One of my literary mentors", Charlie Tremendous" Jones, once said, "You will be the same person in 5 years as you are today, except for the people you meet and the ." Charlie Jones was my first literary mentor, way back in 1980, but over the years I've added others, including Napoleon Hill, Jim Rohn, Tony Robbins, Og Mandino, and Robert H Schuller. In more recent years, I've been blessed to have added Tom Hegna, Wade Pfau, Ed Slott, and Brad Pistole to my list of mentors. I would not be the man I am today, without the influence of these men in my life, their books and "tapes," and even personal friendships, with some of them. The Napoleon Hill Book, "Think and Grow Rich, " which I first read back in the 1980's, started me on my journey of Self Improvement and Personal Growth. It was followed by three "funny little books," by Scott Alexander, "Rhinoceros Success," (The Red Book) "Rhinoceros Relativity," (The Green Book) and "Advanced Rhinocerology." (The Blue Book) I doubt these books are in print any longer, but if you can find them, get them. These books were followed by George Clason's "The Richest Man in Babylon," and Og Mandino's "The Greatest Salesman in The World." And the list goes on. Today is January 5th, 2025. Exactly one year ago, today, I retired at the age of 73 years and 3 months. While I know it is never too late to accomplish any goal you set your mind and heart to accomplish, (short of being physically unable to accomplish the goal because of limitations, or illness,) I am no longer pursuing career goals, per se. I will never give up on trying to become an even better, more knowledgable person, however, and learning as much as I can regarding financial and retirement planning remains an interest about which I remain passionate. I spent the last 15 years of my working life teaching at the collegiate level, in the CFP, CLU, ChFC and RICP Professional Designations programs, among others, of my academic institution. I retired knowing that I had contributed to the education and professional development of thousands of Insurance Planning, Financial Planning, and Retirement Planning Professionals. Like Brad, I own a number of FIAs, with Income Riders, and I am happy to report that I am currently drawing monthly income from two of them. I discovered Brad by reading his books, while I was preparing for retirement in 2023. I sent him a couple of e-mails after reading his books and after we connected, and after discussing FIAs with income riders, at length, I purchased my annuities through his company, Trinity Insurance & Financial Services, in Springfield MO. I am also honored to have been a guest on his Safe Money Radio show in April of 2024, and I look forward to being on the show again, when I travel back to MO in 2025. I highly recommend all the books Brad mentioned in this video, as well as his two books, " Bullet Proof" and "Safe Money Matters." With the exception of Ms. Moore's book on Fixed Annuities, I have read tall of the books Brad recommended on this video, but I plan to get Ms. Moore's book shortly. Happy New Year, one and all!
@bradpistole5175Күн бұрын
Well said my friend!! Thanks, Kevin!
@SherylJMoore8 күн бұрын
Brad- my favorite part was "ain't nobody got time for that!" Thank you for highlighting my book! To be mentioned amongst so many greats is an honor. Keep doing a great job educating the public! sjm
@bradpistole51756 күн бұрын
You're one of the GREATEST to ever bless our industry! Thanks for always keeping us sharp.
@ArianaFelicia-cw7oq8 күн бұрын
With the cost of living continuing to rise, it feels like building wealth is harder than ever. I wonder how we should prepare for 2025.
@cindypatrick78515 күн бұрын
I will be calling you next week. I have heard about the Irma but I have some questions as to how it will affect my husband and I when we sell our rental properties. So far we have sold 1 rental property in 2024. We are set to close on the 2nd property in 2025. My husband is 75 and I am 67. We retired from our 39 year old carpet cleaning business last December. Other than the small amount of income we get from the rentals, we both get our Social Security. Look forward to talking to you soon. Thank you for your informative podcast w your guest Paul. 6:25
@bradpistole517514 күн бұрын
Great! Looking forward to hearing from you Cindy!
@mikeglozier900120 күн бұрын
who wrote the book "Bullet Proof".? Thanks
@bradpistole517513 күн бұрын
I did.
