Separation and Mortgages | #AskAndrew
30:42
Section 7 Hassles
3:35
3 жыл бұрын
Personal Loans
4:08
4 жыл бұрын
Enforcement of Separation Agreements
2:27
Support for the Adult Child
4:21
4 жыл бұрын
Early Retirement
3:03
4 жыл бұрын
The Maximum Contact Principle
2:28
4 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@tamidelgado8698
@tamidelgado8698 18 күн бұрын
Love your series, informative and helpful.
@lanitawolfe1003
@lanitawolfe1003 22 күн бұрын
Anyone over the age of 18 who is not been convicted of a crime and who is responsible under law is permitted to complete service upon another party as long as it’s within the time period allotted and they don’t need to reopen the case and they provide a certificate of service, which is authenticating Under oath that they serve the person in the event service was not made within the time. Required to make that service. You need to have the person your serving sign for the complaint and date otherwise there’s no signature required on the part of the other party and in fact, as long as you know, you have the person right in front of you you know even have to touch them. You can just drop it at their feet and say you’ve been served, if you don’t have any idea how to do this or have no experience at all. It’s best to hire someone even ask Constable to serve the complaint and always execute the certificate of service verifying as an affidavit that you did in fact, have them served that has to be done by the person serving you should not serve them yourself, I wouldn’t even recommend having family do it but anyone else if you know them can serve as long as they are over the age of 18 and legally allowed to do it unless they are fell or something like that it doesn’t apply for them to be able to do it I know because I’ve done it
@TripleJGaming_
@TripleJGaming_ 29 күн бұрын
If the recipient lives outside Canada with one child, say the country where they reside has low cost of living, will that be taken into account in the computation of spousal abduction child support?
@l.w.2468
@l.w.2468 Ай бұрын
On the other side, if a spouse gave up their career aspirations for their spouse, then suddenly, after 30 years of marriage, was asked for a divorce, the need that support.
@sstorm1328
@sstorm1328 2 ай бұрын
One last thing: if a client wants to get around the problem you guys mention about the communication of criminal evidence between lawyers... Tell your client to get a lawyer who can represent them both in criminal and in family court. Simple. The husband mentioned in my comment above has lawyer who represents him in Provincial criminal court as well as in family court. You guys need to be better qualified to do both.
@sstorm1328
@sstorm1328 2 ай бұрын
I ve been helping a friend with a separatiin/divorce (one young child) following domestic violence that did not end with her in hospital, just 2 or 3 instances of cuts, bruises and strangulation marks on her neck. She had photos, neighbour who heard her screams, me who saw the marks and was texting with her immediately following one of the scarier moments, and who offered her and the child refuge for a week at my place afterward. Hoping for the situation to calm down, we prepared a statement for police, but made no report immediately, because we did not want him in trouble with the police, and did not want more ill will. We are in Alberta, where the police do not lay charges unless there is hospitalization or unless you pay a lawyer I m guessing. Cops just tell you to get an EPO and that means maybe exclusive possession of the home but no charges. Only after hubby changed the locks on home, invited his wife to return to house to get some clothes while he was gone camping with the kid on a weekend (with her consent), had a family member from out of province armed and waiting in hiding for her at the home with cameras rolling (hoping to get video of some violence probably in order to accuse her of something-he had plenty of experience with restraining orders etc and we had none)..... Only then did she report all to cops and then go get an EPO.... We had asked cops to attend the home before getting a locksmith to open the door and that was really smart, as the hidden relative tried to threaten locksmith with a knife and cops needed to intervene. He also served her with an urgent hearing to get sole parenting just before the locksmith incident on the basis of lies saying she wanted to kidnap the kid and return to E. Europe where she had nothing waiting for her. He had everything setup to get her charged with a crime and get the home and sole parenting...... I spoke for her in court, and we asked for shared equal parenting and he repeatedly asked for sole.... And we got 90% parenting...probably because we were reasonable and he was a complete dick. But he got ample unsupervised parenting visitation. Then a sex worker contacted us 6 months later.... He has been exposing the kid to a series of prostitutes, has sexually assaulted and battered sex workers while the kid was in the house, has bragged around town of his work in porn to same people he presents his child to, sleeps or takes drugged naps while leaving the kid in the care of sex workers, etc. Etc. Etc...... News flash to concerned parents: child services in Alberta will not open a file or get involved in any matter concerning a child if a parent makes a report to them.... Not if there is a family court parenting order in place. They will not get involved either even if a doctor or psychologist or teacher makes a report to them ... Not if there is already a court parenting order in place. If you get