I take it this has been created by or on behalf of the British Airways markerting department. The vast majority of self-funding, formerly loyal, BA travellers who are commenting on the changes consider the "upgrade" perfidious.
@stevenr86066 күн бұрын
😮I saw the Con cord next to a 747 at HNL. It was tiny‼️
@SkyGeeksUK5 күн бұрын
Never managed to see Concord, so.wish I did and to have a flight
@stupidknut213817 күн бұрын
If you call this an upgrade I think you need to look into the details a little more closely
@youtube623820 күн бұрын
🤦🏼
@Komazur24 күн бұрын
It’s a pocket money for them XD
@SkyGeeksUK23 күн бұрын
Yes you are probably right on a 2023 gross profit of $5.458 billion 😯
@ErinGardiner-i5t29 күн бұрын
First!
@stronzer59Ай бұрын
so from where is all that extra power coming from???
@SkyGeeksUKАй бұрын
Supersonic aircraft like Boom Supersonic’s Overture achieve the power necessary for supersonic flight through advanced jet engine technology, optimized aerodynamics, and lightweight materials. I will produce a short / video on the detail
@stronzer59Ай бұрын
@SkyGeeksUK so in 1960 the SR71 managed Mach 3 and in 2024 the fastest plane still is Mach 3, why is that??
@SkyGeeksUKАй бұрын
Great question! There are several reasons why commercial aircraft speeds haven't significantly increased since the 1960s: 1. **Fuel Efficiency**: Modern aircraft prioritize fuel efficiency over speed . High-bypass turbofan engines, which are more fuel-efficient, perform best at lower speed. Flying faster would consume much more fuel, making it economically unfeasible. 2. **Environmental Concerns**: With a growing focus on sustainability, burning more fuel for higher speeds isn't aligned with environmental goals. Slower speeds reduce fuel consumption and carbon emissions. 3. **Economic Factors**: The cost of aviation fuel has risen significantly since the 1960s. Slower speeds help airlines save on fuel costs, which is crucial for their profitability. 4. **Noise Regulations**: Supersonic flights generate sonic booms, which are disruptive and have led to restrictions on supersonic travel over land. This limits the practicality of faster commercial aircraft 5. **Demand**: There hasn't been a strong demand for faster air travel. The Concorde, which could fly at Mach 2, was retired due to high operational costs and limited market demand These factors combined have led to a focus on efficiency and sustainability rather than speed in modern aircraft Does this help clarify things?
@stronzer59Ай бұрын
@SkyGeeksUK many thanks for your in depth reply say what limits planes flying at 100,000 feet where air resistance is much less? less resistance must equal better economy correct?
@SkyGeeksUKАй бұрын
While flying at 100,000 feet might offer some theoretical efficiency gains, current aircraft are not designed for such extreme altitudes due to aerodynamic, engineering, and economic constraints. For now, the “sweet spot” remains in the 30,000-45,000-foot range for most commercial aviation.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke2 ай бұрын
The only lesson learned by this tragic story of incompetence and criminal negligence is that manufacturers are no longer allowed to conduct their own crash investigations. de Havilland attempts to cover up and hide the truth was reprehensible..
@nigellapaul67872 ай бұрын
Makes you proud, to be scottish, And I'm English 😅
@premyslbenes57152 ай бұрын
Just kidding.
@MiniMotionStudiosOfficial2 ай бұрын
I love SkyGeeksUK❤❤❤
@SkyGeeksUK2 ай бұрын
Thanks so much. We love your comment ❤️
@VundyalaPhaniSheakerReddy19552 ай бұрын
Good day, love watching your channel, very interesting channel, Super Content........
@SkyGeeksUK2 ай бұрын
Thank you very much. Welcome aboard and enjoy the flight
@VundyalaPhaniSheakerReddy19552 ай бұрын
then marry women of your choice, two or three, or four but if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly, then only one” - Quran 4:3
I would think having enough fuel would be a rather high priority. Mayday covered this one.
@SkyGeeksUK2 ай бұрын
You would have thought so, yes. I wonder who made the mistake, the refuellers or pilots, or someone else
@joshsquash2062 ай бұрын
atleast use actual videos of the de havilland comet like bro...
@RUNDNB852 ай бұрын
I flown with monarch lots when I was younger, great memory's
@SkyGeeksUK2 ай бұрын
They seem to evoke good memories people, shame they went
@Paul_Wright2 ай бұрын
They were great remember family holidays with them
@101Flinx2 ай бұрын
If California is involved there is always an expensive catch
@reticentguy29432 ай бұрын
The plane that flew the last OK767 (OK-IOO) did not fly its last flight under CSA AOC with the 100 years livery - it was removed from both planes just a few days before.
@onyinyechigiftpaul19792 ай бұрын
See you in the skies🎉🎉
@HK_littleman3213 ай бұрын
Rip Czech airlines for being the 5th oldest airline in the world and being in service for 101 years Fly high Czech airlines and I will never forget you 😢 🫡🫡🫡🕊️🕊️🕊️
@Av_Geek-Nouh_Chahin3 ай бұрын
Nice Video, Really Underrated!
