Hi, I'm trying to contact you to get one, but seem like your website there is problem.
@PianoSens-ey8jbАй бұрын
Pianosens.com
@choonhowlai986Ай бұрын
Thanks, request send!
@emojijoyioАй бұрын
My piano is very out
@AngeloDeAngelis748Ай бұрын
Mi interessa questo dispositivo ...Puoi dirmi quanto mi costerebbe?'
@paulmccloudАй бұрын
I shot this video on the fly, sorry for low quality audio. Holding the phone while trying to demonstrate is kinda hard. The point here is that the Pianosens can be used on vertical pianos, not just grands. Notice that sometimes in the high treble, where there are dampers that interfere with the Pianosens, you might be able to put the sensor on the pressure bar and get enough signal to run the app. It is also possible to have the sensor pick up enough string energy from the adjacent strings to pick up the vibrations on the ones you're tuning. A large upright like a U3 is fairly easy fit the sensor, but a smaller upright or even a spinet it is also possible to use the sensor on, though in the high treble the sensor may not fit because of the dampers. Past the dampers, you can fit the sensor below the hammers near the bridge. The signal quality is very good in that position, and it makes the pitch indicator much steadier. Note that tuning each string to the app produces a very good unison result, rather than using your ears, and the sound is very clean. By measuring each string, you can see how close you are to the target, and you'll find that your best effort to tune unisons by ear will only get you within about 3-5 tenths of a cent of pitch. A little extra effort to improve the tuning accuracy pays off with a very clean and clear sound. You can tune unisons by ear of course, which may produce a more "organic" sound that some people prefer. I am not one of them. Also note that I am using Pianoscope, which has a special feature of a "freeze line" that measures pitch during the first second. This is an exclusive feature of Pianoscope, which enables this new level of accuracy. With Pianosens and Pianoscope teamed together, you can create the most accurate, clean and precise tuning possible.
@PianoSens-ey8jb2 ай бұрын
I do not criticize others for their tuning preferences. I just love the pure sound of the consonant intervals and I am yet to find any piece of music from any period that is not aesthetically pleasing from this technique. There is a connection between the elegance of the math and the aesthetic results, as there should be. The fact that the 5ths and octaves are inversely balanced allows the 'cancellation' of these intervals. There is nothing that is more important in my musical training than this. The fact that there is as much minor 3rds as major 3rds allows me to conclude that the over-emphasis of UT on major 3rds is not logical.
@unequally-tempered2 ай бұрын
Yes - it's very beautiful. But it's not the _only_ way of achieving a similar beauty. Your demonstration here is, however, perfect.
@PianoSens-ey8jb2 ай бұрын
Then try the exact same exercise that I played with an UT tuning. It will not, by definition, have this consonance. It can't. Go chromatically up and imitate exactly what I did. UT cannot achieve consistency chromatically.
@unequally-tempered2 ай бұрын
@@PianoSens-ey8jb But that's the point! UT enables keys to open doors to different sounds . . . and how I tune UT isn't how conventional pianotechs understand how to tune. kzbin.info/www/bejne/gKfVeIlrbb-md7c is a recent concert. There are two ways to tune and I tune the other.
@PianoSens-ey8jb2 ай бұрын
@@unequally-tempered UT theoretically simply cannot achieve consonances of the 5ths, 4ths, octaves, 12ths, double octaves, and 19ths in a symmetrically balanced way. The consonance intervals are universal to all music. Hence, it is the purest way and most consistent chromatically as well.
@unequally-tempered2 ай бұрын
@@PianoSens-ey8jb UT isn't meant to. Music involves also perfect thirds and minor thirds of varying widths and emotion is conveyed by such. Just as the clue is in the word "key" and what a key does in opening a door, Chromatic means colour which is not achieved in Equal Temperament by going up a staircase of pitches. It is achieved, however, in the places to which doors are opened by keys.
@stevennorsworthy21912 ай бұрын
The Pure 12th system was invented 40 years ago by a German named Bernhard Stopper. It is the best Equal Temperament system every invented The 12th is the 5th above the octave. It perfectly balances the 5th, octave, and 12th It is theoretically the optimum You can hear the incredible openness and clarity… I know of no one who has ever produced a better sounding tuning than my example here. Since the 3rds and 10ths automatically fall into proper place, there becomes no need to bother tuning them directly by their fast beat counts.