Child Services involved as a parent... Or make a report to them as a parent, and if a family court judge knows you did that, or if you tell the judge you made a report to Child Protection the judge will probably take away a lot of the parenting time from the concerned parent and might give the kid over to the parent who is endangering the child. Judges are lawyers and and they do not believe women or mothers who are accusing fathers of anything. So do Not go to Child Services.... A study from an Ontario university revealed recently judges do NOT apply the clauses in the Divorce Act relating to the protection of the child to cases before them. They always disbelieve whoever makes the application and it is dangerous to try to protect a kid from a criminal father.... The mother might lose her parenting! Judges all believe that just because a father or mother is a criminal, he or she can still be a great parent. Not a problem if a Dad sniffs Coke in front of his kids.... Still a great Dad and will probably raise great citizens. Luckily in our Case, we have the testimony of at least one prostitute and her 14 page affidavit... So. Maybe we can ask for supervised visits or no more overnight stays until or if the Dad can make promises, take classes, or do anything to demonstrate he is not wishing the worst for his kid. But we know it is a really risky proposition ..... I'm guessing we need to make a police report first. The police seem willing to lay charges on behalf of the sexual battery of the prostitute.... Maybe they might be willing to assist in protecting the kid from exposure to porn and sexual misconduct. By the way, the wife 's EPO went to trial.. 100 pages of evidence, but we were only allowed to present 10 pages.... Photos. Witness affidavits. Police reports..... The judge never read a single word, did not allow the wife to testify or tell the court what happened.... He went straight to cross..... All she could do was stand still and deny all the accusations of the opposing lawyer none of them based on any evidence...... She had no lawyer due to the lawyer being too busy at the last moment. She presented the 3 criminal charges of breach of EPO to the judge and he literally threw back into the face of the court clerk..... And then he dismissed the EPO!!!!!! She must have asked the police 6 times to lay charges... Will never happen. If the Dad had not raped and sodomized the prostitute and if the girl had not reported it to police, and if she had not made it known to Crown prosecutor ... His charges of breach of Epo would have been dismissed and she would have no protection at all.... This guy has nothing but restraining orders against him from all previous women in his life (not relevant to family court).... Has plead guilty to rape of a minor when he was just under 18 (not relevant to fMily court)..... Etc etc etc. Boasts about his years working in porn industry to all and sundry...(mostly sex workers) . Presents his kid to the same people..... Police here in Alberta rely on EPO to do their job... Not charges of domestic violence (I have heard that historic and ridiculous charges have been laid in some cases but I now tend to disbelieve it is possible...). .... Judges don t believe the women no matter how generous and naive the women are,.... Even I tended to disbelieve the women and all the accusations they make before living through this situation. I have not even told half of the worst of it here.
@sstorm1328
@sstorm1328 2 ай бұрын
More interviews like these! This was good....
@sstorm1328
@sstorm1328 2 ай бұрын
Many European countries don t have treaties with Canada regarding Child custody or parenting orders from Canada. How would a parent permit another to travel with child to Gree Ce for instance, with no worries? File a consent order agreeing to Alberta jurisdiction for Such matters in A Greek court?
@kurtstovall5040
@kurtstovall5040 3 ай бұрын
Their is no arrearage on child support and no interest on child support the u.s. d.o.j stated this.
@kurtstovall5040
@kurtstovall5040 3 ай бұрын
All three decisions has no standing under no state constitution e or authority given. D.O.J Equal access to justice March 14. 2015 .
@kurtstovall5040
@kurtstovall5040 3 ай бұрын
Listen to her again words . As she started.. another factor.... Why the word retroactive is a curse.
@kurtstovall5040
@kurtstovall5040 3 ай бұрын
A Vincent order. Means your not a adult you don't have knowledge law and self as a citizen. That you are without knowledge law and self to govern your adult status. And you have just placed yourself as a .. "Minor" ... without knowing.
@kurtstovall5040
@kurtstovall5040 3 ай бұрын
Listen to this trap for attorney.. she stated retroactive child support that's not paid. Retro means.. beginning and past. That is like black law dictionary.. filling a Nun Pro Tunc. Beginning and past.. it never ending payment beware of these attorneys this is math and science.
@SandraEvans-te1vp
@SandraEvans-te1vp 4 ай бұрын
My daughter took off and left my granddaughter in 2019 and I raised my granddaughter by myself for 2 years the man my daughter took off with went to prison. So my daughter got off drugs and quit prostitution. So I let my granddaughter go stay with her mom ONLY because I was her daycare. Everything was good up until that man got out of prison he was out one week when he stopped me from seeing or talking to my granddaughter and he is not even her father. He just controls my daughter. This man put drugs in my daughter's arm and put her on the streets to prostitute now he has my 7 year old granddaughter! How is this even legal?
