7 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@ITPBP Жыл бұрын
Da gibts nasse Hose 😎
@klauskahlert9709 Жыл бұрын
Was sprühst Du auf Deinen Handschuh damit der nicht auch fest klebt ?
@ag2938 2 жыл бұрын
Sehr schönes Video, und die Rostvorsorge sowie die akribische Arbeit des Fachmann's sind mit Sicherheit weit besser beim '68er Mustang, als er damals in Detroit vom Band lief. Die Amis haben es ja damit auch heutzutage nicht so,schmälert den Gewinn.
@retozielke2419 3 жыл бұрын
Hallo Andree Muss/kann/darf die abzudichtende Stelle noch mit einem Reinigungsmittel und Primer vorbehandelt werden? Danke für dein Feedback. LG Reto
@flyingdog1498 4 жыл бұрын
Holy Fuck Batman. Just die the God Damn things. Rube Goldberg would be proud.
@johannesburgholzer6267 5 жыл бұрын
Welches Kriechöl ist das ..? Ich würde das auch gerne verwenden.
@Andreeskfz 5 жыл бұрын
Hallo Das ist Owatrol C.I.P. Gruß Andree
@johannesburgholzer6267 5 жыл бұрын
Danke super Video.!!
@scarface_x 5 жыл бұрын
Very smart. Thank for sharing.
@alanblanes2876 6 жыл бұрын
That interior is one heck of an upgrade. Looks like it was built by Bentley!
@dennischallinor8497 6 жыл бұрын
LOVE THAT BEAUTIFUL CAR!!! Whoever owned it obviously loved it. Elegance that we will NEVER see again, sadly!!! Oh to win a lottery . . .
@joer3481 6 жыл бұрын
Sexy 😎
@albrechtpoller7688 6 жыл бұрын
5,0 L (305 cui) TPI, 223 PS, 400 Nm...
@mozartcat1 6 жыл бұрын
apparently need an exhaust manifold gasket job
@vFalk 6 жыл бұрын
Ziemlich geiler Sound! Respekt was Ihr aus den Manta A macht! Mit wieviel Budget muss man ungefähr rechnen wenn man so was selber machen will. Wenn's natürlich kein Geheimnis ist 😉 . Ihr hattet ein paar Jahre zuvor den in Deutschland zugelassenen v8 von MG gezeigt. Ist dieses Video hier das selbe Projekt oder ein neueres. Weiter so Jungs!!!
@thebestisyettocome4114 6 жыл бұрын
It's one of Americans best. 💯% Detroit Michigan USA 🇺🇸. Thanks for sharing. It's a Imperial sold by Chrysler Corp. A luxury car that's truly loved by many over decades.
@stefanbarz373 6 жыл бұрын
Labert einen Haufen Mist und sagt noch nicht mal auf Anfrage, was für ein Wagen das ist!!!! Chevy Impala Fastback Coupé!!! Ein 68er um es genau zu sagen... Geile Arbeit, aber Thomas ein schöner Märchenerzähler 🤣🤣🤣
@sweetpapajazz 6 жыл бұрын
I'm waiting for the entire C.I.A. top pop out of that trunk at any giving moment !
@williamg2552 6 жыл бұрын
So were Dodge, Plymouth, and Desoto. But those cars were NOT called by the corporate name. They were known by their individual DIVISION names. From 1955 on, so was Imperial . it CEASED being a MODEL of Chrysler, and became a SEPARATE MAKE unto itself . Starting in 1955, The Chrysler Corporation had FIVE DISTINCT MAKES and DIVISIONS: PLYMOUTH, DODGE, DeSOTO , CHRYSLER...and the now separate IMPERIAL. Want PROOF ? Click on THESE LINKS: (1) 1955: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rYDcZ5KroJieac0 (2) 1957: kzbin.info/www/bejne/eqXceGyghpaMmsU (3) 1959: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fXKYYqKhe8hmabc (4) Here's still ANOTHER: kzbin.info/www/bejne/j5e5onR9r5qCjcU
@uzzle21 7 жыл бұрын
I have never seen anything like this in my life , new inside old outside? wow
@discerningmind 7 жыл бұрын
Just beautiful. Thank you.
@SonicSuperWaffle 7 жыл бұрын
I know this video is 4 years old, but do you know what cam was in the impala?
