þank

But why did Sabahans burned Philippines flag in the 70's and 80's. I only see Malaysian flags.

Keep dreaming

Two facts of life weaken even further the Philippines’ scarcely tenable position. “Possession is nine tenths of the law”, as the old legal maxim goes. Firstly with the British and then as part of independent Malaysia from 1963 onwards, Sabah has developed without being possessed by the Philippines for more than a hundred years. The second fact refers to the United Nations (UN) Mission which it sent in 1963 to conduct a state-wide referendum on whether the inhabitants wanted to join the newly-established State of Malaysia. The UN Mission was requested by both Indonesia and the Philippines. The Mission was clear: a majority of the people of North Borneo have strongly supported the proposed Federation of Malaysia. It was clear that nobody in Sabah had any desire to join the Philippines: the whole concept was unthinkable It would be wise to lift our eyes from this barren dispute over whether in 1878 it was “cede” or “lease” and look at the world today. It would be farcical if Malaysia entertained the Philippines’ claim. It might equally wisely return Kedah to Thailand. There are no countries in Southeast Asia that has territories another could not claim or boundaries that are the same a hundred years ago. It would be childish to entertain such claims. It would be better to accept boundaries that were defined and accepted by the rest of the world when the Southeast Asian states of today joined the United Nations. It would be equally disturbing if the Philippines continues to press its claims in the face of historical facts and international repercussions. It is likely that the Philippines will isolate itself completely from the region and from its European and American allies. No support from any quarter has reached it while discouraging comments are aplenty; such opposition will undoubtedly continue. One thing clear, however, is that the Philippines has no claim over Sabah. Conclusion: Sabah’s status as a state in the Malaysian federation rests on the 1963 referendum conducted by the UN at the behest of both Indonesia and the Philippines. The Sulu Sultanate did not object or make a stand on the matter. The Sulu claim rests on dynastic patrimony, against all international law conventions. Source: www.mbras.org.my/monograph36.html

When I visited Sabah recently, I didn't notice any Philippines flag. I saw lots of Malaysian flags because it was Malaysia national day. Can you explain in detail why Sabah is not celebrating Philippines national day? Do Filipinos need to get a visa and passport just like tourists from Zimbabwe, Ethopia or Somalia?

Two facts of life weaken even further the Philippines’ scarcely tenable position. “Possession is nine tenths of the law”, as the old legal maxim goes. Firstly with the British and then as part of independent Malaysia from 1963 onwards, Sabah has developed without being possessed by the Philippines for more than a hundred years. The second fact refers to the United Nations (UN) Mission which it sent in 1963 to conduct a state-wide referendum on whether the inhabitants wanted to join the newly-established State of Malaysia. The UN Mission was requested by both Indonesia and the Philippines. The Mission was clear: a majority of the people of North Borneo have strongly supported the proposed Federation of Malaysia. It was clear that nobody in Sabah had any desire to join the Philippines: the whole concept was unthinkable It would be wise to lift our eyes from this barren dispute over whether in 1878 it was “cede” or “lease” and look at the world today. It would be farcical if Malaysia entertained the Philippines’ claim. It might equally wisely return Kedah to Thailand. There are no countries in Southeast Asia that has territories another could not claim or boundaries that are the same a hundred years ago. It would be childish to entertain such claims. It would be better to accept boundaries that were defined and accepted by the rest of the world when the Southeast Asian states of today joined the United Nations. It would be equally disturbing if the Philippines continues to press its claims in the face of historical facts and international repercussions. It is likely that the Philippines will isolate itself completely from the region and from its European and American allies. No support from any quarter has reached it while discouraging comments are aplenty; such opposition will undoubtedly continue. One thing clear, however, is that the Philippines has no claim over Sabah. Conclusion: Sabah’s status as a state in the Malaysian federation rests on the 1963 referendum conducted by the UN at the behest of both Indonesia and the Philippines. The Sulu Sultanate did not object or make a stand on the matter. The Sulu claim rests on dynastic patrimony, against all international law conventions.

Sabah, malaysia

Good morning Sabah, Philippines😊🇵🇭 Mabuhay!🌤 we love you Indonesians❤️

Hello sabah philippines mabuhay♥️🙏👐🤲

Excuse me...its Sabah,Malaysia

@@mariavictoria3261 excuse me ka karun sabah belongs to philippines not to malaysia

​@@bruno-up6wm ​Two facts of life weaken even further the Philippines’ scarcely tenable position. “Possession is nine tenths of the law”, as the old legal maxim goes. Firstly with the British and then as part of independent Malaysia from 1963 onwards, Sabah has developed without being possessed by the Philippines for more than a hundred years. The second fact refers to the United Nations (UN) Mission which it sent in 1963 to conduct a state-wide referendum on whether the inhabitants wanted to join the newly-established State of Malaysia. The UN Mission was requested by both Indonesia and the Philippines. The Mission was clear: a majority of the people of North Borneo have strongly supported the proposed Federation of Malaysia. It was clear that nobody in Sabah had any desire to join the Philippines: the whole concept was unthinkable It would be wise to lift our eyes from this barren dispute over whether in 1878 it was “cede” or “lease” and look at the world today. It would be farcical if Malaysia entertained the Philippines’ claim. It might equally wisely return Kedah to Thailand. There are no countries in Southeast Asia that has territories another could not claim or boundaries that are the same a hundred years ago. It would be childish to entertain such claims. It would be better to accept boundaries that were defined and accepted by the rest of the world when the Southeast Asian states of today joined the United Nations. It would be equally disturbing if the Philippines continues to press its claims in the face of historical facts and international repercussions. It is likely that the Philippines will isolate itself completely from the region and from its European and American allies. No support from any quarter has reached it while discouraging comments are aplenty; such opposition will undoubtedly continue. One thing clear, however, is that the Philippines has no claim over Sabah. Conclusion: Sabah’s status as a state in the Malaysian federation rests on the 1963 referendum conducted by the UN at the behest of both Indonesia and the Philippines. The Sulu Sultanate did not object or make a stand on the matter. The Sulu claim rests on dynastic patrimony, against all international law conventions. Source: www.mbras.org.my/monograph36.html

Continue eating rats to live

Yes, it is full of them

They're are not bad don't worry 😁

Merdeka aceh papua new independent Nations of asean and oceania