@mikeglozier900113 күн бұрын
@@bradpistole5175 Got it in the mail 2 days ago. The average family does not have a "portfolio". They have a house, some savings and some qualified money. That is why income planning is so important. I look forward to reading your book.
@bradpistole51758 күн бұрын
I hope you enjoy it!! It is a very easy read, I kept it very simple and straightforward. What you said there is so spot on, I agree wholeheartedly. Give me a call or shoot me an email when you finish and let me know your thoughts.
@sjvarney3 ай бұрын
Good information. Financial advisors sometimes encourage SS early to increase assets under management..Spend down and convert pretax to Roth...Thank you
@qzik02883 ай бұрын
What is Ed's advice on who is the most appropriate primary/contingent beneficiary for a joint tenant brokerage account? Some say your spouse and others say your living trust.
@bradpistole51752 ай бұрын
Go listen to Ed's podcast with Jeffrey Levine, it's titled 'The Great Retirement Debate' they debate single item issues like this on each episode. I believe there is an episode about this specifically!
@daveschmarder-US19506 ай бұрын
With Ed Slott, I'm no longer irate with my IRA. :)
@aquahero6 ай бұрын
Good work.
@Bondbeer7 ай бұрын
Good video. Ed is very knowledgeable. I don’t agree with everything he says but I respect his opinion. I do agree that financial advisors have an incentive to keep your balances higher if their fee is based on a % so they prefer tax deferred. I also agree that if tax rates rise or you go from married filing joint to single filer you will likely benefit from converting to Roth. Where I disagree is that anyone with less than $1m in tax deferred money will automatically benefit from converting. Some may while others won’t. It comes down to your other income and what average tax rate you will pay whether today or later. If you only have the IRA and SS and no other income, by not converting and taking advantage of the standard deduction and lower tax brackets (both adjusted annually for inflation) for your RMDs you may come out ahead compared to converting since the conversion tax is all at your highest or higher current tax bracket.
@bradpistole51757 ай бұрын
Well worded, thanks for watching Keith! ROTH conversions differ in terms of how many dollars and cents it potentially saves you based upon income so you are right in saying it is different for everyone. However, dollars and cents alone don't always justify the reasoning for ROTH conversions. Removing RMD's, governmental control and nightmares for inheriting beneficiaries also play a large role in wanting to do this, even if it doesn't save you as much taxes as you had hoped. This is why we advocate everyone have at least SOME Roth money and at least consider conversions to ROTH on some portion of Retirement assets. Tax diversification is good.
@Sarah-np4sv7 ай бұрын
If Corporations and billionaires would pay their fair share of taxes like normal people, our debt wouldn’t be like this! When Corporations pay 2%, 8%, etc., no wonder we are in this state of affairs!
@eliechidiac94277 ай бұрын
In late 2023, I did the same thing! I put 35% in 7 fixed index annuities (with a doubler if we have ADL issues) and I have 65% in 4 growth ETFs. Same reasoning. Bonds are not as safe as annuities. And like you, I hope to annuitize them after age 73 and create a ladder with those annuities.
@bradpistole51757 ай бұрын
Incredible. Great game plan. You will be happy with your outcome!
@jorgevelasquez99557 ай бұрын
WHAT AVOUT THE 5 YEAR RULE1
@bradpistole51757 ай бұрын
We're talking about this with Ed next week. Stay tuned
@chris-cx2rv8 ай бұрын
Wish it was a age 50 rule.
@johnscott27468 ай бұрын
More than half of my investments are in my Roth IRA. I am spending down my traditional Ira while waiting for Social Security until age 70.
@randolphh80058 ай бұрын
Nice balanced approach
@plumman538 ай бұрын
Cool! I am doing Roth conversions and paying irrma now, so I don't have to in the future!! Good info!
@raygayton23948 ай бұрын
If you are a high income earner, you do not have a choice. It’s going to be higher the first year you retire. You just have to wait until the next year as stated. No one is going to ask for a reduction in salary to avoid this.
