Islam is the cure for Western civilization and its revival.

This is garbage

Appeals to “human nature” are always suspect. Nature changes, Chris

Taylor confuses rational and rationalization as is frequently the case with those committing the logical fallacy of confirmation bias. Start out with the conclusion and then justify the conclusion by concocting excuses that masquerade as rational.

The church can change dramatically by adopting Judo Christian format.

The imagine song as a way to treat each other rather than a government controlled economic system

Abnormal psychology…it’s such a validating type of literature for those who think like “Jesus” and it’s “science “…it is sometimes fake due to our secularism…feminists got rid of histrionic personality

Brilliant

Thanks for your insight on St John Neumann. Our church honors his Name & is in existence because of his lifestyle. Humble & going forth spreading the Good News!!

You are God talking about God. Humans are all Gods.

All actions/movements/moments are the Life force of Creation

Creation/Quantum Mechanics for all Ages. A new Paradigm. No more B.S. Belief Systems.

Luther was not a moral man either.

😊

correct me if im wrong but hes saying, schism within christendom might be the only/best way to keep it alive?

The Golden Rule, do to others as you would have them do to you, is universal, found in all religions

Thanks

The global world order wants an exaggerated humanistic man-made paradise on earth with a sitting Jewish high priest in a stone masonry edifice performing animal sacrifice in earthly Jerusalem. But as they approach it, nature will rebel and social order will break down completely.

' The World's Most Documented Genocide In History . '

Foolery from a man apparently devoid of the Spirit

Do we listen to only what we want to hear or do we listen to what we need to hear?

You are a progressive man of conscience and social justice. Long live!

Thanks for sharing this video with the world. St. John Neumann is the Patron Saint of our school. I admire him for the life he lived, leaving his homeland and caring about the spiritual life of the poor here in our area and beyond. His humility, devotion to God, and hard work for our faith are all inspiring! I look forward to meeting he and St. John Paul II someday in Heaven with Jesus our King!

UN is actually bad

Yeah

Gerrymandering the meaning of "god" here.

This little Bohemisn priest only about 5 ft tall had a heart full of charity. What a smart priest knowing 7 languages!!

Intrinsic value versus monetary value, commodiification, illusory power and money, self-worship, cult of the self, a rudderless existence to be exploited and the loss of the sacred. hmmm.

I see NFL as pretty much the National Religion Now of this Country-- Replete with 'gods' ( t players)

it should be imperative that the church cultivate ,teach, and encourage the speaking of the aramaic language. protect it as a living language

May they Rest in Eternal Peace

Genital mutilation,rape victims being stoned to death ,homophobia and sexism rampant .Yeah that is not barbaric 😳🙄

Errr.. NO!

We are one nation of collective people The Answer to keeping it that way .is to vote No to the Voice

They know the problems, the voice will not help. This is a waste of tax payers money to give albonese a legacy.

The voice of people promoting the voice has been shrill, divisive and vindictive. No thanks

You can't heal culture with capitalism

😂 na, you haven't changed my mind but my children are not Aboriginal and are not Australian in the voices eyes, what benifits do the whole if Australia get when your community can't manage the funds you receive and expect more money to be thrown at it? Look after your own and there wouldn't be an argument.

Vote NO.... The constitution in current form is equal to ALL Australians, past present and future. Enshrining race into the constitution will be the greatest tragedy for our country moving forward. Don't allow the divide and conquer strategy to succeed. We are one!!!

Hmmm your video looks like we are all equal already....and if it was just a voice that would be cool too but then there's Part 2 Treaty then Part 3 Repatriations or as Thomas mayo calls it paying the rent.... I've always treated my aboriginal friends equal and I'm not a redcoat either but of convict heritage I don't get a box to tick on government forms to identify as convict for benefits for my family's great great great grandparents ill treatment.... But u mob do tho don't ya

Vote no,

Being first to a land has never equated to ownership, not not any continent, not at anytime in history. Vote No. You want to close the Gap? stop throwing billions at it. The so called "Culture" is the problem, you address that you will close the gap. You embrace a "culture" that never evolved for thousands of years you make the "Gap" much larger. It's like giving a kid a trophy for coming last. It's BS, it's 2023, move on as one Nation together or face war on our streets.

You have no idea

Obvious is the Uluru Statement? Have Australians woken up by now to the fact that they have already been subjected to a 14 month “cover up” about the true destiny and intention of the Voice to Parliament concept. Additionally there is now an issue in the wording of the referendum proposition. Nowhere in the proposition will one find the word “advisory” body. One will only read the word “a body”. Albanese’s shysters have deliberately omitted the word “advisory” from the proposition wording to satisfy an expectation that the function and purpose of the Voice Body can be changed in the future when the referendum passes. First a “cover up” and now a “deception”. 🇦🇺💯%

We don't care - answer NO! Just be Australian like the rest of us. Aboriginals took this country over from pygmies & committed genocide on them.

