Can you do a series for the Targum on Ecclesiastes?
@ArchangelMichaelHolySpiritКүн бұрын
⚔️ HAL-LE-LU-YA-HU-AH ⚔️
@MarkNeugebauer-cr3pq2 күн бұрын
Love the daily lessons. Thank you. Have you ever thought of looking at Jewish liturgical Aramaic? There are many prayers written in Aramaic as part of Jewish liturgy as well as Talmud?
@dailydoseofaramaic2 күн бұрын
Thanks for this suggestion! We have occasionally looked at and commented upon the Aramaic of the Babylonian Talmud when it has helped to illustrate a connection with other dialects of Aramaic. We’ll continue to do so from time to time as we read the rabbinic literature of the Targums. Most Sincerely, Scott Callaham
@perrycliburn93383 күн бұрын
Awesome! Let's go!
@brianshank98644 күн бұрын
This is going to be great! I'm looking forward to it! Thank you.
@StonesLeonX9512 күн бұрын
🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
@totallysxmmyyt678713 күн бұрын
New subscriber: This is why it is important to search the scriptures because too much is lost in translation.
@meusisto20 күн бұрын
So the difference between a resh a a shesh is a scribal mistake here?
@meusisto20 күн бұрын
Gratias ago propter pelliculam.
@kumarraja408921 күн бұрын
Hello excellent work is there any place where there is translation for these in english for reading the original text
@dailydoseofaramaic20 күн бұрын
An English translation of Targum Neofiti appears in the volumes of The Aramaic Bible series: litpress.org/Products/5476/The-Aramaic-Bible-Volume-1A-Targum-Neofiti-1-Genesis These volumes are available on Logos Bible software. See for example: www.logos.com/product/42155/the-aramaic-bible-volume-1a-targum-neofiti-1-genesis The most comprehensive electronic tool for the study of the Targums is the Targums Add-On in Accordance Bible Software, which contains texts and English translations for all of the Jewish Targums: www.accordancebible.com/product/targums-add-on-aramaic-english-and-samaritan-targums-wordmap-onkelos-glossary-and-stevenson-aramaic-grammar-april-2020/ Most Sincerely, Scott Callaham
@meusisto22 күн бұрын
Gratias ago vobis. Valde disco.
@meusisto25 күн бұрын
Can't modern methods of scan try to find out what was there?
@meusisto25 күн бұрын
Is there someone an introduction to these Aramaic affixes?
@opowiedzmiswojahistorie.528726 күн бұрын
Jewish Palestinian Aramaic... What does it mean? Is it aramaic of the end of first century? How many types of jewish aramaic are there?
@dailydoseofaramaic25 күн бұрын
Please see this earlier Daily Dose of Aramaic episode for a rundown on Jewish Aramaic dialects: kzbin.info/www/bejne/jV7NaYV9jNd8ntE Most Sincerely, Scott Callaham
@Trismhmm28 күн бұрын
God Bless You. THANK YOU GOD🗽🪨☮☮☦🛐⚛✝️🔃🔄♾
@cynthiacassel29 күн бұрын
I wondered why one of my reference guides had the words faded- I was unfamiliar with parsing reading text.
@sherriehutzel202Ай бұрын
I just found this channel on my feed. Thank you so much for making these videos for those of us who are trying to learn on our own.
@MarkNeugebauer-cr3pqАй бұрын
A question: for Hebrew and standard Aramaic the vocalisations are known? How do we know what the vowel patterns are for the other Aramaic?
@dailydoseofaramaicАй бұрын
The vowels in the Hebrew Bible come to us through preservation of reading tradition by the Masoretes. Vowel markings in Targum Onkelos are present in the earliest manuscripts in Babylonian pointing. On Daily Dose of Aramaic I have occasionally shown Babylonian pointing, but we have used Tiberian vowel pointing for audience familiarity. Vowels in Targum Pseudo-Jonathan appear in printed records of one of the early manuscripts (the “editio princeps”). There is only one manuscript of Targum Neofiti, and except for a few words here and there, it does not have vowel markings. My pronunciation on Daily Dose of Aramaic is reconstructed with the aid of some Palestinian Targum manuscripts that have written vowels. Most Sincerely, Scott Callaham
@user-fr2rp2bq2sАй бұрын
❤
@Timothy_A_LeeАй бұрын
Thank you for this review of my Parallel Targums!
