Пікірлер
@matthewjones39 4 күн бұрын
Using the 25mm for tanks and missiles for APCs. Thats new.
@letsgotactical2435 4 күн бұрын
Whathever works, especially at close range. 😁
@wagonwheel6657 Ай бұрын
crazy ambush
@hjyjlkpoijnfgtr Ай бұрын
“Nothin’ but bits.”
@letsgotactical2435 Ай бұрын
Like stated in description. Just highlights showcasing game in early access, focusing on attractive moments. Unfortunately most people don’t like watching me just driving for 7 minutes looking for targets , but most of them keep watching when shooting stars.
@hjyjlkpoijnfgtr Ай бұрын
@@letsgotactical2435 haha, sorry. nothing by what i wrote. just wrote what i did cuz of the text like, "penetrated gunner's skull." So i imagined them being GIB'd
@letsgotactical2435 Ай бұрын
🤔😁 indeed you right. I was thought that is about video being a compilation.😂
@markcorrigan3930 Ай бұрын
There is a bit of game in this propaganda
@Elishamson 4 ай бұрын
My anxiety skyrocketed watching this
@Crazyfrench 4 ай бұрын
Ai needs improvement... But still great game !
@chinohitya 5 ай бұрын
Commander: GUNNER MISSLE TANK! Gunner: Yo Guys Check Out This View
@letsgotactical2435 4 ай бұрын
Keep your head on the swivel 😂
@AlexBauir 5 ай бұрын
W vid lmao do a video abt the soviet forces pls 🙏🙏🙏
@letsgotactical2435 5 ай бұрын
Will do soon.
@stillamarine1001 5 ай бұрын
Like clubbing baby seals.
@PC07K60 7 ай бұрын
friendly fire since 1990 - USAF
@Shocktroop_0313 6 ай бұрын
🤣 I mean, ya aint wrong.
@Militaryfan-cz1fm 7 ай бұрын
LetsGoTactical, 25mm M919 is APFSDS-T, 30mm MK258 is APFSDS-T, you can look up 40mm APFSDS-T, 50mm APFSDS-T exists too, i think it’s supposed to be called XM1203, you can all look those up on google images. They probably have a slip obturation ring to help them function and not spin too much in rifled barrels, it’s just like with 105mm rifled guns and the Challenger 2’s 120mm rifled gun. I’m pretty sure people wouldn’t want to be shot with those, in 2023, we’re basically advanced enough for autocannon APFSDS-T now, it’s not the Cold War anymore where autocannon APFSDS-T is impossible, many modern IFVs have APFSDS-T ammo for their autocannons available now, APDS is obsolete unless it’s 20mm, 14.5mm, 12.7mm and under now. 25mm is now the new APFSDS-T minimum caliber. Sorry if it’s long to read, I just saw google images of autocannon APFSDS-T rounds and I want to show them to you. 25x137mm M919 APFSDS-T: www.gd-ots.com/munitions/medium-caliber-ammunition/25mm-tungsten-apfsds-t/ www.gd-ots.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/400000190-25mmx137_Tungsten_APFSDS-T-2023-09-V02.pdf 30x173mm MK258 APFSDS-T: www.nammo.com/product/our-products/ammunition/medium-caliber-ammunition/30-mm-seriess/30-mm-x-173-apfsds-t-swimmer/ 40x365mmR Bofors Mk II APFSDS-T: docplayer.net/docs-images/46/21811702/images/page_6.jpg 50x228mm APFSDS-T, 35x228mm APFSDS-T and 40x180mm APFSDS-T on the left: global.discourse-cdn.com/business6/uploads/cartridgecollectors/original/3X/4/b/4b88bf2782a5da8cfb2e89c387460d2026ba829c.jpeg 40x365mmR Bofors APFSDS-T vs T-34-85 GIF: i.imgur.com/ATTo4QD.gifv 40mm APFSDS-T vs T-72 side armor (no ERA) simulation by SY Simulations: kzbin.info/www/bejne/ppfaXmqloLKof9U 25mm tungsten alloy equivalent of M919 APFSDS-T vs BMP-2 armor by SY Simulations: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qafEkoSafrSSbrc Pretty cool, huh?
