28 күн бұрын
2 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
6 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@aaronbebeau 15 күн бұрын
This KJV Only is a stumbling block. It is has divided our family due to my father falling prey to this. It has become its own religion and has spawned so much legalism. Makes me sad
@unveiledbeliever7705 24 күн бұрын
Integrity is ....doing the RIGHT THING , even when nobody is looking💯💯💯
@GabrielZuapeawon-k4m 2 ай бұрын
Powerful preacher!
@Kingjamesbible6111 2 ай бұрын
Because the originals have never been available for centuries, how do we 'know' the originals were written in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek? King James bible believer here.....:)
@INTHENAMEOF_JESUS 2 ай бұрын
Why are people always trying to make "new" what has already been perfected in the King James Bible? As soon as I saw the title, I instantly knew it was nonsense. Repent and stop trying to get new age ideas in people's minds. ### Divine Inspiration: - The King James Bible was divinely inspired by the Holy Spirit. The authors of the Bible were moved by the Holy Ghost to write the words of Scripture. (2 Peter 1:21: "For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.") ### Inherent and Infallible Word of God: - The King James Bible is the inherent and infallible Word of God. It contains everything necessary for salvation and living a life that pleases God. It is completely trustworthy and without error in all matters it addresses. (2 Timothy 3:16-17: "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.") ### Exclusivity of Scripture: - The Bible is the sole authoritative source of divine revelation. No other writings or prophecies are valid in the same way as the Scriptures. The teachings and writings of the apostles, as recorded in the New Testament, are foundational and authoritative for Christian faith and practice. Other writings may contain truths or insights, but they are not on the same level of authority as the Bible. (2 Peter 1:19: "We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts.")
@vtjakiela 2 ай бұрын
You talk about the lord like its some kind of hobby building train sets!
@AllisonBerenstein 2 ай бұрын
Keep your sky daddy out of women’s bodies! Vote YES on Prop 1! Vote Blue! It’s women vs the Weirdo Billionaires and the Cult of MAGA Stupidity and their Orange Messiah. Don’t let them steal your rights from you ladies! They lied about Roe Vs Wade and they are lying to you now and want to make women second class citizens. Charlatans hiding behind Jesus. DISGUSTING.
@lms5951 2 ай бұрын
I am saddened that there are no other comments under this video, which indicates to me just how many people don't know much about this proposition and how dangerous it is, or perhaps don't even care. God bless all of you for doing your best to inform people.
@babylonsfall7 2 ай бұрын
2 Peter 3:16 KJV “As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.” To me, this passage suggests that if you are unlearned and unstable (which might mean young Christian), that Paul’s work in general isn’t something one should be thinking to understand right away. So why should we think as Mark does here, as if every word needs to be understood plainly without having to learn or even work for it?
@oshea2300 2 ай бұрын
i want a literal bible like this
@paulflannigan888 2 ай бұрын
Great work on this, I really enjoy reading the Bible this way. I can even blow it up big on my screen so I don't have to use reading glasses. The formatting does help put everything in place. Thank you for sharing.
@freshlookbible 2 ай бұрын
That's kind of you to say. I love that it's helping you.
@charlottehudson9530 3 ай бұрын
Amen...I loved this discussion!
@Silky4ever 3 ай бұрын
It’s funny that Gipp mentioned the Ankleburg show. Him and the other 2 KJVO guys got owned by facts by real scholars.
@jeffengstrom8657 3 ай бұрын
I went to Hac while Bro. Pope was there and had him for a couple classes. If every ifb preacher had the graciousness of Bro. Pope the movement would be double or more in size.
@ronr3334 4 ай бұрын
We need God in Everything and no better way to do that but thru using the original American Bible by putting it in our governments hands, it's very existence proves our founding fathers endorsed it and possessed their own Bibles. I hate the words "separation of church and state" it is a communist tactic that is used by saying something often enough that people will believe it to be true. Since we are dealing with Freedom of Religion: The First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. God Bless The Albany Project and all who are involved and it's donors.
@jamessheffield4173 4 ай бұрын
A circumstantial case for the Comma of John: In 484 A.D. the bishop of Carthage with 400 bishops quoted the comma to an Arian Vandal king. Being the bishop of Carthage, he would have had access to the Scriptures of Cyprian, and he probably had a Vulgate, maybe a first edition. Also, Gregory Nazianzus wrote on the grammar, and he had a student named Jerome. Seems strong evidence to me. Blessings.
