2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@SrikanthIyerTheMariner Күн бұрын
🙏
@AG_KA108 4 күн бұрын
Clearly he hasn’t read Durga Saptashati to claim ma kali isn’t associated with war. Vagueness is what rules the internet.
@geroldbendix1651 6 күн бұрын
There should be duality. In the Bhagavat Purana the place were the demon king Bali resides is Sutala, it's the 5th Loka counted from below. Indras place is also the 5th counted from above. Also Bali will become the next Indra, after the current manvantara ends. But Bali can't really be called asura, because he surrendered to Vamana avatar.
@VaranasiSuryaSubrahmanyam 6 күн бұрын
నువ్వు వినిపించిన ఈ ఏడు కృతులు అద్భుతం. ఇవి రోజూ నేను ఉదయం, సాయంత్రం వింటూవుంటే ఎంతో ప్రశాంతంగా ఉంటోంది. చాలాబాగా భక్తితో ఆలపించావు. ఎప్పటికి కృతజ్ఞతలు. శివశ్రీ..... 🍒🍒🍎🍎🌹🌹🌹🌹🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽
@yogiatmabodha 9 күн бұрын
Namaste🙏🏽 I know the Vedas are boring but could you please discuss the Asuras in the Rig Veda that are worshipped as deities like Varuna. I sense Demons are shape shifters and can take the form of ASURAS or GANAS. I kindly ask of you to please discuss the similarities and differences of the two and elaborate on Demons taking either form. 🙏🏽🕉️☮️
@ArnavSharma-bj4ct 7 күн бұрын
Asura means lord ok. And indra takes forms too. Infact all forms are his creation which is why he is also called vishwakarman
@ArnavSharma-bj4ct 7 күн бұрын
Ganas are army bands and are generally regarded positive in rigveda not in a negative way at all. Infact the word ganesha means lord of ganas
@SomaPant 9 күн бұрын
Thoughts surfaces on their own only with the bessings of the Mother....and we truly believein them...thanks a lot🙏
@shyamolimaghoshchoudhury7746 10 күн бұрын
The story is so cute; mahisha trusts Durga's anugraha 💌
@EnaCarrasco1968 10 күн бұрын
The best story teller ever ❤
@__hemya 17 күн бұрын
55:00
@palania.subramaniam4271 18 күн бұрын
Manusia in Bahasa Melayu is Human.
@marinimelo 20 күн бұрын
jyotsnābhāṃ haimavarṇāmupamitirahitāṃ kalpayitvā kathañcit| tantrīṃ vā pustakaṃ vā kathamapi dadhatīṃ nādabindvādibhūtām|| vāgdevīṃ vāgatītāmapi sakalaguṇātītasaccitsvarūpām| vande nirbhinnarūpāmapi mama hṛdayaṃ nityamāhlādayantīṃ ll sattvānāṃ codayitrī dhiyamavatu sadā pāvakā vṛtrahantrī| cetantī jīvitānāṃ sukṛtibhiraniśaṃ prārthitā brahmarūpā || aiṃ aiṃ aiṃ vāgbhavākhyā navajaladanibhā pāśahastāṅṅkuśāḍhyā| lokānāṃ bhūtidā syānnikhilabhayaharā bhāratī nīlavarṇā ll keciccinmātrarūpāmahami pariṇatāmādimāṃ bhedabhūmim| anye vāṇīsvarūpāṃ praṇavapariṇatāmṛgyajuḥsāmabhūtām|| vidyāṃ dhyāyanti dhanyāḥ paramakaruṇayā rājate’smatkṛte sā| vāgdevī mātṛrūpā śiśuhaṭhavaśagā nityapīyūṣavarṣā ll kastūrīṃ śubhrapadmānmalayajamamṛtaṃ dīpavarti prakalpya | tvāṃ stotuṃ ramyaśabdaiḥ stutirapi racitā śārade bhaktipūrā || romāñcaiḥ svedapūrairvigalitavacanairaśrubhirbaddhadṛṣṭyā | stabdho’haṃ vāṅgayī tvaṃ vitaratu karuṇāṃ tvaṃ yataḥ pūjitā syāḥ ll
@sureshsoundararajan4876 21 күн бұрын
Poo
@minishleaf 22 күн бұрын
Hearing Ācārya Dr. Sthaneshwar Timalsina talking is always a pleasure, but this particular one bought me to tears. Thank you, tremendously. Also, I love your food metaphors, they are the best!
@kfph 23 күн бұрын
hi! can someone please link the book he mentions
@memoriasdeumahandycam 23 күн бұрын
marvelous. this should be on spotify too
@thakurofsimla 24 күн бұрын
🎉 One bright side of tech - in another life, I would have no chance to see and hear a great practitioner and Acarya of this calibre. Thanks for uploading!
@Ekam-Sat 24 күн бұрын
That is true.
