Mange tak! Ingen VR, kun Track IR.

Mange tak! Jeg har desværre aldrig sat som rigtig pilot, jeg er ren kontorstolspilot som dig 😀

Jeg siger tak!

Jeg bruger Virpil Mongoos T-50CM3 base med Virpil Mongoos T-50CM2 stick, Virpil Mongoos T-50CM3 throttle og Virpil Ace Interceptor rorpedaler. Jeg har et par gamle Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog sticks liggende, men de virker ikke på den forlænger jeg bruger i øjeblikket. Jeg overvejer at købe nogle nye forlængere så jeg kan bruge et "rigtigt" F-16 stick.

Tak!

Tak for feedback!

Thank you very much for your pleasent comment!

Agree, all the sounds sounds flat and lack of bass in my taste. But she is still a wonderfull module.

@@bmbpdk It just sounds like it comes from outside the game ... I guess it is a nice module. I'd like to buy it but I will wait for Polychop to stick to their words on the Gazelle first.

@@simonhouel1984 I was hesitant to buy the Kiowa, based on my experience with the Gazelle, a massive disappointment for me. But i must say that the Kiowa is a VERY nice module, either they did a complete staff-change at Polychop, they had someone else make it or they actually did spend some quality time on it, because the Kiowa and Gazelle is night and day. You cant tell that its the same team on those modules.

I uploaded raw recording footage without commentaries, so the volume could be a bit low, i will take a look at it for the next recording. Thanks for the headsup.

Jeg har skam F-16 modulet, så måske kommer der videoer med den engang.

Thank you very much for your nice comment, it is much appreciated!

Thanks for the tip. Im not using the Mercury pod because they changed it to a LLTV pod instead of a thermal pod, making it useless during the day, unless they changed it back gain. But i will try that next time, thank you.

Det er det nemlig!

Tak for feedback og som jeg nævnte i videoen, så er det en rædsom langsom autofokus på mit Panasonic Lumix der er problemet, noget som ingen youtuber eller Panasonic selv nævnte i alle deres videoer. Havde jeg vidst det, havde jeg ikke købt kameraet.

I dont know what you are talking about :-D LOL

Virpil MT50CM3 throttle and Virpil MT50CM2 grip on a Virpil MT50 base.

So do i!

@@bmbpdk What is your HOTAS joystick for DCS? I'm considering the Logitech x 56 hotas.

@@xuanhuymai543 Virpil MT50CM3 throttle and Virpil MT50CM2 grip on a Virpil MT50 base.

LOL!

Thank you!

Funny you say it, i jsut had a poll on my channels community page and the vote was for a replay with commentary. So sometime i september, is the plan, to start a replay of the Su-25T campaign.

@@bmbpdk Nice I would like to here some commentary I only heard you with the Chinook ones and I believe you'll do fine

@@ΓιώργοςΠαπακωνσταντίνου-φ5υ Thank you very much!

Not on my end.

@@bmbpdk I think iit is, i have the 7700xt and have my frames capped at 75 fps with everything in DCS maxed out on a 49 inch monitor 1440p

OH and my cpu is 3800

Hej Lene. Utrolig mange tak for de virkelig smukke ord og tanker! Når man finder ud af hvor man skal prioritere sine kræfter og sier alle drænende elementer fra i sit liv, så har man pludselig kræfter, energi og overskud til at arbejde med sig selv og sine laster. Jeg har periodiske dyk, men der er heldigvis længere og længere imellem dem og man lærer at håndtere dem korrekt.

Mange tak for de fine ord og velkommen "tilbage". Ja, jeg syntes at Kiowa´en er en rigtig fin begynder helikopter: 1: Det er en lille let helikopter som reagere prompte på input uden at være twitchy. 2: Den er meget forudsigelig, det skal selvfølgelig lige siges at jeg har en del hundrede timer i andre DCS helikoptere, men jeg syntes at hun reagere som man forventer. 3: Brug af våben er meget simpelt, de er lette at sigte med og at blive effektiv med, deres opsætning er også meget nemt og let at huske. 4: Mastmonteret sigte er let at blive tryg ved; en enkelt aften/et par timer, også er man "brugeromskolet" til den. 5: VRS er selvfølgelig muligt, men jeg vil sige at der er en fornuftig buffer imellem stabil hover og VRS. 6: COMM´s er meget let at bruge, forudsat at man har en 4-way hat konfigureret til båndskift og en op/ned til kanalskift, det er også ret let at omprogrammere frekvenser. Alt i alt en lille let helikopter, der kan bide fra sig, flyve som havde man stjålet hende og med layout og system opsætning der giver mening og som er nemt at huske. Når det er sagt vil jeg sige at når man kommer ind til landing og er indenfor groundeffect, så kan hun godt nogen gange kræve ekstra opmærksomhed, mens andre gange går smidigt.

