Hopefully with the new European commission people like you will need to find a new job 😂
@gian_83815 ай бұрын
🤡
@gian_83815 ай бұрын
🤡
@LastBoyScout875 ай бұрын
"end road and airport expansion" ...LOL...welcome to communism!
@TevvaTrucks5 ай бұрын
Great event, let's keep making progress on transport decarbonisation. #greendeal #fitfor55 #horizoneurope
@MiGac216 ай бұрын
eko-bastards........
@Ruaynirun7 ай бұрын
What about using e fuel for airplanes and ships ?
@jonassimon24126 ай бұрын
The word e-fuel is just one word for different types of fuel. There’s something called SAF (sustainable aviation fuel) or also known as e-kerosene. And there is also fuel for ships. But in the refinery process of the e-crude (the raw fluid every e-fuel is made of) many products arise which have different densities: wax, Diesel, petrol, kerosene, etc. And that’s why it makes absolutely no sense why we should allow e-kerosene but prohibit e-Diesel.
@gian_83819 ай бұрын
BS
@mahmodaakter23410 ай бұрын
Hello dear,, I hope you are well. I saw your KZbin channel. That's impressive for your KZbin channel, and Your video content is really great. However, your KZbin channel subscribers and video patterns are very low and KZbin SEO is not perfect. So, if you want Your Channel Customers, opinions, likes, comments, Correct Video SEO, YT SEO, Add Google Advertising, and monetization. I will give you the Real and organic targeted audience I am waiting for your message. Thanks4wvland. T
@gianf988710 ай бұрын
Continuate a sognare 😂😂
@gianf988711 ай бұрын
Electric vehicles are already dead 😂😂😂
@wulung594311 ай бұрын
Millions of Internal combustion engines belching out pollutants in cities is obviously a stupid idea when electric vehicles are available
@gianf988711 ай бұрын
The electric transition will FAIL both for cars and trucks, because people don't want it. Lobbies like yours want it, and certainly not to reduce pollution.
@gianf988711 ай бұрын
In your dreams 😂😂😂
@freddied2485 Жыл бұрын
If e-fuel is good enough of planes and ships than it is good enough for cars. Why should there be any difference?
@PK-sg1po Жыл бұрын
This is as close to propaganda I have yet seen on this subject. You literally have no clue what you are talking about.
@gianf9887 Жыл бұрын
The number of your subscribers clearly shows how little people trust your lobbist organization and the information you post 😂😂😂😂
@BritneyLaZonga10 ай бұрын
Could you please refrain from posting divisive content.
@gianf9887 Жыл бұрын
We know that you can throw them away.
@morefiction3264 Жыл бұрын
Cut it with the idiotic CO2 climate crap.
@BritneyLaZonga10 ай бұрын
What is the factual basis for your post?
@paulr1125 Жыл бұрын
But this cannot be solved by all electric vehicles . Industry has to change and more goods made locally , and there has to be more investment into energy research , and not wait for Fusion which is decades away. Also goods should be made repairable and stop the throw away culture , and recycling should be made a culture worldwide ( which the UN has failed to ask for ) Business and industry models will have to be changed to take care of repairability and lack of sales , just as the financial sector will have to adapt
@gianf9887 Жыл бұрын
These are dangerous people
@TROONTRON Жыл бұрын
Congrats you found hot exhaust. Point the camera at your computer and you see that it leaks "methane" too.
@gianf9887 Жыл бұрын
Nice to see how T&E turned the comments off, because they are getting too many negative comments to their videos🤣 Hopefully this bunch of "green" lobbyists will be very soon unemployed.
@gianf9887 Жыл бұрын
Electric cars make no sense.
@fredjacobs26 Жыл бұрын
Wind and solar power are a very low EROI (energy return on energy invested) energy source when compared to hydrocarbon fuels (taking into account full cradle-to-grave energy costs), arguably way below the level needed to maintain our modern society (for reference, see "The Unpopular Truth: about Electricity and the Future of Energy" 2022 by Lars Schernikau & William Hayden Smith. See also "Spain’s Photovoltaic Revolution: The Energy Return on Investment" (SpringerBriefs in Energy) 2013th Edition by Pedro A. Prieto). Nuclear-powered electricity generation can have EROI’s 2 orders of magnitude higher, especially with the newer, safer and more efficient SMR’s (such as the NuScale VOYGR SMR recently certified by the US NRC). This means that electricity should become much cheaper than is possible with conventional green tech. Prometheus Fuels is in the process of commercializing a CO2/H2O to electrofuels process at costs which are projected to be cost competitive with fossil fuels, blowing the cost argument against them out of the water (pun intended). So don’t count e-fuels out for cars just yet.
