Although one can guess that the original integral must be related to the well known integral of e^(-x^2) , it is quite a long and tricky way to get there.
@albertbadal44252 күн бұрын
great work. If you use geometric series right off the bat, you can skip the trig sub.
@mathemagicalpi2 күн бұрын
I suppose so, at the time I was going through whichever method or way to manipulate the integral into a nicer format and trig sub seemed to catch my attention at first.
@sofianesk30504 күн бұрын
Nice
@slavinojunepri76485 күн бұрын
Excellent 👌
@maxencebondy31955 күн бұрын
Don't we have a vertical asymptot at x=pi/2 making the integral diverges ?
@mathemagicalpi5 күн бұрын
Yes, but it so turns out that this integral is in fact convergent despite there being an issue in the upper limit. You can check in Wolfram Alpha as well to verify.
@MaherHamza-y5c6 күн бұрын
what is G constant ??
@mathemagicalpi5 күн бұрын
Catalans Constant
@DeapHere6 күн бұрын
ridiculously impressive
@filipeoliveira70016 күн бұрын
All you had to do is use the Basel problem result and factor out 1/4 from the even terms and you’d get the answer in 3 minutes lolllll
@mathemagicalpi6 күн бұрын
True, but a 30 second video isn't really as appealing.
Damn that's a really nice use of complex numbers and euler's identity
@holyshit92210 күн бұрын
Integration by parts twice then finish with substitutions
@FloriePatek11 күн бұрын
They only ask me if it converges or diverges, I hope I will be able to understand how to actually sum it one day!
@user-kp2rd5qv8g11 күн бұрын
The given integral is Sum^{\infty}_{0} (-1)^n \int^{1}_{0} dx x^n ln x = Sum^{\infty}_{0} (-1)^n d/dt /t=n \int^{1}_{0} dx x^t = Sum^{\infty}_{0} (-1)^(n+1) 1/(n+1)^2 = Sum^{\infty}_{1} (-1)^n 1/n^2 = - eta(2) = -(\pi )^2/12.
@user-kp2rd5qv8g12 күн бұрын
In fact, one could generalize this to I(m,n) = \int^{1}_{0} dx x^m (ln x)^n. Let f(t)= \int^{1}_{0} dx x^t = 1/(t+1). Then, I(m,n) = d^n/dt^n f(t), t=m = (-1)^n n!/(m+1)^(n+1). So, \int^{1}_{0} dx x^m (ln x)^n = (-1)^n n!/(m+1)^(n+1).
@user-kp2rd5qv8g13 күн бұрын
Let f(t)= \int^{1}_{0} dx x^t = 1/(t+1). The given integral I = d/dt f(t), t=1 as d/dt x^t = x^t ln x. So, I = -1/(t+1)^2 with t=1 = -1/4.
@mathemagicalpi13 күн бұрын
Awesome observation
@jmcsquared1815 күн бұрын
So, now, how do you prove the Weierstrass product? Start with proving the Eisenstein series for cotangen using the Residue theorem. In fact, that Eisenstein series formula makes even quicker work of this sum.
@jmc-2316 күн бұрын
Awesome technique! I hope you'll make a video discussing on how to evaluate the sum in 15:20
@21quangminh216 күн бұрын
🥰 tysm
@slavinojunepri764819 күн бұрын
Nice and smooth
@Mario_Altare19 күн бұрын
Cool 😀A DJ taking part in an integral
@jwkim442820 күн бұрын
Int_0^inf u^2/(1+u^4) dx = (pi/5) csc(3pi /5) What did i do wrong?
@mathemagicalpi20 күн бұрын
It's hard to say without anymore context, though your answer is similar to something utilizing the Euler Reflection Formula.
@jwkim442820 күн бұрын
Very sorry. I made mistakes. Thanks for your kind reply. Your right answer.
@jwkim442820 күн бұрын
answer = pi / (2 sqrt(2)) ?
@jwkim442820 күн бұрын
Sorry i was wrong
@nicolascamargo833923 күн бұрын
Genial
@mathemagicalpi22 күн бұрын
Thanks
@user-kp2rd5qv8g26 күн бұрын
Very nice! Therefore, the sum from - \infty to +\infty should yield pi coth pi. This is a very useful result for calculating Matsubara sums in finite temperature field theory.