@dutchbeef89202 ай бұрын
Adagio for Piano and Ninja Blender
@dutchbeef89202 ай бұрын
I love these kind of real world tests
@hansroemerszoonvanderbrikk76262 ай бұрын
using a Fazioli is cheating, it's probably the cleanest sounding piano 🤣 still an amazing tool your sensor! Paolo Fazioli will love it
@dan_obie3 ай бұрын
Seems like a fast Fourier Transform that snaps amplitudes to their nearest note frequency. Pretty neat!
@UpdateFreak333 ай бұрын
This taught me a lot about overtones lmao
@notrelu3 ай бұрын
Haven't seen something like this before. Can this be used to turn a normal piano into a MIDI input device?
@PianoSens-ey8jb3 ай бұрын
I haven't really thought of that, but it's possible! It reads string movement and produces the sound from the strings, which is the input into the soundboard of an acoustic piano.
@MATIOSAR452 ай бұрын
Sure thing. I'd consider making a CASIO DG-20 (MIDI guitar) kind of instrument with such system in place.
@fartcheeks20253 ай бұрын
cool! 🤭🤭🤭🤭
@fasdm3 ай бұрын
I think it's a mistake to eliminate the moving indicator (red line in Pianoscope) to get a single reading. I just spent a few hours with Pianoscope to tune my piano. The moving line guides how much adjustment is needed to get close. I found the process of piano tuning is an exercise in getting close. The "Freeze" function of Pianoscope gives the same info as your device and is adjustable through its parameters. 0.1 cents accuracy is not necessary since the people who judge professional tuners' performance accept 0.9 cents as being acceptable (which, had I known this earlier, would have taken hours off my work...piano tuning is a difficult job for people who are nitpickers for pecision.)
@PianoSens-ey8jb3 ай бұрын
No one recommends 'removing' the moving red indicator. The freeze indicator is a 'target' and the moving red indicator is a guide to use for adjusting the hammer in real time to get you to the freeze target of zero at the last attack.
@Hammondbrass3 ай бұрын
I recently tuned a grand piano with PianoSens at a church and about halfway through I was told that about 40 violinists needed to use the room to warmup before a recital. I told them, “no problem,” I put on some headphones, and was able to continue to tune normally while the room was filled with the cacophony of 40 students simultaneously playing 😄
@PianoSens-ey8jb3 ай бұрын
Totally awesome! It is the 'real deal' device. It speaks for itself. I just need to get my customers to tell their peers about it like you are doing! Thanks. I am here to serve, let me know if you ever want help or advice. Best, Steve
@SickNick19983 ай бұрын
Hi, I wish I could hear some samples of tempered fifths, fourths, sixths or thirds… Maybe a double-octave or a 19th (in middle-section)… I tune by ear a low octave with a 19th and/or double-octave. Infact: I tune with verituner, but not in the lower section. Here: I only compare with overtones, double-octave and 19th. To find the best compromise between thes three components makes my clients happy; they are amazed.
@PianoSens-ey8jb3 ай бұрын
When the Pure-12th tuning concept, invented by a German theorist Bernard Stopper, came out, it was a breakthrough. It simplified all aspects of tuning. All we need to do it tune 12th's and everything else falls in line. Kent Swafford, former president of the PTG, wrote many articles on it which can be found on the PTG archives. No more need to do aural tuning (by ear), as a machine tuning that can detect the 12ths is simply the new way.
