Пікірлер
@johnleake5657 2 ай бұрын
Thank you very much for uploading this!
@traianivanescu24 3 ай бұрын
Mulțumesc pentru prezentare, părinte profesor.
@VasilePrepelita-qh3lo 4 ай бұрын
Mulțumim foarte frumos .
@mariaiovu5234 5 ай бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/eni4i4KIZs6kirssi=-xAExTtoDBEZcSF4
@rodicadraganrodica 5 ай бұрын
Felicitari pentru realizarea acestui proiect de mari proporții si succes in continuare.Respect.
@elenaprecup9306 6 ай бұрын
Deosebit respect!🙏🙏🙏❤️
@enachemarioara9001 7 ай бұрын
Mulțumesc , cu respect și recunoștință !....
@ioncernea8225 7 ай бұрын
😢❤ CU DOMNUL DOCTOR HORST MUELLER M ASI BUCURA SA AVETI O CONFERINTA ACADEMICA PE TEAMA RENASTERII ROMANIEI UN TEOLIG OROFUND CARE CRED VEU ATI CRREA ACELE CONECXIUNI VSI PUNTI BPE TEMA LEGII VIETII ATI FACE LUMINA IN ROMANIA AMBIGUA SPIRITUAL SI SOCIAL LA UN APEL LA SOLIDARITATEA TUTUROR CELOR CARE VOR SI POT AJUTA TARA NATALA I CADERE TOTALA DE 34 DE ANI. MULTUMIM PTR TOT CE ATI FACUT SI FACETI MULT SUCCES LA ALEGERILE EUROPARLAMENTARE ❤❤❤
@eusebiutihan5048 7 ай бұрын
MInunat
@amterapeut3449 11 ай бұрын
La minutul 21:21 definitia poetului si a poeticului este geniala 😅
@amterapeut3449 11 ай бұрын
Extraordinara Conferinta! Multumesc!
@biblicalpsalmodyaudio 11 ай бұрын
Very interesting. Thank you for uploading
@jamessheffield4173 11 ай бұрын
Why some have problems with Reasoned eclecticism. I John 5:7 is found in a majority of the Latin, but not the Greek so out it goes. Good will towards men Doxology in Matthew Without cause God manifest in the flesh Are a majority in the Greek but not in the Latin, so out they go The PA and Mark 16:9-20 are a majority in both the Greek and Latin so out they go. Even the “not yet” found in the two of the earliest(P66.P75) in John 7:8 some throw out. If as an orthodox Christian you don't see a problem, what would you see as a problem?
@tiptupjr.9073 11 ай бұрын
So true. There's simply no consistency. All scholars now admit the second clause in 1 John 2:23 is genuine despite being a minority reading in the Greek. They say it fell out of the manuscripts at some point. And yet this is just three chapters before the Comma, which they're somehow *sure* is false...
@jamessheffield4173 11 ай бұрын
@@tiptupjr.9073 A circumstantial case for the Comma of John: In 484 A.D. the bishop of Carthage with 400 bishops quoted the comma to an Arian Vandal king. Being the bishop of Carthage, he would have had access to the Scriptures of Cyprian, and he probably had a Vulgate, maybe a first edition. Also, Gregory Nazianzus wrote on the grammar, and he had a student named Jerome. Seems strong evidence to me. Blessings.