@Blues.Fusion 4 ай бұрын
I have a pdf of the Webster Bible. I can send it.
@jamessheffield4173 4 ай бұрын
Why some have problems with Reasoned eclecticism. I John 5:7 is found in a majority of the Latin, but not the Greek so out it goes. Good will towards men Doxology in Matthew Without cause God manifest in the flesh Are a majority in the Greek but not in the Latin, so out they go The PA and Mark 16:9-20 are a majority in both the Greek and Latin so out they go. Even the “not yet” found in the two of the earliest(P66.P75) in John 7:8 some throw out. If as an orthodox Christian you don't see a problem, what would you see as a problem?
@Blues.Fusion 4 ай бұрын
M Ward is employed by a company that sells modern bibles. The conflict of interest is very troubling.
@henrylaurel1188 3 ай бұрын
Not modern Bibles. But translations in English we can understand. The unchanging gospel is as clear as ever. The KJV only cult is very troubling.
@Blues.Fusion 3 ай бұрын
@@henrylaurel1188 interesting. For 400 plus years we were called bible believing Christians for reading a KJV all of a sudden the exact same people reading the exact same book are accused of being a cult. It is my assertion you newcomers are the cult.
@henrylaurel1188 3 ай бұрын
@@Blues.FusionI never said that KJV preferred is cultish. But the indefensible unbilical man made doctrine is without cultish. In fact true bible believers would never be KJV only because no scripture supports this deception. Seems you think all who reject the KJV only heresy are not bible believers. That is absolutely a trait of a cult. Also using the loopy logic of the KJV only cult. Was there no "true Bible believers" before 1611? Then only in the archaic English of the KJV? The gospel is about Christ and him crucified. The name above all names. The only name given by which we must be saved. It is not, never was, never will be about an imperfect uninspired archaic translation of scripture called the KJV. No doctrine is changed in the more accurate modern translations none at all. No matter what the false teachers of KJV onlyism say. Many far stronger on the deity of Christ and the Holy Spirit than the KJV. No problem with those who prefer the KJV. I personally prefer modern translations that God has blessed us with in English we can understand. KJV onlyism no scripture supports this teaching started by a Seventh day Adventist cultist. Therefore KJV onlyism has added an unbilical teaching to the finished work of Christ. Making it another gospel, therefore a cult. No KJV only cultists has anything I do not have in Christ Jesus, nothing at all. Nothing superior in any way. My salvation does not depend upon what translation of scripture I read. But upon what Christ did for me. Shedding his blood for my sin. Clearly taught in the excellent modern translations that Almighty God has blessed us with
@christinecarpenter6367 4 ай бұрын
Great message!!
@joeymac6970 4 ай бұрын
Amen, brothers. Thanks for uploading.
@wardonwords 4 ай бұрын
This two-hour response to me *does* represent me accurately by using my words. I really, really appreciate this. You used my exact words repeatedly, and this almost never happens with KJV defenders. You also praise as “noble” my desire for the plow boy to understand every word of Scripture. For all this I thank you. I will try to give the same fairness to you. I listened to your whole discussion. But … 1. Your response, brothers, discusses precisely one of my 84 (so far) false friends: “halt.” Jim says he doesn’t agree with all my false friends, only some of them. That’s fine! But the KJV defenders who say this to me never go on to tell me which ones they agree with, which they disagree with, and why. 2. Your response spends the great, great majority of its energy discussing textual issues rather than translational ones-precisely the opposite of my work. Your response fails to note my standard answer-one I have given literally hundreds of times on my channel and in comments there-to your attempt to change the subject from translation to text. I’m not going to give you that answer here; you’ll have to find it! I confess to being somewhat weary of repeating myself, and I am unwilling to discuss textual issues with anyone who insists on the exclusive use of the KJV. 3. Your response dismisses my arguments against Vance’s book by a mere appeal to authority (that of Vance and that of Norton). Such an appeal isn’t wrong in itself but doesn’t answer my specific arguments. I myself bear some authority, by God’s grace. I did not use that authority to dismiss Vance; I listened hard to him and made counterarguments. Jim’s response here was, once again, unworthy of his intellectual gifts. I’ve answered the great majority of arguments you use in the video for KJV readability-like that the KJV is used every day so it isn’t archaic, or that “we need pastors and teachers,” or that the Ethiopian eunuch story shows that we need those teachers, or that resources for reading false friends are “widely available,” or that dead words and false friends aren’t doctrinally significant, or that the natural man