@robertghigliotty765
@robertghigliotty765 4 ай бұрын
So this vid has just started said the case wraps around 6g a yr thats 500 a month 125 a week over 18 yrs thats 36k so your telling me this guy was ordered 75percent of his income? Thats crazy and the lady was asked how did he hide it idk tomato tamato who cares lets not dwell on petty details(facts) smh
@user-yp8xv1jb7f
@user-yp8xv1jb7f 4 ай бұрын
The lawyers are liars in family court. It is not right or fair
@Jas111ld
@Jas111ld 4 ай бұрын
I wish the society would follow the law, especially after putting her with the abuser, person with a criminal record, who made the compains found to be false, but I have disabilies, can not make phone calls, and I have been threathened , no help , it is sick what they are doing, my child was fine, now she is suffering from ptsd, was traumatised , we all are, no therapy , my child is told to be quiet about what happened to us, and is still happening, for 3 years now
@ultimate8550
@ultimate8550 4 ай бұрын
Here is what she is actually saying..."We know that your child is probably being abused or neglected by the other parent, and this would more than explain their refusal to visit with said parent. But you can't actually bring that up in court, or take any kind of protective action without being labeled an "alienator" and having the kids removed from your custody. This is because the judges, lawyers and evaluators involved don't understand coercive relationship dynamics, and routinely deny abuse. These same people may also have financial ties to reunification camps which have a vested interest in making sure alienation theory is perpetuated, regardless of contradicting evidence. Instead, you have to pretend that the other parent is doing nothing wrong and you must lie to your child, and gaslight them into believing they aren't in danger or being abused. It's not the responsibility of the parent the child is refusing contact with to make any changes to their parenting approach. No, it's YOU who is responsible for maintaining that relationship and making sure your child is ok with the other parent's shitty behavior. Therefore, any refusal behavior the child exhibits must be YOUR fault and a result of you coaching the child to feel that way. It could not possibly be the child's own, organic response to their experiences with that parent! Blasphemy, that would mean we would actually have to acknowledge that abuse is happening and that alienation theory is a load of garbage that is forcing kids into the home of their abuser!."
@christinamattson6520
@christinamattson6520 5 ай бұрын
What if my son will get a certificate of completion when he finishes high school but will never have a steady job because he has Downs Syndrome, an intellectual disability? Can I continue to get child support for him? There won’t be any reason for continuing education.
@tolowreading6807
@tolowreading6807 5 ай бұрын
Force your child to spend time with someone they don't want to see? Sounds like a nightmare.
@ultimate8550
@ultimate8550 4 ай бұрын
It's either that or be accused of alienation, and have them removed from your custody. This is why alienation theory is demonized in Domestic Violence advocate circles...its way to easy for abusers to weaponize it against protecting parents.
@tolowreading6807
@tolowreading6807 4 ай бұрын
It is a nightmare@@ultimate8550
@xAlphaSpiderx
@xAlphaSpiderx 5 ай бұрын
😂
@user-yv3wq9yq8i
@user-yv3wq9yq8i 5 ай бұрын
Human trafficking selling child for money
@annalisavajda252
@annalisavajda252 5 ай бұрын
Well honestly I would think it was illegal to lie to police and the court but apparently lots of them don't care to verify facts or hold liars accountable anyway. Rather shocking actually how someone can just make claims.
@annalisavajda252
@annalisavajda252 5 ай бұрын
Well honestly I would think it was illegal to lie to police and the court but apparently lots of them don't care to verify facts or hold liars accountable anyway. Rather shocking actually how someone can just make claims.
@ScalesOfaRam
@ScalesOfaRam 5 ай бұрын
The OCL is nothing more than a bunch of feminists, furthering the discrimination and bias against men in family court. Nicole Perryman also bring a racial aspect, using her "not for profit" racist organizations to influence policies.
@LatinBostonH8ter79
@LatinBostonH8ter79 5 ай бұрын
What if I find a deadbeat dad that never paid child support and was found many years into adulthood of the child.
@lythiascanlon2131
@lythiascanlon2131 6 ай бұрын
God bless you my darling, but you look like someone is making you speak at gun point.