@letsgotactical2435 7 ай бұрын
Cool. Will have read through that.👍
@samargrewal929 8 ай бұрын
great work also fun fact ( not for the enemy ) but if you shoot at something like a M60 with BR-412D at the right angle and aim for the turret the round will punch thorough the armor and can fuse inside one of the crew members and the AAR looking like a 100MM air burst round detonated inside the turret. and then the dev's add gore i don't think that will be an image you're going to forget
@letsgotactical2435 8 ай бұрын
APHE is a killer if you shot M60 from a flank. When it bursting inside it will detonate all ammunition spread around crew compartment almost instantly. Even M60 is popping its turret in Russian style.
@samargrewal929 8 ай бұрын
@@letsgotactical2435 funny how everyone companies that soviet MBT's pop there turrets anytime they get shot and yet the same could be side for every NATO MBT before Abrams and other late NATO tanks also i think the M60 has the worst crew survivability of any tank in ghpc - it's as tall as a house - has simple steel armor - a rolling ammo rack and also everything is very close to one another at least the t55 has it small size and the T-72's carousel is at the bottom of the tank. the thing that messes up the T72 is the ammo for the 2nd reload that is also %100 likely to get hit also the T72 has composite armor on the hull and the KVARTZ turret + the 16mm add-on plate for the hull on the M1
@letsgotactical2435 8 ай бұрын
In 1970’s T-72 keep US tankers in Europe actually awake at night. 125mm gun , low profile sheer numbers and far advanced design compare to T-62 or T-55 was something to recon with. US attention and resources was spend in Vietnam leaving European theatre dangerously exposed. Short term solution was perfecting “combined arms doctrine” leveraging assets like TOW or Air Power to have standing chance in fight. Long term was technological Army revamp , bering fruits in early 80’s with Abrams , Bradley, Apache , Kevlar Helmet , GPS, etc. Even just before Desert Storm , tank crews been worried about facing T-72’s and no one suspect it will be actually such a one sided fight. M60 linage is direct line from M26 Pershing, a WW2 tank . So despite all refinements it was already very obsolete by 1970’s. Hence projects like MBT-70 , Chieftain/Challenger 1 been heavily researched since 1965.
@samargrewal929 8 ай бұрын
@@letsgotactical2435 also the whole patten line of tanks where all stop-gaps wacth made things worse look at the M60A3's FCS and stabilizer wacth i describe as it is JANKAY AS HELL wacth M60A3 TTS Switchology, and a little M1A2. by the chieftain as while GHPC does a amazing job at modeling fire control systems the m60a1 and a3's FCS is not fully modeled and i don't think they will in the future. i could see them doing for multi-crew but that is it
@Militaryfan-cz1fm 8 ай бұрын
Well yes, APHE is a killer for side hits but APFSDS-T is a killer for frontal hits, it’s way better in terms of penetration than APHE, that’s why APFSDS-T is the main armor piercing tank ammunition type and not APHE. Also, what are your favorite tanks? My favorite tank is the M1A2 Abrams MBT by the US Army, it’s the best American tank in the world. And about the M60 tank, are they used as target practice now?
@LawatheMEid 8 ай бұрын
No new version was released this month!!
@letsgotactical2435 8 ай бұрын
Update just about to be released with “Halloween special” . I believe we may got it even by tomorrow evening.
@LawatheMEid 8 ай бұрын
@@letsgotactical2435 das ist gut
@Militaryfan-cz1fm 8 ай бұрын
Since autocannon (25mm, 30mm, 35mm, 40mm, 50mm) APFSDS-T rounds exist in real life, API ammo for autocannons is basically obsolete, right?