@@bmbpdk - mange tak for den beskrivelse. - du har ikke været medlem af online flyve community der hedder S-RDAF har du?

@@NicolajFlies Det var så lidt da. Nej, det har jeg ikke, jeg har faktisk ikke hørt om dem.

1: Stay above AAA range, that also give you reaction time to deploy countermeasures against MANPADS. 2: Its DCS, the wingman have always been borderlining useless, but use them as bait and then spot where the enemy air defences are. 3: The mountainridge on the left have several valleys, use them as ground cover when egressing while deploying flares in continues mode. 4: They changed the Mercury screen and i havent tried it for months, so i cant help you there. 5: The Vihkrs used to be super precise, i have fired thousands of Vikhrs, so unless they changed them too, its most likely usererror. 6: Spend time planning your attack, its better to circle for 5 - 10 minutes spotting targets and planning your ingress/egress than just bull in. That being said; DCS campaigns have changed alot the last year or so, so perhaps i should try them again.

@@bmbpdk I tried again without going below 1,5 km altitude and moved all the way back to the sea before turning around for the next attack. Hugged the mountain to the left also and turned all the jammers on. Still got hit at some point lol but I was way safer that way. Are manpads able to shoot through trees and am I more visible with jammers on overall?

@@niyiu3547 You did as you should, MANPADS and AAA is the biggest threat since they give you practically no warning and can popup literally anywhere. If i remember correct, the AI does not see trees as obstacles, so yes, they can see and shot through trees. But i believe that trees triggers proximityfuses in warheads. Technically DIRCM actually makes you more visible for an IR sensor, that is the point; when the sensor/missile gets close enough it gets blinded and can even burn out. DIRCM does work, but is not 100%, just like all other jammers and countermeasures; they only reduce the chance of getting hit, they do not eliminate it. So always keep that on when entering a hot zone. I highly recommend the software called Tacview, its really great to analyze exactly how you got hit and to see how countermeasures works. Ive spend many hours in Tacview to analyze exactly how, when and where i got hit, and adjusted my tactics accordingly.

Mærker er ikke vigtige da det afhænger meget af hvilken del af påklædning man skal bruge, men mine erfaringer er at carinthia, woolpower, montane, ulvang og termo original er mærker man kan have i lang tid og have stor glæde af, såfremt at man behandler og vedligeholder dem korrekt. Jeg sveder meget/let, så når det er koldt og jeg ved at jeg skal yde for så at sidde stille, er 100% uld påklædning vitalt for mig. Woolpower og ulvang tilbyder 100% uldprodukter mens termo original, så vidt jeg husker, har en polyester/uld blanding. Den blanding er for mange helt fint men for mig er 100% uld det eneste jeg går efter. Var det svar nok eller vil du have et mere specifikt og detaljeret svar?

Mange tak! Liggeunderlag er Therm-a-rest neoair x-therm wide. Sovepose er Carinthia Defence 4 (Den er nu udskiftet med en Therm-a-rest Questar -18c dunsovepose da den pakkes meget mindre ned og er varmere) Soveposeovertræk er den udleverede fra Hæren jeg glemte at aflevere da jeg afmønstrede.

Jeg siger mange tak. Jeg køber mine kort hos nordisk korthandel også kaldet scanmaps.

Yes, ED have made a completely new cargo system and with the C-130 coming logistics will play a bigger role in the future. Adding medium transport helicopters/modules give a completely new aspect to DCS; imagine flying pallets and pallets of ammo and gear in to a besieged FOB under heavy fire, a surrounded ally or inserting/extracting SPEC OPS in the middle of the night along a path that the Kiowa have scouted and with the escort of Apache´s. And with the new dynamic campaigns imagine the impact it would have on the war if a FARP or FOB did not get that shipment of ammo or reinforced with troops.

Im using Track IR 5.

@@bmbpdk oh that makes sense, I am using open track and my webcam and it's kinda shitty

@@ΓιώργοςΠαπακωνσταντίνου-φ5υ I have used Track IR for close to 10 years now and it served me well. Track IR just dont like sunlight, thats why i mostly fly in the evening.

@@bmbpdk What do you mean it doesn't like sunlight?