@hanumantharaoj4154 25 күн бұрын
As per SriSankara Maya means not an illusion .They have translated wrongly as illusion.But you can refer to his definition in his 2/1/14.Sutrabhashya where he defines it as Shakti name and form(नामरूप) प्रक्रृति (premordial Nature)Maya as you can't say it as Absolute and at the same time not other than Absolute independently as waves to water. Finally my suggestion is as you said earlier to go to orinal texts of Agamas to know correctly what Agamas are telling so too go to original Sankrara bashyas and learn the teachings under a अनुभावि who is apt in giving correct purport of the texts and bhashya on them. Don't study who says "thus speaks Sankra " and judge Srisamkara .There are so many mis conceptions about Srisamkara.
@muralidharankv169 24 күн бұрын
@hanumanthraoji Sankara’s vada is called vivartha vada. It of course does not mean illusion.
@hanumantharaoj4154 25 күн бұрын
You are saying the world is real and even while enjoying it you can get Enlightenment or Shivahood or any name you give.One seems to missing that the body mind complex also comes under the heading world .Whenbody also real and you suggest enjoy the world one is considering the world as real and enjoying fully already.Where is the place for AGAMA when it says the samething.Why should one strive for Shivahood which is not in his experience instead of enjoying the world?And finally who knows that Shiva really delivered Agamas?You may question the same thing regarding Vedas.But here lies the greatness of Sri Sankara he proclaims daringly that keeping this seeming combination of Self and notself which is called Avidya all the Sastras not only both emperical and religious but also the sastras that recommend Liberation also.For that only the Upanishad proclaims "अत्र वेदान्तवेद्याय भवन्ति here when one recognizes his true nature even Vedas merge in his Absolute nature..So the final judge is your own अनुभव. But we consider Vedas as valid means because it is given by God but it doesn't go against your experience. न हि वेदोक्तकर्मनिर्मुक्तान्विप्रैश्च वेदःप्रणामत्वमीह इष्यते ।किं तु अमानित्व हेतूनां वेदवाक्येषु असंभवात्।we don't consider Vedas as valid only due to they are Vedas but they won't contain any words that are invalid " says SriSureswara a desciple of Sri Sankara.That is the glory of Sankra Vedanta which asks to apply one's own experience अनुभव without taking any other authority as means to recognize the Truth the Absolute!OM!
@hanumantharaoj4154 25 күн бұрын
Not because Vedas are given by God but ......
@bklamsal 25 күн бұрын
🙏
@bellacchu 25 күн бұрын
Please make this a lyrical video ❤
@hanumantharaoj4154 25 күн бұрын
Sri Sankara says "Who is saying that Shiva is the Ultimate and Shakti through which He remaing in his own glory manifests himself as the world etc all these You are saying.Who is this I that is telling all these things? ..So know who you are first.You are a seemingly combination of yourself and not self in this present state.Descriminate what is change less and what is ever changing.After Recognizing yourself you come to know that what you rejected as notself also nothing but you. There is nothing to keep or reject anything because there is nothing second entity other than you.आत्मौवेदं सर्वम् ।I am everything. OM!
@muralidharankv169 24 күн бұрын
@hanumanthraoj Will this INTELLECTUAL discrimination between the changeless and changing destroy avidya? Evidently you have discriminated .Has your avidya vanished? Have you become a Brahmajnani? Please don’t give a theoretical reply. My question is down to earth practical question.
@harvey667 25 күн бұрын
Thats a interesting session. Pranam Guru 🙏
@hanumantharaoj4154 25 күн бұрын
Does not Vedanta say दृष्टिं ज्ञानमयीं कृत्वा पश्येत् ब्रह्ममयं जगत्?That is the defect is with your looking at the world.. not with the world.But one is in present state totally engulfed in the world taking it as real as a first step vedanta says the world is not real as you see but it is nothing but Brahman.Then one tries to know what is Brahman. Then the teaching declares you are that and it shows the WAY how to recognize the truth!This is simplified vedanta.You are also telling so many Upayas to remove Malas.If malas are REAL they can never able to be removed because they are REAL.And who has to do upayas ?Jeeva you say .Why Shiva became jeeva?You say it is His इच्छा .Why all this confusion at all?And so many such questions! Pranams!
@Ekam-Sat 25 күн бұрын
If anyone claims that Vedanta says that he World is not real then it is not Vedanta (or the final and complete understanding) but half-baked Vedanta. True Vedanta is realizing that the World and the Self are One hence Ekam Sat (Rig Veda). The only illusion is Separation. And there's a good reason for the illusion of separation. The Brihadaranyaka Upanishad speaks of cosmic loneliness as being the trigger. Big Bang. Wow. Jesus came to the same conclusion. Krishna too. Anandamayi Ma also. Tagore too. Ask me any question. I will answer you.
@muralidharankv169 24 күн бұрын
@@Ekam-SatEkam sat vipra bahudha vadanti
@muralidharankv169 24 күн бұрын
@@Ekam-Sat What does the acharya say in the Mandukya Karika? Does he say that nothing has ever been created or that everything has been created?