@joshuaharris3145 Жыл бұрын
I wonder how long it took the children in the DRC mines to get the cobalt for those 1,000,000 batteries. Average weight of an EV battery is what like 450kg? Being really really generous. 450 x 1,000,000 = 450,000,000 tons of battery. That's a lot of slave labour. There's also no evidence for any of the claims made in this video. There is no perfect solution to the energy/greed problem. But we can strike a balance and hopefully make efficient travel and consumption of bullshit as green as possible.
@basvantilt774 Жыл бұрын
450 kg of cobalt in a battery? Get your facts straight please. More and more cobalt free batteries are being built everyday. Cobalt is also used for fossil fuel production, but for this child labour is ok? Or for production of clothes? Working conditions are the problem, not a single mineral of product. Selective outrage.
@edlowry1 Жыл бұрын
Boring troll answer, new batteries have no cobalt like the Tesla LFP battery that's in all the new cars. Facts
@yujacky5307 Жыл бұрын
(1) Where does the power of electric cars comes from? (2) How to handle the battery of electric car?
@fort6564 Жыл бұрын
I assume you have already done your research If not, even if the batteries for electric cars were produced in the most polluting way, your electric was extremely inefficient and the power you get was from a coal plant, after 100k km it will still be way greener than any combustion engine car
@Tense Жыл бұрын
This is totally disingenuous video. 5x more electricity... yeah renewable energy. They will produce pollution yeah... at the "wheel" while being captured at the "well". If we capture CO2, and CO and methane..etc etc and just convert it back into e-fuel then its a net zero solution. Who is promoting this video, it makes no genuine arguments.
@btk7520 Жыл бұрын
It’s not the engines fault what it runs on so e fuels make sense in long term
@stanleysimmonsreactions9056 Жыл бұрын
This video is so disingenuous
@correomacv Жыл бұрын
And electric planes and ships. Can be Tesla o similar compañy. At least, for airplanes.
@correomacv Жыл бұрын
Want the Tesla Semi in EU now.
@gianf9887 Жыл бұрын
The Greens have become the Europe's biggest problem
@gianf9887 Жыл бұрын
The sad thing is that these people at T&E are paid using public funds to support the electric lobby interests
@gianf9887 Жыл бұрын
Electromobility is dead even before being born
@gianf9887 Жыл бұрын
The answer is VERY FEW
@timstanford995 Жыл бұрын
Pathetic video.
@pangrac1 Жыл бұрын
Your link in bio doesnt work! Repair it.
@angelguasch6548 Жыл бұрын
Benicarló Patria Viva LA MAYOR MENTIRA JAMÁS CONTADA. Esta máquina tiene que mover 500 toneladas de tierra/mineral que se refinarán para crear una batería de litio de coche. Consume 450 litros de combustible en un turno de 12 horas. El litio se refina a partir del mineral utilizando ácido sulfúrico. Una mina de litio se estima que requiere hasta 75 cargas de ácido sulfúrico al día. Una mina abierta consumirá miles de millones de litros de agua subterránea, contaminará acuíferos y producirá montañas de residuos tóxicos. Según estimaciones de Lithium Americas que cita The New York Times, una mina consumirá 12.200 litros de agua por segundo para producir 66.000 toneladas de carbonato de litio al año. Cuando la fuente de litio es un lago de salmuera alcalina, la técnica de extracción de litio estándar es evaporar el agua de la salmuera. El cloruro de litio se convierte en sal de hidróxido o carbonato y después se o hace pasar por una etapa de evaporación. Una batería de un coche eléctrico, digamos un Tesla, está hecha de 11 kilos de litio, 27 kilos de níquel, 19 kilos de manganeso, 13 kilos de cobalto, 90 kilos de cobre, y 181 kilos de aluminio, acero y plástico, promedio de 385 kilos de minerales, que tuvieron que ser minados y procesados en una batería que simplemente almacena electricidad…Electricidad generada por el petróleo, el gas, el carbón, la energía nuclear o el agua y una pequeña fracción de viento y solar…. La mina de litio más grande de Europa estará en España: el yacimiento de Las Navas, y será capaz de extraer 1,2 millones de toneladas de material de manera anual, lo que dará lugar a 30.000 toneladas de sulfato de litio aprovechables para baterías de coches eléctricos. Después de analizar los datos podemos asegurar que fabricar un coche eléctrico contamina un 70% más que uno de gasolina. Entonces me pregunto ¿por qué la alarma sobre el cambio climático solo afecta a los vehículos de combustión? 👇👇👇
@MAC_6.7 Жыл бұрын
Where’s your electricity coming from? Where’s the precious metals for the batteries coming from? How are the two aforementioned items harvested and from where? What are the environmental implications for harvesting and disposing of materials for these e vehicles? These are the answers that NONE of the pro e-vehicle ads/ manufacturers/ scientists will divulge. This is a highly politicized topic, either answer the questions or go away.