can’t understand the things of the Spirit. I’d give links to my videos, but KZbin tends to delete comments with links. There is one argument you use in the video that I have not answered in any one specific video on my channel; maybe I need to give it more attention. That is that the KJV interprets itself. I don’t think this is always the case; but sometimes I think it is. You say, for example, that someone could figure out what “halt” means in 1 Kings 18:21 by checking other uses of the word. This is perfectly true. In fact, I did this myself over a decade ago when I first noticed this false friend. But I was alerted initially to its existence by reading the ESV and checking the Hebrew. In years of reading and memorizing the KJV exclusively, and of hearing “How long halt ye between two opinions” preached repeatedly, it simply never occurred to me that the word might have meant something different in 1611 from what it means today. This also didn’t occur to the KJV preachers who preached it to me. The KJB Study Project I did shows that this ignorance is common. So I ask again: how am I supposed to look up KJV words that, because of language change, I don’t realize I’m misunderstanding? How do I even know to look them up? Maybe this and my other false friends are minor, but I still want to understand rather than misunderstand “halt” and “remove” and “commend” and “miserable” and “by and by” and “so that” and “coasts” and 77 others I’ve put on my channel so far. The same Baptist confession that says that the text of Scripture has been “kept pure in all ages” says that Scripture is to be “translated into the vulgar language of every nation.” Once again: how am I supposed to look up words that, because of language change, I don’t realize I’m misunderstanding? I challenge you to do for me what I did for Vance: pick ten examples at random from my full list of 84 (so far) false friends and evaluate them in another episode of your podcast.
@babylonsfall7 2 ай бұрын
The first thing that comes to mind is how do you know you were/are misunderstanding the 84 examples that you bring up? Is it not because you read the passage, thought to yourself “that doesn’t make sense” and then looked into the word online or in some other book that you believe helped your understand? Or perhaps you see the surrounding context of the word and think to yourself “perhaps that word used to mean X in 1600… it seems like that is how they are using it here.” In other words, most of these things are going to be discovered naturally though the way we learn any other word that we don’t understand at first.
@wardonwords 2 ай бұрын
@@babylonsfall7 This is a worthy question. Would you like to know the answer? Will you listen, brother?
@babylonsfall7 2 ай бұрын
@@wardonwords - sure, I’d like to hear your perspectives.
@wardonwords 2 ай бұрын
@@babylonsfall7 Sorry-just saw this, Greg. You have accurately described maybe 15% (?) of the false friends on my list. Once someone knows to look for them and knows how to look for them, context can tell you that you may be missing something. But I would guess that 55% of the KJV false friends I've discovered I found because I read modern translations and 30% have been sent to me by others. Does that help? In other words, I think that it takes a really exceptional reader to notice most false friends at all. Some of them are in very familiar passages that I read for years, such as "by and by."
@babylonsfall7 2 ай бұрын
@@wardonwords- are there any false friends that, if you misinterpret them, cause serious doctrinal issues? If so, which are those?
@Superman111181 4 ай бұрын
48:58 . Actually they are not quoting the KJV. They are quoting Tyndale (85 years prior), because thats what KJV uses there!
@Superman111181 4 ай бұрын
Start at 13:00 . Through 34:25 What? No one is going to challenge this old guy in the middle? He literally was rambling nonsense. What kind of argument is Eph 1:12? And then he says the translators of newer translations were not as concerned about doctrines! Give me a break dude. The 'new' translators are more similar to you in doctrine than any of the 1611 translators lol
@SEL65545 4 ай бұрын
The irony is that in all this back and forth amongst you three, you done more to foster doubt about the scriptures rather than confidence. Your arguments are completely circular. I'm so thankful for people like Dr. Ward who can graciously, carefully, clearly articulate and debunk the falsehood and cancerous disease of the King James Only obsession. You've done nothing but cause division, doubt and heat. No light.
@sjurdurkjv 4 ай бұрын
Mark is indeed a very untoWard wayWard blasphemer, who will have much to answer for at the judgment seat of Christ. He and James White are high in Satan’s Yea Hath God Said board. Mr. Ward bears the Mark of the serpent and beast.
@TeachingChurch 4 ай бұрын
Mark ward. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@flytrap2001 4 ай бұрын
Love it
@briankorner750 4 ай бұрын
Great and informative discussion. I would be interested in a reply from Mark Ward. I am thankful I grew up in an A.V. 1611 church.
