The square of (-1) is (1), because ((-1) \times (-1) = 1). However, when we talk about (i), the imaginary unit, the situation is different. By definition, (i) is such that (i^2 = -1). By definition i^2 = −1
@Footballworld-4ok3 сағат бұрын
I also solve this question
@olteanumihai12454 сағат бұрын
in boolean algebra that would work just fine if x=y=1
@Tareef-h9l5 сағат бұрын
Stupid solution for stupid question
@devildarkbg12345 сағат бұрын
I guess it's x=7.5 To solve the equation , you can combine like terms: 1. Combine and : 4x = 30 2. Divide both sides by 4 to isolate : x = \frac{30}{4} = 7.5 So, the solution is . X=7.5
@reforma7158 сағат бұрын
Идиотизм! Зачем все это было нужно, если в конце все равно вычислили с помощью калькулятора первоначальное выражение!??
@wolfmanoh10 сағат бұрын
Is the D=(b^2)-4ac thing just to find out if the answer is a complex answer? Cause I was just taught to use the Quadratic Formula, which is what the x=[-b±SQRT(D)]/2a is.
@SALogics10 сағат бұрын
Very nice problem! ❤❤
@TheDavidlloydjones11 сағат бұрын
7 & 5, by inspection.
@pocolucky12 сағат бұрын
in wolframalpha, the result of 1^x=3 is "False", 1 power to anything except infinity is 1.
@Bible_bits14 сағат бұрын
bc/ab = c/a = 2; c = 2a, ca = 300, =>a = sqrt(150), c = s* sqrt(150), b = 2/3 * sqrt(150), a+b+c = 11*sqrt(150) = 55*sqrt(6)
@lambbenally14 сағат бұрын
The handwriting is sending me 😤
@alvarobegue205214 сағат бұрын
Not a math olympiad problem.
@asrielkk696916 сағат бұрын
B = 0 A = 100 c = 200
@SunilSingh7jx8ez5o17 сағат бұрын
The method is hard and time consuming.
@SunilSingh7jx8ez5o17 сағат бұрын
The method is hard and time consuming.
@ТигрМудрый17 сағат бұрын
х=1,1508
@hamzagladiator525818 сағат бұрын
what a click bait omg
@dickslocum18 сағат бұрын
1 to the fifth power equals 1 1-1 equals zero. also zero to the fifth power equals zero zero minus one is still zero so either will work. So much more simple than half an hour of inconclusive math.
@PotentialDevGcimOgism.4 сағат бұрын
0 - 1 is -1
@RealQinnMalloryu419 сағат бұрын
(0.5)+(0.5)=1 (y ➖ 0.5x+0.5). (xy ➖ 1xy+1). .
@metalislamidemikeadilankeb12120 сағат бұрын
Semua test itu tidak penting, hanya berhubungan masalah nama, dan wawasan, ilmunya sama saja
@KipIngram20 сағат бұрын
Well, let's see... x! / 6! = 7! x! = 6! * 7! x! = 2*3*4*5*6 * 2*3*4*5*6*7 x! = 2*2*3*3*4*4*5*5*6*6*7 We have duplicates for 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. So let's take 2 and 4 and make 8: x! = 2*3*3*4*5*5*6*6*7*8 Now let's take 3 and 3 and make 9: x! = 2*4*5*5*6*6*7*8*9 Now let's decompose a 6 into 2 and 3: x! = 2*2*3*4*5*5*6*7*8*9 Now let's take 2 and 5 and make 10: x! = 2*3*4*5*6*7*8*9*10 And there we have it: x = 10. 10! / 6! = 7!. So let's see, it took maybe 2 minutes to type all that? I don't see how I could possibly stretch it out to 11 minutes.
@sofiaagr2221 сағат бұрын
Did not even take 2 minutes
@sofiaagr2221 сағат бұрын
Easy
@wertom_21 сағат бұрын
2^x + x = 20 /2 "1^x = 1" 1 + x/2 = 10 x = 9*2 x = 18 ?
@stefanlishev519621 сағат бұрын
Very good!
@swampratje21 сағат бұрын
Without W function you could have immediately have mentioned that this is an increasing and continuous function - estimate te value through Newton-Raphson. Don’t see the point of ‘solving’ when you need approximation anyways.
@PakistaniCreations22 сағат бұрын
So easy, the answer is - 4. Took me 3 seconds.
@SYLVESTRIVS23 сағат бұрын
Phi^12 😂😂😂
@vloggingwithmichael7635Күн бұрын
You dont know how to write )( 😂
@mohitraj4377Күн бұрын
Easier method: Step 1:3^x=30-x Step 2:log 3^x=log(30-x) Step 3:xlog3=log30/logx Step 4:xlogx=log(30-3) Step 5:xlogx=log27 Step 6:xlogx=log 3³ Step 7:xlogx=3log3 By comparison X=3 I am in grade 12 cbse
@jerry24675Күн бұрын
1 - 1 = 0 to easy
@ruhi435Күн бұрын
Yeh I had solve it correctly
@punamsharma3757Күн бұрын
It was way too easier by hit and trial 😕 As 30 is a small no. we can easily calculate value by putting random value to this x=3
@곽우섭-v2uКүн бұрын
4.0392
@davidgray6999Күн бұрын
a times e**a does NOT equal a.
@elmer6123Күн бұрын
The simple approach. Substitute x=1/2+z and y=1/2-z into the second equation: (1/2+z)(1/2-z)=1 or z^2=-3/4. Thus, z=±i√3/2, x=(1±i√3)/2, and y=(1∓i√3)/2
@RikiFaridokeКүн бұрын
You can using complex analysis method sir.
@Mustafa_ShahzadКүн бұрын
You can use* not using
@andreyzaglodin5430Күн бұрын
2а=с, 2b=3a, b=3a/2, ab=a*3a/2=100, a=√(200/3)
@김유상-x4lКүн бұрын
4
@SegalmedКүн бұрын
y = 1-x; insert in 2nd equation; x(1-x)=1 => x² - x + 1 = 0 ; standard formula yields x1,2 = 0.5 +/- 0.5 * SQRT(-3) = 0.5 +/- 0.5*i*SQRT(3) => y1,2 = 0,5 -/+ 0,5*I*SQRT(3)
@PatrickL91-l1gКүн бұрын
moi à l'iut je faisais de tete lorsque on a a + b = S ab = P a et b sont les solutions de l'equation t² - St + P Delta = S² - 4P x,y =( S +/- racine (Delta) ) / 2 x = e^+/-ipi/3 en 4eme !!!! | x².y + x.y² = -540 | x.y = -45
@krispoli22Күн бұрын
This is why our University's have gone to s*** and they graduate not knowing the difference between s*** and shinola.
@the_m_originalКүн бұрын
4080 = 4096-16 4096 = 2^12 16 = 2^4 n = 12; m = 4
@aliovaisgureja768Күн бұрын
Stupid solution
@zanoza6168Күн бұрын
Да, пиндоская математика, это просто дно
@thirteencoffinsКүн бұрын
Wtf is lambert w function? I've done bachelors in mathematics and never heard about it. You shouldve given at least some info regarding it or at least a short definition.
@bjorntorlarssonКүн бұрын
He manages to write L so that it is identical to e. That's very artistic! So L=e thus Ln e = e*n*e = n*e^2 = 1 and from there on...
@kimba381Күн бұрын
Wow. Do we not all recognize that (1+ √5)/2 = φ? And do we not all know that φ^2 = 1+φ?