@basvantilt774 Жыл бұрын
Lots of research about this. Type your questions in a search engine and learn instead of spreading misinformation.
@MAC_6.7 Жыл бұрын
@@basvantilt774 I have my information from citable sources. You believe what you want but I’m certainly not spreading “misinformation” which seems to be your crutch.
@basvantilt774 Жыл бұрын
@@MAC_6.7 so cite those sources, you won't find any trustworthy ones. You are asking questions that have been answered hundreds of times by independent researchers. Don't let your own opinion blur your vision of the facts.
@5er312 Жыл бұрын
You're not mentioning the fact that far more of the parts in an ICE vehicles, are recyclable compared to EVs. Present both sides in video like this, or be clear about your bias. Not mention the other issues with EVs stated by others.
@rc9352 жыл бұрын
Not to mention that by 2050, e-fuel (petrol variant) is expected to cost around (conservatively) £1.2 / litre. Once again, you can shove batteries up your arse.
@rc9352 жыл бұрын
You will not win against e-fuels, you can shove batteries up your arse. They will be carbon neutral, like EV's, however EV's production emissions are over double an ICE production emissions. EV's will cause energy black-outs, environmental toxicity problems from battery disposal & sourcing, cause the world to run out of lithium, ruin the pleasure of driving, lithium is almost solely sourced from China, e-fuels can be created on any type of land in any country, elminiating reliance on other countries for fuel, e-fuels also work seamlessly with any era of combustion engines, they allow motorsport to continue, lets not even get into the fire hazards batteries in cars cause, and the weight issues. I could go on and on.
@rubenprata82722 жыл бұрын
E fuels use co2 to be produced, the co2 emited is the same that was used before, so yes they are green(or almost). The production just needs to be improved to waste less energy. E fuels are getting known because they prevent the killing of the automobile culture, because lots of people love combustion cars, simple.
@andreu94312 жыл бұрын
𝓟Ř𝔬𝓂𝔬𝐒ϻ 😱
@aaronmiller50122 жыл бұрын
I think efuels can make cars as carbon neutral as possible. Yes, it will still emit carbon and others but it will be captured by plants and/or the fans from the factory in Chile producing the fuel. There’s got to be some balance between electric cars, fuel cells, efuels, etc. They should be given a chance and not turned away.
@fort6564 Жыл бұрын
have you looked at precisly where in chile its produced? You cannot go more south than where its produced, so getting that efuel around the world where its needed will be another head. Besides, it will pollute even more since we will either need to use planes, trucks and or airplanes to transport it thousands of km to places where its actually needed.
@MrGmilton Жыл бұрын
E Fuel is going to be produced at many factories not just in Chile.
@frankriddle77262 жыл бұрын
sadly the destruction of the planet for humans is certain because politicians are driven by economy and wealth.
@and_bold2 жыл бұрын
Please, if you tend to be scientific, mark temperature of this "cloud", I see hot gases on this video. If you have expensive flir camera, use it's potential and do it scientific way. Access the ship, measure it in controlled manner, use methane sensor on drone flying in this "cloud"... For now I could only see spreading rumours based on fears with no sensible data. Your methodology could prove methane clouds from any exhaust pipe, even at your ship you were filming from.
@transportenvironment2 жыл бұрын
Hi Andrzej, here is a guide to how the camera works. Of course we would love to use drones but it is not an easy operation for many reasons. cutmethane.eu/learn/the-basics-of-optical-gas-imaging/