@letsgotactical2435 8 ай бұрын
25mm M791 is a APDS-T. Auto canons are not smooth bore but riffled , so stabilisation is achieved by spin instead of fins. Due to small diameter of projectile it will be prohibitively expensive and difficult to fit fins in such small package, not mention a “set ring” . For example British L11 riffled gun require to use “set ring” with its “ FIN “ shot (British name for APFSDS-T) to reduce spin and energy wastage. Decision behind to develop L11 gun as riffled, was motivated primary to allow use of HESH ammunition , and for APFSDS was actually a limiting factor. So as all auto-canons are riffled then APDS is probably better option.
@Shocktroop_0313 8 ай бұрын
lol I've seen some tank units do that in force on force exercises. Had some actual soviet vehicles as opfor and the friendly tanks and bradleys just charged straight ahead after they were advised of enemy opposition location and make up. 🤣
@letsgotactical2435 8 ай бұрын
Quite realistic situation. Against Thermal Sights your only option is to stay away from where enemy is looking. Apparently In battle of 73 Easting Iraqi Type-69 parked behind building in Al Busayyah town let approaching elements of US 2nd “Iron Brigade” to pass and open fire from rear flank, albeit ineffective. No one was scanning in that direction as everyone was focusing on what was ahead. It cause instant confusion and order was called to disengage After “grid box” been cleared M270 MRLS strike was dropped. You could technically say that this lone Type-69 managed to delayed whole brigade assault.
@Gracz87 8 ай бұрын
That's what I call "tactical"! :)
@letsgotactical2435 8 ай бұрын
Thanks. As they say “Skills over Gear” 😁
@cfly11wastaken41 9 ай бұрын
i need multiplayer
@letsgotactical2435 9 ай бұрын
It is planned. Please check link to GHPC development roadmap. gunnerheatpc.com/news/articles/ghpc-early-access-roadmap
@Militaryfan-cz1fm 9 ай бұрын
What do you think about autocannon APFSDS? Like 25x137mm APFSDS-T, 30x173mm APFSDS-T, 35x228mm APFSDS-T, 40x365mmR APFSDS-T and 50x228mm APFSDS-T?
@letsgotactical2435 9 ай бұрын
I think 30x173 have best developed ammo park right now, and best balance of round size to amount of ammunition carried. Have recently read about 50x228 (airburst fused HE-FRAG) and started seeing a merit in bigger shell size . Apparently lethality on entrenched personnel in airburst mode is estimated to be sixfold compared to 30mm. Another advantage is effective fire from 3000m! and dual use as anti-air. Unfortunately didn’t find any articles about kinetic AP round in 50x228 yet.
@Militaryfan-cz1fm 9 ай бұрын
@@letsgotactical2435 look up 50mm APFSDS-T
@SovietBear4 9 ай бұрын
Alyosha's tank crew in GHPC
@samargrewal929 10 ай бұрын
nice work :)
@letsgotactical2435 10 ай бұрын
Thanks. 👍
@FuseAC230V 10 ай бұрын
Nice shoting man :)
@letsgotactical2435 10 ай бұрын
Thanks .👍
@toadsilverstone4193 10 ай бұрын
Oooooh what mission has the mi-8 in it? Not found it yet in the new patches
@letsgotactical2435 10 ай бұрын
Hilside Havoc Part.2 - a flight of two Mi-8 will try to target your M60TTS platoon.
@toadsilverstone4193 10 ай бұрын
@@letsgotactical2435 ah thats why. Ive only done part one i think.
@IrishCarney 10 ай бұрын
I've been interested in the East German military for years, partly just as a contrarian (it seems like every other era of modern or early-modern German military gets massive attention). So it's just so much fun to see them get some serious solid focus
@NeroontheGoon 10 ай бұрын
Jesus, really…
@letsgotactical2435 10 ай бұрын
What happened???
