanks so much for sharing this video, it's useful in helping understanding the importance of prior knowledge and retrieval. Personally this is something I need to have clear to support my Year-8 child' learning.

Watched this whilst multitasking, don’t @ me :)

Thank you for this really informative talk. Please could I have a copy of the slides you mentioned around cognitive load theory. Many thanks ([email protected])

Thanks for this. Could we have the link please?

Thank you.

This was fascinating - so many useful tips to take back to the classroom! thank you Daniel!

Nice one guys - really enjoyed this. thanks.

seeing the presenter sitting on a bed conveys unprofessionalism and disrespect towards the speaker and the audience.

Very interesting and lots to consider!

This is so useful Adam. The issue of split attention of course is a massive issue with online learning as it is virtually impossible to ensure that students are not being distracted by other stimuli when they are in their bedroom with lots of potential distractions that might not be available in their classroom e.g. mobile phones, TV, other household members. Any advice of how to deal with this?