@Andreeskfz 7 жыл бұрын
Sadly we cant tell anything about the engine details, cause we didnt refurbished the engine in the past. Many greets!
@SonicSuperWaffle 7 жыл бұрын
I understand, and thanks for replying!
@kmath50 7 жыл бұрын
I would love to go cruising in that. Beautiful!
@joer3481 7 жыл бұрын
fucking beautiful interior
@olur44 7 жыл бұрын
Beautiful, nobility defined for an automobile.
@subwayopfer 7 жыл бұрын
M20B20 hat doch 129PS ;-) 192PS wäre der M50B25 oder eben M50B25 tü
@Andreeskfz 7 жыл бұрын
Ja, es ist der M20B20 mit 129PS, so wie auch oben in der Beschreibung geschrieben. Wie kommen Sie auf 192PS?
@subwayopfer 7 жыл бұрын
Komisch ich meine in der Video Überschrift 192 PS gelesen zu haben.
@Andreeskfz 7 жыл бұрын
Kein Problem, haben Sie vielleicht gedanklich einen Zahlendreher gehabt. Trotzdem viel Freude beim Schauen der Videos und ein schönes Wochenende!
@globeglobe4497 7 жыл бұрын
Isn't that the Green Lantern car? Ugly as hell.
@michaeldanz9117 6 жыл бұрын
Green Hornet's 'Black Beauty". Beauty in the eyes of the beholder I say.
@RAMROD4708 7 жыл бұрын
Great restoration job on an Imperial hardtop. For the record, this automobile is a standard sedan and not a limousine.
@snostalgics 7 жыл бұрын
the fiftyes: when the cars were beautiful, heavy and exagerately long
@MrTommyUdo 7 жыл бұрын
Tasteful and elegant. Loved the 60's Chrysler's.
@williamg2552 7 жыл бұрын
This car is NOT a limo....and it's NOT a "Chrysler" . It's an IMPERIAL Crown 4 door Hardtop. PERIOD.
@kingearl1678 7 жыл бұрын
Wirklich schöne und aufwändige Arbeit - aber das besch+++ene Automatikgetriebe könnt ihr gleich wieder ausbauen und entsorgen! Ein Tremec ist da das Wahre, sont nichts. Wenn sie mir micht glauben, messen sie auf dem Prüfstand den Verlust an PS durch die Automatik - fast 100 Pferde!! Geht gar nicht sowas, höchstens in Trumpmerica...
@liquid_oxygen4409 7 жыл бұрын
OMG THIS LOOKS LIKE TANNER'S CAR IN DRIVER SAN FRANCISCO!
@dumbfluff2453 7 жыл бұрын
ArchieLaurenCiranJackProductionsPolice On ROBLOX. <dear god your name is abnormally long> Tanner's car was a 1970 Dodge Challenger, but he had a Hemi and a scoop on the hood, and a small spoiler on the back, yes it also a strong yellow with a black stripe.
@dippy_sippy 7 жыл бұрын
yesss
@jec1ny 7 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure I'd call that a sedan. It looks more like a limousine with the fold out jump seats in the back.
@dontellgucci1117 7 жыл бұрын
jec1ny 75 Series is a Limousine. You're right.
@bobshaw4063 7 жыл бұрын
Beautiful old limousine
@michealbeers777 7 жыл бұрын
I hope you did restore this car.....very rare indeed!!!
@Andreeskfz 7 жыл бұрын
Sadly the costumer bring the car in only for some smaller fixings. But you are right! The car is very rar, therefor we made a small clip to show the people this beauty. Thanks for your comment as well!!!
@williamg2552 7 жыл бұрын
1)kzbin.info?search_query=jay+leno+imperial 2) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_(automobile)#First_generation_.281955.E2.80.931956.29:_A_separate_make 3) imperialclub.org/~imperialclub/Repair/Lit/Marque/index.htm 4) kzbin.info/www/bejne/eqXceGyghpaMmsU 5) kzbin.info/www/bejne/rYDcZ5KroJieac0 6) kzbin.info/www/bejne/fXKYYqKhe8hmabc
@morgulstower5839 7 жыл бұрын
The legend. A real mans man car. Driving one of these will definitely make u feel like u are king of the streets. These cars give me chills :D. If they would have had cars back in medieval times this is what the king would have driven.