@SkyGeeksUK3 ай бұрын
Thank you and welcome aboard, enjoy the flight
@I_love_bacons3 ай бұрын
😢
@theonlywoody2shoes3 ай бұрын
I’m a PPL in my early 60s, so a career in aviation is sadly no longer an option for me. Several of my flying club colleagues are ATPLs, and during the pandemic they were laid off with no work or pay for months. One became a delivery driver for a supermarket, and has never gone back to the airlines. He is home every night for his young family, no layovers in crappy hotels, and with a few hours overtime (always on offer) his pay is similar to that he was getting as a first officer on 737’s flying to and from Europe - without the 2am starts to get to the airport, no pay until the cabin door is shut, and complaints from management about delays (that they are in no way responsible for). It’s hardly surprising the way some airlines treat their crew (flight deck and cabin) that there is a shortage of those willing to invest £100k in training and years of gaining the 1500 hours of experience needed to occupy even the right hand seat on the flight deck.
@SkyGeeksUK3 ай бұрын
An interesting perspective from somebody with some experience. It would seem that the majority of people imagine only the glamour of being a pilot but not the hardships to pursue a career in doing something they love. I think international cricketers, tennis players and golfers and the like continually on the circuit being away from home are in a similar position to pursue a career they love.
@Antek-cd9mv3 ай бұрын
-200/10 joke
@speelat3 ай бұрын
Not even a picture of a Constellation!
@h.rahim35k3 ай бұрын
AI
@garry8433 ай бұрын
why do they bother with life vests.
@SkyGeeksUK3 ай бұрын
Good question @garry843 Airlines include life vests as a crucial safety measure for several reasons: Regulatory Requirements: Aviation authorities like the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) mandate that all aircraft flying over water must be equipped with life vests for each passenger and crew member Passenger Safety: In the unlikely event of a water landing or emergency evacuation over water, life vests provide buoyancy and support, significantly increasing the chances of survival Psychological Comfort: Knowing that life vests are available can provide passengers with a sense of security and peace of mind during flights, especially those that cross large bodies of water. Practical Design: Modern life vests are designed to be compact and easy to deploy. They are inflatable, which means they take up minimal space on the aircraft but can be quickly inflated when needed. Overall, while the likelihood of needing a life vest is very low, their presence is a critical part of ensuring passenger safety and compliance with aviation regulations.
@Francisaviation4 ай бұрын
Why do we have to watch this if we dont like surprises
@landmarkavionics70864 ай бұрын
Stupid AI videos.
@kritgupta82055 ай бұрын
❤❤
@deanblake23726 ай бұрын
And they are all spraying GeoEngineering chemtrails... TRAITORS
@briandalton2876 ай бұрын
Are the birds flying around the wind turbines on the thumbnail ment to be ironic..?
@Avg_426 ай бұрын
Well emirates has had the best safety record of any airline and also is ranked Th he best airline in the world
@megaaviation206 ай бұрын
Wrong
@Avg_424 ай бұрын
Ok have a good day
@rubinnederlof10086 ай бұрын
Don't fly with Ryanair! Their planes are in very bad condition. My wife has been a flight attendant at Ryanair. The planes keep being used even when there was a fire in the plane at the previous flight without the plane being checked. Often they take off with no extra fuel so if something happens they can't fly to another airport or sometimes don't even have enough fuel to make it to the original destination. Stay safe and don't fly with Ryanair!
@parpaquetdesix72756 ай бұрын
seriously, what area of nature will we have to raze to create all these agrofuel fields on a global level?
@smoketinytom6 ай бұрын
So what's inside these batteries... Cobalt, Lithium and acid... Gee, those sound like "Greener" minerals to mine.
@polandull7 ай бұрын
how ai generated is this? yes
@SkyGeeksUK7 ай бұрын
Hey in answer to your question then yes this is AI generated, but I hope that you still find them interesting and entertaining. I will be producing non AI when the channel becomes more established. Thanks
@Traytell157 ай бұрын
Why isn't this just a yt short??
@SkyGeeksUK7 ай бұрын
Anyone feel free to correct, but I think shorts are under a minute long and this was just over?
@AvionesEnMiMundo7 ай бұрын
❤ ✈
@aviation_edits-vq2ds7 ай бұрын
When does this come out!
@jetcabutaje74917 ай бұрын
Damn keep this type of videos your underrated 🎉 im subscribe to you btw im your 14th subscriber
@SkyGeeksUK7 ай бұрын
Thank you and welcome aboard, enjoy the flight !!!
@Biscuits02047 ай бұрын
Dude your channel is really underrated, keep it up!
@SkyGeeksUK7 ай бұрын
Thanks just starting out let me know if you have any subjects you would like to see
@Nevada-Habesha.Mapper7 ай бұрын
Underrated! Im your 4th subscriber!
@SkyGeeksUK7 ай бұрын
Thank you and welcome aboard, enjoy the flight !!!