@John14Verse6 4 ай бұрын
So you use the apocrypha?
@JohnnyBeeDawg 4 ай бұрын
@@John14Verse6It was never considered scripture. It was placed between the 2 testaments in the 1611, not interspersed throughout.
@GodisGracious1031Ministries 4 ай бұрын
Mark Ward posted a comment on this video.
@CalebRichardson 4 ай бұрын
1:40:40 “We’re all in the school of Jesus Christ, we’re all learning…” Amen, me too. The NKJV, CSB, NIV, NET, and KJV all help me understand what my Teacher said. Just like I would never board over a window that faces the sunrise, I will not refuse a translation that brightens my understanding.
@JohnnyBeeDawg 4 ай бұрын
Can you share an example in those modern works that shed light on a doctrine that the KJB didn’t, or made hard to understand?
@CalebRichardson 4 ай бұрын
@@JohnnyBeeDawg Sure! I'm studying Jude recently and I didn't quite understand what the angels' "estate" was in verse 6. Modern versions translate this as "own position", "proper domain", and "position of authority". That really helped me understand the passage! I'm a little nerdy, so I did some digging to find out *why* the translations are different. The TR and CT are the same for this whole verse, so this is purely a translational choice. But the KJV translators didn't make a mistake. The word "estate" used to mean "A class, order, rank in a community or nation". But that sense of the word is not used anymore; the dictionary I checked said it's "obsolete". So a good translator will either choose "estate" or "own position", depending on whether he's translating into 17th century English or 21st century English.
@JohnnyBeeDawg 4 ай бұрын
@@CalebRichardson You had trouble understanding that the angels didn’t keep their first estate, but left their own habitation? Really? That seems pretty straightforward. What doctrine did you learn by understanding that word?
@CalebRichardson 4 ай бұрын
@@JohnnyBeeDawg You're surprised that I misunderstood the KJV word "estate", but the dictionaries I checked reflect that most modern English speakers don't use the word that way anymore. I need the help of modern translations and I'm glad to have it.
@JohnnyBeeDawg 4 ай бұрын
@@CalebRichardson I’m surprised you needed a dictionary at all since it was obvious from the context. What doctrine did those versions make clear for you?
@spencersmith312 4 ай бұрын
Jim Alter is a legend.
@MarkSherlock 4 ай бұрын
I watched 50 children memorizing the King James Bible during VBS. They had no issues. My kids had no problems reading the King James when they were little.
@MAMoreno 4 ай бұрын
When I was a kid, I memorized plenty of verses from the King James Version. That doesn't mean that I properly understood what those verses meant. What good is it to memorize the words, "In my Father's house are many mansions," unless you know that the word "mansions" is being used here in a way that most people don't use the word "mansions" anymore?
@GodisGracious1031Ministries 4 ай бұрын
@@MAMoreno I surely knew what that meant and we still sing songs with those words. Should we drop hymns too?
@John14Verse6 4 ай бұрын
@@GodisGracious1031Ministries Depends, but definitely should sing more psalms like the Bible tells us.
@GodisGracious1031Ministries 4 ай бұрын
@@John14Verse6 Yes.
@oshea2300 4 ай бұрын
I'm a former junkie who can understand the King James bible, because God helps me. If I can do it friend, a person as smart as you can do it Mr ward. It sounds like you are making excuses and just trying to attack the Bible. It doesn't sound like you're genuinely trying to understand..Please get down on your knees, fast and pray and ask God to show you the truth. Ask God to help your unbelief.. Hebrews 11: 6
@oshea2300 4 ай бұрын
Dr Alter please reach out to Tucker Carlson.. go on and correct this mess
@SimplyProtestantBibleBeliever 4 ай бұрын
Mark Wards false friends helped me understand my King James Bible like never before; it’s really a shame on us that all of the IFB preachers never caught these, and are constantly tripping over them when they preach, making applications off of a modern definition of a word that didn’t mean that when it was penned by the translators.
@JohnnyBeeDawg 4 ай бұрын
Like what doctrine?
@MAMoreno 4 ай бұрын
@@JohnnyBeeDawg Just a couple of examples... John 14.2: The promise is not that we'll end up living like millionaires in giant manors, but that we'll have abodes within the Father's house. 2 Timothy 2.15: This verse is not stating that Timothy will gain the approval of God through hours of ardent Bible study, but through properly handling God's true message (i.e. the gospel; cf. Eph. 1.13 and Col. 1.5) in the face of false teachings. That's not to say that Bible study has no role in accomplishing that end, of course, but it's a means toward the end, not the end unto itself.