@MrPoodleMrPoodle 7 жыл бұрын
You guys did a amazing job on reconditioning this beauty! I was born the 90s and I still LOVE this car a lot!
@zorilaz 7 жыл бұрын
Give it to me
@blast4me754 7 жыл бұрын
Fucked the inside up hell the might as well make it new on the outside then
@IntelligentHorseworldofrandom 7 жыл бұрын
Man, that's my picture!
@rogerbaker2068 7 жыл бұрын
"Imperial", was a separate division of the Chrysler Corporation...like "Lincoln" is a division of Ford Motor Company. This is only a "Chrysler Imperial", if you call a Lincoln, a "Ford Lincoln". You don't.
@williamg2552 7 жыл бұрын
Anyone who really knows the history of this car would NOT call it a "Chrysler" Imperial. Obviously, they don't know what the Chrysler Corporation did in 1955. That was the year that the Imperial was spun off from the Chrysler Division, and became it's OWN MAKE and DIVISION.
@SuperWolfey 7 жыл бұрын
it is a chrysler imperial , but not a limo........had a 65 myself . Beautiful cars
@williamg2552 7 жыл бұрын
1) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_(automobile) (2) www.google.com/#q=imperial+marque+history
@2right4words 7 жыл бұрын
if I owned that car, I would buy a couple of hood flags, and fake people into thinking I was a diplomat
@deanstroke1127 7 жыл бұрын
la voiture de mes rêves !!!
@williamg2552 7 жыл бұрын
For all of the guys who insist that the IMPERIAL is , was, and will always be, a "Chrysler", explain THIS: On the VIN numbers all "Chryslers" (Newport, New Yorker, 300, etc) carried a "C" code. The IMPERIAL didn't . Under IT'S "Make" code,all IMPERIALS (Custom, Crown, LeBaron, Ghia Limousine) there was a "Y"code. TWO DIFFERENT MAKES. If The IMPERIAL was a "Chrysler", wouldn't it ALSO have had a "C" code ?Also consider THIS: (from Wikipedia) : "For the 1955 model year, the Imperial was launched and registered as a separate marque (make), apart from the Chrysler brand. It was a product of the new Imperial Division of Chrysler Corporation, meaning that the Imperial would be a make and division unto itself, and not bear the Chrysler name. Chrysler Corporation sent notices to all state licensing agencies in the then-48 states that the Imperial, beginning in 1955, would no longer be registered as a Chrysler, but as a separate make ." Why would the Chrysler Corporation go to such great lengths to separate The IMPERIAL into it's own MAKE and DIVISION, even to the point of contacting all Motor Vehicle Departments (DMV's) in the then-48 states to inform them of this change, if, as you guys claimed, IT NEVER HAPPENED ?Think about it.
@SRamos-rf6eb 7 жыл бұрын
williamg2552 : Never the less, would not Chrysler be considered the PARENT, company of the mighty Imperial? General Motors, is considered ( I am sure ), the Parent company, of Chevrolet, Oldsmobile, Pontiac, Buick, and of course, the G.M.C. trucks......( Gee, they used to make, some handsome, HEAVY DUTY, COMMERCIAL TRUCKS. WHAT IN THE WORLD HAPPENED? ) Any way, that is, MY understanding of what was considered, Parent Companies 😕 ! WELL, ........"YOU" all say, "Potato", and some of us, say "Potato",...... Let's just leave it be, and let us enjoy the BEAUTY, of these "OLD TIMERS"..... O.K.?😉
@williamg2552 7 жыл бұрын
If we were to proceed from that logic, then we should be calling all General Motors cars "GM Chevrolet", "GM Cadillac" ,"GM Buick" etc. Or, Ford Motor Co cars as "Ford Lincoln", "Ford Mercury", "Ford Edsel", etc. But these cars don't go by their corporate names...only their individual division names. So should Imperial. When was the last time you heard other cars in the Mopar lineup referred to as "Chrysler Plymouth" "Chrysler Dodge" , or "Chrysler DeSoto" ? Have you ? I haven't either.