@stellaeduardo7061
@stellaeduardo7061 6 ай бұрын
Promo'SM
@Mental-Maniac
@Mental-Maniac 6 ай бұрын
Child support was originally intended neither to address the financial needs of the child nor serve as a funding source for the mother. The father's increased child support raises concerns, as its purpose is to cover costs incurred by the county and compensate court contractors. The persistence of this practice raises questions about its constitutionality. Additionally, the combination of business contracts and the collection of funds from a U.S. citizen without due process raises legal issues. If the mother resorts to public assistance, the father may have the right to seek custody, relieving the state of its financial burden. It is worth noting that in 1924, the Social Security Administration created Title 4D, where the mother was originally intended to be on child support for a brief period. The father was granted the right to take custody if he agreed to care for the child, preventing the mother from becoming a long-term burden on the county's resources. For reference, consider Title 4D enacted in 1924.
@newaveride3396
@newaveride3396 6 ай бұрын
So ave plus length of marriage?
@HappyDudeCustoms
@HappyDudeCustoms 7 ай бұрын
Great video
@dirtyminerapparel
@dirtyminerapparel 9 ай бұрын
Child support is a scam! It’s not for the child it’s for the state and women use it as spousal support. No kid needs thousands a month.
@rosemary4802
@rosemary4802 9 ай бұрын
Thanks so much
@rosemary4802
@rosemary4802 9 ай бұрын
Thank you
@jimfrank7538
@jimfrank7538 9 ай бұрын
Thank you for the great advice. At 71,still paying half my wages in spousal support l will apply your reasonable and common sense advise to my counsel. Thank you..
@davidbrewster9743
@davidbrewster9743 10 ай бұрын
Great episode. Wish I had gotten the notification. I would have asked questions about foreign property. :)
@bsdgffishtuna5186
@bsdgffishtuna5186 11 ай бұрын
Hi. A quick question. I recently got married and my wife has a pre-existing debt with the CRA for about $30,000. We have not filed taxes and until now I've been solo filing. Am I going to inherit her tax debt if I file jointly with her? Thank you.
@district5198
@district5198 Жыл бұрын
Freedom of Information requested mothers vs fathers child support, have it documented FRO say they don’t keep that statistic. They are trying to bury the discrimination. All documented and all going online for everyone to see their BS.
@user-bs3kn4ew9w
@user-bs3kn4ew9w Жыл бұрын
1st amendment freedom of speech yes it is not defamation that is opinion not defamation.
@user-cf3cp3zm1j
@user-cf3cp3zm1j Жыл бұрын
If someone wants to know about attorney and lawyer-related best information the link is given below aiattorneylawyer.com/mental-health-lawyers/
@MrProfessional777
@MrProfessional777 Жыл бұрын
Both parents are responsible for financially supporting the child!!! Mother's, often the custodial parent, manipulate the courts and are the intentionally under employed party!
@davidbrewster9743
@davidbrewster9743 Жыл бұрын
Succinct and great contact... as usual. :)
@stillasking
@stillasking Жыл бұрын
Any ideas on how to get a man out of jail for non payment of child support without a lawyer?? Thanks to our wonderful government, there is no way! So how many people are currently in jail for this? How many tax dollars go into paying for these sentences? This is an absolutely ridiculous way to deal with this issue! Many people are broke, jobless and homeless! So what do we do about it...we throw your ass in jail while your new family goes on welfare! Again I ask, how many tax dollars go into that!?😡😡
@impactxl
@impactxl Жыл бұрын
Cam I ask for visitation order first appearance?
@kanyesigyejotham5692
@kanyesigyejotham5692 Жыл бұрын
Kindly help me to stand in Uganda with divine harvesters trust
@natashahill4572
@natashahill4572 Жыл бұрын
You are doing a great job on your channel. This channel needs to look into Promo sm!!!
@teofiloencarnacion1972
@teofiloencarnacion1972 Жыл бұрын
nOT AUDIO
@amadeuss3341
@amadeuss3341 Жыл бұрын
Family law = fairness ? 🤣🤣 that's a nice joke
@irinasolarova2636
@irinasolarova2636 Жыл бұрын
This was very helpful. Especially the part about blended families. Thanks for giving insight.
@johnjackson9235
@johnjackson9235 Жыл бұрын
Here is a fallacy in your logic about the implication of retirement. As a general rule, all marital assets are split 50/50 and the ex's investment income would be equal to my investment income. Therefore, if I elect to retire, me and my ex are experiencing relatively the same income/cashflow. So the law should quit making excuses for women and hold them accountable for either (a) living within the means of their investment income or (b) require them to figure out how to make whatever additional money they need to live whatever lifestyle they choose. Otherwise you are incentivizing women to leave marriages and not have to work for the rest of their lives.