Yes23 Voice to Parliament, is what happens when the demand for racism, outpaces the supply of racism. While the Yes vote is collapsing, the question should be asked: How the hell did something so absurd ever gain this level of traction in the first place? While individual circumstances of racism are wrong. Systemic, government funded racism, bigotry, intolerance, and discrimination is truly appalling, offensive, and sickening. Government funded racism, bigotry, intolerance, and discrimination taught, and encouraged, and stimulated in Australian schools today, and the ongoing government funded racism, bigotry, intolerance, and discrimination that has been fostered and encouraged over the preceding decades. The generational attack, offensive,assault on muti-cultural Australia has left us divided, and embarrassed of Australia’s wonderful past. All to serve the self seeking, selfish interests of a very small militant, embittered and clearly corrupt organisation. The goal of separatism seems to be this small ‘elite’ group within an equally small group's agenda. This small ‘elite’ group has garnered a great deal of power, and influence thanks to some very clever, and less than honest use of every available manipulation available to them, especially the weaponization of race. Our nation's genuine history has been entirely subverted throughout the last two decades with: ‘truth’ telling that there is now virtually only one Australian hero, the innocent, entirely virtuous Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander’s who were wronged by ‘white men throughout their innocent, and entirely virtuous histories. Time for a national reconsideration on the broad rights and obligations of all Australians in Australia, and a re-evaluation of the current preferential treatment, and actions towards Aboriginal and or Torres Strait Islander’s. Australia must embrace once again national equality, egalitarianism, fairness, justness, and equitability. The moment Australia stepped over the line from equality to a favoured group, we took a massive misstep. We must walk back this shallowness and clear stupidity. Honestly embracing a group's cultural ancestry to such an aggressive degree, and using this cultural ancestry as an excuse, is clearly pretty racist. Equally blaming some other culture, and those belonging to this differing cultural ancestry is clearly and unquestionably racist. Equality, egalitarianism, fairness, justness, and equitability are non-discriminatory, evenhanded, and unprejudiced. The opinion that the colour of your skin, or the antecedents of an individual are the defining factors is narrow-minded, backwards, bigoted, racist, discriminatory, prejudiced, unfair, and insulting. Yet it's been the dominant thinking in the Australian government, Universities, the Australian media, (particularly the ABC) and general public discourse for decades. This retrogressive, confused, righteous stupidity has to be walked back. Australia will be burning witches again if this level of ‘objectiveness’ and ‘honesty’ continues. Bring Australia together. Australia is for all Australians equally, with objectivity, fairness, impartiality, and even-handedness.❤🇦🇺🦘

vote no and will always vote no no no no no no no so stop telling me how to think and just say no!

Every morning I pray for the end of the war at Ukraine in my morning Rosary prayers. Prayers for the family and wildlife. God bless you Father the other priests 🙏✝️

04:35 Yes, I think it has to be not only noted but emphasized that Christianity began with a passionate vision for the Kingdom of God as a distinct entity from the kingdoms of this world, not for a Christendom incorporated into the politics of the nations. Jesus told Pilate that His Kingdom was not of this world, Paul adjures the Corinthians in 2 Corinthians 6 that they are to be a separate people even while both he and Peter emphasize obedient responsibility towards civil authorities and law whenever possible (i.e., when not contradicting essential Christian practice). Instead of putting forth a vision of a politicized Christendom, they speak to the idea that Christians were to live as pilgrims and strangers during their time on earth. This didn't really change significantly until the 4th century and the birth of Roman Catholicism through the edicts and related policies of Emperor Constantine, which ended up largely creating a hybrid marriage of church and state. There is no such thing as a Christian political structure in any apostolic sense. The Kingdom of God originally had its own culture and church governance distinct from general public and world affairs. James Madison appealed to this history in his advocacy for separation of church and state in the US, saying that for almost 15 centuries the legal (and therefore political) establishment of Christianity had been on trial with, in general, very poor results, and he questioned why it seemed that only the Quakers and Mennonites had enough sense to retain the prior, original stance of the Church: "Enquire of the Teachers of Christianity for the ages in which it appeared in its greatest lustre; those of every sect, point to the ages prior to its incorporation with civil policy." The Quakers have changed considerably, as have the "mainline" Mennonites, since Madison said that, except for most "conservative" Mennonites / Anabaptist church communities which still retain the teaching and do still live their lives the way that Madison referred to, but I think that Madison's question and challenge is one that should cause Christians to think deeply about why they change their teachings and practices over time when the Bible presents their God and His character and values as unchanging.

You want to stand out from oppressive systems? Stop accepting tax breaks and housing allowances from governments. So long as you're tied to governments financially, nobody will believe you when you preach against them. And that goes for "progressives" as well as fundiegelicals.