@stevenhorton5500 7 жыл бұрын
Imperial was solely Imperial from 1955 to 1975. From 1926 to 1954; from 1981 to 1983; from 1990 to 1993 they were indeed Chrysler Imperials
@stevenhorton5500 7 жыл бұрын
+And this beautiful car is correctly referred to as a "limousine"
@williamg2552 7 жыл бұрын
Steven Horton-Partially right, Steven. The 81-83's were still just Imperials, with separate "IMPERIAL" dealership signs , and no "Chrysler" name on the car or in it's marketing. Here's an ad from that period: Lee Iacocca tells Frank Sinatra " I've got a bunch of IMPERIAL DEALERS ready for them, Frank". (Not "Chrysler" or "Chrysler Imperial" Dealers). In fact, the name "Chrysler" appears nowhere in the ad. i.ebayimg.com/images/i/121793963512-0-1/s-l1000.jpg But , you're totally CORRECT about the 1990-93 Imperials.It was thought that re-adding the "Chrysler" nameplate would increase sales. But, sadly , it DIDN'T ...So they might just as well have kept the Imperial SEPARATE, for all the good it did. That K-Car-based , Front-drive car wasn't worthy of the IMPERIAL name anyway.
@chevyv8996 7 жыл бұрын
Mit kompliziert meinte ich auch nicht den Aufbau des Systems sondern das auf und abladen der Rampe bzw der Motorräder. Sicherlich muss das System auch mit dem Fahrzeug verbunden sein Ladungsichetung und so aber dennoch geht dort das auf bzw abladen wesentlich schneller und unkomplizierter . Ich sag ja auch nicht das euer System schlecht ist keineswegs aber wäre für mich halt zu kompliziert 😉
@donaldbarfield5471 8 жыл бұрын
yes it is a Chrysler very rare car
@williamg2552 7 жыл бұрын
Five Makes....not Four.www.heffrons.com/retro/images/neonetics/8MPARW-Mopar-Arrow-Neon-Clock.jpg
@chevyv8996 8 жыл бұрын
Viel zu kompliziert und zu viel zu aufwendig, gibt Lösungen die sind viel einfacher. Made in USA
@Andreeskfz 8 жыл бұрын
Hallo Herr Hübner, vielen Dank für Ihre Meinung! Auch wir würden gerne wissen, welche weitere Lösungen es gibt, unter der Voaussetzung das alle im Video zuvor aufgeführten Bedingungen zur Montage & Verwendung eingehalten werden können. Haben Sie vielleicht ein(en) paar Links zur Hand? Mit freundlichen Grüßen Ihr Team von Andrees Kfz
@Andreeskfz 7 жыл бұрын
Hallo Herr Hübner, leider ist Ihre Antwort im Spam gelandet. Dennoch konnte ich den Link sehen. Nun, diese Schlitten-Rohr-in-Rohr Kunstruktion ist selbstverständlich auch sehr kompliziert. Um genau zu sein, ist generell eine Konstruktion jeglicher Art im Detail sehr kompliziert. Alles muss mit Reserven berechnet sein und über Jahre und unter widrigen Umständen funktionieren. Dies nur nebenbei. Ferner hatten wir im Video einen K5 Blazer mit offener Kabine. Das Fahrzeug sollte ohne großen Aufwand und auch Einschränkungen (Stichwort feste Anbauten) bei Nichtnutzung der Plattform zu nutzen sein. In der Plattform integriert ist ebenfalls ein rückseitiger Kabinenanschluss. Ein Rohr-in-RohrSystem war aufgrund der kurzen Ladeflächentiefe nicht möglich. Die Idee ist grundsätzlich gut und sinnvoll. Auch haben wir dieses schon an einem Ford Ranger (siehe hier andrees-kfz.de/us_car_services/uscar_spezialumbauten.html ) umgesetzt. Im Übrigen muss auch diese Art der Plattform gesichert werden, was in dem Video nur nicht gezeigt wurde. Gezeigt wurde nur das Aufziehen der Plattform. Im Endeffekt ist also der einzige Unterschied der, dass man die Rampen nicht zuvor anbringen muss. Aber man muss konstruktionsbedingt genug Platz haben und auch das Trägersystem mit dem Fahrzeug fest über statische Punkte verbinden. Dann ist das sicher eine feine Sache.
@ridgewoodfats9645 8 жыл бұрын
1965____1966 Chrysler Imperials......."OUTSTANDING BEAUTIES"!!! 😆😅☺
@williamg2552 7 жыл бұрын
www.imperialclub.com/Repair/Lit/Marque/index.htm