@Pieter23608 ай бұрын
Sequence of return risk is real. Retired on 1 Feb 2022 and I was happy that I was well prepared for the chance of bad returns early on through a very low withdrawal rate and a risk-appropriate asset allocation.
@bradpistole51758 ай бұрын
Very real. Glad you made adjustments and made it through, 2023 was probably much nicer to your portfolio! Let's hope the rest of 2024 does the same.
@Pieter23608 ай бұрын
@@bradpistole5175 Indeed. 2023 and Q1 2024 were amazing.
@rainmaker63359 ай бұрын
According to actuary tables, the odds of an average person dying in the USA before age 70 is about 20%. Do you like those odds? If you are alive at 70 but hooked up to a machine and watching reruns of Bonanza, will the extra $$ make a difference to you? IMHO take your $$ at 62 and go to Thailand/New Zealand/Bali while you can.
@bradpistole51759 ай бұрын
I understand your side of the coin, but I personally have 15 clients over the age of 90, in my small little corner of the US. People are living longer, and living healthier longer, and could really use the income later in life when their costs are going up for end of life care. Lot's of people in their late 80's and 90's end up becoming a financial burden on their children/grandchildren, and delaying SS can make a big difference to your bottom line for those who live longer. If you don't expect to live long and want to trigger at 62, go for it. That could be the best option for some. But numbers don't lie. You're more than likely to get more bang for your buck delaying until 70. It is different for everyone, but most people want to choose what will give them the most dollar and cents back in their pocket at the end of the day. Statistically, deferring until 70 provides the highest likelihood of maximum dollars and cents in your pocket!
@rainmaker63358 ай бұрын
@@bradpistole5175 Yes you are correct. everyone has a different set of circumstances, The biggest wild card being health. If you live into your 90s, the payoff certainly would be worth the wait taking SS at 70. Good Video BTW🙂
@markbajek25418 ай бұрын
It's a tough decision, I'd start looking at the health of your older siblings as an indicator and possibly even near by neighbors if there's some type of unknown environmental issue causing some health issues outside of norms in your area. A chemical plant, metal foundary, PFas in the water ., While it's nice enough to grow a third eye, it means custom eyewear which isn't cheap.
@mapsandglobespro9 ай бұрын
Great information. I learned a great deal. Thank you!
@bradpistole51759 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@tompalmer30849 ай бұрын
This is exactly what is happening to me right now. I did not know that Medicare Part B cost anything. Additionally, I didn't know that Part B costs were impacted by my Modified Adjusted Gross Income. I inherited part of an IRA three years ago and I would have sold the stocks three years ago had I known all this. Now, I'm probably going to sell all of it now and take a hit for one year with the increased IRMAA for one year. I am glad I saw your video because I had not even thought about it potentially doubling for my wife when she turns 65 and takes Medicare part B, as she just turned 62 earlier this year. 🙂
@bradpistole51759 ай бұрын
I hate hearing that. I unfortunately end up guiding clients along with this same exact nightmare more than I care to admit. Good news is you've caught it, and know what you're up against now!
@tompalmer30849 ай бұрын
@@bradpistole5175 Yes, I am trying to work through about a half dozen scenarios now to see which way is best. It is trying to pay the least amount of taxes as possible as well as keeping the part B premium down. It would have been nice if the IRMAA and the Federal tax tables would have aligned with one another, but Nooooo. I have brought this information to my siblings attention so they will hopefully avoid the pitfall since they are younger than I am.
@jws39259 ай бұрын
Yup, IRMAA is getting me! I am doing Roth conversions at age 72. I know, I know, I should have been doing them about 10 years earlier. Well, I didn't. I was working with too much on my mind to even think about that plus, I did not employ a financial advisor. Let me explain why I am doing it now. My wife is 15 years younger than I and don't want her to experience the widow tax bomb. Also, I am unlikely to need that IRA money unless something unforeseen happens. We are living comfortably on SS and pension. I was so concerned about having enough in retirement. Well, I it was unfounded anxiety. I have more money now than I need. The house is paid, I bought a new car with cash and we live a relatively simple life. So, the bottom line is this; I am paying a ton in taxes and increased IRMAA just so my wife will have little to no income taxes when I am gone. I just hope she doesn't enjoy it too much with her new husband. I worked and saved hard for that money.
