Thank You so much for the STRONG explanation. You sir are a saint.
@MohamedSayedKamel218 күн бұрын
Why 9 dislikes? This doesn't make sense.
@fjtam840622 күн бұрын
thank you that's helpful
@NahidulIslam-l2n27 күн бұрын
Noice...
@veereshsir1224Ай бұрын
Excellent explanation
@oussamafes9542Ай бұрын
@HtmanАй бұрын
Thank you so much for these videos.
@HtmanАй бұрын
Besides it being declarative, If it leaves you hanging or wondering what something stands for, it is not a proposition. "This statement is false" is not a proposition because even though it is declarative, it begs the question, "Which statement?".
@scali5948Ай бұрын
Saved me thanks!!
@ro_ddr4Ай бұрын
Im in tears right now, 1 month trying to understand this god bless you
@voltaire88282 ай бұрын
what an incredible teacher! your explanation are really straightforward which makes my discrete math course just so so much easier
@phandinhthanh22952 ай бұрын
My discrete math textbook says that logical equivalence is not a logical operation(or logical connective) while biconditional is a logical operation. The statement 'p is logically equivalent to q' is the statement that 'the biconditional p <-> q is a a tautology'. A biconditional can be either true or false while a tautology is always true.
@owowowowoaa2 ай бұрын
Porfa vuelveee :C
@VMANFdo2 ай бұрын
Thanks sir well explained
@Code-y4v2 ай бұрын
Thank you so much 🙏🏿
@GodwillhandleIT3 ай бұрын
I'm really struggling, I don't know how I'm suppose to complete the entire discrete math logic class in two months. It's going to take at least 6 months to understand the fundamentals and terminology, I'm so discouraged.
@ZainabAnwar-j6k3 ай бұрын
You are literally such an underrated teacher.. everyone's teaching same thing but they way u teach makes the whole thing simplee... Need your Instagram to get in touch with u
@ZainabAnwar-j6k3 ай бұрын
If anyone is watching this video, then note my words... He is the best teacher in case of teaching strong induction.... I haven't experienced his other videos but he teaches strong induction v well
@alitahir21604 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@angieg72574 ай бұрын
Your videos are really great!
@MyOneFiftiethOfADollar5 ай бұрын
WLOG or Without Loss of Generality is superfluous commentary for a proof that could have been written better without it. For example your opposite parity proof could have been written more clearly via modular arithmetic avoiding tedious case by case approach. modulo 2 x and y have "opposite parity" Therefore x==1 and y==0 Adding the two congruences gives x+y == 1 modulo 2 implies x+y = 2k+1 QED Your wordy proof is useful for those who have not learned modular arithmetic.
@Gwizz10275 ай бұрын
Dude. I love you.
@stviz875 ай бұрын
Can't stand the high squeaks , had to turn it off
@eliasali6355 ай бұрын
I wish there was CMPSC360 in summer 24. This is great!
@yeh97185 ай бұрын
thanks for sharing, this video is excellent
@DOOMSLAYER80556 ай бұрын
Thank you sir.
@RobertturtleMcNugget6 ай бұрын
Loved the vid, not sure what you're writing or if you're writing backwards but still amazing vid
@pseudolullus6 ай бұрын
The vid has probably been mirrored, notice how he is writing with his left hand.
@skroy16 ай бұрын
What is this?
@amandatheyahoo4116 ай бұрын
At 1:06 I can see them!! Wow. Good job!!!
@woodstockman69726 ай бұрын
Don't see anything
@razibhaque44807 ай бұрын
Outstanding!
@knightning35217 ай бұрын
waste of my time imo, its great that youve shown the conclusion of strong induction. but if you already knew the induction step was true then you didnt need this video.
@arasukiasyan17 ай бұрын
you made this very simple thanks
@juvia17737 ай бұрын
HOW ARE U WRITING?!?!? HOW R U BENEATH THE SCREEN
@chidochiradza8 ай бұрын
This deserves a million views and likes
@santiagoalzate34468 ай бұрын
Quick question, is it just a norm to use implies when using the for all quantifier? Or why would it be wrong to say for all x: H(x) and M(x) when translating the example?
@asianiandude18268 ай бұрын
he seems like a cool math teacher
@Maher-gw7in8 ай бұрын
Thanks ❤
@شيماءالنجار-ح8ك8 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@散华-l9m9 ай бұрын
omg i finally understand the meaning of this compound expression via this proof and your clear explanation
@hiddenmystery55429 ай бұрын
Your way if explanation is goat ❤❤
@FlexThoseMuscles9 ай бұрын
thx for the "correction"!!
@hellachan808010 ай бұрын
4:06 why we assume that P is true.
@hellachan808010 ай бұрын
best video on this topic, thanks!
@arnoldmugahi682711 ай бұрын
Thank you could you make one on building conclusions from arguments as well
@dario268811 ай бұрын
great videos i appreciate these.
@DanielAdejo-yq8qx11 ай бұрын
Amazing teaching
@aymansoliman178311 ай бұрын
A wonderful channel, thank you 💙
@Sora-o Жыл бұрын
FINALLLLLY, im an absolute dummie and couldnt understand most of these laws until now thanks!!!!