@GodisGracious1031Ministries 4 ай бұрын
@@MAMoreno The NIV still uses mansions.
@glenn1611 4 ай бұрын
@@MAMoreno Mansion is still in everyday use in the UK to mean an individual dwelling; nearly every street in London has an apartment block on it called Something-or-other Mansions.
@MAMoreno 4 ай бұрын
@@glenn1611 Yes, I'm aware of the UK's retention of that sense. However, the main hub of the King James Only movement is in the US, where it isn't used in that sense. (Thus, I have to explain "Victory Mansions" when my students start reading 1984.) And as someone who grew up in a fundamentalist Baptist church, I can attest that no one ever bothered to say that "mansions" meant "apartments." In fact, we sang songs that would suggest otherwise!
@teamrecon2685 4 ай бұрын
So thankful i was born after 1611. If i was born before 1611, i wouldn't have had a Bible!
@briankorner750 4 ай бұрын
I sense that your tongue is firmly implanted in your cheek.
@JohnnyBeeDawg 4 ай бұрын
That’s why it was called the Dark Ages. The KJB is the Bible for the English speaking people. If you lived before 1611, you likely wouldn’t have even been speaking English. English only became a coalesced language in that very time, and the KJB was partially responsible for bringing together and settling the very English language we speak today.
@Superman111181 4 ай бұрын
@@JohnnyBeeDawg have you not heard of Tyndale? Because you should probably know about this dude. Around 80% of KJV NT is direct from Tyndale
@JohnnyBeeDawg 4 ай бұрын
@@Superman111181 Yes, he was a hero. But the AV was mostly a revision of the Bishop’s Bible.
@Superman111181 4 ай бұрын
@@JohnnyBeeDawg This is only true if you also understand that the Bishops Bible, the Geneva Bible, and the Great Bible were all 80% Tyndale word for word in the New Testament. Get a copy and see for yourself.
@oshea2300 4 ай бұрын
Independent Baptist Churches need to return to doctrine.. I see some Churches and all they do is preach devotional /inspirational messages. (I understand that they can be good and needed) But People want to know what the Bible means verse by verse and I really wish Independent Baptist Churches would return to deep, verse by verse preaching and teaching.
@oshea2300 4 ай бұрын
When you change words, cross-references are broken, doctrine changes and is attacked, context changes.. you lose the every mention study of words in their context, Gods blessings lost.
@colbyhicks2752 4 ай бұрын
Exactly! Best way I like to think of it all is how God deals with Job's self righteousness in Job 38-39. In summary, "you think you know stuff, but you have no idea how much you have no idea". We'll never know how much we could loose by changing only a handful of words.
@henrylaurel1188 3 ай бұрын
No doctrines are attacked in the excellent modern translations. Only the liars of the KJV only cult say that. The KJV attacks the deity of the Holy Spirit by calling him an"it" four times. Modern more accurate translations correct this.
@oshea2300 4 ай бұрын
These people are being deceived by devils.. lying spirits..(people that don't believe we have a preserved, inspired, infalliable, inerrant word of God.. the very words of the living God.) and the very living word of God... It's alive!! It's deep and it's real real good!!
@Superman111181 4 ай бұрын
🤦
@henrylaurel1188 3 ай бұрын
When you say deceived by devils and lying spirits. Are you talking about the KJV only cult? Totally agree KJV onlyism is without a doubt one of Satan's most subtle deceptions. Praise God for better translations.
@paulflannigan888 4 ай бұрын
You can use a dictionary to find out what beeves are, but you cannot use a dictionary to find missing verses.
@GodisGracious1031Ministries 4 ай бұрын
Amen, and don't forget, we can probably find all the meanings by understanding, reading, cross-refrencing, and the Holy Ghost will lead us to all truth. Check out Awe of thy word by Gail riplinger too.
