ZMVT about history

Пікірлер

@ЛюдаКонова-т3д Күн бұрын

Всем кому не лень, сочиняют болгарскую историю...Интересно...почему не интересуються ,что болгары говорят о своей истории ,с документами с очевидными артефактами...Какие тюрки...? У всех наций тюркского больше,чем у ДНК болгар...Старая версия пропаганды,давно отпала...Болгары владели семь империй...почему все это скрывают...? Может всем невыгодно об этом говорить...?

@IL_Bulgaro1 Күн бұрын

Bro don't spread nonsense, Bulgaria was never Khaganate , there is no evidence for any Hans or khaganas ? Please respect the culture

@erikheddergott5514 Күн бұрын

There was no Byzantine Empire, there was a Roman Empire.

@mitkodimitrov8396 2 күн бұрын

hihi turkish and turkic,are not same things, mate.Who told you all peoples,from the steppes around Black see are turkic?Thanks for video

@OccidentalAryan 2 күн бұрын

Ukraine ain't a "great country" lol.

@mivanov4143 3 күн бұрын

Show me an artefact from the ,, seven Slavic tribes". This is bullshit.

@kaneto88 4 күн бұрын

100 soldiers? Are they having a small picnic or something like that?

@mariamihailov5725 4 күн бұрын

Bulgarians are NOT Turkic race, they are INDOEUROPEAN race, from Iranic extraction1

@MiroslavBaldzhiev 4 күн бұрын

This is utter bullshit. Bulgaria was never a kaganate. Bulgarian rulers never had titles like kagan or khan.

@nikiindzhiev5369 4 күн бұрын

ty for covering this history <3

@just_hris 4 күн бұрын

I'm pretty sure it should be called an Empire as we call it "Царство" (Tsarsvo) equal to Empire in English but not to the English tsardom.

@vixcontango Күн бұрын

Царство / Кесарство с сигурност не е Империя. Това са две тотално различни титли. Едната е етническа титла, другата е военна и специфично над етническа титла.

@streetviewer538 4 күн бұрын

Turkish and Turkic is a big diffrence that leads to missconseptions. Thank you for the video. :)

@EvgeniOvcharov 5 күн бұрын

The word "Turk" did not exist at the time of the Bulgars and its use to describe them is problematic. Bulgars certainly did not call themselves that way. Ethnically, they had little in common with modern-day Turks who came into Anatolia after spending centuries in the Middle East and mixing with the local population there. In contrast, Bulgars have always been a North Eurasian population and DNA analysis indicates their generic similarity with other European populations in the Ukrainian and Russian steppes.

@ivanjuric6979 5 күн бұрын

Turks went to Anatolia following the southern coast of the Black Sea, Bulgarians came to Balkan from area north of the Black Sea. Until fall of Byzantium those 2 groups never shared a border.

@faroutchris11 4 күн бұрын

Modern day Turkish people have almost nothing in common with Tatars/Turks. One thing people don't realize is that the nomadic steppe lifestyle was not exclusive to just Turk peoples. The Rus Khaganate was Slavic and Viking in origin. The rulers didn't come from tribes that tilled the soil, they were nomadic conquerors. They set themselves up as the ruling class of the settled peoples.

@harbinger200 6 күн бұрын

U svakom video o Srbima uvek se nadju ustase. Pa goveda jedna jel samo sedite i trazite Srbiju? Kompleksi ubijaju.

@harbinger200 6 күн бұрын

This is again Vatican version of history. There was no Slavic or Serb migration to Balkans, thats Vatican fantasy invented to erase Serb history and portray Romans and later Vatican oldest and to manufacture clam to land. There is no proof of Serbs migrating to Balkans, and if you do have proof please share! On the Other handa there is alot of proof Serb/Slavs where indigenous to the region. Apart from archeological evidence dating before 5 century, we have Mavro Orbinis book "Il regno de gli Slavi" that documents Slav/Serb kindoms in Roman times in Iliria, Dacia, Tracia, and today Germany.

@proetcontra5599 6 күн бұрын

Great short recapitulation of medieval history for this area of Europe.

@AMEurope333 6 күн бұрын

If you intend to study Serbian history, you must use historical and ethnological evidence. There is no evidence of Serbian migration to the Balkan Peninsula in the 7th century, only evidence of autochthonism in these territories.

@CocoSon-we2rg 6 күн бұрын

With a few small inherent exceptions due to the intrigues of the imperial powers, Romanians and Serbs were the best neighbors. The only thing that casts a shadow is the treatment of religious rights and schools in the mother tongue of the Vlachs in Serbia just like in Bulgaria or Greece.

@vickoslavkovic2593 8 күн бұрын

Do you think that the murder of sultan Murat by the knight Miloš Obilić is a myth or is it true?

@pripri632 6 күн бұрын

The hero who killed Sultan-harem Murad was Dardanian-Arbanian Prince Mëhill Kopili from Dardanian-Arbanian Drenica region.. His family is still living over there..

