I owned a variant of this weapon w/o firing pin. Paid 21k back in 2001
@Raul_Rogriguez8 күн бұрын
can you do more italian army things? example, cannone da 149/40, m13/40, 75/18 pls?
@Amz_H9 күн бұрын
Although it looks very nice, the turret is too long so it cannot rotate and is very heavy so its speed is quite slow
@naimexx10 күн бұрын
flat boi
@KeepARE22 күн бұрын
Мне лень переводить, так что кому интересно, тот сам сможет перевести. Это не может быть М1а5, потому что танк выглядит как концептуально новая платформа. Это не имеет отношения к действующему Абрамсу. А если речь идет о следующем поколении танков, то почему он А5, если до него должны были быть модификации с А1-А4?))
@GabrielAguayo-jh3sr23 күн бұрын
Ah yes, the next rank VI premium for 50$
@357reasons723 күн бұрын
Leopard 2a6 type of composite armor on abrams turret feels so weird, but makes sense
@guardsman-against-the-chaos23 күн бұрын
Looks like an Abrams and a leapord 1 had a child.
@AdheDwiPutraHamzah-z6b24 күн бұрын
Nice i is it from Revell? I have the mil mi 24 hind-D
@KMZX_70024 күн бұрын
Should be in Enlisted.
@trturr24 күн бұрын
no aps though?
@Aussie_swagger43026 күн бұрын
Fav vehicle in 2042
@Кумысик-ь4к26 күн бұрын
Что за кузнечик?
@Skhajavi-tz4xd27 күн бұрын
It is made very orderly and coordinated good luck
@ok3d18927 күн бұрын
Thank you! You too!
@UnwrappingByMimiKoteng29 күн бұрын
Hi. Can do a avlb bridge tank pls.
@cmdr4229 күн бұрын
fancy shmancy
@DEERCRACKERLOVERАй бұрын
Funny cheap made in china drone beating an expensive tank
@thecorneroftheinternet4656Ай бұрын
Leobrans has become reality
@CrakenАй бұрын
M1a3 *Special* Equipment Package v4
@YellowBaboon2009Ай бұрын
I think I'll use this vehicle in a book
@k1apollo693Ай бұрын
Will it have the same turret ring driver port weak spot. Will it also have modern equipment on it like spall liner, middle warning, active protection, and etc.
@wyne9145Ай бұрын
So how can driver get inside a Tank?
@streetfighter2471Ай бұрын
I had the honor of serving on this machine back in '42.
@DonteatnuggetsАй бұрын
Man this is the guy that said funny things about a commander guy that die in a t-90m
@_wayward_49429 күн бұрын
@@Donteatnuggets huh
@AutumnStar097Ай бұрын
Looks kinda good, kinda wish the US army make like this ngl
@ghostface6947Ай бұрын
Warthunder forums do your thing!
@EpicnessandderekАй бұрын
hstvl looking ahh
@thedesignerblacksmith5953Ай бұрын
Ah, so I was coming from this video? But was the tank real?
@thedesignerblacksmith5953Ай бұрын
That's cool. I don't seems to be able to find any info on this piece quickly Like, it should be taken into consideration, as from what I know, recoilless gun is pretty late war weapon (although the concept has been there since the 30s)
@thedesignerblacksmith5953Ай бұрын
I think there can be 2 seats for the carriage Still, it's no where near any modern anti air platform
@thedesignerblacksmith5953Ай бұрын
I saw the design of a flatform that contain everything in Russian 50mm mortar, French 50mm and German 50mm. That's good since lighter mortar can be aimed at being lighter. In heavier mortal like this, disassembly ability would be a good thing since a single piece of any part is already very heavy, and mortar teams never get a good amount of shell for a small number of men.
@thedesignerblacksmith5953Ай бұрын
Thank you for the model. It was nice to know Like, it was first come to my knowledge that some cannon flatforms have this circular thing under the wheel, when I see the M119 cannon. I was calling it "cannon plate" as like mortar plate. If I remember right, the M102 have something like that too. It would be quite careless to learn just from Wiki and some KZbin video, but there is just no real explain on what with that design. It's so nice that the 25 pounder QF wiki has some explain on it. And I'm still thinking on comparing this and the D30 122mm platform. D30 is of course more heavy duty of a cannon, while M102 prove to be lighter solution
@thedesignerblacksmith5953Ай бұрын
People used that much pod back then? Like I know Soviet and their D30 122mm which is unique not just to the world but also to Soviet artillery system, but it takes tripod.
@theangeryyАй бұрын
Okay now show us the inside
@KvakenKvakovichАй бұрын
героин или мефедрон
@derrickstorm6976Ай бұрын
Lol remaking the entire turret? Doubt that
@카일이-e6mАй бұрын
Spin
@WarAndThunder-li2ivАй бұрын
Make the actual M1 Abrams 💀
@leclerceazyАй бұрын
а как у тя будет водитель залезать в танк
@garyhand5104Ай бұрын
Jesus Christ they made it bigger
@cubanspy1231Ай бұрын
massive neck jam
@VALMOXАй бұрын
I gonna make this tank with LEGO on my channel soon
@haouribiАй бұрын
Abrams X isn’t even out yet 😭 🙏
@fredlodersy6489Ай бұрын
Cool Leobrams
@pacificfederationpeacekeep999Ай бұрын
Is there a way i could use this vehicle
@Le_pakg4468Ай бұрын
It just looks like a leopard or merkava at this point. I guess that means theyre peak design?
@schnitzel_enjoyerАй бұрын
Knowing americans, they will make the turret asymmetrical and find every way to make the tank look like it was put together in a backalley garage
@KwisssАй бұрын
Leopard 2's turret is actually asymmetrical if you take off the wedges. Its clear from a top down point of view. Most tanks are actually asymmetrical due to needing space for the gunner/commander in the typical four crew configuration.
@skadoosh2396Ай бұрын
Most tank turrets are asymmetrical... Plus with urban combat, honestly camo nets made of trash ain't too bad of an idea
@kronk9418Ай бұрын
The Abrams objectively looks better than the Leopard 2A5+.
@belgianfriedАй бұрын
@@kronk9418 It is better in nearly every technical aspect save for weight, too. Ergonomically I would complain about its lack of loader safety (there is no breech guard for the recoiling action trunnion-lengthwise during firing) and driver seat. Awkward entry and egress.
@tafed3165Ай бұрын
nice tank bro unfortunately apfspds from side
@Marshmallow603Ай бұрын
is it even an abrams anymore?
@GwantPlayzАй бұрын
looks like abrams and merkava if they had a baby💵💵
@fefferenАй бұрын
looks more like it'd be the M1A4 Abrams or perhaps the M1A4/A5 Abrams II
@conservativedemocracyenjoyer14 күн бұрын
Why would it be called Abrams II when it uses the same M designation?