@SickNick19983 ай бұрын
@@PianoSens-ey8jb Hello, I know all about Bernhard Stopper (R.I.P.). I know some people who had personal contact with him. And I know about the PTG by Kent Swafford - I use his tunings, too (available for Verituner). But to compare intervals with ear should always a skill - THE skill - in my opinion. And as I wrote: I tune with verituner, because I can use historical temperaments. Only to tune by machine won’t give the deep understanding, why this particular interval sounds like it sounds. Because of a little more stretching in 19th interval (octave+fifth; you write 12th and I know why 😉) 3:1 (octave by Werckmeister was 2:1) there is the result, that the thirds and 10ths are wider in a very minimum way. The masking of beating only works with chords. But how does it sound in e.g. Inventions of Bach which are only in two voices? Once I heard a sample (it is on YT, played by Sokolov), with a very “harsh” sounding 10th. Stopper is not completely beatless, octaves are wider-yes the Pythagorean “Komma” is not in the fifths but splitted in the octaves. There is a saying in Germany: “Jeder Vorteil wird mit einem Nachteil erkauft.“ Translated 1:1: “For every advantage you buy, you will get another disadvantage.” In other words: “No advantage with another disadvantage.” Think, you know what I mean. The disadvantages are-in my opinion-the wider thirds and 10ths. But that is MY opinion. And I think it is okay to tell that. Kent Swafford has a 26th tuning… Also interesting… And that is, what I meant, what I wanted to hear in your vid --- thirds, sixths, 10ths… The octave you’ve showed is absolutely remarkable! The first trust is the app, because of my acute hearing loss 5 years ago (that was the reason to buy Verituner); especially in the high treble I love to use the app - BUT the final control and trust is my ear. And after the acute hearing loss I learned new. And I love to tune by ear. I have built some wood-tools---for the 19th (octave+fifth) and the double-octave. :)
@PianoSens-ey8jb3 ай бұрын
@@SickNick1998 Nick, if you really want unreal never-hear-before tuning, use the PianoSens device. I was shocking everyone at the convention last week with it. My users are all saying they are getting tunings they didn't think possible before. PianoSens.com
@rickclark13724 ай бұрын
Those are top grade mics placed in good positions. Imagine how much wilder the deviations would be where ETD mics end up getting positioned for a tuning- which is to say for good line-of-sight between the tuner and the screen, not good audio. Not to mention whatever weird characteristics cheap built-in device mics have.
@rickclark13724 ай бұрын
Great work! My whole life I have tuned on the sustain tail, whether by ear or ETD, because that was really the only way we could tune. I look forward to using a new method snap-shotting the pitch a fraction of a second in as suggested by your work and hearing the aesthetic result as music is played. The idea of tuning to a better standard than has ever been possible before in history is very exciting.
@davidgarnett50114 ай бұрын
With this device would you tune A0 to 27.5 htz? how does this compensate for the idea of stretching octaves at the upper and lower ends of the keyboard
@PianoSens-ey8jb4 ай бұрын
The device is best thought of as a super microphone that does not hear acoustic waves but reads string movement at the source instead. It has a frequency response from 0 Hz to 22 kHz. It has no problem reading 27.5 Hz. Your ETD software would determine how to interpret your tuning overall. The device has no bias of frequency.
@barrybraksick55044 ай бұрын
Hi Steven, saw your pianoworld post. Very interesting comparison. There is a technique called the "phase vocoder" that builds on the STFT which can produce the kind of frequency and amplitude analysis you're talking about here. I first encountered it many ears ago in the book "Digital Audio Signal Processing: An Anthology" by John Strawn, but I'm sure there are other explainers online now.
@PianoSens-ey8jb4 ай бұрын
I am familiar with the phase vocoder. I use a different approach to get ultra fine grain frequency estimate between FFT bins that is better in this application. Thanks for the reference.
@lingerlights4 ай бұрын
Interesting
@8891randy5 ай бұрын
You have to watch this several times. It’s the best explanation of why we need to tune unisons as perfectly as possible- how it affects the tone. The second example in the video has a sound that would make me think the string wasn’t seated properly or the hammer needs to be filed. But that’s not it - it’s the response of the partials behaving from the result of a less than perfect unison. The kind of unison you would get when tuning by ear.
@rickclark13725 ай бұрын
This is outstanding work. The most comprehensive objectively measured description of what is happening with pitch following the note strike that has ever been published/reported I believe.
@Hammondbrass6 ай бұрын
What tuning curve do you use in Pianoscope?
@PianoSens-ey8jb5 ай бұрын
I am using the 12ths curve.
@maxrey40557 ай бұрын
Just curious why you set all octaves at 200ms instead of using he default setting for freeze that ranges from 500 -300?