@mikemccune4078Ай бұрын
Where do you get the BHQ volumes? And what is the difference between BHQ and BHS? maybe a video idea. :)
@dailydoseofaramaicАй бұрын
A review of BHQ would indeed make a fine episode of DDA sometime. Thanks for the suggestion! For now, let me refer you to a resource that offers a comparative BHQ/BHS review of the volume that appeared in this video: David Marcus, “How BHQ Differs from BHS in the Book of Ezra-Nehemiah,” pages 169-176 in Sôfer Mahîr: Essays in Honour of Adrian Schenker Offered by Editors of Biblia Hebraica Quinta (Boston: Brill, 2006). Most Sincerely, Scott
@mpmccune100Ай бұрын
@@dailydoseofaramaicthank you, I appreciate your response! And thanks for making a video about the readers.
@mikemccune4078Ай бұрын
@@dailydoseofaramaic I just looked up that book. Very expensive! And I am nowhere close to a theological library. (and I noticed I responded with two different YT channels, oh well!).
@Timothy_A_LeeАй бұрын
Thank you Dr Scott Callaham for this review of my Aramaic Bible Readers!
@BenjaminGiffoneАй бұрын
First
@hamtruckerАй бұрын
If we have answers like this, why are so many Jews still Jews? If it was this simple to see and understand then everyone from the traditional Jewish religion should come to the knowledge of the Christ! I am still not satisfied with the old answer that God has blinded the Jewish people to the fact that Christ is lord. I am a believer in the salvation of Jesus Christ, but I have always had a problem with this. The Jewish people are very smart and love God, so I can not reconcile this in my heart.
@user-fr2rp2bq2sАй бұрын
How I wish, I have this kind of unintentional opportunity to study extensively the word of God. Congratulations to both of you and God bless!
@user-fr2rp2bq2sАй бұрын
Sir, this Aramaic is so difficult compared to Hebrew and Greek. Can you slow it down, please... But, this passage is so interesting!
@TheBackyardProfessorАй бұрын
This is fantastic teaching the Aramaic!!! I love this. You earned a new sub!
@b-r-o-bАй бұрын
Thank you. This was helpful. I look forward to browsing your archive of lessons.
@brianshank98642 ай бұрын
I hesitate to get too excited, but like a bug drawn to light, hoping it's not a zapper, my interest is always piqued when there is more and clearer OT evidence pointing to the triune nature of God, especially with regard to Christ.
@joswan7762 ай бұрын
It is Daniel 4:13 I saw in the visions of my head upon my bed, and, behold, a watcher and an holy one came down from heaven;
@ConsideringPhlebas2 ай бұрын
Interesting. Say, do you do commentaries on the Aramaic of the Palestinian or Babylonian Talmuds? I can make sense of the language in Onkelos or the Peshitta, but then when it comes to Talmudic Aramaic it's like a different language. Is the Aramaic of the Talmuds totally different from other texts or do they just use different vocabulary?
@dailydoseofaramaicАй бұрын
The dialect of the Jerusalem (or “Palestinian”) Talmud is Jewish Palestinian Aramaic, which is also the dialect of Targum Neofiti and the Fragment Targums. As for the Babylonian Talmud, its dialect is Jewish Babylonian Aramaic. We have referred briefly to a Talmud passage before for illustrative purposes, though at present we are working through biblical passages in various Targums. May you continue to advance in your knowledge of Aramaic! Most Sincerely, Scott Callaham
@ConsideringPhlebasАй бұрын
@@dailydoseofaramaic Thanks. Currently learning Syriac through the Peshitta New Testament. ;)
@Trismhmm2 ай бұрын
Amennn ✝️🙏
@user-fr2rp2bq2s2 ай бұрын
...'the Son of Adonai', is that Jesus?
@meusistoАй бұрын
@stizelswik3694 The Second Person of the Holy Trinity, not Jesus (the Second Person incarnated), so no mother.
@ConsideringPhlebas2 ай бұрын
Very interesting.