@@ΓιώργοςΠαπακωνσταντίνου-φ5υ Track IR works by two ways: either you attach a bulky IR sender that requires a wire to you headset or you use a metal bracket with reflective tape on it. The Track IR unit itself sees that IR light and translates that into movement, sunlight is IR light and the Track IR does not know which IR light is which, so its an absolute hell to use the Track IR in sunlight/during the day. Even the light from a woodstove messes up the Track IR, so its a pain to find the exact position and angle and settings in the software; its totally unique for each person. Yes you can tune down the sensitivity for the unwanted IR sources, but that also tunes down the wanted sources, so its plague or cholera or dont use it during daylight or spent hours fidling with position, angles and settings.

Hello Fred, good question! I studied the map and the assumed enemy positions, and as far as i remember, there was a river going out to the sea and some treelines, i had an idea of where the enemy was in relation to the river and treeline and the thermals in the missiles did the rest. I actually made a video, titled "How i spot targets in DCS" i believe, where i go through the procedures and thoughtprocess on target spotting. I call the procedures "Peeling the onion". Roughly speaking its zeroing in using prominant features like rivers, forest, bridges etc. You are slowly "peeling away features" to zero in on the target position. That way you can dive on a target from 25.000ft without actually seeing the target, triangulating your way in using said techniques. I hope that answers your question. Brian.

I dont know but i guess he got hit by a SAM or AAA.

Det var så lidt og tak for den flinke kommentar.

I could yes, but only the F-16 official module and the MH-60 mod is worth spending time on. The C-130 mod is no longer supported and have not yet been released as a official module and as far as i know there i no T-17, Fennec or Merlin. The F-35 mods i have seen is not worth my time or effort, they have either a F-15 or Su-27 cockpit. I do not want to waste time on a mod that have a "Copy/paste" cockpit, i want a proper realistic cockpit. The MH-60 mod looks very nice, but im waiting for ED to release the update for DCS before i will install it. I dont want it to crash DCS or DCS crash it. We once had the Naval Lynx, replaced by the MH-60 and the Cayuse, but the Cayuse mod is a very broken mod with an awful flightmodel and a proper (Naval) Lynx havent been released yet as far as i know. If you know of any proper and well done T-17, Fennec or Merlin for DCS, please let me know and i would love to try them out.

@@bmbpdk Was the AJ537 viggen not used by the danish in the cold war?

@@JadenRedselvoni No, we had the (AJS-35)F-35 Draken instead. It was used as a fighter, ground attacker and in a recce role, as the RF-35 Draken with the F-104 as a interceptor/fighter until both was replaced by the F-16 in the ´80s, now our F-16, after 43 year of dutyfull and honourable service is being replaced by barely a single squadron of F-35´s.

Yep, for some reason i often forget/dont use flaps on take-off in the Grach 😀

You are most welcome!

Det er korrekt, jeg bruger Virpil MT-50CM3 throttle og Virpil MT-50CM2 stick på Virpil MT-50CM3 base HOTAS og jeg bruger Virpil ACE Interceptor rorpedaler.

Ah fedt, har kigget lidt på virpil, indtil videre prøver jeg stadig og få mit saitek x52 til at virke ordentligt i dcs

@@c0kemeister Virpil er pengene værd og de har en super kundeservice og deres software giver mange muligheder for customization. X52 er et meget populært joystick, så der skulle være rigelig med hjælp at hente på internettet.

Hej Jacob. Rigtig god idé, der kommer en video om det de nærmeste dage.

Klokken 1500 idag kommer der en video op som du eftersøger.

Either use the map; bearing and distance or, if its in the navigation computer, use the PVI 800 button "Airfield" and the "2". Number one airfield is always your starting airfield and number two is always your primary landing airfield.

