Craig Camera

Пікірлер

@Tricklarock 2 жыл бұрын

Dood, nice review! People are asking why you don't make more, you must play in that band, and have zero time to make more huh? What's the band name/info to check out?

@NNA1984 2 жыл бұрын

When a lens at 2.8 is as sharp as another at 4.0, you know the first one is good.

@BillCipher1337 Жыл бұрын

the tes pics where at same f-stop.

@TheSleve22 2 жыл бұрын

I love the 24-105. I have bad eyes so the image stabilization helps. Also i prefer the range of 24 and 75-105. Planning on getting a fast prime next.

@kesavank7 3 жыл бұрын

Sigma 24-70 vs tamron 28-75 which best

@cerberus_uwu 3 жыл бұрын

A comparison with different apertures and shutter speeds! LOL!..

@finlikeanime 3 жыл бұрын

Leon S. Kennedy

@HectorRiveraPhotography 3 жыл бұрын

Tammy for me !! I have all primes G masters :)

@jonscon4604 3 жыл бұрын

Why didn´t you make more videos? This one is amazing!

@nerdyandy3101 3 жыл бұрын

Very up to the point as a lot of people must have the same questioning, and at least I do. I guess most essential points have been mentioned and thanks for that. I was using a Canon 24-105mm for years but the quality was inferior to the Sony as I hear from users and I miss the range. I may want to carry a faster portrait lens along but I guess I'm going to try the 24-105 & sell my Tamron (which has served me faithfully though! Thanks again

@jabezhane 3 жыл бұрын

Never got the love for 28-70(ish) range lenses. When I got hold of one it was "Okay...nice wide shot, not bad" and then zoomed out to the far end and then looked at what my eye saw and it was "Oh that gives me normal eyesight for zoom range!" Wow. I'd rather just take a 24/28mm prime and the good old 85mm prime. I swapped the 24-70 for a 24-105 F4. As for low light with the 2.8? Well now your cameras can go to ISO 8000+ okay...is that a bit old world thinking?

@viktorhogberg9070 3 жыл бұрын

Which one do you reckon would fit best with a Sony A7R III? It has 42 MP so it might compensate for the 75mm on the Tamron? Being able to still crop a lot in to get a telephoto effect. But at the same time is that one sharp enough?

@petvesta 3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for your down-to-earth review. I am getting the a7iii and considering the 24-105 lens. I have heard IBIS cannot be used with the OSS for more steady video. Is that true?

@cpr1087 3 жыл бұрын

It will use 3 axes from the lens and 2 from the camera, but the difference between this and only OSS is not visible

@Tricklarock 2 жыл бұрын

@@cpr1087 So does this render the Tamron equal to the Sony in terms of shakiness??? I'll be using whichever on the a7iv. Thanks!

@roccofalzone9369 3 жыл бұрын

I’m really torn here. Currently own the Tamron but I think I would benefit from the IS in the lens because my addiction to coffee. It’s hit or miss from me on the Tamron with portraits, landscape is always a win. F stop is no biggie with the way these cameras perform in low light now, however, it’s the fight between the extra focal length as a daily driver and the macro capabilities on the Tamron

@barongreenbackthe2nd418 3 жыл бұрын

Got the Sony and it’s brilliant.

@shangw6618 4 жыл бұрын

Great video, thanks!

@cyberden 4 жыл бұрын

Thanks. Just what I needed!

@gadgetphilosophy8290 4 жыл бұрын

Good review man. No bullshit.

@ShadowManTV 4 жыл бұрын

Respect!

@debaratihalder2917 4 жыл бұрын

Awww ... Your voice and looks .. 😍😍 ..

@supernoona89 4 жыл бұрын

“Just pick the one you’ll use more” GOOD POINT!☝🏻 Thank you^^

@DrWasim 4 жыл бұрын

This was EXACTLY the video I was searching for. Thank you so much! I’ll be going for the Sony 🙂

@chamodmalalathunga6920 4 жыл бұрын

Have you experienced any focusing issue with the Tamron?

@craigcamera2457 4 жыл бұрын

Nope. It's on par with my Sony lenses in that category.