@nash-p 11 ай бұрын
1:57 "Gunner SABOT... Chopper?" 😳
@letsgotactical2435 11 ай бұрын
Comander called ammo type already in gun breach. When Mi-24 charging you any second is important to start firing back.
@Militaryfan-cz1fm 11 ай бұрын
Imagine if there was infantry and the commander said “GUNNER SABOT SOLDIER”
@99bimmer 11 ай бұрын
I don't remember being able to see the moon through thermals IRL. It doesn't really give off any heat. I don't think you could see it on an A3 Bradley, and they use FLIR
@letsgotactical2435 11 ай бұрын
Good point. 👍
@letsgotactical2435 11 ай бұрын
Just google it and apparently you can see moon in thermal camera.
@99bimmer 11 ай бұрын
@@letsgotactical2435 Hmm. Must be the wavelength of the light
@letsgotactical2435 11 ай бұрын
They mentioned long waves infrared.
@99bimmer 11 ай бұрын
@@letsgotactical2435 The question is: Which type of thermals are people using NOWADAYS. Most thermal images these days are FLIR, but the Bradley didn't have FLIR back in 1985, just straight thermals. The image quality was nowhere near as detailed as what the modern Bradley or Abrams use. I have no doubt that the devs have done all the necessary research. I was just questioning it because I never thought to look at the moon using thermals IRL. I have looked at the Sun by accident before.
@rayotoxi1509 11 ай бұрын
4:39 WHAT tell me you have the AAR report from that
@letsgotactical2435 11 ай бұрын
Yep. Manage to penetrate hull bottom as this T-72 just started climbing small bump. Lucky 25mm AP-I pass thru 20mm of bottom armour and struck one of HE- Frag shells in ammunition carousel. Proper lucky shot. 😄
@FuseAC230V 11 ай бұрын
@@letsgotactical2435 Luckiest shot ever period 😀
@99bimmer 11 ай бұрын
It looked like the round went right through the turret ring. There are a couple of spots you can hit on a T55 that will kill it. But, in my experience, they're very specific and you're better off just chucking a missile at it. It's actually easier to kill a T72 with the 25mm providing that it's a flank shot
@SirCabooseCCCP 11 ай бұрын
@@99bimmer you can kill T-72 with 14.5mm MG found on BRDM and BTR-60, if you shoot the lower side hull near where the lower ammo carousel is you can get a shot through after trying for a short time
@Militaryfan-cz1fm 11 ай бұрын
Will dead infantrymen ragdoll? Also, can you penetrate and take down helicopters with the 7.62 Coax?
@letsgotactical2435 11 ай бұрын
Cannot answer about Infantry, as it wasn’t implemented yet. Regarding 7.62mm COAX . Yes you can shot down helicopter’s with it , but it take a bit of ammo. ( manage to shoot down Cobra with MG)
@Militaryfan-cz1fm 11 ай бұрын
Why do you think that 50x228mm ammo would be carried less than 35x228mm ammo when the only difference is that the 50x228mm is just a necked up full bore 35x228mm, the casing diameter is the same for both rounds which means that if the width isn’t any different and the 50x228mm height is barely even taller, you might as well go for the more powerful option since using less shots to destroy vehicles is better, because which is better, going gradually from 30 to 35 to 40 to 45 or so on or making a big leap from 30 to 50mm or maybe it’s just me preferring even numbers, like I mean do you prefer autocannon cartridge projectile numbers to be even or odd? Also, how much of a huge upgrade do you think 120x570mmR is over 105x617mmR? I think it was a big and important upgrade. Anyways, good content
@letsgotactical2435 11 ай бұрын
Yes , you right on that one. Bulk of cartridges will be roughly the same. My point is about general concept of employment of auto-canon. 35mm will feel to operate as beefed up 30mm , but 50mm more like medium artillery. And 35mm AP-I may have actually better performance then 50mm one. (More powder to propel smaller round giving it bigger kinetic energy) Regarding NATO 120mm. It is apparently designed effect of German research on what is maximum practical weight, length and bulk of tank round to be effectively and rapidly hand loaded. Anything heavier then 20kg is getting difficult for loader to handle. Shorter length is beneficial , as rounds in turret bustle are stored with warheads pointing away from crew compartment and need to be “flip” before going to breach. Obviously 120mm is better concept then 105mm as it been developed to replace former but apparently US 105mm DU M833 had better performance then German Tungsten 120mm DM23 . It was probably due self-sharpening effect of DU and more mature development of US round. Way of development for future tanks gonna be probably autoloader with 130mm Rheinmetal gun or maybe some 120mm “magnum” rounds with longer case , allowing to use longer Sabot penetrator and have more “powder” behind it.