@Ekam-Sat 24 күн бұрын
@@muralidharankv169 Dear Sir. I am just a novice. Regarding your question about whether the Acharya (Gaudapada) says that "nothing has ever been created" or "everything has been created," the key idea in the Māṇḍūkya Kārikā is that creation, as we understand it, is an illusion. Gaudapada asserts that the world is not really created, and there is no true distinction between creation and the unchanging, eternal reality (Brahman). This is grounded in the non-dual (Advaita) perspective, which emphasizes that the world is an appearance in consciousness and that ultimate reality is beyond the cycle of creation and destruction. HOWEVER... and this is very important. The above interpretation misses the point. If all is ONE (which it is), then it could be argued that there is no illusion and that the only illusion is separation/separateness. Personally; I am inclined to go with Shuddhadvaita. Shuddhadvaita has the same view as Kashmir Shaivism that the individual soul (the bodymind complex) is Brahman since there is only Brahman (Atman = Paramatman, or, Differentiation within Oneness). So even Maya or Leela is Real since there is only the Real. It is just that it isn't really good to be alone. Hence why the purpose of Brahman/Shiva/Krishna/Self is ultimately Companionship/Love. Bhakti is the way to God/Self realization. But so is Jnana. Passion and intelectual curiosity for science, religion, spirituality as well. I am sure you could give me many more examples. Please note that I was raised Catholic and that my interpretation may thus be slightly different. Do not be influenced by different opinions. Please choose what resonates with you. Blessings. Wishing you all the goodness in the World. Thank you. In appreciation.
@Ekam-Sat 24 күн бұрын
@@muralidharankv169 🙏
@hanumantharaoj4154 25 күн бұрын
Pranams !Why at all these raga dwesha and Ajnana? Malas at all?
@StoneHerne 25 күн бұрын
😃 Thank you so much for your teachings! 😃
@gokulmenon9476 25 күн бұрын
Sadar pranams acharyaji..shree mathre namaha
@Tahn215 25 күн бұрын
🙏🏼
@asinglespark 25 күн бұрын
Merci Acharya Dr. Sthaneshwar Timalsina ...bows of gratitude🙏🤎
@aumkartarkar2272 25 күн бұрын
He is not buddha he is Siddha ( siddhartha) 🙏☀️ please everyone call him by his real name Siddhartha
@muralidharankv169 25 күн бұрын
@@chhetrigauravHe is that
@jessehumphrey4273 25 күн бұрын
Such a wonderful speech Acharyaji 🔱
@stefchollet 25 күн бұрын
thank you for sharing
@manish_thorat 25 күн бұрын
🙏🙏🙏
@niharlaljani6531 25 күн бұрын
Very informative! 🙏
@3alia_m 26 күн бұрын
الحمدلله على نعمة الاسلام والعقل
@English_Literature_Enthusiast 27 күн бұрын
As a scholar working on sakta tantra someday I am looking forward to speaking in this big platform ❤
@marinimelo Ай бұрын
nāsadvā sadyadapi paramaṃ veda vā tanna veda। yatsatyaṃ tanna khalu kuśalaiśchidyate tarkabāṇaiḥ ॥ dvaitādvaitādyakhilamatibhiryatpadaṃ sevyate tat। vande cetovilayanilayaṃ śāradāpādapadmam॥1|| sāṃkhyaṃ yogaṃ paśupatimataṃ vaiṣṇavaṃ vā yatheccham। cārvākaṃ vā bhavatu hṛdayāhlādakaṃ sajjanānām ॥ yatsatyaṃ tatpramitipathagaṃ svaprakāśaṃ vareṇyam। dadyācchaukhyaṃ jagati sakalaṃ darśanaṃ śāradāyā ॥2||
@krishnapartha Ай бұрын
🙏🏾
@thepowerofpositivity218 Ай бұрын
Ye Sambad yahi hindi ya Sanskrit me rahta hai ham jaise logo ko bahut help milta
@chandreyeesaha5666 Ай бұрын
Divine 🙏
@selvavinayagamkanagavel Ай бұрын
Shiva Shiva 😊😊😊
@srpsr7328 Ай бұрын
Very beautiful composition, very melodious and blissful voice Sivasri
@minishleaf Ай бұрын
I love this answer, it does make us see how transcendental this subject is, and how we often are tied to a very limited perception in what the word is. :) Thank you as always! 🩷
@ParisHoward Ай бұрын
We asked for lalitha devi not chamunda devi.
@gokulmenon9476 Ай бұрын
Sadar pranams acharyaji..
@EnaCarrasco1968 Ай бұрын
Wonderfully inspiring so wholesome talking
@srpsr7328 Ай бұрын
Blissful rendition
@srpsr7328 Ай бұрын
Mesmerizing and divine rendition, one can listen to infinite number of times, a real surrender prayer to divine feet.
@metalearn2521 Ай бұрын
Thought provoking; and work in right direction.
@srpsr7328 Ай бұрын
Very good rendition, instantly evokes bhakti to immerse in Shiva prayers and to forget oneself.
@EnaCarrasco1968 Ай бұрын
I can listen to this eternally 🪷🙏🏼