@PianoSens-ey8jb7 ай бұрын
I am the inventor and researcher for the Freeze. I personally believe all notes should be the same freeze setting. 700 msec is my recommendation.
@ivankonyukhov5497 ай бұрын
Perhaps the sensor is insensitive to the movements of the string in the plane of the soundboard, and therefore it does not detect the beats arising from the vertical and horizontal modes of the string vibration. If the beats do occur between the soundboard's natural frequency, then 3bps must be present on all 3 strings of the choir
@PianoSens-ey8jb5 ай бұрын
If I lay the sensor 90-deg on its side it still picks up less of the false beat. The acoustic false beat can occur from undamped strings, for example.
@ivankonyukhov5497 ай бұрын
The first partial in the vibrations of the string is present and lasts for a very long time. But it is poorly radiated by the soundboard due to the high impedance of the soundboard and due to the acoustic short circuit (in far acoustic field). Human ear is significantly less sensitive to low frequencies. Therefore, the fundamental tone goes below the hearing threshold and is masked by overtones. Also, the fundamental tones in the strings of the lower octave do not participate in interval beating(octaves,5ths, etc) and therefore fundamental tones of A0...G#1 are not important for tuning
@PianoSens-ey8jb5 ай бұрын
I did not say the fundamental is 'important' for tuning. I simply say that the fundamental IS present in the string.
@hoilst2657 ай бұрын
Subtitles: tap-tap-tap-tap-tap-tap
@ElikemTheTuner7 ай бұрын
Lovely. Would've liked to hear what it sounded like both before and after. Can you make another video?
@PianoSens-ey8jb5 ай бұрын
Slightly less of a 'ping' on the attack, a bit softer.
@saveriosalerno92327 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@rogershaffer17 ай бұрын
It's really too bad there are less than a handful of truly knowledgeable piano techs in the entire country. Fortunately there are a few. You absolutely are one of them.
@NSResponder7 ай бұрын
Just a suggestion: don't bother with trying to support Android. At my last gig, we were making a specialized camera that supported both iOS and Android, and Android sunk easily 3x the engineering effort for about 1/4 of the revenue.
@737milehigh5 ай бұрын
Same experience.
@user-lh3uz1cp7y2 ай бұрын
He doesn't have to support any particular operating system since it acts like a microphone which can be hooked up to a dedicated tuning device. I wouldn't be surprised if it's just a pickup like found in a guitar which would mean it would work with anything that has an audio input.
@rickclark13727 ай бұрын
As good as the best concert quality tunings I have ever heard. Oh, yeah, great playing too.
@paulmccloud7 ай бұрын
Amazing how clear each note is. Each unison (all 3 strings played together) is beatless, in perfect tune. Nice!
@paulmccloud8 ай бұрын
The clarity of this tuning is just amazing. I've been tuning 36 years, and I could not do this, by ear or otherwise. It doesn't hurt that the piano is amazing, but the clean sound of the Fazioli makes it hard to hide any imperfection in the tuning.
@Gavinbrady-Pianist8 ай бұрын
Which tuning app did you use?
@PianoSens-ey8jb8 ай бұрын
Pianoscope, and with my PianoSens sensor
@rickclark13728 ай бұрын
The tuning sounds amazing. I don't think I have ever heard better. And of course it's a fabulous piano as well. And played well. What a combination!
@PianoSens-ey8jb8 ай бұрын
Thank you very much, Rick!
@rickclark13728 ай бұрын
It's the latest Verituner for Android, on Android 12, on a 2023 Moto G Play using a cable that came bundled with the PianoSens package.
@黄战-k2v8 ай бұрын
TUNIC only:pure try this
@PianoSens-ey8jb8 ай бұрын
I am familiar with Bernhard Stopper's approach; there are better tools now.
@黄战-k2v8 ай бұрын
Can you demonstrate it😃@@PianoSens-ey8jb
@musicus77818 ай бұрын
Interesting Experiment! Can you specify the settings a bit more regarding: - used microphones and orientation(especially important IMO is off-axis-performance/ coloring - Schoeps has demonstrated this quite nicely) - distance (maybe it would be better to measure at various listener positions several meters away) - which "very sophisticated sprectal resolution techniques" were used in Matlab - at which point of the played note did you capture the soundfile (attack included? length?)