@Militaryfan-cz1fm 11 ай бұрын
@@letsgotactical2435 oh ok, I mean, I’m pretty sure the 50x228mm is using APFSDS-T not AP-I, after all, if you are on land, you use APFSDS for more penetration than AP-I. Ok, here’s an idea, how about 50x228mm Chain guns for land vehicles and 35x228mm guns for aircraft?
@jisraeltaliktal 11 ай бұрын
The tower shot at 1:33 looks nice.
@letsgotactical2435 11 ай бұрын
Turret toss. 😄
@thebiggestoneyouveverhad 11 ай бұрын
I've never played a game that has tanks/vehicles burning and exploding like this. Some of the best effects I've seen.
@letsgotactical2435 11 ай бұрын
With heat blur and thick smoke mixed with flames, it looks extremely real. What is a really neat , that actually paint slowly burning off ,longer destroyed tank is on fire. So top attention to details from GHPC dev team. 👍
@samargrewal929 11 ай бұрын
great work also fun fact : the Hungarian's did some testing with the 125mm HE rounds of the 2A46 gun on a t34 turns out that frontal hits could perforate the upper glacis armor and detonate inside the tank.
@sebekglab 11 ай бұрын
I manage to take some of M60 with 125mm HE-Frag shots. If you land hit on turret mantlet it is a big chance shrapnel will punch thru thin top armour and hit ammo rack.
@ammoracked 11 ай бұрын
it would be cool if ghpc added in animations of crew escaping from the hatches, even if they never add playable crew members or infantry
@letsgotactical2435 11 ай бұрын
No.5 on Development Roadmap is „Detailed Crew” Hopefully we will get it soon.
@samargrewal929 11 ай бұрын
infantry is 100% coming not playable however as they will be a.i controlled
@simplemusketeer7421 Жыл бұрын
ngl I love the panic lines for a helicopter for the US faction. reminds me of my days in squad and my old days in Arma 3 "HOLY FUCK! GUNNER CHOPPER FUCKING KILL IT FIRE FIRE FIRE!"
@letsgotactical2435 Жыл бұрын
Considering that if you see Mi-24 lining up on you , meaning that your life is at stake “this level of panic” can be easily called a “moderate” 😁😂
@111222333daniel Жыл бұрын
THE BEST TANK GAME AVAIBLE IN PC. AND SINGLEPLAYER!!!!!!! TO MUCH MULTIPLAYER/WORLD OF TANKS ETC ETC. SINGLEPLAYER RISE !!!
@letsgotactical2435 Жыл бұрын
It what was missing on market since M1 Tank Platoon 2 . We been waiting whole 25 years.
@111222333daniel Жыл бұрын
@@letsgotactical2435 so you appreciate the single player fact. The AI is so great and sometimes put us in trouble. Also the graphics are awesome but hope soon we can see more damage in vehicles show. Also we need a true rival for M1 in the form of T80U. It will be a equal fight. Also will come West Germany with the Leopard 2A2. I would like to see even M1A1 but since it entered service in 1986 it's near impossible. later it would be great to make a campaings/instant battles about Gulf War 1991 and maybe other conflicts. The sound of M1 engine is 👑 KING 👑
@Woody_Minionovich Жыл бұрын
звуки выстрелов как были говном так и остались..
