He's a clever thinker but his characterisation of science is unfair. If may have been the case in the distant past that curious people had to destroy a sample of the world to extract information - e.g. killing a frog for anatomy like a hard ball thrown at a surface, to use his analogy However, contemporary science is more like a rubber ball and science measures the varying rates of return to learn about a substance. I've noticed that Ingold sets up these initial premises to better make his final point and not all of these premises are fair.

WOW!

29:34 Dewey

Terimakasih banyak

A very brilliant Professor Dorita Hanah.

This is the most insightful total truths talks about the depths, heights and far reaching looks through glass hour housing arts movements resting on hands of thoughts across Workflow Field Channeling WHOLE Windows to Real Feel Worlds of Writing by Will of thy Self, Soul and Spirit elevating Oneness Via Others.

Tim Ingold is so worth listening to.

it is too long

Bravo. Like a poet who puts words on vague unformulated feelings, Tim Ingold, you put with words your finger smack on the current trouble with science and its associated big data, objectivity, neutrality, distance, protocols, methodology, jargon... i.e., lack of "correspondance".

I listen to this at 2.00

He's touching his face near the end. That's how we can tell he's not Chinese.

Thanks for uploading this video.

Many thanks for the upload, in addition I'd like to share one of my recent notes ( inspired by the newest fashion: a greed for consciousness/hunger for knowledge, wisdom... ) CONSCIOUSNESS = ATTENTION ≠ understanding, but knowledge of presence.

9

deep, beautiful and moving talk

Updated video of Welby Ings' keynote presentation at Art of Research.

Keynote presentation: Kerstin Abraham, Muthesius Academy of Fine Arts and Design.