@HLSRetire8 ай бұрын
You are not alone in your forward-thinking about your wife and the years that she will likely spend in retirement as a single, given your 15 year get disparity. We have certainly seen couples in your situation that have taken the stance that they would rather pay taxes now to avoid higher taxes later such as the ones that you mention like the widow's tax. Congrats to you for planning well and working so hard to live comfortably in retirement!
@Bondbeer9 ай бұрын
Is the relief for retiring at 63 automatic if income drops at age 64 and the proper form is filed? Do I need to wait for the notice before filing? When would the notice come out if I am turning 65 in June of 2025.
@HLSRetire8 ай бұрын
If your income exceeds the MAGI thresholds for your filing status in 2023 due to your earnings, you will need to complete SSA-44 www.ssa.gov/forms/ssa-44.pdf requesting that your MAGI for 2024 be used instead and citing "work stoppage" as your qualifying life-changing event as the reason. If you apply online for Medicare, I would suggest applying during the 3 months before your 65th birthday (the earlier, the better). Once you have done that, I suggest completing SSA-44 along with proof from your employer that you retired in 2023 and visiting your local SSA office with the documentation so that they can handle your request right away. Alternatively, you could wait until you receive your initial determination notice and then submit the form, but it may take a bit for your Medicare premium to be adjusted accordingly. Remember that Medicare premiums are always re-determined on an annual basis, so if they rise due to circumstances that do not fall into one of the qualifying life-changing events, and then income subsequently goes down the following year into the normal MAGI premium range, the surcharge will only apply for the 12-month period that the MAGI exceeded the normal premium limit. Also, remember that if you are married and you and your spouse are both enrolled in Medicare, you must separately apply for a new initial determination by completing SSA-44. Good luck!
@iamiam29949 ай бұрын
Good video. Another thought to keep in mind is the 2034 S.S. is cutting benefits by 20%. For every 1,000 $ you'll receive $800. 😢
@bradpistole51759 ай бұрын
We will be addressing this soon. Stay tuned
@tricord29399 ай бұрын
Why isn’t anyone discussing taking income from a par whole life insurance policy?
@bradpistole51759 ай бұрын
I believe Dr. Wade Pfau talks about this quite extensively in one of his recent books, as well as Tom Hegna.
@timg51719 ай бұрын
Does the 5 year rule apply to a non Roth rollover ira? My research shows the 5 year rule applies to a Roth rollover or an inherited rollover. I can’t find anything specific on direct non Roth rollover from TSP to rollover ira (non Roth)
@bradpistole51759 ай бұрын
Tim, It does not apply to pre-tax (Non-ROTH) rollovers!
@lovethomassowell10 ай бұрын
Very well done, Brad and Wade. I subscribed to Brad's YT and purchased Wade's Retirement Planning Workbook. I would not have considered reverse mortgages or annuities if it weren't for Wade's research.
@bradpistole51759 ай бұрын
Awesome! Thank you!
@teekay_110 ай бұрын
If you know in advance when you'll die, then you can figure it out. "Average" is interesting but it can be skewed by people who live very long, or people who die early. Judge based on when your mother or father died, that's a lot more accurate than average. A reason to consider collecting at 62 is if your retirement savings are not where they should be, and you'd like to avoid drawing your 401K or IRA as long as possible giving it the ability to grow the market. Finally, has anyone figured out the difference if you take SS at 62, and then invest it in an IRA to maximize the value of the money at FRA? That may be the best strategy of all.