@PianoSens-ey8jb8 ай бұрын
It has nothing to do with mics. It has everything to do with dual modes of resonance and how these modes are resonated on the soundboard and where these resonance spots are on the soundboard, and that is why the sensor is the solution, bypassing the soundboard.
@celiaschwartz30419 ай бұрын
Are you marketing this somewhere?
@PianoSens-ey8jb9 ай бұрын
PianoSens.com
@celiaschwartz30419 ай бұрын
My iPhone only has a port for charging I don’t see one for USB. How would that work?
@stevennorsworthy21919 ай бұрын
Your iPhone has a Lightning port which is good for both charging AND for external devices. No problem.
@hayforker10 ай бұрын
Who tunes with a Reattack rate that fast? Most beginning tuners make the mistake of reattack rates much too slow.
@PianoSens-ey8jb9 ай бұрын
The top tuners in the world, many of them, I could name them, use 2x to 3x per second attack rates. It is fundamentally a smearing of the ETD's inability to keep up.
@ElikemTheTuner10 ай бұрын
Intriguing.
@PianoSens-ey8jb10 ай бұрын
Give it a try!
@ElikemTheTuner10 ай бұрын
@@PianoSens-ey8jb I would love to. Is it possible to use the device for uprights? How will it be attached to the strings?
@paulmccloud10 ай бұрын
This is important information for those of us who use ETD's to professionally tune pianos. I was not aware that the microphone in my iPhone was introducing errors into the calculation of my ETD. It's not intuitive, because when we make a recording, it sounds good. So then, what could be wrong with using a microphone in the phone, or any external mic? It turns out, there IS a problem. That's because the microphone picks up all kinds of other sounds that are not relevant to tuning a piano, and there are patterns of wave interferences that are invisible to us that the mic responds to. That affects the relative strengths of the overtones in the sound envelope sampled through the mic. The ETD then interpolates those overtones and calculates the frequency target. But if the overtones are mixed in with these acoustic anomalies, the result is that the target frequency is off. When using the Pianosens, all of the impertinent sound vibrations are eliminated, and only the vibration of the string is used for calculation. The result is much more accurate, which means your tunings become better when using your ETD. This mic discrepancy is the reason that the tuner-technician must check the final result to verify if the tuning is as accurate as we expect from our ETD's. Thanks, Steve.
@黄战-k2v10 ай бұрын
hi What software is used for measurement in the video?
@PianoSens-ey8jb10 ай бұрын
Matlab (Mathworks.com)
@resound710 ай бұрын
This is fascinating. As a guitar player, I get the tuning peculiarities factoring the acoustical nature of tuning. As a recording engineer I wonder how your device would “translate” in a recording. Maybe I’ve missed something along the way…
@smbrooksus10 ай бұрын
Are you actually selling these devices? Planning to? I'm interested but need to know how to accomplish buying one.
@PianoSens-ey8jb10 ай бұрын
PianoSens.com, for sale, buy on line
@PianoDoctor5710 ай бұрын
Paul, Yes, I suspect that is the case. Considering the fact that a soundboard panel (not installed in the case) typically will vibrate actively at no lower than about 49hz (roughly an octave above A0), and when installed in the piano case that base frequency (unloaded) jumps up to nearly 60hz generally speaking. So except in the case of an extremely large instrument, the ability to reproduce those low fundamentals should be quite impossible. Or if able to, quite inaudible to our ears or microphones. Therefore our brain "fills in" the missing stuff and we "hear" those low frequencies. Even though (at this time) I am a dedicated analog/aural tuner, I have long suspected that acoustic anomalies including absence of various partials in certain notes has an adverse effect on my ability to tune some notes accurately. My proof of this is when I can't hear the 6:3 octave partials clearly (down low) and I try to "ghost" it and it's not there. One note above it's fine, but on this note it's gone. I have to use another interval or "fake it" to the best of my ability. I'm looking forward to trying this thing out. When Steve told me it has a headphone jack that sealed the deal for me. I see this as an innovation with numerous potentials. Peter Grey Piano Doctor