Fiction7507

Пікірлер

@Adam-o1x2t 2 күн бұрын

Why never do one of these with Paul hunter

@TheOriginalGankstar 7 ай бұрын

Watching this live was agonising.

@agfi88 9 ай бұрын

Broke me watching this live, vintage higgins.

@zielaq87 Жыл бұрын

Higgins was very lucky

@chrismaginess1289 Жыл бұрын

Wot a great final that was. 2 great players in their prime. It's a shame one of them had to Lose it.

@johnk-pc2zx Жыл бұрын

Wow!

@omegaman6494 2 жыл бұрын

O'Sullivan couldn't have played any better, and he lost by 4 points. To this day, dunno how Higgins managed to win this lol

@AnilSingh-nl4ok 2 жыл бұрын

Great player. Superb final. So humble in victory.

@adamoliver5589 Жыл бұрын

John higgins is an awesome player BUT i can't get over the fact he wanted to cheat. He only didn't do it because he got caught before doing it. Still doesn't make it right. The intention was definitely there for all to see

@MrGloryglorymanutd18 2 жыл бұрын

Out of the 4 Major's finals these two players have played o Sullivan won 2 by alot and the world final they played by 4 and this was the only close one but Higgins had to pull of what is considered his best clearence of his career to just win 1 against Ronnie.

@ryansweeney5716 2 жыл бұрын

Am this was when he was a criminal and got away with it

@2pacpsycho477 2 жыл бұрын

6:22 I don't like this red

@kylemc0254 2 жыл бұрын

Can't this venue comeback

@deandavies9576 2 жыл бұрын

Remember watching this in my local 15 years ago, I still think these pair reached levels nobody else could touch from around 2000-2010. I remember my heart sinking when higgins got that double at the end, because i knew it was over, what a clearance.

@sugs1191 Жыл бұрын

Williams in 2003 reached a very high level imo.. probably the highest of that decade. Hendry in patches of 02 and 03 too

@FleetAdmiral833 8 ай бұрын

@@sugs1191agreed, williams of 2003 reached the highest heights ever in the game imo, even above Hendry of mid 90s and Ronnie 2008-12.

@harlen07 3 жыл бұрын

33 👍

@siyaadomar662 3 жыл бұрын

From the lions jaws .

@Ganstaz003 3 жыл бұрын

So from this video, is it fair to say that peak John Higgins > peak Ronnie O'Sullivan?

@alanunaiomen5306 2 жыл бұрын

If you think it works that way, then it's not a good image for you.

@Ganstaz003 2 жыл бұрын

@@alanunaiomen5306 I asked a question. And it does seem true, Ronnie requires John to be below his best to beat him. Whenever John is playing his best or both are playing their best, John always seems to beat him. This match is evidence and so is their most recent masters match.

@alanunaiomen5306 2 жыл бұрын

@@Ganstaz003 Again it doesn't work that way. Why you assume Ronnie played his best this game? Maybe this was Higgins' best play vs Ronnie's worst, and it still was very close in the end. Of course that's not true, but I just showed you how you can interpret such a thing to fit your narative. John Higgins is a legend of the game and a great player himself. I would rank him 3-5 after O'Sullivan and Hendry. Peak Ronnie is also not a time period necesarry, as people who have watched snooker for years know that Ronnie unfortunately hasn't been the most profesional player, especially in the 2000s. And as you probably know by now, Ronnie at his best is a beast, he just gives you no chance. When in a sport like tennis let's say, number 100 in the world beats number 3 in the world. Do you then think that number 100 in the world at his best is better than number 3? Or a small team from second division beats a team from first division. Does it mean that team is better? Of course not. Teams/people have bad days. Their oponents have good days. You can't just see a match and decide after just a match who the better player is. Form is also an extremely important thing. Fluke/luck plays a part as well in snooker, soccer, etc. Even in chess it can play a part.. if you are unlucky enough to enter a line that your opponent has prepared very well (and this things do happen sometimes). Also you have to look at someone career, trophies, direct results etc. but in the long run. English is not my first language so I am sorry for the mistakes i've made or if this is hard to understand because how i phrased it, but i hope you get it.

@paddyt4043 3 жыл бұрын

Its still exciting to watch

@indigo025 3 жыл бұрын

Get right up the kosher

@TheJohnCooperShow 4 жыл бұрын

No-one mentions it but This tournament was the seminal moment in history when Higgins quantum leader from school boy to old man

@iamtheresurrection4141 4 жыл бұрын

John Higgins has more bottle than anyone to pick up a cue

@jonathanluke9317 4 жыл бұрын

2 greatest cuemen ever 👏👏

@pedropicapiedra3598 4 жыл бұрын

¡Grande Constantino Romero!

@paddyt4043 4 жыл бұрын

Snookers peak talent

@dannyb763 4 жыл бұрын

Music = "The Mission - BBC National Orchestra of Wales & Ben Foster"

@apilpatidar07 4 жыл бұрын

What a Match.....

@gurdeepchumber2764 4 жыл бұрын

One of the best finals I've had the pleasure to watch!!!

@AnilSingh-nl4ok 2 жыл бұрын

Please watch the 1985 embassy world Champion which was decided on final black and moreover Denis was trailing 0-8. championships

@gurdeepchumber2764 2 жыл бұрын

@@AnilSingh-nl4ok that's s classic too

@AnilSingh-nl4ok 2 жыл бұрын

@@gurdeepchumber2764 you agree

@SnookerLounge 4 жыл бұрын

Really Nice Content.... :)

@kevingreen3781 4 жыл бұрын

Biggest cheat of all time Higgins

@SuperSaiyanArsh 4 жыл бұрын

Beating Ronnie at his prime wow!!

@jimmymagic2438 4 жыл бұрын

This is Higgins at his prime as well.

@1Sniperman 3 жыл бұрын

@@brettharrison837 Higgins is a cheat.he should have been banned for good

@ArtEmis55K 4 жыл бұрын

A great match. I wonder how many of John's misses were legit or ordered by his wealthy gambling syndicate mates? The way the WPBSA brushed his match fixing away was contemptible