@OLDGUY730110 ай бұрын
We both worked the extra 5 years. Retiring at age 66.3. Those were our highest income years ever, contributing to a higher SSI payout. Working longer allowed us to pay off our mortgage and 3 cars. We are total dept free, together drawing well over $66,000.00 a year from SSI. "Also a small pension." Our tax and full replacment insurance on our home is only $2,320.00. A year. We do a year to year budget. My wifes parents lived to their late 80s. My dad just died at 88 and moms still moving adequately at 87. Everyone is different, it's a diffacult decision. We wanted to start retirment dept free. We're still able to add to our savings emergency fund. Which is well over our yearly income. STOP BUYING STUPID STUFF. THINK- "NO I DON'T NEED IT." RETIRE WITH NO DEPT.
@Roadglide2020.10 ай бұрын
My wife and I retired at 62 and started drawing immediately. No one is guaranteed tomorrow. My break even point is 80. What quality of life will you have after 80? We are traveling and helping with grandkids and not going to work everyday. Get out as early as possible
@srujangulla9519 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing.
@Stocks1986 Жыл бұрын
A married couple of average income over their lifetime by delaying SS can generate 60K - 70K per year in benefits. With SS being the largest income stream you can strategically stack other income on top like dividends or capital gains and pay virtually 0 tax on 100K of income. i would rather draw down other assets to delay and then once turned on be more aggressive investments to rebulid over the rest of retirement.
@stevecox7856 Жыл бұрын
Wade - just got second addition - incredible resource
@andrewroth9175 Жыл бұрын
Good stuff. I live in a state with 2 uncles, uncle Fed and uncle state tax. Is there a point of not using life insurance or annuities if your portfolio is large enough? Example: Barbell bucket portfolio-retired at 60 MFJ spend about 100,000. 2 million in Roth stock portfolio, 1 million in pretax cash earning 5.29 in MM. 10 years will spend down pretax. Then collect SS at 70. This plan factors in sequence of return risk of say: (a lost decade 2000-2010) And protect from widows tax trap. Thoughts?
@bradpistole5175 Жыл бұрын
Andrew, There are many people who feel more comfortable without using life insurance and annuities because they are more aligned with stock market accounts, MM, bank products, etc. There is no doubt a plan can work without life insurance and annuities, but math and science say your outcomes will be more efficient when adding them into the overall plan. They are great income and wealth transfer products that don't require the market to cooperate for them to be successful, which is why many experts believe everyone should own at least a little bit of them. In your situation, it may not be a very large part of your portfolio, but I'd consider looking into it to see how this could enhance your situation. You've done a fantastic job (top 1% of all retirement savers) of saving, congratulations! Please email me at [email protected] or call my office any time. Would be more than happy to chat more in depth.
@andrewroth9175 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for your timely response. I have read a couple of Ed Slott books over the years. And can thank him for the tax free Roth’s I have plowed money in them for the last 25 years. I feel very confident in my account positions and in control of the levers I need to pull going forward. Do you work only as a AUM or fee adviser? My wife and I have 5 years on our term insurance till 65 going forward. After that will decide where any of my investment holes will be. Thanks
@bradpistole5175 Жыл бұрын
I have Ed to thank for my Roth balances as well! I am not securities licensed, I work on the insurance side only. My son is an AUM fee only advisor who manages portfolio's for those who want and need that service. I am compensated by the insurance companies I represent when structuring income annuities & life policies for clients. Hope this helps. Reach out any time. -Brad
@sylaskeb3493 Жыл бұрын
If I call that number will that book offer still be available or was this a live offer?
@bradpistole5175 Жыл бұрын
This offer is always available!
@eikoGoldstein Жыл бұрын
I wonder if Ed would comment on annuity versus owning a bond fund. With annuity you give up your principal. With bond fund, your investment is still available. Some of the preferred bond funds provide substantial, dependable monthly payments. Thank you.
@bradpistole5175 Жыл бұрын
That is a great question. To make a long story short, not ALL annuities do you give up your principal. In fact, many of the annuities being used in best practices today, are annuities in which you do retain your principal. I think back to a great Tom Hegna quote in which he says, "Why own bonds? Let the annuity company own the bonds for you."