@letsgotactical2435 Жыл бұрын
It is still work in progress.
@blizz94it70 Жыл бұрын
i love that explosion
@111222333daniel Жыл бұрын
This game deserve T80U and M1A1
@letsgotactical2435 Жыл бұрын
GHPC 1.0 is set in 1985 Fluda Gap. So it is to early for M1A1 as it wasn’t fielded in numbers till 1987. Regarding Soviet Forces T-80B is planned as it was over there in 1985.
@111222333daniel Жыл бұрын
Why not appear the info of the impact in red words like before? How can I put it again? A button?
@letsgotactical2435 Жыл бұрын
Damage log was part of development tool kit. I been removed about two months ago. It is actually positive change as in real tank battles crews need to judge if target has been neutralised ( not relying on Damage Log😁) In principle. “You engaging enemy vehicle until it is on fire , or visibly change shape” That is your insurance to some wounded T-72 gunner “dead man shot” attempts. 😁
@111222333daniel Жыл бұрын
@@letsgotactical2435 so until not see a T72, T55 turret doing "moonwalker in the sky" is not sure destroyed xD
@letsgotactical2435 Жыл бұрын
My treshold is “when I see jets of flames from crew hatches then I know” 😉
@111222333daniel Жыл бұрын
@@letsgotactical2435 Hahaha. Actually M1IP is god of tanks in this game. I want also to try when avaible Leopard 2A2 and T80U. Then the T55/72 will be even more the prey xD
@Militaryfan-cz1fm Жыл бұрын
Will the vehicles have fully modeled First Person interiors and animations?
@letsgotactical2435 Жыл бұрын
Devs. mentioned on GHPC website that intent of game is to be between “War thunder” and “Steel Beast III”. So basically realistic (gunnery and historical setting) , but not so realistic its became another Steel Beast. So I believe no interior modelling and fiddling with specific tank systems oddities will be included. So in nutshell probably no. 😀
@CyborgHunter-T800 Жыл бұрын
where are these missions from in the BMP-2 game? I only saw one in the list of missions in the game ... or are you in the company?
@letsgotactical2435 Жыл бұрын
Those three mission was a part of “2023 April Fools “ update and been removed after 2 weeks (unfortunately). Last mission been kept and called “Obscene Odyssey” but in far less steep difficulty. Im not part of Radian LLP studio, just aspiring KZbinr really liking GHPC😁
@Tamburello_1994 Жыл бұрын
Nice shooting, solder !
@letsgotactical2435 Жыл бұрын
Thanks.😁
@Militaryfan-cz1fm Жыл бұрын
Does GHPC have infantry? And if so, is there blood and gore?
@letsgotactical2435 Жыл бұрын
Infantry is in GHPC roadmap and I believe it should be implemented soon. Regarding gore , it has been mentioned by developers as well. gunnerheatpc.com/news/articles/ghpc-early-access-roadmap
@Militaryfan-cz1fm Жыл бұрын
@@letsgotactical2435 Wait, Where is gore mentioned?
@letsgotactical2435 Жыл бұрын
It been mentioned in Discord chat by devs.
@robingrewal8103 Жыл бұрын
@@Militaryfan-cz1fm harry one of the original dev's Then he was asked this question He side quote "I want to make you feel sad"
@letsgotactical2435 Жыл бұрын
It been said in one of Q/A that some stuff regarding gore may be show for some” Halloween Special “ . We still a bit away from this year Halloween .
@crochou8173 Жыл бұрын
thats very risky
@letsgotactical2435 Жыл бұрын
Rapid close in deprives enemy of its plan of action and force on him new situation where more aggressive party have advantage. In short “Shock Effect of Armour Attack”
@jisraeltaliktal 11 ай бұрын
@@letsgotactical2435 True.
@jisraeltaliktal Жыл бұрын
Amazing...
@letsgotactical2435 Жыл бұрын
Thank you! Cheers!