Ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@MATEUSJANSENDEBRITO 10 күн бұрын
Olá, como consigo o artigo de Maria Luísa? Estou concluindo o curso de Filosofia e meu TCC aborda a ética ecologica de Espinosa, o trabalho de Maria Luísa seria de grande ajuda.
@reginamemoriesforever-vc8ql 12 күн бұрын
55:59 que falta de profissionalismo dos “filmadores”… eu quero imaginar q eram alunos da escola secundária a fazerem um projeto de cinema.
@Luis88571 12 күн бұрын
Você só tem isso para dizer? E o que dizer do "q" em: "imaginar q eram alunos da escola secundária"? Você sabe escrever?
@Verialdo Ай бұрын
Tantas facas, nenhum amolador. Como faz falta.
@manegalinha4019 Ай бұрын
Tenho orgulho de ser seu aluno !!!!
@paulomonteiro1647 2 ай бұрын
Grande Ser Universal!! Obrigado pela sua passagem terrena e continuação do seu trabalho nos Planos Superiores! Bem Haja!
@user-btmbangalore 3 ай бұрын
We can never be anti Earth and still be healthy or long lived, male and female is an constuct happening outside of an individual mind/brain. We want to redefine what is with what a minority mind finds comfortable, even if it were a MAJORITY mind we become anti earth. A mind alone, no body to confirm with the mind. As such, we are trying best to address a suffering mind, a mind that must find hapiness and relevance outside of an regular role, not ever mock the regular earth confirmity.
@luisatilano1 4 ай бұрын
Um anarquista espirituaI!
@orlandopereira6708 4 ай бұрын
amadeo copia modi claro que sim basta ver o genio de modiglianni....
@orlandopereira6708 4 ай бұрын
modi eh midigliani bebbado e pobre e amadeo era rico e cagao
@orlandopereira6708 4 ай бұрын
veja modi e veja o genio
@orlandopereira6708 4 ай бұрын
assinatura eh genial rssssssssssssssssssss merda soh isso . a dra mete o rossio ma betesga rssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss.
@orlandopereira6708 4 ай бұрын
copia o modi claro
@orlandopereira6708 4 ай бұрын
galegos sao acima do porto ou douro rio.
@orlandopereira6708 4 ай бұрын
a sra veh coisas geniais parvas ....
@orlandopereira6708 4 ай бұрын
esta sra estah na base da merda nao eh criativa nem esperta eh bem parva parva parva...
@orlandopereira6708 4 ай бұрын
a merda eh merda e amadeo eh isso e tb acima do porto eh galego.
@orlandopereira6708 4 ай бұрын
tem o estilo do modigliani que eh genial.
@orlandopereira6708 4 ай бұрын
criar eh modigliani o amadeo eh saloio como eu sou .
@orlandopereira6708 4 ай бұрын
madeo eh portuga rico e cagao
@orlandopereira6708 4 ай бұрын
midigliani sim eh ppintor oamadeo eh rico e copia copia copia....
@MAJONOME 4 ай бұрын
❤
@pazificer 5 ай бұрын
alguém saberá onde na obra de Eduardo Prado Coelho se encontra a expressão "linha de mistério e fogo" ? Clarice Linspector também a usa.
@marciopintoferreira9914 5 ай бұрын
Muito ruído... difícil ouvir o palestrante
@Luis88571 5 ай бұрын
Qual palestrante? São três. Abra as legendas. Ponha auscultadores. Se houver verdadeiro interesse...🧐😵💫
@marialuisa9588 6 ай бұрын
Formidavel o que diz do Eduardo Prado Coelho
@marialuisa9588 6 ай бұрын
Admiro bastante o grande João Barrento é um intelectual formidavel e faz muito pela língua portuguesa e não so PARABENS DR.JOÃO BARRENTO foi um prmio bem merecido e envio de todo o coração esta mensagem ❤. Luísa Brito
@manuelnetopinafeteiramateu9777 6 ай бұрын
Boa tarde, gostava de adquirir uma flauta dessas, como posso adquirir? Obrigada
@Luis88571 6 ай бұрын
Boa tarde. Pesquise em "gaita" ou "harmónica de amolador".