@thatsreallyamoon 3 жыл бұрын

@@craigcamera2457 I've seen some videos of people testing the tracking, and the Tamron loses the person every so often. I think if autofocus is a priority for video, one is always stuck with first party; Sony. :( Probably doesn't matter for photos as much.

@chamodmalalathunga6920 4 жыл бұрын

24-105mm & 50mm would be great combination

@craigcamera2457 4 жыл бұрын

Agreed. Fast 50mm or 35mm would be a good compliment.

@chamodmalalathunga6920 4 жыл бұрын

Great video 👍

@craigcamera2457 4 жыл бұрын

Thanks!

@NickL0VIN 4 жыл бұрын

I loved your review! I went with the tamron as well, I enjoy night time street photography so f/2.8 is a must.

@igoryudnikov6198 2 жыл бұрын

Tamron is an APS-C lens, and APS-C mode has worst ISO performance, on both APS-C camera and FF camera in APS-C mode. Then low light performance of this lenses is near equal, but APS-C shots would have ISO 6400 and FF ones would have 12800 with near the same amount of noise.

@NickL0VIN 2 жыл бұрын

@@igoryudnikov6198 The tamron 28-75mm is a Full frame lens.

@ShervinKoushan 4 жыл бұрын

Great video! You should have way more than 28 subs. Well it's 29 now haha. I am wondering if I should sell my 24-105 and get the Tamron instead. Is it holding up well?

@craigcamera2457 4 жыл бұрын

Thanks! Mine is holding up great, especially considering how much use it gets. You will notice it feels bit "cheaper" than the Sony in the hand, but it's also lighter. They're both great lenses. I'm happy with the Tamron for my uses, but the Sony has its clear advantages as well (range, lens stabilization etc.) Depends on the work you're doing.

@ShervinKoushan 4 жыл бұрын

@@craigcamera2457 Thanks for the info! This is the hardest choice ever haha

@autumn7283 4 жыл бұрын

I have got 24-105 G. My intention is like your opinion but I have a lot of prime lens e.g. 24 35 50 including 70-200 f2.8. So I keep 24-105 for travelling in daylight because the picture edge is contrast and sharp, and use it with other prime lens in the low light situation.

@Парень-ш3о 4 жыл бұрын

You nice bro !

@craigcamera2457 4 жыл бұрын

Thank You 🙏

@jeremias.lindner 4 жыл бұрын

tamron for the win

@lduplago 4 жыл бұрын

Great video. I agree it's the best on this subject I have been able to find. Appreciate it.

@craigcamera2457 4 жыл бұрын

Thanks Lou! Useful/helpful vids are the goal.

@PhotonGaming 4 жыл бұрын

You should post ur instagram!

@craigcamera2457 4 жыл бұрын

Good call!

@cypher3323 4 жыл бұрын

man you're beautiful

@craigcamera2457 4 жыл бұрын

Emam Araf Thanks Bro 🕺🤘

@sabs1423 4 жыл бұрын

Best review video I've seen on this topic. Thanks!

@craigcamera2457 4 жыл бұрын

Glad it helped! Thanks

@Director414 4 жыл бұрын

is the auto focus the same in both lenses?

@craigcamera2457 4 жыл бұрын

I didn't notice a discernible difference in autofocus between the two. They both seemed about the same.

@gurudeclan 5 жыл бұрын

You look like Jason Donovan if he never discovered drugs.

@craigcamera2457 5 жыл бұрын

Jason Donovan life minus the massive drug problem. I think I could handle that life. haha

@adrianalfordphotography 5 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the comparison review Craig. Found it really helpful.

@craigcamera2457 5 жыл бұрын

Glad it helped you out Adrian. That was the goal. Thanks.

@coreytomsrealtor3072 5 жыл бұрын

Surprised there aren't more vids on this. Thank you! I agree with tamron being a tiny bit sharper in the middle and sony on edges. I like the colors of sony better though. I hate that magenta hue almost anytime.

@craigcamera2457 5 жыл бұрын

Corey Toms Realtor Glad it helped! The Sony’s colors are more true to life. It’s a great lens. Outside of the F4 vs 2.8 differences, I’d rate the Sony as the better lens in terms of overall performance.

@igoryudnikov6198 2 жыл бұрын

do you know what calibration is?