@brianshank98642 ай бұрын
Uuhh!! Intrigued, to say the least!
@bobtalbott3362 ай бұрын
Cool.
@ftk-forthekingdomministrie74392 ай бұрын
O yea, let's talk more about this! 🎉
@MarkNeugebauer-cr3pq2 ай бұрын
I love this site and look forward eagerly for each day's podcast. However, in light of the current Mid East situation, and even though scholars often it ), I do not find the term helpful. And erroneously, I might add, since the Romans named the Land as an insult to the Jewish people, and not in NT period: after 150AD. Unfortunately, the Church picked up the use of this term and it was used until the Br Mandate was over. Calling it, as you also did, the Targum Yerushalmi or Jerusalem Talmud is so much better.
@ChristianBrady2 ай бұрын
I appreciate the sensitivity, but "Palestinian Targum" is the term that scholars, Jewish, Christian, and non-religious, use for this material and to use a different nomenclature would be confusing in an already complicated landscape of manuscripts, language, and traditions. However, the term "Palestine" did not arise only in the 2nd C CE when the Romans renamed the region, but rather dates back at least to the 4th C BCE, and is probably found in Egyptian and Assyrian texts as well (though debated). Further, it is likely cognate with the Hebrew translated as "Philistines." So the attestation of "Palestine" and its cognates is very ancient indeed. Language does change over time and today the term "Palestine" has particular connotation in popular culture, to be sure. Scholarship can and should be slow to change terminology so that there can be consistency of meaning and understanding. In Targum studies in particular, we have been debating and seeking greater consistency with respect to textual traditions and even linguistic identification (e.g., Jewish Literary Aramaic). With a broader historical understanding and providing some consistency in nomenclature, it seems to me best to continue using the terminology most widely used and accepted by scholarship today.
@cemb68842 ай бұрын
You misread ובריך as "God created" instead of "God blessed" when you parsed the verb, but then you corrected it when you read the whole verse 🙂
@qusshinemark2 ай бұрын
Malk also king by Arabic
@qwerty-so6ml2 ай бұрын
Genesis 1 is Lucifer and the fallen angels. They made man (H120 adam not H121 ADAM) in their image. Man is an idol, a trap for angels. Wanna see a fallen angel? LOOK IN THE MIRROR. Only one Gospel: The Gospel of Reconciliation. Jesus Christ came into THEIR kingdom to reconcile fallen angels unto Himself. We are the fallen angels (ELOHIM) kept in DNA chains of darkness. If you do not confess being a fallen angel in Lucifer's kingdom, then you are an unbeliever. Unbeliever = those that claim to be made in the image of ELOHIM(gods). REPENT FALLEN ANGELS.
@justincagle60752 ай бұрын
Can i use this book to learn hebrew and Aramaic simultaneously or do i need prior knowledge of Hebrew? thank you for your time.
@MarkNeugebauer-cr3pq2 ай бұрын
could not the KOMOI of line one be a gloss for KODMOI where the dalet is missed as a vav? BTW love this. Look forward to you daily video. PS Are you going to examine liturgical Jewish Aramaic as in the prayer books? That would be very interesting too.
@illustriouspics13 ай бұрын
God bless
@adrewfis9253 ай бұрын
For the love of Christ compels us, because we judge thus: that if One died for all, then all died; 15 and He died for all, that those who live should live no longer for themselves, but for Him who died for them and rose again. 16 Therefore, from now on, we regard no one according to the flesh. Even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, yet now we know Him thus no longer. 17 Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new. 18 Now all things are of God, who has reconciled us to Himself through Jesus Christ, and has given us the ministry of reconciliation, 19 that is, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not imputing their trespasses to them, and has committed to us the word of reconciliation. 20 Now then, we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God were pleading through us: we implore you on Christ’s behalf, be reconciled to God. 21 For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him. 2 Corinthians 5:14-21
@jackjohnson10723 ай бұрын
Thank you for this video!
@qusshinemark4 ай бұрын
Easy for me,like my language Arabic
@ftk-forthekingdomministrie74394 ай бұрын
Let's get to the part where it says Ishmael's wives were named Phatima and Aisha