@MAMoreno 4 ай бұрын
Just because you can use a dictionary to look up an archaic word doesn't mean that it's worth the time to look up an archaic word when your study should be on the message of the Scriptures, not the obscurities of the English language. Now let's apply your same "look it up" argument to the Middle English translation from the 1380s associated with John Wycliffe. While Leviticus 18.19 may give us the obscure "beeves" in the KJV, this verse presents us with the even more obscure "wem" in the Wycliffe Bible (context: "it schal be a male without wem"). Our pal Noah Webster can help us with that word: "A spot; a scar." But I'm sure you much prefer that the KJV uses the recognizable word "blemish" instead of the archaic word "wem," and you can see that any potential advantage of "wem" (namely, that it can also refer to moral corruption, which captures the symbolism of using an unblemished sacrifice) is utterly outweighed by the comprehension barrier it creates in this verse. **** Side note: If you want to make this about so-called missing verses, then here are a few places where the KJV is missing words from the Wycliffe Bible: - Gen. 4.8: And Cayn seide to Abel his brother, Go we out. And whanne thei weren in the feeld, Cayn roos ayens his brother Abel, and killide him. [KJV omits Cain's line, "Go we out."] - Acts 15.41: And he wente bi Sirie and Silice, and confermyde the chirche, comaundinge to kepe the heestis of apostlis and eldre men. [KJV omits Paul's command to keep the teachings of the apostles and elders.] - Acts 18.4: And he disputide in the synagoge bi ech sabat, puttynge among the name of the Lord Jhesu; and he counselide Jewis and Grekis. [KJV omits Paul proclaiming the name of Jesus in the synagogues.] - Romans 4.5: Sotheli to hym that worchith not, but bileueth in to hym that iustefieth a wickid man, his feith is arettid to riytwisnesse, aftir the purpos of Goddis grace. [KJV omits the mention of God's grace and purpose.] There are other examples I could cite, but you get the idea. The KJV "removes" these sections from the Bible that Western Christians used for centuries. Why? Because they followed the standard textual criticism of their time (that done by Erasmus, Stephanus, and Beza) rather than the Latin received text.
@GodisGracious1031Ministries 4 ай бұрын
@@MAMoreno Uh, the KJB for sure used blemishes.
@GodisGracious1031Ministries 4 ай бұрын
@@MAMoreno Wycliffe is from the Latin text not the T.R. Also, we have to apply all those others things to the Great, Matthew, Geneva, Witchurch and other TR bibles.
@GodisGracious1031Ministries 4 ай бұрын
@@MAMoreno Beeves and wem and blemishes are not the same words.
@williamrobertson3643 4 ай бұрын
My faith in his words is precious to me
@williamrobertson3643 4 ай бұрын
Mark Ward is deceived and he is sowing discord and a false witness ,the words are spirit and life
@henrylaurel1188 3 ай бұрын
Mark Ward is a sound teacher, who teaches the truth. Especially about the KJV only deceivers who are sowing discord. With their ridiculous ludicrous claims and unscriptural deceptions.
@joeangular 6 күн бұрын
@@henrylaurel1188no, he is in secular liberal vaticanus only cult. tell me please, when was the sinaiticus and vaticanus chemicly tested and come back to me with info. I am very curious how old they really are. 😂
@Rightlydividing-wx1xb 4 ай бұрын
Overseers should be chosen from within their own congregation; the qualifications for overseers in 1 Timothy 3 imply, instantiate that the congregation knows the man well. Nearly no congregation looks within, which should be pointing to very shallow teaching when no man in that congregation can oversee.
@bobbymichaels2 4 ай бұрын
The James White's and Mark Ward's of the world have to say something different to get people to listen to them and to sell books. It's their living.
@sjurdurkjv 5 ай бұрын
Kenny: you´ne not bald yet, so go win.
@DavidBrown-tf7uv 5 ай бұрын
You guys are saying things without substantiating any of your claims.
@Silky4ever 3 ай бұрын
They are a cult. They worship the King Jimmy over God.
@ABearOnYouTube 3 күн бұрын
I grew up with the KJV, I love it and always will, but I read the ESV more today and have gotten more juice out of it now than I ever did with a KJV. It is hard to understand and it can be a hinder to someone new to Christ. I feel the Lord revealing things to me and speaking to me just as much or more than he did through a KJV. It's a great book, but the language is outdated. The reading level isn't higher. It's outdated.
@DavidBrown-tf7uv 5 ай бұрын
13:40…”they would make copies if doctrinal verses…”. What proof do you have of this? It’s sounds good, plausible, but sounding good doesn’t make it true
@mikewallace4497 5 ай бұрын
Amen, very encouraging
@SebastianHutten 5 ай бұрын
Can't hear it... Too quiet
@brianmiller4574 5 ай бұрын
Very good advice from a very wise pastor