@alvarosousa7707 7 ай бұрын
Ainda me lembro na cidade do Porto esses sons que eram dos amoladores.
@jotrilx 7 ай бұрын
Que a sua alma inquieta e criativa esteja em Paz.
@SuperAna1954 7 ай бұрын
É uma pena não de perceber nada, o som é muito mau
@Luis88571 7 ай бұрын
Mas pelo menos escreva como deve ser: "é uma pena não perceber nada", e não "É uma pena não de perceber nada". Porque também podemos não perceber nada do que você escreve... 🤪🧐😎😇
@SuperAna1954 7 ай бұрын
O som não permite perceber o que é dito. É pena
@jotrilx 8 ай бұрын
O saudoso Manoel Leal.
@Luis88571 8 ай бұрын
Estou a publicar vídeos inéditos e a republicar outros, com legendas quando é possível... Abraço!
@pippiniyt 8 ай бұрын
Lbtavares Tavares, do you know if there is an English transcript available of this lecture anywhere? For accessibility reasons, I'd prefer to be able to read it if possible... Thanks.
@pippiniyt 8 ай бұрын
I mean, for download... whoops.
@Luis88571 8 ай бұрын
@@pippiniyt, I don't know...
@elmasantos2550 8 ай бұрын
Parabéns pela explanação!
@clfm20 9 ай бұрын
By the 21st minute she seems to have dissolved in to gibberish.
@clfm20 9 ай бұрын
If she believes that what defines which sex a person is has changed significantly through history, perhaps she should name an historical figure who would be assigned a different sex today than they were deemed to be during their lifetime. I can't think of any myself.
@janusz_santana 7 ай бұрын
I recommend checking the pre-enlightenment understandings of sex, "one sex theory" with women and men being essentially of the same sex and with same organs but in different forms. I bet had we been born back then, our view would be different than it is now
@clarkbowler157 5 ай бұрын
Your question is your answer. The process of assignment is changeable. Using the terminology today would make no sense in a historical period as many concepts such as non-binary did not exist. The concept is tied with the society within which it resides. Treating these concepts solely as biological realities rather than social phenomena reminds of biological essentialism. P.s. There are many non-binary, queer and trans folk all through history.
@nothersheep 4 ай бұрын
The example Butler offers is that of Caster Semenya, who would historically have been recognized as female (as she identifies and is identified by her own family, based upon anatomy) but has been refused that sex designation by the Olympic committee (due to naturally occurring testosterone levels). This example of hormone defined sex vs anatomically defined sex is an example of a change within our own time. Butler also points to the historical and ongoing complexity of “intersex” folks being assigned a binary sex.
@clfm20 4 ай бұрын
But this is a current example, rather than historical. Also, the definition of intersex (as I, perhaps wrongly, understand it) captures a lot of people who would never dream of questioning their gender identity - boys with malformed penises or women born without a uterus, for example.@@nothersheep
@clfm20 9 ай бұрын
Just before 16.03 she seems to argue against the definition of a person's sex as being related to having developed along a certain pathway towards a reproductive function, by drawing from it the conclusion that this would mean anyone who does not reproduce is not 'sexed'. This is a failed attempt at a reductio ad absurdum. To develop towards a certain potential end is not the same as fulfilling that end. A car that is never driven is still a car.
@battags22 9 ай бұрын
Beelzeboob - Professional Circular Reasoner
@the_grand_tourer 8 ай бұрын
Ha yes! and the cultists fall for it like the sheeple they are.