Hej Peter. Tak for spørgsmålet. Du har ret i at i det opstillede scenarie er det umuligt at sige hvor man er, men det er ikke umuligt at finde ud af hvis det var det dine venner mente. Har man over flere dage har gået i blinde i vilkårlig retninger, uden at have mødt unikke/let genkendelige terrængenstande er det praktisk talt umuligt indtil man finder noget unikt. Det at pejle ud fra stjernerne om natten er dybt unøjagtigt med et simpelt kompas og tit kan man heller ikke se nok af nattehimlen og horisonten til at kunne lave en triangulering når man er i en skov eller bjergrigt terræn. Scenariet: Lad os sige at man skulle gå fra A til B, det var planen og man vidste jo hvor man startede. Man vidste at man skulle gå retning 270 fra A for at komme til B, men i et par dage kiggede man ikke nok kort og til sidst mistede man sine fixpunkter, sine opfang og sine terrænpunkter. Hvor langt man kom væk fra ruten er ukendt og man har ingen ide om en nøjagtig postition. Og man ved heller ikke om man er faret vild syd for eller nord for ruten eller om det er en blanding eller om man faktisk er faret vild tilbage ind på ruten. For man må ikke glemme det scenario at man faktisk er på ruten, man ved det bare ikke. Det jeg ville gøre var at finde et form for opfang, unikt terræn eller ligende indenfor en hvis afstand af B. Var man gået vild i en dag, ville jeg finde sagte mærker indenfor en dags vandring af B. Og siden at man vidste hvor man startede ville jeg simpelthen gå retning 270, så har man ihvertfald en generel retning. Lad os sige at der er en markant flod eller dal der skærer igennem B i en nord/syd retning. Det vil være ens opfang, men skal man gå nord eller syd for at ramme B, ja det vil afhænge af eventuelle detaljer i terrænet eller blot ens held. Ved man at der er en bro over dalen eller floden nord for B, så er det ens nye opfang og man ved at hvis man rammer den, så skal man gå mod syd og man har derfor fået et nyt fixpunkt. Rammer man dalen/floden og man støder ikke på en bro indenfor rimelig tid/afstand kan man gå ud fra at man er syd for B. Har man mulighed for at gå op i højden/terrænet og få en udsigt er det et plus, da man så ofte kan se dale, floder eller ligende der skærer sig igennem terrænet og man kan få et birds eye view som er relativt nemmere at matche med et kort. Var B blot et koordinat midt ude i amazon, ville det være nødvendigt med en kompasretning fra et fixpunkt/kendt punkt som jeg ville bruge ovenstående metode til at finde. En anden mulighed, som er den trælse afhængig af situation, er at søge tilbage mod A, så har man ihvertfald en chance for at møde kendt terræn, husk blot at en rute set bagfra kan virke helt ny, måske mere forvirrende. Hvis jeg skulle navigere i tæt skov, over længere afstande, ville jeg lave fixpunkter for hver x antal minutter/km., det kan godt være at ruten blev længere, men at vide hvor man er, er altid den korteste rute. For at relatere til f.eks. DCS World flyvespillet, så har jeg ALTID skrevet ned hvilken retning jeg skal flyve fra målet og hjem, hvis alle mine navigationsmidler bliver skudt i stykker, den retning bevæger jeg mig så i indtil jeg møder noget kendt og til det kan jeg bruge solen eller stjernerne. Fortalte dine venner hvordan de præcist ville plotte deres position på kortet? For det lyder ret imponerende hvis de kan det i sagte situation, måske jeg kan lære noget nyt. Jeg håber at det hjalp, ellers sig til. Mvh. Brian.

@@bmbpdk Tusind tak for hjælpen! Det var meget hjælpsom :)

@@ImPinu Det var så lidt!

Hello Fernando, I assume that Brian, that commented a year ago, didn use labels or other cheats. I would try his recommedation; circle around until you see the last MANPAD/AA.

That is VERY good to hear, thanks!

Yes it looks very good!

Det er en H145, du kan læse i beskrivelsen hvem der har lavet moddet.

Det ser mega cool ud. Jeg har dog erfaringer med at selve styringen af helikoptere især i MSFS er ekstremt urealistisk og underligt. Jeg ved ikke om der er en indstilling man kan sætte for at gøre det bedre med heli?@@bmbpdk

@@gadDenmark Sammenlignet med DCS World er flight physics på helikopterne ringe, faktisk urealistisk som du siger. Jeg er utrolig skuffet over hvor ringe det føles, derfor har jeg kun fløjet under fem timer i MSFS i helikopter. Lad os håbe at det bliver bedre i næste version.

@@bmbpdk- Jeg tvivler på megen forbedring i 2024, men vi må krydse fingre.

You are most welcome and please tell us how it works with the heavy Apache collective!

How long ago did you order. I've been waiting a week for it to ship.

@@homeworxchannel4120 I dont remember the exact date, but very close/within a week or two of the date they announced it. They cant keep up with demand for it, but it is worth the wait.

@homeworxchannel4120 I don't want to disappoint you, but mine was at the end of Dec. I hope the process is going fast now

@ammarjohar654 oh wow. I messed up and thought it would ship faster than the apache grip. Ordered it when I got my apache grip so now im just staring at it 🤣

Some helicopters are easier than others in landing and general handling. I prefer the Mi-8 and Ka-50, its all individual which module you like. I made a video how i land the Hind, the tips and tricks are translateable to other modules as well. A few quick tips: Take it slow, never decend more than 3-4m/s, be gentle on the controls and use the trim!

I use Track IR 5.