@harbinger200 6 күн бұрын

@@pripri632 Ahahaha you are funny. Albanian tribes came with Ottomans from Azerbeijan.

@vickoslavkovic2593 6 күн бұрын

@@pripri632When you don't have your own, of course you will invent or steal other people's history like the Albanians have been doing for a little over a hundred years since they existed.

@SrdjanBasaric-w2s 8 күн бұрын

Where did you find that information about the immigration of Slavs? If you had said that Croats fell from Mars, I would have believed you more.This is the latest Vatican version of Serbian history.

@igorpantic1638 8 күн бұрын

So unaccurate.

@todorvulic2748 8 күн бұрын

For about 29 minutes, you talk about a coalition of Bulgarians, Serbs, Hungarians and Bosnians (Bosniaks). The king of Bosnia at the time, Stefan Tvrtko I, bore the title - King of the Serbs of Bosnia, Primorje and Humska Land (today's Herzegovina). No Bosnians are mentioned anywhere, only Serbs. It seems that you know better than Tvrtko whose king he was? The ideology of the Vatican, the Comintern and the modern Liberal Empire is so powerful in your story, but it is an ideological story, not history.

@JosipRadnik1 8 күн бұрын

The Vatican, the Comintern (!?!) and the Liberal Empire... wow, THAT sounds like some solid coalition. 🤨

@todorvulic2748 8 күн бұрын

@@JosipRadnik1 Yes, it is a very solid continuity of creating anti-Serbs from Islamized Serbs. First, Benjamin Kalaj as an exponent of the Vatican policy in Bosnia, then the decisions of the Dresden Congress of the Communists of Yugoslavia made on the instructions of the Comintern, and finally Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, Jacques Chirac, Gerhard Schroeder... who fulfilled the Comintern's decisions, item by item. And those decisions were: break up Yugoslavia at any cost and create "independent" Slovenia, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, and annex Kosovo to Albania as satellites of the empire. And so in 1993, during the NATO aggression against Republika Srpska (along with the Iranian Republican Guard, the Afghan Mujahideen, Hezbollah... etc.), the Bosnian and Herzegovinian Muslims (thus a religious group) constituted themselves as a nation called Bosniaks. Of course you know that, Josipe, you're just pretending to be English. And the Pole projected the situation after 1993 into the Middle Ages and found Bosniaks there when they were not there.

@harbinger200 6 күн бұрын

@@JosipRadnik1 Josip 😂😂😂 Dont play dump ustasa, you know Vatican and Communists had close ties. Every country that fell under communism destroyed Orthodox church, what Catholic where not even touched.

@robertab929 8 күн бұрын

*Kyivan Rus* Kyiv is an name of the City in Ukraine accepted by US and UK geographical naming organisations

@ales811507 9 күн бұрын

The Turkish conquests were something like the Crusades. The Ottoman rulers called for a fight against the infidels and they were joined by Muslims not only from the territories of the Ottoman sultans but also from distant Muslim countries. That is also why the Ottoman Armies were so numerous, even if compared to, for example, European countries, the size of their territory did not correspond to this. The reward of their soldiers was what they stole, including people. In practice, the Ottoman sultans were just big thieves.

@harbinger200 6 күн бұрын

They where vicious, in Serbia we have preserved memories from those times and one of them is "tax in blood" where Ottomans would take a male baby or child up to 2-3 yeas old and take it to Constantinople (Istambul) to train them as Janissary. Mothers would cut of fingers of kids so they would not be taken, as they would not be stable for Ottoman army.

@etoeto6754 9 күн бұрын

Can you make video about croatian history

@etoeto6754 9 күн бұрын

You can make it in shorts since there isnt much to talk about

@Kicmi07 9 күн бұрын

@@etoeto6754 Hahahhahaha

@CepaD11 8 күн бұрын

I think he just did.

@mrroyale5688 26 күн бұрын

A genetic history of the Balkans from Roman frontier to Slavic migrations „The rise and fall of the Roman Empire was a socio-political process with enormous ramifications for human history. The Middle Danube was a crucial frontier and a crossroads for population and cultural movement. Here we present genome-wide data from 136 Balkan individuals dated to the 1st millennium CE. Despite extensive militarization and cultural influence, we find little ancestry contribution from peoples of Italic descent. However, we trace a large-scale influx of people of Anatolian ancestry during the Imperial period. Between ~250-550 CE, we detect migrants with ancestry from Central/Northern Europe and the steppe, confirming that “barbarian” migrations were propelled by ethnically diverse confederations. Following the end of Roman control, we detect the large-scale arrival of individuals who were genetically similar to modern Eastern European Slavic-speaking populations, who contributed 30-60% of the ancestry of Balkan people, representing one of the largest permanent demographic changes anywhere in Europe during the Migration Period.” The major genetic impact of Slavic migrations is visible not only in current Balkan Slavic-speaking populations, but also in places that today do not speak Slavic languages such as Romania and Greece," said co-senior author David Reich, professor of genetics in the Blavatnik Institute at Harvard Medical School and professor of human evolutionary biology in Harvard's Faculty of Arts and Sciences.