Пікірлер
@typhoon-7 2 ай бұрын
This isn't 82t. On the bed is a J-1175 Terex rock crusher. It weighs a shade over 51t. So even with the trailer this isn't even 62t let alone 82. However it's still a good load for a 4x2.
@TheKigosi 6 ай бұрын
Great❤
@cheeseycheeseo6624 6 ай бұрын
82t my hoop
@OGMoses_ 7 ай бұрын
No way that weight is 82t
@jonchilds1637 8 ай бұрын
That would put something IRO 20t on the drive axle - not a chance!!
@haroldwilkes6608 8 ай бұрын
What the heck kind of asphalt is that? Without more axles that load would have destroyed half the highways in my state.
@bmad1386 8 ай бұрын
More like 42 tons
@raymondsawyer8626 8 ай бұрын
That is not 82 tons
@jasongittins5406 8 ай бұрын
Keep it lite
@puttervids472 8 ай бұрын
Is that a snake in the road ?
@davidjeffrey5395 8 ай бұрын
No wonder roads are such crap...
@ciaranclancy3296 8 ай бұрын
Where was this filmed ?
@philgordon6671 8 ай бұрын
82 tons my ass
@laurentlassen7812 8 ай бұрын
82 tons my a$$!
@charliedoherty5965 8 ай бұрын
Not that type of weight.wouldnt b half of it.
@sakapole 8 ай бұрын
Leaves drugs Bro, 4x2 carring 82 tons just in your drugged brain.
@adamhurst4246 8 ай бұрын
82 tonne ?! 😂
@garyemerson5476 8 ай бұрын
82 tons, my arse.
@rickyperks3895 8 ай бұрын
Definitely not 82ton as would need to be a double drive axle and a STGO category plate displayed
@tuhcs_joshua 8 ай бұрын
Like it's nothing
@shush103 8 ай бұрын
DVSA having heart attack 😂
@jamesfordjhfcontractingltd1627 8 ай бұрын
82 tons on its back????🤣🤣
@jonnykerley 8 ай бұрын
Definitely not 82 tons on her back
@alastairjhunter3666 8 ай бұрын
More like 18 tons
@HubertofLiege 8 ай бұрын
The crusher itself weighs 120,000 pounds, add 40 for truck and trailer and it’s 160,000 total.
@neilpowell6191 8 ай бұрын
Wow... are you sure it wasn't perhaps a 28-ton piece of machinery on the back.
@seanhedley8028 8 ай бұрын
82 tons ? It’s not even displaying an STGO plate . More like 20 tons
@linchaynes3824 8 ай бұрын
Not 82 ton...no way
@ithedigs 8 ай бұрын
More like 28 ton . No way there’s 82 ton there even in gross weight
@nipper44 8 ай бұрын
Having driven a scanny 143 many years ago i can attest to what a brilliant motor it was,when i retired i ended my HGV career driving a Scania Topline 480,but when i first started my HGV life my first wagon was an old Albion Reiver,no fancy sleepers in those days,but we were a different breed in those days.
@leighjordine4031 8 ай бұрын
My dad said before power steering sometimes you had to stand up in the cab to turn the wheel.
@nipper44 8 ай бұрын
@@leighjordine4031 your dad is 100%correct,at one time I drove an 8 legger for Allen's in Trafford Park and I had to stand up every time I had to go round a corner,and the lock was that bad more often than not I had to have a shunt to get it round.it was better than all the weight lifting exercises 🤣🤣🤣
@chuckg2016 8 ай бұрын
I fully understand the weight distribution as I pulled heavy equipment for years with most of it in our Rocky Mountains. The axle debate might be geographical as here in the U. S. you won't find a single axle transporting that kind of weight.
@jonchilds1637 8 ай бұрын
Nor in the UK - not without a load divider
@Yeakerr 8 ай бұрын
Town officials love to see that (not) lots of exspensive road damage for those small townships to fix.
@michaelgaskell7408 8 ай бұрын
That thing shouldn't be on the back roads/lanes,in the first place.PS.You can hear the "bridge cracking",as it moves up the second incline.
@numbnutz7832 8 ай бұрын
Not many motorways in Ireland. It’s all back lanes til you get to a motorway. 😂😂😂😂😂
@chuckg2016 8 ай бұрын
I just can't buy 82 tons on a single axle.
@MattiAntsuK 8 ай бұрын
Its not like all the load is on that one rear axle, load is more centered on the trailer. Many timber trucks in Sweden and Finland in the 80's hauled up to 60 tons of timber with their 6x2 configs. Lifting that tag added most weight to the drive axle and boom you got grip for days. With just a search you can find multiple clips from Sweden or Finland spinning their tires on those older Scanias from early 2000's.
@benjibb5173 8 ай бұрын
😅
@geddonmeansome9834 9 ай бұрын
Wow, I can hardly contain my excitement.
@Onthemove6801 9 ай бұрын
I'm not going to argue that she couldn't have had 82 ton on her back (because she didn't!!) but I will vehemently argue another point.... LONG LIVE DIESEL No other form of power will ever replace diesel in the trucks that keep the shelves stocked and the wheels of industry turning.
@darrenfarrell-bn2cb 9 ай бұрын
She’s Horse’n The Work In Hey 👋by God Them 143’s Could Pull. EC 14 ERF Was the only Lorry I Know Could Beat Them on a Long Pull.
@paddysyron 9 ай бұрын
82000lbs more like. Illegal on a 4x2
@MattiAntsuK 8 ай бұрын
Illegal on the ground pressure I bet. Not illegal for Scania weight standards. Early 80's Scanias could haul 40 tons on just 1 axle.
@jaggass 9 ай бұрын
They really pick up after 1800 rpm
@davidperry9954 10 ай бұрын
Awesome 👍
@fatlad5090 10 ай бұрын
80 ton on a 4x2 143H no problem the 143 was just a true luxury work horse. power house. was lucky to drive 3 different ones.
@thomasmeehan8583 11 ай бұрын
Best sound ever
@Onthemove6801 9 ай бұрын
@thomasmeehan8583 There is no sweeter sound than a Scania V8 diesel engine. 😊
@williamsmith5060 Жыл бұрын
Bit heavy for that
@ballaki Жыл бұрын
8.2 tons or 82?
@mynameisschezuan 4 күн бұрын
82
@Stecher007 Жыл бұрын
Sweden Power wow👌👍👍👍
@bossroad Жыл бұрын
👍
@nigelleahy406 Жыл бұрын
We are not going to get into the argument about the weights ok but that what id call a animal of a truck. 143 a legend never forgot and thats when men was men not going on about weights.........
@barryburton7755 2 жыл бұрын
82 ton my arse 😆
@johnnymolloy3813 2 жыл бұрын
The sound of success 👌
@zekeryieziko8332 2 жыл бұрын
Maşallah