@mitchthornton1820 Жыл бұрын
I am in the boat of cash is king , I would rather draw SS at 62 and preserve my cash which has a better chance of doubling in the 5 year waiting period for FRA than getting a 6.7% bump on my SS . It’s harder to pay for a new roof or a new car or a big medical bill if you are eating up your cash on living expenses … I want more money early in retirement when I am most likely doing more than when I am 75 and older ..
@JDawg-y6e Жыл бұрын
Is drawing at say 65 a good compromise ?
@bradpistole5175 Жыл бұрын
It really depends on your life situation, income needs, and overall numbers. Typically it would be better to wait at least until your FRA (Full Retirement Age) which is age 66-67 depending on your birth year.
@arthurshingler2025 Жыл бұрын
I dont agree with age 62 taking SS, unless its absolutely necesarry. Most people that I know who did it early, just put more of a strain on the SS system andvthe Trust Fund. But I also am NOT in favor of raising the FRA either. Especially NOT past age 68. Pushing the upper limit from age 70, to age 71 or 72, might not be a bad option also. (and still allowing your benefit to increase by 8% every year till that maximum age).
@rightwingprofessor1356 Жыл бұрын
Great Video Brad! If you are sickly and single...file at 62. If you are not sickly and single, you will almost ALWAYS benefit from waiting until at least FRA. I waited until age 70...for the benefit of my wife, who is four years younger than me. The 8% guaranteed annual increase, (Deferred Income Credit) added to the COLA that is already guaranteed, makes it the "best " financial decision as well.
@bradpistole5175 Жыл бұрын
Thank you! Great decision making on your part.
@88888gerald Жыл бұрын
plus the tax advantages are enormous....if you are healthy....and can live comfortably without it...wait til 70
@retromoto9456 Жыл бұрын
Ahhhhhhhh, one question? What about the solvency of SS? The anticipated benefit reduction? Simple mathematical fact is that there are fewer people entering the system to support the retirement generations.
@bradpistole5175 Жыл бұрын
We will have a video out on this soon. Great question and valid concerns.
@youngtimer964 Жыл бұрын
If there were to be an across the board reduction, say 25%, wouldn’t you rather be starting from a higher number?
@Frank-nh9fe Жыл бұрын
Another approach to the question is whether or not to take SS vs draw down a nest egg. Also tax consequences of one strategy vs the other. Can get quite complex.
@bradpistole5175 Жыл бұрын
EXTREMELY complex. There is no one size fits all answer here.
@wingandhog Жыл бұрын
I am 63 this month and will wait until FRA or beyond to draw SS. According to the SSA website, the difference in taking SS at 62 or waiting until 67 is right around $800 per month. I would rather have that money later on in my old age. If I wait to collect at age 70, I would get roughly $4K per month or $48k per year. (As I am typing, I am convincing myself to wait😂)……However, I can still fully retire whenever I want to and live quite well, off several long-standing and well-funded retirement accounts until I decide to take SS, whenever that may be. I am still working, but by choice, not by necessity, in a job I absolutely love and my current large salary is way too much to just stop working just so I can lay around the house looking for things to do. I am also very healthy and working on my personal fitness with the goal of being rock hard and strong as I enter my 70’s.
@440tomcat Жыл бұрын
Good for you, Im kind of the opposite. I drew at 64.5 and it will take me 4.5 years to break even. Want to help me spilt some wood.
@sw6118 Жыл бұрын
Sometimes just knowing it’s your choice to quit or continue makes continuing easy if you like what you’re doing.