@madrededeus 9 ай бұрын
capitalismo falhou, falha e falhará - guerras ao servico dos "senhores" para aumentar ou proteger suas riquezas roubadas
@madrededeus 9 ай бұрын
Essa narração cor-de-rosa dos chamados "descobrimentos".....os povos "descobertos-invadidos- escravizados" tem outra historia para contar O negocio de escravos nas costas de Africa...etc, etc Como AS afirmou, espirito critico essencial
@saotorpes 11 ай бұрын
Alexandre Delgado
@northking2317 11 ай бұрын
I ma here because of mossbag
@17thstellation Жыл бұрын
excellent, this truly deepened my understanding of hollow knight lore, thank you [REDACTED]
@ligiacerqueira1721 Жыл бұрын
Obrigada!
@Luis88571 Жыл бұрын
Obrigado!
@daxeckenberg Жыл бұрын
I stumbled across this recently. This seems to be a whole lot of effort to explain away mammalian evolution. Evolutionary success is dependant on the sex binary. One group of individuals possess large gametes while the other group possesses small gametes. We define those with large gametes (eggs) as women or females and those with small gametes (sperm) as males or men. There are of course individuals who have genetic or developmental issues which prevent them from either as a woman to become pregnant and bear children or as a man to impregnate a woman. But with all of those individuals something has gone awry. I find it puzzling that we spend so much effort trying to justify their existence by trying to dismantle the binary that is present in all primate biology. What is it about sex or gender that's driving this desire to adjust what is evolutionarily the norm. We don't do this , at least not with this fervor , with any of the other issues that impact human development. Please do not interpret my words as disavowing the existence of people who don't fall neatly into the sex binary. They of course exist, but they are by definition the exception. Also, this is not to say that all women must be feminine and all men must be masculine that's ones behavior not their sex. Are they highly correlated, yes, but culture plays a significant role in the behaviors of men and women. And this is not say that all men must be sexually attracted to women and all women must be sexually attracted to men. So your behavior and your preferred sexual preferences while highly correlated to your biological sex are not as neatly packaged into the binary. But your desires and actions do not change the existence of an underlying biological sex binary.
@slaapkaamers3377 4 ай бұрын
How about the Australian bush tomato?
@daxeckenberg 3 ай бұрын
@@slaapkaamers3377 it's a plant. it can't move. and so therefore evolutionarily speaking it would be beneficial for it to be able to switch between the male and female. and these types of sex change are minimal at best because it's simply what kind of flower do I grow. so there's already an evolutionary process built-in about growing flowers during that time of year now you just have to decide what type of flower are you going to grow is going to grow the male version of the female. as mammals we don't have this flexibility because there are physical reproductive components that are created in utero as well as mature during puberty. these structures are not changeable nor replaceable.
@rebal1681 Жыл бұрын
Too conforming? That's a judgement
@rebal1681 Жыл бұрын
I have never heard of anyone claiming that the ability to reproduce is what define sex. Never. Reoroduction is one component of sex among about 6000 biological markers that define sex.
@user-rl3io8nj6t 7 ай бұрын
The Oxford English Dictionary defines “female” as the sex capable of bearing offspring.
@Sallyfacehshnvsefcgfgfdff Жыл бұрын
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰😅😅🥰😅😅😅😅😅🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
@Neo2266. Жыл бұрын
Day 376 of tracking down mossbag's adress
@lechafeiaiex Жыл бұрын
Obrigado!
@poetaiberico Жыл бұрын
Obrigado. Onde posso encontrar livros do poeta ?
@Luis88571 Жыл бұрын
Há uns livrinhos de edição de autor. Mas não estão à venda em livrarias nem em sites. Eu tenho exemplares.
@poetaiberico Жыл бұрын
@@Luis88571 Prezado , gostaria muito de ler a obra de nosso poeta, porém estou no Brasil atualmente. Obrigado por sua gentileza em divulgar a obra .
@Luis88571 Жыл бұрын
@@poetaiberico Obrigado, boas leituras!