@slavinojunepri764826 күн бұрын
Excellent
@alexkaralekas406028 күн бұрын
Wait dont you need for |x|<1 in order to use the maclaurin series of ln(x+1)
@carbazone61923 күн бұрын
Yeah you need to be within radius of convergence to use the power series and interchange sum and integral
@alexkaralekas406028 күн бұрын
Or just do x=(1-t)/(1+t) just like cipher did and solve it in 3 minutes
@mathemagicalpi28 күн бұрын
Sure, but there's always multiple ways to approach things and not just one.
Integration by parts would be better for this example
@jasonlin5884Ай бұрын
i ask the same question (the definite integration ) to the wolfram . wow it give the same answer. actually it also give a indefinite integration form. dosen't know how it can do.
@jasonlin5884Ай бұрын
at 9:46 the 2nd term in the summation is not correct. missing (a+1)^2 in denominator.
@mathemagicalpiАй бұрын
Yeah you're right, since I'm speaking while writing, sometimes some of these things go over my head.
@slavinojunepri7648Ай бұрын
Marvelous
@davidblauyoutubeАй бұрын
I let x=y^2 and performed long division.
@davidblauyoutubeАй бұрын
I let x = cot(y) and integrated by parts twice.
@rishabhshah8754Ай бұрын
can u do the integral of sqrt(tanx)
@RayMyNameАй бұрын
never saw such a way of solving a definite integral. pretty cool, thank you
@V.Ranjan____Ай бұрын
didn't understood 82% of the video, still here to increase the no of comments. Thank Me later
@mathemagicalpiАй бұрын
Would you say I'm going a bit too fast in the explanation?
@V.Ranjan____Ай бұрын
@@mathemagicalpi no not at all, relax i am in the high school i don't know anything about what was going in the video but it was fun to watch.....
@holyshit922Ай бұрын
Integration by parts with u = ln(x^3+1) , dv = 1/x^3 dx \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{x^3+1}dx = \frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{x^3+1}dx + \frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{x^3+1}dx \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{x^3+1}dx = \frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{x^3+1}dx + \frac{1}{2}\int_{\infty}^{0}\frac{1}{\frac{1}{u^3}+1}(-\frac{1}{u^2})du \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{x^3+1}dx = \frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{x^3+1}dx + \frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{u^3}{1+u^3}\frac{1}{u^2}du \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{x^3+1}dx = \frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{x^3+1}dx + \frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{u}{1+u^3}du \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{x^3+1}dx = \frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1+u}{1+u^3}du \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{x^3+1}dx = \frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{u^2-u+1}du \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{x^3+1}dx = \frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{\left(u-\frac{1}{2} ight)^2+\frac{3}{4}}du u-\frac{1}{2} = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}w
@MrDoctorlee2Ай бұрын
high class. It's very difficult for me to solve this.
@maxvangulik1988Ай бұрын
6:05 Isn't arctan(cot(@)) just pi/2-@?
@newmantwine1224Ай бұрын
I think you can make these videos shorter and better if you combine some of the obvious steps. But good video otherwise.
@mathemagicalpiАй бұрын
Apologies for the disruptive sound towards the end, had to cut the video short.
@bih505822 күн бұрын
allg brotha, ezpz and drunk as shit
@txikitofandangoАй бұрын
Very cool solution. You can't pull the y terms all the way out of a double integral, can you?
@mathemagicalpiАй бұрын
You should be able to just like how it is allowed to pull constants out of an integral because the constant doesn't depend on x, same thing for the y terms it acts like a constant because it's being integrated with respect to x first.
@holyshit922Ай бұрын
and too complicated , integration by parts and simple substitutions solve the problem in the way that even beginners can understand
@slavinojunepri7648Ай бұрын
Very cool indeed
@holyshit922Ай бұрын
1+cos(x) = 2cos^2(x/2) then integration by parts with u = x , dv = 1/(2cos^2(x/2))dx Finally substitution u = cos(x/2)
@federicoreyes9983Ай бұрын
Can you make a video explaining the Last function you mentioned.
@holyshit922Ай бұрын
From where you have integrals to calculate ? I have one \int_{\theta}^{\pi}{\frac{\sin{\left(\left(n+\frac{1}{2} ight)t ight)}}{\sqrt{2\left(\cos{\left(\theta ight)} - \cos{\left(\t ight)} ight)}}dt} Hint using trigonometric identities and integration by parts derive recurrence relation and dont forget base cases for recurrence
@mathemagicalpiАй бұрын
Some Integrals I make up or are inspired by other integrals, some are integrals previous people on KZbin have done but I try to use a different approach if possible.
@holyshit922Ай бұрын
Integration by parts with u = arctan(x) , dv = 1/(x+1)dx Substitution u = (1-x)/(1+x)