@RonP48309 Жыл бұрын
Same here at age 65 @ wingandhog :) As long as I still like working and they keep paying me my high salary with 5 weeks vacation I plan to work. Took 30 years to get a respectful salary, why give it up early? If I go to 70 my wife can claim half my benefit as spouse support and get more than what she get on her own. It's a wash if I collect at FRA. She is a couple of years older and retired at FRA
@jo-annmacneill6454 Жыл бұрын
If you’re still working, you have your life insurance and all your benefits from work it’s not even worth it if you’re working full-time, you’re better off waiting because once you leave your job, you lose your life insurance you lose your health insurance no one‘s contributing to your 401(k) anymore you have to see if you’re in good health you’re in good health keep working if you’re very sickly, then take it early but it’s not gonna be much less you’re living with somebody that’s going to support you
@ballhawk387 Жыл бұрын
Well done, kudos for considering many factors. Given my age, fitness, and need for SS for the standard of living I want (1), and how much more I'd be getting (2), waiting until it maximizes is a no-brainer, even if I actually stop working earlier. 1) Reducing the ability to outstrip it with investments, which would also be more risky. 2) Which varies for different people, based on past income patterns. My ratio is very high, based on the latest projections.
@worldchanges10 Жыл бұрын
Even if I wait later for more money, the more money I will get isn’t benefit me much because the problem I will have with my body that I can’t move around to travel much so is eating
@HLSRetire Жыл бұрын
I completely understand and respect that perspective. That is why both Brad and I emphatically state that everyone has their own set of unique facts and circumstances that will certainly determine what makes sense for them. My only caution is that, with an extended retirement and living longer, factoring in the potential for increased healthcare expenses as we age should also factor in to the equation as those may be just as significant as the higher expenses we may choose to have while we are young in retirement to enjoy the fruits of our labor! Good luck to you!
@markkile8215 Жыл бұрын
One of the best commentaries that I have seen, this is the only 1 mentions the life of the 2nd to die (spouse) to get the survivor benefits, if you are married this is a No Brainer ! Drawing at 62 is foolish if you are still working and make decent money, I’m in good health and have been the primary earner, I’m waiting till 70 to draw so I can have peace of mind that my spouse will get my survivor benefits, I’m also still working so my benefits will increase beyond my FRA !
@bradpistole5175 Жыл бұрын
Amazing!! Thanks, Mark.
@HLSRetire Жыл бұрын
Great plan! And yes, continuing to work to ensure that the 35 years used to calculate your primary insurance amount is the very best it can be is also a great strategy!
@bernie9728 Жыл бұрын
I hate to break the news to you, but you have no way of knowing if waiting will get you more money. More per month is not the same as more money total. Let's say I owed you 10 dollars and I said I will give you a dollar every year for the next 10 years, or if you are willing to wait 10 years I'll give you the whole 10 bucks at that time. That's the deal Social Security is trying to make. Your choice is simply less per month for more months, or more per month for fewer months. For most people the total dollars doesn't change all that much. Ask your self this question. Do you think Social Security offers that incentive to wait because it's better for you, or do they do it because it's better for them. The only way to know is to already know, in advance, the date of your death.
@bernie9728 Жыл бұрын
If you are going to reference math, you should probably know something about math. Here's the deal. I retired 7 years ago at age 62, my wife retired 2 years later, also at 62. To day we are having no problem living on just our Social Security. Look, Social Security does not offer that "incentive" to wait because they care about you. They do it because they know that if they can get enough people to delay drawing the money it's better for them. Get that, it's better for them, not better for you. The only reason you should even thing about delaying your Social Security is if you have a well documented history in your family of living well past 80. Make whatever decision you think is best for you, but never forget that more per month does not mean more total.
@bradpistole5175 Жыл бұрын
As Retirement Income Certified Professionals through the American College, MATH is exactly what we rely on. Social Security math doesn't lie. Deferring results in substantially higher lifetime income if you live past a certain age. Since the date of death is unknown for every person, you have to make an educated, mathematical decision when you start SS. The higher benefit is the benefit that will remain for the surviving spouse. Since you both triggered SS at age 62, you elected a "permanently reduced" benefit for both of you. That is your choice for your family and that is ok. However, if one of you outlives the other by 10-15 years, I can assure you of this, the surviving spouse will wish you had deferred the higher payment until a later date. The permanently reduced payment will result in a much lower standard of living in the future if one of you lives to a ripe old age.